How this is built

The Scripture Analysis sections set the biblical text beside another lens — science, or the text's own internal claims — and let you weigh it. This page describes how that corpus is built, so you can judge the method rather than take our word for it. The approach is the same in every section: lead with the cited verse in full, set out the honest viewpoints people hold as equal peers, and reach no verdict of our own.

Where the data comes from

Science & Scripture

The Science section is a curated set of passages that touch on the natural world — each one set beside what current science says, with the verse cited in full. Every statement is marked vetted before it appears: only reviewed entries are shown, and a statement that has not been checked is held back rather than published unreviewed. The fields you can browse are derived from the statements themselves, not imposed from outside.

Currently 329 vetted passages across 10 fields.

Contradictions

The Contradictions section grows from the long skeptical tradition of cataloguing places where the Bible seems to say two different things — the lineage of the Skeptic's Annotated Bible. For each question we set the passages on each side together and list the answers people have offered as peers, never ranked. Two guards shape what you see. First, any row a reviewer has flagged as low quality is excluded, so a weak or mistaken entry never reaches the page. Second, the dataset also carries metadata that would rank or adjudicate these questions — how settled scholars consider them, how notable each one is — and we deliberately do not use it to take a side; the questions are presented in a plain, neutral order.

Currently 605 questions, 1329 proposed answers, across 69 books.

Messianic Prophecies

The Messianic Prophecies section is a curated set of Hebrew-Bible passages that have been read as pointing to a Messiah. For each one we set two readings side by side as equal peers: the fulfillment reading that sees the passage realized in Jesus, and the counter-reading that reads it within its own context. The two are sourced differently, and we say so plainly. The counter-reading draws on the named Jewish exegetical tradition — the rabbinic commentators, the Targums, and the medieval exegetes, cited and dated. The fulfillment reading is shown through how the New Testament uses the passage, labeled honestly as a direct quotation, an allusion, an echo, or a typological reading — an application by a later author, which is not the same as a prediction in the Hebrew text. That asymmetry — named exegesis on one side, textual usage on the other — is a real difference of genre, not a verdict; a fuller exegetical treatment of the fulfillment reading is still being written. Where a passage turns on a disputed manuscript reading, that is shown too.

Currently 24 passages across 12 books.

Commandments

The Commandments section presents the 613 commandments of the Torah in the standard Maimonidean enumeration, each led by its cited verse and set within its living halakhic reality — how the streams of Judaism treat it, its place in the classical counting systems, and its consequences — then engaged, in clearly-attributed layers, by later receiving traditions, ancient Near-Eastern law, and modern critical scholarship. Each layer is reported as what it is, attributed to the voice that holds it; none is framed as a rebuttal to another, and GEBible reaches no verdict of its own. The catalog this section draws on is a work of critical scholarship that applies its own evaluative classifications — it tags 288 of the 613 commandments “arbitrary,” 45 “misogyny,” and 7 “genocide.” GEBible does not adopt these classifications or surface them as its own; it reports the analysis each commandment’s entry carries, attributed to that catalog. Because that catalog carries one developed prose field — the critical commentary — and only token-level notes for the traditional and observance readings, the traditional Jewish reading is added by hand, independently sourced, on the closely-examined commandments, so the section does not read as the prosecution’s brief on the pages where it invests depth. So that the modern-critical layer states its tension without pre-empting the traditional reading, a light neutrality pass removes an appended foreclosing clause — a “regardless of …” dismissal of a commandment’s own rationale — from 74 of the catalog’s 1,066 modern-conflict entries; the clause is removed verbatim, nothing is reworded, and the catalog’s classification of each relation is left intact.

Currently 613 commandments, 24 examined in depth, across 5 books.

The commentary, cross-references, reception, and modern-conflict analysis in this section are drawn from a public compilation of the 613 commandments, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The cited biblical text is rendered from GEBible’s own public-domain reading corpus. CC BY-SA 4.0 (opens in a new tab). GEBible’s presentation of this material is offered under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms.

What this does and does not cover

This is curated depth, not an exhaustive catalogue. The sections gather a reviewed selection and show each entry with its verse and the honest ways to read it; they do not claim to list every passage a given lens might touch, and a question or passage left out is not a verdict that it does not exist. New entries are added as they are reviewed.

Original-language study lives in Lemma

These sections set the text beside another lens; they are not original-language analysis. For the Greek and Hebrew themselves — interlinear text, Strong's numbers, and word-by-word morphology — GEBible hands off to its sibling app, Lemma, which it links out to.

Where advertising sits

These pages carry at most one advertisement, after the last block of content. No ad is placed inside an argument or between the two sides of one. The placement is a rule rather than a preference: an advertisement set between two readings of a passage would sit where a verdict would go.