“ ‘Don’t turn to idols, nor make molten gods for yourselves. I am Yahweh your God.
Not to turn to idolatry in thought or deed
The cited verse
The Hebrew (Masoretic Text)
אַל־תִּפְנוּ֙ אֶל־הָ֣אֱלִילִ֔ים וֵֽאלֹהֵי֙ מַסֵּכָ֔ה לֹ֥א תַעֲשׂ֖וּ לָכֶ֑ם
In Maimonides’ words
How Maimonides defines this commandment in his Sefer HaMitzvot — his own words, shown as a primary source.
שהזהירנו מנטות אחר ע"ז ומהתעסק בספוריה, רוצה לומר בזה העיון ברוחניות, כלומר הכוכב פלוני ירד על תאר כך ויעשה כך והפלוני יקטירו לו ויעמדו לפניו על תאר כך ויעשה הדבר הפלוני ומה שילך על הדרך הזה, כי המחשבה באלו הדברים והעיון באלו הלשונות הוא מה שיעורר האדם לבקש אותם ועבודתם, והכתוב אשר הזהירנו מזה הענין הוא אמרו אל תפנו אל האלילים. ולשון ספרי אם פונה אתה אחריהם אתה עושה אותם אלהות. ושם אמרו רבי יהודה אומר אל תפנה לראותם, אפילו להסתכל צורת הצלם הנראית והמחשבה בעשיתה אינו מותר כדי שלא יתעסק חלק הזמן בחלק ממנה. ובפרק שואל אדם (דף קמ"ט) אמרו כתב המהלך תחת הצורה ותחת הדיוקנאות אסור לקרותו בשבת ודיוקנא עצמה אפילו בחול אסור להסתכל בה משום שנאמר אל תפנו אל האלילים מאי תלמודא א"ר יוחנן אל תפנו אל מדעתכם. וכבר נכפלה האזהרה בזה הענין בעצמו רוצה לומר באיסור מחשבה בע"ז, והוא אמרו יתעלה השמרו לכם פן יפתה לבבכם רוצה לומר כי כשתעמיק לבך לחשוב בה יהיה מביא אותך לסור מן הדרך ולהתעסק בעבודתה. ואמר גם כן בזה הענין בעצמו ופן תשא עיניך השמימה, כי לא בא להזהיר האדם (ראשונה) שלא לראות אותם בעיניו, ואמנם הזהיר מן הענין במה שיתיחס אל עבודתם בעיון הלב. וכן אמר פן תדרוש לאלהיהם יזהיר מלדרוש איכות עבודתם אע"פ שלא יעבדם שזה כולו מביא לטעות בהם. ודע שהעובר על זה חייב מלקות. וכבר התבאר בסוף פ"ק מעירובין (דף י"ז:) על מה שאמרו לוקים על עירובי תחומין ושמו ראיית זה אמרו אל יצא איש ממקומו, והקשה אחד ואמר ואיך ילקה מלקות על אזהרה במלת אל ולא באה האזהרה במלת לא, והשיבו על צד הקושיא וכי כל מה שיבא במלת אל אין לוקין עליו אלא מעתה אל תפנו אל האלילים ה"נ דלא לקי, הנה הורה כי לאו זה לוקין עליו. (קדושים תהיו, שם פ"ב):
That He prohibited us from inclining towards idolatry and occupying ourselves with its narratives - meaning to say, into this study of spirituality. [That] means, star x descends according to this description and [then] does such; and [when] they burn incense to y and stand before it according to this description, it does thing z - and that which goes in this way. For thought about these things and study with these [types of] expressions is what arouses a person to seek them and their worship. And the verse that prohibited us from this content is His saying, "Do not turn to the idols" (Leviticus 19:4). And the language of the [Sifra] (Sifra, Kedoshim, Chapter 1:11) is, "If you turn to them, you make them gods." And there (Sifra, Kedoshim, Chapter 1:10), they said, "Rabbi Yehudah says, 'Do not turn to see them'" - it is not even permissible to observe the appearance of the image's form and the thought of its construction, so that one not spend any time [involved with any] part of it. And in the chapter [entitled] Shoel Adam (Shabbat 149a), they said, "[Regarding] writing that is under a picture or under graven images (deyokenaot), it is prohibited to read it on Shabbat. And [regarding] the image itself, even on a weekday it is prohibited to look at it, because it it is stated, 'Do not turn to the idols.' What is the [derivation from this verse]? Rabbi Yochanan said, 'Do not make a god from your minds.'" And the prohibition about this very content - meaning about the prohibition of the thought of idolatry - has already been repeated. And that is His, may He be exalted, saying, "Take heed to yourselves, lest your heart be seduced" (Deuteronomy 11:16). [This] means to say [that] if you have your heart delve into it, it will bring you to veer from the [true] path, and to become involved in its [actual] worship. And He also said about this exact content, "And lest you lift your eyes to the sky" (Deuteronomy 4:19). For He did not come to forbid a person from seeing them with his eyes, but rather forbade the matter in which one relates to their worship with the interest of the heart. And likewise, His saying, "lest you inquire about their gods," is forbidding the inquiry about the nature of their worship, even though one does not worship them. For this all leads to erring about them. And you should know that one who transgresses this is liable for lashes. And this has already been made clear at the end of the first chapter of Eruvin (Eruvin 17b), regarding that which they said, [that] we give lashes for [going outside of] the mixing of perimeters (eruvei techumin). And they gave as a proof, His saying, "let no (al) man go out of his place" (Exodus 16:29); and someone asked and said, "But how can they give lashes for a prohibition, with the word, al, when the commandment did not come with the word, lo? And they answered him rhetorically, "And do we not give lashes for anything that comes with the word, al? But if so, we would also not give lashes for, 'Do not turn to the idols!'" Behold this indicates that we give lashes for this negative commandment. (See Parashat Kedoshim; Mishneh Torah, Foreign Worship and Customs of the Nations 2.)
