When Abram heard that his relative was taken captive, he led out his three hundred eighteen trained men, born in his house, and pursued as far as Dan.
A person was chased to a city centuries before that city existed.
History/Archaeology
26
passages in this field
Show this passage in
The cited passage
Anatomy of the claim
- Documented The city was earlier called Laish and was renamed Dan in the period of the Judges (Judges 18:29).
- Documented In Genesis the ancestor Dan, for whom the city is named, is born later in the narrative (Genesis 30:6).
- Debated Whether “Dan” is a later scribe’s modernization of an older toponym or evidence of late composition is debated. Gordon Wenham, Genesis (Word Biblical Commentary)
What the text says
"Abram ... pursued them unto Dan." This is an obvious anachronism, since the city of Dan was not named "Dan" until the time of the Judges (see Judges 18:29 ). In fact, Dan (for whom the city was named) was not even born yet (see Genesis 30:6 ).
Three honest ways to read this passage
-
As history
The text records how its authors understood the world with the knowledge they had. Read this way, a difference from modern science is a window into the ancient mind, not a failure.
-
As accommodation
The text speaks to its first audience in their own terms, to make a point that isn't mainly about physics or biology. Read this way, the scientific detail is the vehicle, not the cargo.
-
As contradiction
The text makes a claim about the physical world that modern findings dispute. Read this way, the difference is a genuine factual disagreement worth naming.
GEBible doesn't pick one of these for you. Each entry shows the passage, what it says, and what current science says — nothing more.