Contradictions

Is God's will always done in heaven?

The tension

Matthew 6:10 has Jesus teach disciples to pray *genēthētō to thelēma sou, hōs en ouranō kai epi gēs* — 'your will be done, as in heaven so on earth' — taking the perfect obedience of heaven as the model for which earth is the petition. Revelation 12:7 then has *egeneto polemos en tō ouranō* — 'there was war in heaven' — between Michael and the dragon. War in heaven is a strange backdrop for a kingdom in which God's will is always done.

Proposed answers

People have answered this in several ways; GEBible presents them as equal peers.

No.

And there was war in heaven. Revelation 12:7

Cited passages

Examining the tension

What follows is one scholar’s way of reading this disagreement — a critical-historical view that often concludes the texts genuinely disagree. It draws on the peer-reviewed sources listed below and stands as one position among the answers above, presented for transparency, not as GEBible’s position.

How critical scholarship weighs this: Leans toward reconciliation

This summarizes where critical scholarship tends to land on this tension — a report on the field’s center of gravity, not GEBible’s own ruling.

The surface tension is thinner than it first appears, but it opens onto a genuine and well-documented seam in biblical cosmology.

Matthew 6:10's petition *genēthētō to thelēma sou, hōs en ouranō kai epi gēs* — 'your will be done, as in heaven so on earth' — treats heaven as the locus where God's will is already perfectly executed and earth as the realm where it is not yet. The comparative clause presupposes that heaven currently exemplifies what earth currently lacks; heaven is the standard, earth the petition (Davies-Allison).

Revelation 12:7-9 stages something else: *egeneto polemos en tō ouranō, ho Michaēl kai hoi angeloi autou tou polemēsai meta tou drakontos* — 'there was war in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon.' The dragon and his angels are defeated and thrown down to the earth. This presupposes a heavenly realm in which a powerful adversary can operate and from which he must be removed by battle — not obviously a place where God's will is already and frictionlessly enacted.

The harmonizing case (Beale, Mounce, Aune) runs along two paths. First, the *temporal* path: the aorist *egeneto* narrates a completed event — the primordial expulsion of Satan — so that heaven's present condition is one of restored, uncontested obedience, and Matthew 6:10 describes that settled post-war state. Second, the *cosmographic* path: in Second Temple and apocalyptic literature heaven is multi-tiered (Paul speaks of being caught up to the *tritou ouranou*, 'third heaven,' 2 Cor 12:2; cf. the seven heavens of 2 Enoch and 3 Baruch), so conflict may occur in a lower heaven while God's will reigns absolutely in the highest. Both moves enjoy textual support, and either can dissolve the literal collision of the two verses.

The complication is that Revelation 12 resists being tidily filed under either move. Many commentators read the chapter as recapitulatory rather than strictly past: the dragon's expulsion is precisely what intensifies persecution on earth (12:12, 'woe to the earth... the devil has come down to you in great wrath'), and the victory over him is won 'by the blood of the Lamb' (12:11), tying the heavenly war to the cross and the church's present experience. The war is staged as cosmically active, not safely sealed in a pre-creation past.

The deeper issue lies behind the verses. The Hebrew Bible does not present heaven as a place of monolithic, automatic obedience. In 1 Kings 22:19-22 Yahweh sits enthroned amid the *ṣĕbāʾ haššāmayim* ('host of heaven') and the council deliberates, with a 'spirit' volunteering to entice Ahab. Job 1-2 has *haśśāṭān* ('the accuser') roaming the earth and arguing his case in the divine court. Genesis 6:1-4 has the *bĕnê hāʾĕlōhîm* ('sons of God') transgress by taking human wives. Daniel 10:13 has the 'prince of the kingdom of Persia' withstand Gabriel for twenty-one days until Michael intervenes. As Mark Smith and John Collins document, the inherited Israelite and Second Temple picture of heaven is a populated, sometimes contested council, not a realm of instantaneous compliance.

The critical reading (Aune; Collins; Smith) is that Matthew 6:10's serenely obedient heaven reflects a later, more streamlined cosmology, while Revelation 12 preserves the older mythic pattern of heavenly conflict rooted in Canaanite and Near Eastern combat myth (the dragon, the woman, the cosmic battle). The two are different cosmological strata that the canon places side by side.

Where the critical reading lands: harmonizable at the verse level by the primordial-fall or multi-tier-heaven readings; the broader Hebrew Bible and Second Temple picture of heaven as a contested divine council sits in real, unresolved tension with the Lord's Prayer's heaven-as-perfect-obedience. Thin locally, deeper canonically.

Sources for this reading

  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, vol. 1 (ICC; T&T Clark, 1988) pp. 605-606 on Matthew 6:10 Matthew 6:10
  • G. K. Beale, The Book of Revelation (NIGTC; Eerdmans, 1999) pp. 650-668 on Revelation 12:7 Revelation 12:7
  • Robert H. Mounce, The Book of Revelation, rev. ed. (NICNT; Eerdmans, 1997) pp. 233-244 on Revelation 12:7-12 Revelation 12:7-12
  • David E. Aune, Revelation 6-16 (WBC 52B; Thomas Nelson, 1998) pp. 691-700 on Revelation 12:7-9 Revelation 12:7-9
  • John J. Collins, The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature, 3rd ed. (Eerdmans, 2016) pp. 280-313 on Revelation 12:7 Revelation 12:7
  • Mark S. Smith, The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford University Press, 2001) pp. 38-66 on the divine council (1 Kings 22:19; Job 1:6) 1 Kings 22:19, Job 1:6