Hebrew: Sefer HaMitzvot, Warsaw 1883 (public domain). English: Sefaria Edition, trans. Rabbi Francis Nataf, 2021 (CC0). Via Sefaria; translator’s footnotes omitted.
Literary form: a prohibition
Applicability
How the catalog describes where and when this commandment applies. These are independent descriptions, not a verdict on which laws still count.
- Recorded as practiced today
Classical halakhic consequences
The consequences the classical halakhah attaches to this commandment, grouped by who imposes them. Where a category has none recorded, that absence is itself meaningful.
Imposed by a court
No court-imposed penalty is recorded.
At the hands of Heaven
No divinely-imposed consequence is recorded.
Ritual remedy
No ritual remedy is recorded.
How the streams of Judaism treat this commandment
The streams of Judaism read the same commandment differently — an ongoing plurality, not a ranking. Each position below is reported as the catalog records it; none is presented as the correct one.
- Orthodox Binding
- Conservative Binding
- Reform Kept as an ethical principle
- Reconstructionist Kept as an ethical principle
- Karaite Binding
24 of 613 commandments have been examined in depth so far — this one is queued.
How later traditions received this commandment
How later traditions read or reworked this commandment, each attributed to its own voice. The catalog’s own classification of each reception is shown as it records it, never adopted as GEBible’s.
Rabbinic aggadah
- Sifra Kedoshim 1:1 expanded it homiletically
- Genesis Rabbah 38:13 expanded it homiletically
Philo of Alexandria
- De Specialibus Legibus 1.21-31 rationalized it
- De Decalogo 66-76 rationalized it
Josephus
- Antiquities 3.91 affirmed it
The New Testament
- 1 Corinthians 8:4 The catalog describes this reception as: affirmed with qualification Paul affirms the elilim polemic — 'an idol has no real existence' — endorsing the denial of pagan deities' reality, while relativizing the practical prohibition by permitting idol-meat under certain conditions
- 1 John 5:21 affirmed it 'Keep yourselves from idols' restates the prohibition for the early Christian community
The Church Fathers
- Tertullian, De Idololatria 1-4 read it more strictly
- Augustine, De Civitate Dei 8.23-24 The catalog describes this reception as: polemical critique of Hermetic idol animation
The Qur'an and hadith
- Q 5:90 carried a parallel
- Q 22:30 carried a parallel
Beside the older legal codes of its world
The commandment set beside the ancient Near-Eastern legal collections scholars compare it to — a descriptive comparison, not a claim of dependence.
- enuma elish Enuma Elish presupposes a cosmos of multiple deities whose cult images are legitimate vehicles of divine presence; the elilim ('nothings') polemic of Lev 19:4 directly denies the ontological reality that Babylonian creation theology assigns to other gods and their images Relationship to the parallel: polemical contrast Tablet VI (creation of humanity to serve the gods) and closing hymn (Tablet VII) Lambert, Babylonian Creation Myths (Eisenbrauns, 2013)
- ugaritic texts The Ugaritic Baal Cycle documents the veneration of Baal and El through cult images in a polytheistic framework; the prohibition against turning toward elilim and making molten gods (Lev 19:4b) constitutes a direct rejection of the Canaanite icon-veneration cult attested at Ugarit Relationship to the parallel: polemical contrast Baal Cycle (KTU 1.1–1.6) and Asherah traditions Smith and Pitard, The Ugaritic Baal Cycle, 2 vols (Brill, 1994, 2009)
Where this commandment meets modern human-rights frameworks
One modern normative lens, attributed to it — not GEBible’s assessment. Each row names the framework it measures against and the catalog’s own classification of the relation.
This framework catalogues tensions; it records agreement in only one of its entries. The near-total tension rate is the shape of the instrument, not a finding.
-
UDHR Article 18
This framework classifies the relation as a substantive tension.
The commandment prohibits directing mental attention toward other deities, including investigative curiosity about their theological claims, making the inner cognitive act of considering alternative religious systems legally cognizable; UDHR Article 18 protects freedom of thought and the freedom to change religion, both of which encompass the right to intellectually engage with competing religious traditions.
-
Article 18 (freedom of thought)
This framework classifies the relation as a direct contradiction.
ICCPR Article 18 protects freedom of thought absolutely and without limitation; the commandment's Maimonidean extension to reading idolatrous texts, contemplating their claims, or investigating their practices attempts to regulate cognitive content in a way that Article 18 identifies as beyond any permissible state interference.