Commandments · Negative commandments

Not to practice divination as do the heathen nations

#577 Negative commandment Deuteronomy 18:10

The cited verse

The Hebrew (Masoretic Text)

לֹא־יִמָּצֵא בְךָ ... קֹסֵם קְסָמִים

In Maimonides’ words

How Maimonides defines this commandment in his Sefer HaMitzvot — his own words, shown as a primary source.

הזהירנו מקסום, רוצה לומר שיניע כח הדמיון במין מן ההנעה כאלו בעלי הכחות כלם המגידים מה שיתחדש קודם היותו, אמנם יתאמת להם בהיות כח הדמיון מהם הזק ודבריהם מתקיימים ברוב ולכן ישענו במה שיהיה, ויהיה להם יתרון על זה כיתרון מעלות אישי האנשים קצתם על קצתם בכל כח מכחות הנפש, ואי אפשר לאלה בעלי הכחות הדמיונות מבלתי שיעשה מעשה ופעולה אחת מהפעולות יניע בה כחו ויוציא פעולתו לאור, והנה מהם מי שיכה במטה אשר בידו בארץ הכאות תכופות ויזעק זעקות משונות ויעזוב מחשבות ויביט לארץ זמן ארוך עד שימצאהו כמו עניני חולי הנופל ויספר מה שעתיד להיות, וכבר ראיתי זה פעמים בסוף המערב. ומהם מי שישטח החול ויעמיד בו תמונות, וזה הרבה מפורסם במערב. ומהם מי שישליך אבנים דקות ביריעה מעור ויאריך לעיין בהם ואחר כך יספר דברים, וזה ידוע ומפורסם בכל מקום שהלכתי. ומהם מי שישליך אזור עור ארוך בארץ ויסתכל בו ויודיע הנסתרות. הכוונה בזה להניע את כח הדמיוני בו, לא שהפועל בעצמותו יעשה דבר או יורה על דבר זה, ובזה טעו ההמון כי הם בעבור שיצדקו להם קצת הספורים יחשבו שפעולות האלו יורו על מה שיהיה, תגיע בהם בזה הענין הטעות עד שיחשבו שקצת אותן הפעולות סבת מה שיהיה כמו שיחשבו בעלי משפטי הכוכבים, כי דיני הכוכבים הם מזה היחס כלומר שהם מין מהנעת הכח הדמיוני ולעורר אותו, ולכן לא ישתוו שני בני אדם בהודעת הנסתר ואם ישתוו בידיעת המשפט. וכל שיעשה אחת מאלו הפעולות וזולתן ממה שילך בדרכן יקרא קוסם, ואומר לא ימצא בך קוסם קסמים. ולשון ספרי איזהו קוסם זה האוחז מקלו בידו ואומר אם אלך או אם לא אלך, וזה מין ההנעה המפורסם באותו הזמן, אמר הנביא עמי בעצו ישאל ומקלו יגיד לו, והעובר על לאו זה ויעשה אחד מאלו חייב מלקות, כלומר מי שיהיה קוסם ויגיד לבגי אדם בפועל שיפעל אותו, לא מי שישאל לקוסם, אבל השאלה לקוסם מגונה מאד. וכבר התבארו משפטי מצוה זו במסכת סנהדרין. (שופטים ושוטרים, מדע הלכות ע"ז וחקות העכו"ם פי"א):

He prohibited us from divination - meaning to say, that one moves the faculty of imagination with a type of stimulus, like all of those with abilities to say what will happen before it does. Indeed, it comes true for them - since their imaginative faculty is strong, their words mostly come true. And hence they will rely upon their [predictions], and they will have an advantage with this, like [any] advantage of the personal skill of some people over others in any abilities of the spirit. And it is impossible for any of the people with these imaginative faculties without [first] doing some deed or action with which to stimulate his faculty and to bring his [imaginative] activity into effect. And among them is one who strikes the ground with a stick that is in his hand - repetitive strikes - and yells unusually, ignores his thoughts and stares at the earth a long time until he is visited by effects of a seizure, and tells over what will happen in the future. And I have already seen this a few times in the far West. [Also] among them is one who spreads out sand and shapes forms in it; and this is very famous in the West. And among them [as well] is one who throws smalls stones onto a strip of leather and studies them and afterwards speaks out words. And this is well-known and famous in every place that I have gone. And [also] among them is one who throws a long leather belt to the floor, observes it and reveals hidden things. And the intention in [all of] this is to stimulate the imaginative faculty with it; not that the action does something on its own or indicates the [specific] matter. And the masses err in this. For since some of the reports are correct, they think that these actions are what indicate what will be - [such] that this error comes to them to the point that they think that some of these actions are the cause of what will be, like some of the astrologers think. For astrology involves the same relationship - meaning that [the movement of the stars] are a type of stimulus of the imaginative faculty and arouse it. And hence no two men will be the same in their revealing that which is hidden, even if they are the same in their knowledge of the discipline. And anyone who does any of these acts and other ones that follow in this way is called a diviner; and He said, "Let no one be found among you who is a diviner" (Deuteronomy 18:10). And the language of the Sifrei (Sifrei Devarim 171:6) is, "Which is a diviner? It is one who holds his stick and says whether I should go or whether I should not go." And this was a famous type of stimulus at that time - the prophet said (Hosea 4:12) "My people consults its stick; its rod tells it (what to do)." And one who transgresses this negative commandment and does one of these [things] - meaning one who divines and speaks to people from an action that moves him - is liable for lashes; [but] not the one that asks the diviner. However asking the diviner is very vile. And the regulations of this commandment have already been explained in Tractate Sanhedrin. (See Parashat Shoftim; Mishneh Torah, Foreign Worship and Customs of the Nations 11.)

