While it was still dark.
Cited passages
Now on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went early, while it was still dark, to the tomb, and saw the stone taken away from the tomb.
John 20:1 has Mary Magdalene arrive at the tomb 'early, when it was yet dark' — before sunrise. Matthew 28:1 has the women come 'as it began to dawn.' Mark 16:2 specifies they came 'at the rising of the sun' — explicitly after sunrise. Three sequential moments on the morning timeline, and the gospels can't agree on which one applies.
People have answered this in several ways; GEBible presents them as equal peers.
Cited passages
Now on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went early, while it was still dark, to the tomb, and saw the stone taken away from the tomb.
Cited passages
Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb.
When the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, bought spices, that they might come and anoint him. Very early on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen.
Examining the tension
What follows is one scholar’s way of reading this disagreement — a critical-historical view that often concludes the texts genuinely disagree. It draws on the peer-reviewed sources listed below and stands as one position among the answers above, presented for transparency, not as GEBible’s position.
How critical scholarship weighs this: Leans toward reconciliation
This summarizes where critical scholarship tends to land on this tension — a report on the field’s center of gravity, not GEBible’s own ruling.
Of the resurrection-narrative discrepancies, the timing of the women's arrival is the most readily harmonized, and a fair reading should say so plainly. The four Greek markers describe points along a single short interval. John 20:1 has *prōi skotias eti ousēs*, 'early, while it was still dark.' Matthew 28:1 has *tēi epiphōskousēi eis mian sabbatōn*, 'as it began to dawn toward the first day,' the participle *epiphōskō* meaning to grow light. Mark 16:2 has *lian prōi … anateilantos tou hēliou*, 'very early … the sun having risen.' Luke 24:1 simply has *orthrou batheōs*, 'at deep dawn.' The total span between full darkness and the sun clearing the horizon in late-March Jerusalem is roughly half an hour to forty-five minutes. A party of women setting out in the dark (John's vantage, focused on Mary's departure) and reaching the tomb as light broke (Matthew, Luke) or just after sunrise (Mark) can be described in all these ways without anyone misreporting. This is the steel-manned harmonization run by John Wenham in *Easter Enigma* and Craig Blomberg in *The Historical Reliability of the Gospels*, and on this entry, taken in isolation, it largely holds.
The interesting question is why each evangelist chose his precise wording, because the choices are not random — they are shaped by each gospel's theology and by the redactional relationships among the texts. Mark's *anateilantos tou hēliou*, 'when the sun had risen,' is the single most precise solar marker in any resurrection account. There is a long-noted internal awkwardness in Mark 16:2 itself: the women come *lian prōi*, 'very early,' yet *anateilantos tou hēliou*, 'after sunrise' — a near-redundancy that some manuscripts and ancient readers tried to smooth, and that Joel Marcus in his Anchor Yale Mark discusses as possibly preserving two layers of tradition. Mark's emphasis on full daylight removes any suggestion of dim-light error: the empty tomb is discovered in plain sight. Matthew, who follows Mark as his primary source on the Two-Document Hypothesis, softens this to *epiphōskousēi*, less interested in the hour than in the angelic earthquake and descending theophany that he alone adds (Matt 28:2-4). John's *skotias eti ousēs*, 'while it was still dark,' is the most theologically loaded of the four. John has reduced the witnesses to Mary Magdalene alone, and her solo predawn approach fits the Fourth Gospel's pervasive light/darkness symbolism (John 1:5; 3:19; 9:4; 13:30, where Judas goes out and 'it was night'). Raymond Brown's Anchor Bible commentary treats the Johannine 'still dark' as a deliberate symbolic detail: Mary comes in darkness and the resurrection dawns. The descriptions are thus not four reporters' clock-readings but four authorial framings of one event.
The critical point, made by Dale Allison in *Resurrecting Jesus* and by Gerd Lüdemann, is that the four accounts draw on partially independent traditions each evangelist has shaped, not on coordinated eyewitness depositions. That said, harmonization on the bare question of timing does not require implausible assumptions. The honest verdict separates this entry from the harder ones around it: the divergence in hour is real but minor, and a group arriving over a few predawn minutes covers it. The contradiction sharpens only when the timing is bundled with the genuinely irreconcilable data — how many women came, whom they saw, and what they did next — which are treated in the neighboring entries.
Where the critical reading lands: overstated in isolation; the timing is harmonizable, and the real tensions lie elsewhere in the resurrection cycle.
Sources for this reading