Hebrew: Sefer HaMitzvot, Warsaw 1883 (public domain). English: Sefaria Edition, trans. Rabbi Francis Nataf, 2021 (CC0). Via Sefaria; translator’s footnotes omitted.

Literary form: a prohibition

Applicability

How the catalog describes where and when this commandment applies. These are independent descriptions, not a verdict on which laws still count.

  • Recorded as practiced today

Classical halakhic consequences

The consequences the classical halakhah attaches to this commandment, grouped by who imposes them. Where a category has none recorded, that absence is itself meaningful.

Imposed by a court

  • Lashes (malkot)

At the hands of Heaven

No divinely-imposed consequence is recorded.

Ritual remedy

No ritual remedy is recorded.

How the streams of Judaism treat this commandment

The streams of Judaism read the same commandment differently — an ongoing plurality, not a ranking. Each position below is reported as the catalog records it; none is presented as the correct one.

  • Orthodox Binding
  • Conservative Binding
  • Reform Kept as an ethical principle
  • Reconstructionist Not binding
  • Karaite Binding

24 of 613 commandments have been examined in depth so far — this one is queued.

How later traditions received this commandment

How later traditions read or reworked this commandment, each attributed to its own voice. The catalog’s own classification of each reception is shown as it records it, never adopted as GEBible’s.

Rabbinic aggadah

  • Numbers Rabbah 20:7 expanded it homiletically within the Balak section's aggadic treatment of Balaam the qosem, developing the contrast between gentile divination and Israelite prophecy

Philo of Alexandria

  • De Specialibus Legibus 1.60-65 rationalized it Philo treats the Mosaic ban on mantike/divination as the rejection of deceptive omen-reading and false soothsaying, contrasted with authentic Mosaic prophecy

The New Testament

  • Acts 16:16-18 rejected it polemically the slave girl with a 'spirit of divination' (pneuma pythōna) whom Paul exorcizes; presented as Greco-Roman mantic practice condemned in line with the Deuteronomic prohibition

The Qur'an and hadith

  • Q 5:90 The catalog describes this reception as: prohibitive parallel prohibits khamr, maysir, idols, and al-azlam (divining arrows); cf. Q 5:3 on istiqsam bi'l-azlam — a functional parallel to the Deuteronomic ban on divination rather than a direct literary dependency

Beside the older legal codes of its world

The commandment set beside the ancient Near-Eastern legal collections scholars compare it to — a descriptive comparison, not a claim of dependence.

  • ugaritic texts Ugaritic ritual and omen texts include divinatory practices and omen interpretation as part of the Canaanite cultic system; these Levantine divination traditions form part of the 'Canaanite-Levantine hepatoscopy/lecanomancy' milieu identified in the polemical target as what the Deuteronomic qosem prohibition targets Relationship to the parallel: polemical contrast Ugaritic ritual and omen texts (Pardee, Ritual and Cult at Ugarit, texts KTU 1.78 astral omen, 1.103 izbu/birth omens and related) Pardee, Ritual and Cult at Ugarit (SBL, 2002)
  • hittite laws Hittite law addresses the performer of purification rites (§44b, concerning the remnants of a purification ritual) and the practitioner of malicious magic via clay images (§111), indicating that the regulation of magico-mantic practitioners was a general ANE legal concern; the Deuteronomic prohibition extends this to total exclusion rather than regulation Relationship to the parallel: shared theme §§44b, 111 (purification/magic clauses) Hoffner, The Laws of the Hittites: A Critical Edition (Brill, 1997)

Where this commandment meets modern human-rights frameworks

One modern normative lens, attributed to it — not GEBible’s assessment. Each row names the framework it measures against and the catalog’s own classification of the relation.

This framework catalogues tensions; it records agreement in only one of its entries. The near-total tension rate is the shape of the instrument, not a finding.

  • general principle

    This framework classifies the relation as a direct contradiction.

    The commandment prohibits the practice of technical divination — consulting omens, casting lots, or reading natural signs to determine the future — on pain of flogging; freedom of conscience encompasses the right to engage in esoteric or divinatory practices as an expression of worldview, and criminal punishment for such practices directly contradicts that freedom.

  • Article 18 (freedom of thought, conscience, and religion)

    This framework classifies the relation as a direct contradiction.

    Divination as practiced in the ancient Near East constituted an institutionalized religious epistemic practice; ICCPR Article 18 protects the right to manifest religion or belief in practice and observance, and flogging for the practice of divination constitutes a coercive restriction on religious manifestation that the Covenant prohibits.

  • general principle

    This framework classifies the relation as an incompatible method.

    The thirty-nine-lash sanction for divination practice is a corporal punishment for non-violent esoteric conduct; contemporary penal codes in modern states do not criminalize divination at all, and even where fortune-telling statutes exist they do not carry corporal sanctions.

  • general principle

    This framework classifies the relation as a direct contradiction.

    Flogging for consulting omens or employing divinatory techniques violates the proportionality principle, which precludes corporal punishment for non-violent, non-harmful ritual conduct.

  • Article 5

    This framework classifies the relation as a direct contradiction.

    The malkot (thirty-nine lashes) sanction prescribed for the qosem constitutes corporal punishment categorically prohibited by UDHR Article 5 as cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

Source & licence

The commentary, cross-references, reception, and modern-conflict analysis in this section are drawn from a public compilation of the 613 commandments, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The cited biblical text is rendered from GEBible’s own public-domain reading corpus. CC BY-SA 4.0 (opens in a new tab). GEBible’s presentation of this material is offered under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms.