The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, one of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin.
Parallel Translations
-
The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, one of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin.
-
The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin:
-
THE WORDS of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin,
Cross-references (10)
Passages linked to Jeremiah 1:1 in the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, ordered by reader-vote popularity; verse text shown in World English Bible.
- 1 Chronicles 6:60 and out of the tribe of Benjamin, Geba with its pasture lands, Allemeth with its pasture lands, and Anathoth with its pasture lands. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities.
- 2 Chronicles 36:21 to fulfill Yahweh’s word by Jeremiah’s mouth, until the land had enjoyed its Sabbaths. As long as it lay desolate, it kept Sabbath, to fulfill seventy years.
- Jeremiah 11:21 “Therefore Yahweh says concerning the men of Anathoth, who seek your life, saying, ‘You shall not prophesy in Yahweh’s name, that you not die by our hand;’
- Jeremiah 32:7-9 ‘Behold, Hanamel the son of Shallum your uncle will come to you, saying, “Buy my field that is in Anathoth; for the right of redemption is yours to buy it.” ’ ” “So Hanamel my uncle’s son came to me in the court of the guard according to Yahweh’s word, and said to me, ‘Please buy my field that is in Anathoth, which is in the land of Benjamin; for the right of inheritance is yours, and the redemption is yours. Buy it for yourself.’ “Then I knew that this was Yahweh’s word. I bought the field that was in Anathoth of Hanamel my uncle’s son, and weighed him the money, even seventeen shekels of silver.
- Ezekiel 1:3 Yahweh’s word came to Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and Yahweh’s hand was there on him.
- Joshua 21:17-18 Out of the tribe of Benjamin, Gibeon with its pasture lands, Geba with its pasture lands, Anathoth with its pasture lands, and Almon with its pasture lands: four cities.
- Isaiah 1:1 The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.
- Amos 1:1 The words of Amos, who was among the herdsmen of Tekoa, which he saw concerning Israel in the days of Uzziah king of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam the son of Joash king of Israel, two years before the earthquake.
- Amos 7:10 Then Amaziah the priest of Bethel sent to Jeroboam king of Israel, saying, “Amos has conspired against you in the middle of the house of Israel. The land is not able to bear all his words.
- Isaiah 2:1 This is what Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
Cross-references from openbible.info (CC BY 4.0)
Explain this verse (23 sources)
Historical commentary, presented as a primary source — not an endorsement.
Private notes
Saved on this device only — never synced or sent anywhere.
John Calvin 1540 · Public Domain After having explained The Twelve Minor Prophets, we reached…
After having explained The Twelve Minor Prophets, we reached at length to the end of Daniel. I now undertake to explain The Book Of Jeremiah, provided life be spared and leisure be given me. But if through God’s grace time will be allowed, there will remain still one Prophet, that is, Ezekiel; which I hope will be undertaken by a more competent Interpreter.
As to Jeremiah, it must be first observed, that he commenced his office as a Prophet under Josiah, and in the thirteenth year of his reign, who was a sincere servant of God, and yet the state of things was then very confused: the Book of the Law was unknown; so that every one indulged his fancy in inventing many impious forms of worship. No doubt at a time when such liberty prevailed, there were many turbulent men laboring to pervert the worship of God and pure doctrine, and fabricating for themselves many absurd things. For if the priests taught rightly, they must have derived all their knowledge from the Law: and though it is probable, that the memory of it was not wholly lost, yet a few fragments only remained, so that they could not with certainty learn how the Church was to be regulated according to what had been received from above. For it is related in sacred history, that the Book was found in the eighteenth year of Josiah, (2 Chronicles 34:8, 15;) so that Jeremiah had been then teaching for four, and even for five years.
Read full note →
Now this fact clearly proves how great is the carelessness and sloth of men in the great concerns of Religion. God had commanded Moses, that a copy of the Law should not only be kept reverently and carefully in the Temple, but also by the kings themselves, (Deuteronomy 17:18;) and there was also added a command, that the whole Law should be read to the people at their festivals. (Deuteronomy 31:11.) But when the kings departed from the true worship of God, no copy of the Law was preserved by them: and at length the whole Law became as it were extinct. No doubt this happened through the tyranny of King Manasse, who cruelly raged against the priests and against all the other servants of God. Wherever only a spark of religion appeared, he was intent on slaughter; so that blood, as sacred history testifies, flowed through all the streets of Jerusalem. (2 Kings 21:16.) It was then no wonder, if he took away from the Temple all the copies of the Law found there, in order to extinguish all memory of true doctrine. However, a book, which had been hid, was found, as we are told, by the priest Hilkiah.
The first thing then to be observed is the time when he began to teach: as religion was then so corrupted, and every one invented errors to suit his own humor, the office of Jeremiah must have been hard and arduous.
Secondly, the termination of his ministry must be noticed. He says, that from that time he pursued his office until the transmigration. He therefore continued in his course for forty years. We shall hereafter see what hard contests he had to undergo during his life. But had the people been teachable, he could not have performed what God had commanded him without great pain and even weariness: for we shall presently see what was the doctrine which he was commanded to proclaim. As then he was assiduous in his labor for forty years, we hence perceive with what a courageous spirit he was endued. If we further consider what storms had been raised, calculated to cast him down from his high station, and even wholly to drive him from the right way, more clearly still will shine forth the invincible firmness of his mind and his zeal; for he never desisted from executing the office committed to him.
We must further observe, that after the city was cut off, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem were led captives into Babylon, Jeremiah still continued to discharge his office. He was indeed drawn into Egypt, as we learn from the end of his Book, especially from chapter 44 (Jeremiah 44); nay, he was taken there by force, while yet he pronounced a curse on all the Jews who sought hiding — places in Egypt. Though he was forced to go there, yet it much lessened his authority; for we know that ungodly men lay hold on any pretense for evil — speaking. There was here a specious pretense; “He cursed, “they said, “all who went to Egypt, and now where does he dwell himself? In Egypt with the other refugees.” No doubt the faith of the holy man was shaken by these banterings: ungodliness has been wanton in all ages. There, then, after the destruction of the city, Jeremiah was constrained to bend his course: and it may be, that he persevered in his work and labor beyond fifty years. It is said, that he was stoned to death, and not unlikely, for he inveighed with no less severity against the Jews who had fled into Egypt, than against the city while it was standing; and despair might have roused them into madness. It is hence probable that they slew the holy Prophet, and thought this lawful because he upbraided them with their miseries, while his object was to correct their perverseness, which was untamable; and this they did not consider.
I come now to The Contents of the Book. As Isaiah and the other Prophets spent their labor almost in vain, nothing remained for Jeremiah but briefly to announce this sentence, — “There is now no pardon, but it is the time of extreme vengeance, for they have too long abused God’s forbearance, who has borne with them, kindly and even sweetly exhorted them to repent, and testified that he would be exorable and propitious, provided they returned to the right way.” Since then God’s kindness had been despised by them, it became necessary for Jeremiah to fulminate against them as men lost and in a hopeless state of perverseness. The main thing then in his teaching was this:
“It is all over with the kingdom and the priesthood; for the Jews have so often and in such various ways, and for so long a time, provoked God’s wrath and rejected the pious warnings of his servants.”
Isaiah also in his time used threatenings; but we see that to mitigate what was terrible, some hope of pardon was added whenever he spoke with severity. But after the ten tribes had been carried into exile, and the kingdom had been visited with various calamities, while the Jews still continued impenitent, and even hardened themselves more and more under God’s scourges, it was necessary, as I have said, that he should deal more sharply with them. God had contended with them by Isaiah and the other prophets; by Jeremiah and also by Ezekiel, he proved them guilty, and denounced on them the sentence of condemnation. This difference between the teaching of Isaiah and that of our Prophet, ought to be noticed. At the same time, that Jeremiah’s teaching might not be imperfect, it was God’s purpose that he should be also the herald of his grace and of the salvation promised in Christ. This exception, however, ought to be borne in mind, that he offered them no hope of mercy until they had suffered the punishment due to their sins.
We now then understand what Jeremiah mainly taught: but particulars will be better and more distinctly understood by readers by following the course of the text. And I do not now treat in general of what is to be found in the prophets; for this is what I have done elsewhere. I now then say only, that Jeremiah was sent by God to proclaim to the people their last calamity; and also to speak to them of their future redemption, and at the same time, ever to remind them of the interposition of seventy years in exile. I come now to the words.
I Have said that the time, when Jeremiah began to discharge his office of a Prophet in God’s Church, is not stated here without reason, and that it was when the state of the people was extremely corrupt, the whole of Religion having become vitiated, because the Book of the Law was lost: for nowhere else can be found the rule according to which God is to be worshipped; nor can right knowledge be obtained from any other source. It was then, at the time when impiety had by a long custom prevailed among the Jews, that Jeremiah suddenly came forth. There was then laid on his shoulders the heaviest burden; for many enemies must have risen to oppose him, when he attempted to bring back the people to the pure doctrine of the law, which the greater part were then treading under their feet.
He calls himself the son of Hilkiah The Rabbins think that this Hilkiah was the priest by whom the Book of Moses was found five years after: but this seems not to me probable. The conjecture also of Jerome is very frivolous, who concludes that the Prophet was a boy when he began to prophesy, because he calls himself נער (nor,) a child, a little farther on, as though he did not use the word metaphorically. At what age he was called to the prophetic office, we do not know; it is, however, probable that he was of mature age, for it was a work of high authority; and further, had he been a youth, doubtless such a miracle would not have been passed over in silence, that is, that he was made a prophet before the age of maturity.
With regard to his father, it is nothing strange that the Rabbins have regarded him as the high priest; for we know that they are always prone to vain boastings. Ambition possessed them, and hence they have said that Jeremiah was the son of the high priest, in order to add to the splendor of his character. But what does the Prophet himself say? He declares indeed that he was the son of Hilkiah, but does not say that this was the high priest; on the contrary he adds, that he was from the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin Now we know that this was a mean village, not far from Jerusalem; and Jeremiah says, that it was in the tribe of Benjamin. Its nearness to Jerusalem may be gathered from the words of Isaiah, who says that small Anathoth was terrified. (Isaiah 10:30) He threatened Jerusalem by saying that the enemy was near.
“What,” he says, “is your security? Ye can hear the noise of your enemies and the groans of your brethren from your very gates; for Anathoth is not far from you, being only three miles distant.”
Since then Jeremiah only says, that he came from Anathoth, why should we suppose him to be the sort of the high priest? And frivolous is what the Chaldee paraphraser adds here, that Hilkiah had possessions in the town of Anathoth, as though it was allowed the priests to possess land: God allowed them only what was necessary to feed their flocks. We may then take it as certain, and what the Prophet indeed expressly declares, that he came from the village of Anathoth.
He further says, that he was of the priestly order. Hence the prophetic office was more suitable to him than to many of the other prophets, such as Amos and Isaiah. God took Isaiah from the court, as he was of the royal family, and made him a prophet. Amos was in a different situation: he was taken from the shepherds, for he was a shepherd. Since God appointed such prophets over his Church, he no doubt thus intended to cast a reflection on the idleness and sloth of the priests. For, though all the priests were not prophets, yet they ought to have been taken from that order; for the priestly order was as it were the nursery of the prophets. But when gross want of knowledge and ignorance prevailed among them, God chose his prophets from the other tribes, and thus exposed and condemned the priests. They ought, indeed, to have been the messengers of the God of hosts, so as to keep the law in their lips, that the people might seek it from their mouth, according to what is said by Malachi. (Malachi 2:7) But as they were dumb dogs, God transferred the honor of the prophetic office to others; but Jeremiah, as I have already stated, was a prophet as well as a priest.
John Calvin's Commentaries (1540-1563) — public domain. Text from the Calvin Translation Society English edition (1840s-50s) via the Christian Classics Ethereal Library (ccel.org). Calvin's coverage is partial (roughly two-thirds of the Bible); uncommented books and verses are honest gaps, never fabricated. The 19th-century editor's footnotes and remarks are omitted so the notes are faithfully Calvin's own voice.
Geneva Bible translators 1599 · Public Domain Which is thought to be he that found the…
Which is thought to be he that found the book of the Law under king Josiah, 2 Kings 22:8.
This was a city about three miles distant from Jerusalem, and belonged to the Priests, the sons of Aaron, Josh. 21:18.
Read full note →
That is, the sermons and prophecies.
Geneva Bible (1599) marginal notes — public domain.
John Trapp 1656 · Public Domain Jer 1:1 The words of Jeremiah the son of…
Jer 1:1 The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that [were] in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin:
Ver. 1. The words {a} of Jeremiah.] Piscator rendereth it Acta Ieremiae, The Acts of Jeremiah, as we say, "The Acts of the Apostles," which book also, saith one, might have been called in some sense The Passions of the Apostles, who were for the testimony of Jesus "in deaths often." And the same we may safely say of Jeremiah, who, although he were not omnis criminis per totam vitam expers - which yet great Athanasius {b} affirmeth of him - that is, free from all fault, for he had his outbursts, and himself relateth them, yet he was Iudaeorum integerrimus - as of Phocion it is said that he was Atheniensum integerrimus - a man of singular sanctimony and integrity; good of a little child, a young saint, and an old angel; an admirable preacher, as Keckerman {c} rightly calleth him, and propoundeth him for a pattern to all preachers of the gospel. Nevertheless, this incomparable prophet proved to be a man of many sorrows, πολυπαθεστατος, as Isidor Pelusiot, {d} a most calamitous person, as appeareth by this book, and one that had his share in sufferings from, and fellow sufferings with, his ungrateful countrymen, as much as might be. Nazianzen saith most truly of him, that he was the most compassionate of all the prophets; {e} witness that pathetical wish of his, Jer 9:1-3, "Oh that my head were waters," &c.; and that holy resolve, Jer 13:17, "But if ye will not hear it, my soul shall weep in secret places for your pride, and mine eye shall weep sore and run down with tears, because the Lord’s flock is carried away captive." It was this good man’s unhappiness to be a physician to a dying state -
Read full note →
“ Tunc etenim docta plus valet arte malum. ”
Long time he had laboured among this perverse people, but to very small purpose, as himself complaineth, {Jer 27:13-14} after Isaiah, {Isa 49:4} whom he succeeded in his office as a prophet, some scores of years between, {f} but with little good success. For as in a dying man his eyes wax dim, and all his senses decay, till at length they are utterly lost, so fareth it with commonwealths, quando suis fatis urgentur, when once they are ripe for ruin; the nearer they draw to destruction, the more they are overgrown with blindness, madness, security, obstinace, such as despiseth all remedies, and leaveth no place at all for wholesome advice and admonition. Lo, this was the case of those improbi et reprobi - "reprobate silver shall men call them" {Jer 6:30} - with whom our prophet had to do. Moses had not more to do with the Israelites in the wilderness than Jeremiah had with these "stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears," {Act 7:51} as good at "resisting the Holy Ghost" as ever their fathers were. The times were not unlike those described by Tacitus, concerning which Casaubon saith, Quibus nulla unquam aut virtutum steriliora, aut virtutibus inimiciora, that no times were ever more barren of virtues, or greater enemies to virtues. And to say sooth, how could they be much better, when the book of the law was wanting for over sixty years, and the whole land overspread with the deeds of darkness? Josiah indeed, that good young king - by the advice of this prophet Jeremiah, who was younger than himself, but both full of zeal {g} - did what he could to reform both Church and state, but he, alas! could not do it; the Reformation in his days was forced by him, and their was foul work in secret, as appeareth by Zephaniah, who was our prophet’s contemporary; it met with much opposition both from princes, priests, and people, who all had been woefully habituated and hardened in their idolatry under Manasseh and Ammon. Unto which also, and other abominations not a few they soon relapsed when once Josiah was taken away, and his successors proved to be such as countenanced and complied with the people in all their impieties and excesses. This prophet therefore was stirred up by God to oppose the current of the times and the torrent of vices; to call them to repentance, and to threaten the seventy years’ captivity, which because they believed not, neither returned unto the Lord, came upon them accordingly, as is set forth in the end of this prophecy. Whence Procopius, Isidor and others, have gathered that, besides this prophecy and the Lamentations, Jeremiah wrote the first and second book of Kings. {h} But that is as uncertain as that he was stoned to death by the Jews in Egypt, or that the Egyptians afterwards built him an honourable sepulchre, and resorted much unto it for devotion sake; whenas R. Solomon thinketh, from Jer 44:28, that Jeremiah together with Baruch, returned out of Egypt unto Judea, and there died.
The son of Hilkiah.] The high priest who found the book of the law, say the Chaldee paraphrast and others; but many think otherwise, and the prophet himself addeth,
Of the priests that were at Anathoth.] "Poor Anathoth," {Isa 10:30} renowned as much by Jeremiah as little Hippo was afterwards by great Augustine, bishop there. The Targum tells us that Jeremiah was one of the twenty-four chieftains of the temple. {i} A priest he was, and so an ordinary teacher, before he acted as a prophet; but his countrymen of Anathoth evil entreated him.
In the land of Benjamin.] Some three miles from Jerusalem.
{a} Verba sive res.
{b} Serm. 4 contra Arianos.
{c} De Rhet. Eccles., cap. ult.
{d} Lib. i., Epist. 298.
{e} Prophetarum omnium ad commiserationem propensissimus. - Orat 17, ad cives.
{f} Vide Oecolamp.
{g} Iosias a zelo ignis divini nomen habet: Significat autem Ieremias altidudinem Dei, vel exaltatum a Deo.
{h} Isodor, Doroth., Epiphan.
{i} Ex praepositis templi. Innuitur in ipsum rectius potuisse competere propheticum munus, quam in multos alios vel ex aula, vel ex caula vocatos.
John Trapp, A Commentary or Exposition upon All the Books of the Old and New Testament (1647–1656) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Matthew Poole 1685 · Public Domain The words, i.e. sermons or prophecies, which he received…
The words, i.e. sermons or prophecies, which he received from God, (as being his mouth to declare them unto the people,) and comprised all in the volume of this book going under his name, as the matter and substance of them. See Poole "Isa 2:1".
The son of Hilkiah: as this serves to distinguish him from other priests, so his being of Anathoth ranks him among the common priests; not that high priest mentioned 2Ki 22:8, under whose progeny Jeremiah is not named, 1Ch 6:13; who, it is probable, would have been named, being one of so much note, and who always lived at Jerusalem, not at Anathoth, which was a city three miles from Jerusalem, lotted out of the tribe of Benjamin for the priests, Jos 21:18. Of an ordinary teacher he was made a prophet, not so the rest.
Read full note →
In the land of Benjamin, i.e. that part of Canaan that fell to Benjamin's share.
Matthew Poole's English Annotations on the Holy Bible (1683–1685) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword/MySword module.
Matthew Henry 1710 · Public Domain We have here as much as it was thought…
We have here as much as it was thought fit we should know of the genealogy of this prophet and the chronology of this prophecy. 1. We are told what family the prophet was of. He was the son of Hilkiah, not that Hilkiah, it is supposed, who was high priest in Josiah's time (for then he would have been called so, and not, as here, one of the priests that were in Anathoth), but another of the same name. Jeremiah signifies one raised up by the Lord. It is said of Christ that he is a prophet whom the Lord our God raised up unto us, Deu 18:15, Deu 18:18. He was of the priests, and, as a priest, was authorized and appointed to teach the people; but to that authority and appointment God added the extraordinary commission of a prophet. Ezekiel also was a priest. Thus God would support the honour of the priesthood at a time when, by their sins and God's judgments upon them, it was sadly eclipsed. He was of the priests in Anathoth, a city of priests, which lay about three miles from Jerusalem. Abiathar had his country house there, Kg1 2:26. 2. We have the general date of his prophecies, the knowledge of which is requisite to the understanding of them. (1.) He began to prophesy in the thirteenth year of Josiah's reign, Jer 1:2. Josiah, in the twelfth year of his reign, began a work of reformation, applied himself with all sincerity to purge Judah and Jerusalem from the high places, and the groves, and the images, Ch2 34:3. And very seasonably then was this young prophet raised up to assist and encourage the young king in that good work. Then the word of the Lord came to him, not only a charge and commission to him to prophesy, but a revelation of the things themselves which he was to deliver. As it is an encouragement to ministers to be countenanced and protected by such pious magistrates as Josiah was, so it is a great help to magistrates, in any good work of reformation, to be advised and animated, and to have a great deal of their work done for them, by such faithful zealous ministers as Jeremiah was. Now, one would have expected when these two joined forces, such a prince, and such a prophet (as in a like case, Ezr 5:1, Ezr 5:2), and both young, such a complete reformation would be brought about and settled as would prevent the ruin of the church and state; but it proved quite otherwise. In the eighteenth year of Josiah we find there were a great many of the relics of idolatry that were not purged out; for what can the best princes and prophets do to prevent the ruin of a people that hate to be reformed? And therefore, though it was a time of reformation, Jeremiah continued to foretel the destroying judgments that were coming upon them; for there is no symptom more threatening to any people than fruitless attempts of reformation. Josiah and Jeremiah would have healed them, but they would not be healed. (2.) He continued to prophesy through the reigns of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, each of whom reigned eleven years. He prophesied to the carrying away of Jerusalem captive (Jer 1:3), that great event which he had so often prophesied of. He continued to prophesy after that, Jer 40:1. But the computation here is made to end with that because it was the accomplishment of many of his predictions; and from the thirteenth of Josiah to the captivity was just forty years. Dr. Lightfoot observes that as Moses was so long with the people, a teacher in the wilderness, till they entered into their own land, Jeremiah was so long in their own land a teacher, before they went into the wilderness of the heathen: and he thinks that therefore a special mark is set upon the last forty years of the iniquity of Judah, which Ezekiel bore forty days, a day for a year, because during all that time they had Jeremiah prophesying among them, which was a great aggravation of their impenitency. God, in this prophet, suffered their manners, their ill manners, forty years, and at length swore in his wrath that they should not continue in his rest.
Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708–1710) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API.
John Gill 1763 · Public Domain The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah,.... This…
The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah,.... This is the general title of the whole book, and includes all his discourses, sermons, and prophecies; and designs not his own words, but the words of the Lord, which were put into his mouth, and he delivered under divine inspiration. The Septuagint version renders it, "the word of God": and the Arabic version, "the word of the Lord": the Targum,
"the words of the prophecy of Jeremiah;''
Read full note →
who is described by his descent and parentage, "the son of Hilkiah". The Arabic version calls him Selkiah. This was not Hilkiah the high priest, who in the days of Josiah found the book of the law, Kg2 22:8 as Kimchi's father and Abarbinel think, and so Clemens of Alexandria (n); since he is not said to be a high priest, or of the high priests, but
of the priests that were in Anathoth, in the land of Benjamin; though the Targum paraphrases the words to the other sense,
"of the heads of the ward of priests, of the amarcalin, or governors which were in Jerusalem, a man that took his inheritance in Anathoth, in the land of the tribe of Benjamin;''
nor is Jeremiah mentioned among the posterity of Hilkiah the high priest in Ch1 6:13, besides, Hilkiah, a priest of Anathoth, must be of the family of Ithamar; the last of which family that was high priest was Abiathar, who had fields in Anathoth, Kg1 2:26, and so could be no other than a common priest; for Hilkiah the high priest was of the family of Phinehas; for, from the times of that Abiathar to the Babylonish captivity, there was no high priest but of that family. The Jews say that Jeremiah descended by his mother's side from Rahab the harlot (o). Anathoth was a city in the tribe of Benjamin, as is here said, and belonged to the priests, Jos 21:18, it lay north of Jerusalem about three miles from it, according to Jerom (p) and others; but, according to Josephus (q), it was but twenty furlongs from it, that is, two and a half miles.
(n) Stromat. l. 1. p. 328. (o) T. Bab. Megilia, fol. 14. 2. Yalkut Simeoni, par. 2. fol. 59. 3. Jarchi in loc. (p) Comment. in Hieremiam, I. 1. fol. 121. H. tom. 5. & I. 2. fol. 135. F. & I. 6. fol. 161. C. Isidor. Hispalens. de Vit. & Mort. Sanct. c. 38. (q) Antiqu. I. 10. c. 7. sect. 3. Ed. Hudson.
John Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible (1746–1763) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API.
John Wesley 1765 · Public Domain The pedigree, time, and calling of Jeremiah, confirmed against…
The pedigree, time, and calling of Jeremiah, confirmed against his excuses, ver. 1-10. His visions of an almond-rod and seething pot, ver. 11-14. His heavy message against Judah, ver. 15, 16. God promises him his assistance, ver. 17-19.
Anathoth - Was a city three miles from Jerusalem, allotted out of the tribe of Benjamin for the priests.
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the Whole Bible (1754–1765) — public domain. Text via the GEBible commentary corpus.
Adam Clarke 1810 · Public Domain Chronological notes relative to the commencement of Jeremiah's prophesying
THE BOOK OF THE PROPHET JEREMIAH
Chronological notes relative to the commencement of Jeremiah's prophesying
Read full note →
-Year from the Creation, according to Archbishop Usher, 3375.
-Year from the Deluge, according to the generally received Hebrew text, conferred with Ac 7:4, 1719.
-Fourth year of the thirty-seventh Olympiad.
-Year from the building of Rome according to the Varronian account, 125.
-Year before the vulgar era of Christ's nativity, 629.
-Twelfth year of Ancus Martius, the fourth king of the Romans: this was the one hundred and twentieth year before the expulsion of the Tarquins.
-Nineteenth year of Phraortes, the second king of Media.
-Twenty-third year of Archidamus, king of Lacedaemon, of the family of the Proclidae.
-Sixteenth year of Eurycrates II., king of Lacedaemon, of the family of the Eurysthenidae.
-Third year of Sadyattes, king of Lydia, which was the eighty-second year before the conquest of this kingdom by Cyrus.
-Twelfth year of Philip, the sixth king of Macedon, or the two hundred and ninety-third before the commencement of the reign of Alexander the Great.
-Thirteenth year of Josiah, king of Judah.
-Epoch of the building of Cyrene by Battus, according to some chronologers.
CHAPTER I
General title to the whole Book, 1-3.
Jeremiah receives a commission to prophesy concerning nations
and kingdoms, a work to which in the Divine purpose he had been
appointed before his birth, 4-10.
The vision of the rod of an almond tree and of the seething
pot, with their signification, 11-16.
Promises of Divine protection to Jeremiah in the discharge of
the arduous duties of his prophetical office, 17-19.
NOTES ON CHAP. I
Verse. 1. - 3. The words of Jeremiah] These three verses are the title of the Book; and were probably added by Ezra when he collected and arranged the sacred books, and put them in that order in which they are found in Hebrew Bibles in general. For particulars relative to this prophet, the times of his prophesying, and the arrangement of his discourses, see the introduction.
Eleventh year of Zedekiah] That is, the last year of his reign; for he was made prisoner by the Chaldeans in the fourth month of that year, and the carrying away of the inhabitants of Jerusalem was in the fifth month of the same year.
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible (1810–1826) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword/MySword module.
Joseph Benson 1811 · Public Domain Jer 1:1-2. The words of Jeremiah — That is,…
Jer 1:1-2. The words of Jeremiah — That is, the sermons or prophecies, the contents of which he received from God, that he might declare them unto the people, and which are comprised in this book under his name. See on Isa 2:1. The son of Hilkiah — Some have supposed this to have been Hilkiah the high-priest, by whom the book of the law was found in the temple, in the reign of Josiah; but for this opinion there is no better ground than his being of the same name, which was not an uncommon one among the Jews; whereas, had he been in reality the high-priest, he would doubtless have been mentioned by that distinguishing title, and not put upon a level with the priests of an ordinary and inferior class. Besides this, Hilkiah dwelt at Anathoth, which was indeed one of the cities allotted to the priests, but not the place of residence of the high-priest, who always lived at Jerusalem. It may be observed here, that Jeremiah, being of the family of Aaron, would have been a teacher of the people even if he had not been called to the extraordinary office of prophesying. To whom the word of the Lord came — Not only a charge and commission to prophesy, but also a revelation of the things themselves which he was to deliver; in the days of Josiah — That young but good king, who, in the twelfth year of his reign, began a work of reformation, applying himself with all sincerity and diligence to purge Judah and Jerusalem of the groves, the images, and the high places, 2Ch 34:3. Now the very next year was this young prophet seasonably raised up to assist and encourage the young king in that good work. And it might have been expected that, by the joint efforts of such a prince and such a prophet, both young, and likely to continue long to be useful, such a complete reformation would have been effected, as would have prevented the ruin of the church and state. But, alas! it proved quite otherwise: and their united labours, with respect to the generality of their countrymen, only served to aggravate their guilt and accelerate their destruction.
Joseph Benson's Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1811–1818) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Albert Barnes 1834 · Public Domain The words of Jeremiah - The usual title of…
The words of Jeremiah - The usual title of the prophetic books is “the Word of the Lord,” but the two books of Amos and Jeremiah are called the words of those prophets, probably because they contain not merely the words of those prophets, probably because they contain not merely prophecies, but also the record of much which belongs to the personal history of the writers. This title might therefore be translated the “life of Jeremiah” or “acts of Jeremiah,” though some understand by it a collection of the prophecies of Jeremiah. One derivation of Jeremiah’s name is “God exalteth.”
Hilkiah, may have been the high priest of that name.
Read full note →
That were - Or, who was, i. e., dwelt. The meaning is, that Jeremiah was a priest who dwelt at Anathoth.
Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible (1834–1885) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword/MySword module.
Haydock's Catholic Bible Commentary 1859 · Public Domain Helcias, the high priest who discovered the book of…
Helcias, the high priest who discovered the book of the law, (Clement of Alexandria, Strom. i., &c.) though this be uncertain. --- Anathoth, a village to the north of Jerusalem, to which many priests had retired, though it did not belong to them. (Calmet)
George Leo Haydock (1774–1849), Haydock's Catholic Family Bible and Commentary, 1859 edition — public domain. Excludes Psalms (Douay-Rheims chapter numbering differs from Protestant) and Deuterocanonical books (Catholic canon only).
Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures 1864 · Public Domain Jeremiah 1
1. THE INTRODUCTION
Jeremiah 1
Read full note →
1. The Superscription
Jer_1:1-3 1
1The words of Jeremiah, the son of Hilkiah, [one] of the priests that were [LXX., 2dwelt] in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin, To whom the word of the Lord [Jehovah] came [was communicated]2 in the days of Josiah, the son of Amon, 3king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign. It came also in the days of Jehoiakim, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
Jer_1:1. The words of Jeremiah … Benjamin. We find a similar commencement in the prophetical book of Amos (Jer_1:1) and in the Song of Solomon (Jer_1:1). Etymologically דִּבְרֵי יּ׳ might certainly be rendered historia Jeremiæ (De Wette), compare יֶתֶר דִּדִבְרֵי so frequent in the book of Kings (1Ki_11:41; 1Ki_14:19; 1Ki_14:29, etc.). Since, however, this book is not historic, but prophetic, since the prophet’s work consisted essentially in preaching, since the other prophetic books bear inscriptions denoting discourses (מַשָׂא ,דִּבַר י׳) or visions (הֲזון), and since finally the historical narratives contained in the book are also the words of Jeremiah (so Starke, ad h. l.), it is more correct to take דִּבְרֵי in the sense of “words,” which it certainly has in Son_1:1. Concerning the name, origin and birthplace of the prophet, see the Introduction. Besides Jeremiah (and Nathan, 1Ki_4:5, VideTholuck, Die Proph. und ihre Weiss. S. 20, u. 32), the prophet Ezekiel (Jer_1:3; comp. Jos. Ant. X. 5, 1), and most probably Zechariah (Jer_1:1 comp. Köhler, Socharja, S. 9), were of sacerdotal origin. No special traces of his priestly descent are found in the book of our prophet, unless we reckon as such his accurate knowledge of the Law, especially Deuteronomy, of which the exposition will furnish proofs in great number.
Jer_1:2-3. To whom. … in the fifth month. The subject of came in Jer_1:3 is word of Jehovah, repeated from Jer_1:2. Chr. B. Michaelis falsely renders in the Hallesche Bibel: idemque etiam fuit propheta. As regards the chronological statements in Jer_1:2-3, it should first be noticed that the two kings Jehoahaz and Jehoiakim are passed over, without doubt because each of them reigned only three months. Since Jeremiah labored from the thirteenth year of Josiah, consequently eighteen years under Josiah, and eleven years each under Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, he ministered altogether, including the six months under the two kings omitted, forty years in the midst of the theocracy. How long afterwards he labored, cannot be ascertained with any certainty. Comp. Introduction and remarks on Jer_44:29. Since the book, as we have it, contains not only those words of Jehovah which were communicated to the prophet before the fifth month of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, but others of later date (Jeremiah 40-44), this inscription does not comport with its present extent. According to Jer_36:32, in place of the writing destroyed by Zedekiah, Jeremiah prepared another, which was twice as large as the first. When he completed the second roll, we are not told. After the destruction of Jerusalem in the fifth month of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, Jeremiah remained more than two months longer in the country (comp. Jer_41:1; Jer_42:7). During this time, or perhaps after his arrival in Egypt (comp. rems. on Jer_2:16; Jer_2:36), he may have continued his writing till the time mentioned, and provided it with the present inscription, Jer_1:1-3. Comp. Ewald, Die Propheten des A. B.II. S. 15. We have the contents of this writing in our present book, though not in the same order. On this point see the Introduction.
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
Origen, in his first homily on Jeremiah, regards the chronological statements of the inscription as a proof of the long-suffering of God. He says, § 3, “God had pronounced judgment against Jerusalem for its sins, and it was condemned to captivity. But as the time approaches, the compassionate God sends this prophet under the third king before the captivity. For the long-suffering God wished to grant them a respite, and Jeremiah was to prophesy, so to speak, the day before the captivity, as a preacher of repentance, in order that the cause of the captivity might be removed.” [“Dr. Lightfoot observes that as Moses was so long with the people as a teacher in the wilderness, till they entered into their own land, Jeremiah was so long to their own land a teacher before they went into the wilderness of the heathen.” M. Henry.—S. R. A.]
Footnotes:
[1][The text of the common English Version will be retained in the prose portions of the book, with occasional corrections, included in brackets; but a new rendering of the poetical portions will be given, founded on a comparison of the German and English Versions with the Hebrew.—S. R. A.]
[2]Jer_1:2.—[Henderson: was communicated.]
2. THE CALL OF THE PROPHET BY WORD AND VISION (Jer_1:4-19)
a. His choice, call and aggressive destination
Jer_1:4-10
4, 5Then the word of the Lord [Jehovah] came unto me,3 saying, Before I formed thee in the belly4 I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified [separated] thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. 6Then said I [But I said], Ah,5 Lord God! [Jehovah] behold, I cannot speak: for 7I am a child. But the Lord [Jehovah] said unto me, Say not, I am a child: for thou shalt go to6 all that [wherever] I shall send thee, and whatsoever I command 8thee thou shalt speak. Be not afraid of their faces: for I am with thee to deliver 9thee, saith the Lord [Jehovah]. Then the Lord [Jehovah] put forth his hand 10and touched my mouth. And the Lord [Jehovah] said unto me, Behold, I have put my words into thy mouth. See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out and to pull down [extirpate and exterminate] and to destroy and to throw down, to build and to plant.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
Jer_1:5. Before I formed thee. …to the nations. Observe the progress of thought in the three clauses of this verse—1. Before I formed thee, I knew thee: the Divine idea in eternity lies back of the creative act in time. Comp. Psa_139:15. 2. Before thou camest forth from the womb, I sanctified thee: the instrument prepared in accordance with the Divine idea is set apart for the sacred service. Comp. Isa_45:4; Isa_49:1; Act_9:15; Rom_1:1; Gal_1:15; Luk_1:15. 3. I ordained thee a prophet to the nations: it is expressly stated in what this sacred service consists: Jeremiah is to proclaim the word of the Lord as a prophet, not to one nation only, but to the nations generally.
Jer_1:6. Then said I …… I am a child. Jeremiah perceives directly the difficulty and danger of this Divine commission. He therefore pleads his inability to speak on account of his youth. By a similar plea Moses seeks to escape the Divine legation, Exo_3:11; Exo_4:10; Exo_4:13; but Jonah flees from before the Lord, Jer_1:3—Many expositors suppose that Jeremiah was then twenty years of age, but no definite age is designated by נַעַר. The Rabbins understand by the term a boy to his fourteenth year. See Buxtorf, Lex. Chald. Talm. sub voce. Maurer. more correctly concludes from the long continuance of the prophet’s ministry (Jer_1:2-3, coll. Jer_40:1; Jer_43:8), that he could not then have passed his twenty-fifth year.
Jer_1:7. But Jehovah said unto me, say not… thou shalt speak. Jehovah rebuts the objection of Jeremiah at the outset, not by the promise of His assistance, but by a categorical declaration of His will. He is to go where he is sent, and speak what he is commanded. כֹּל in itself might be taken in a personal sense (προςπάντας, LXX). But since the following אֵת כֹּל is certainly to be regarded as neuter, and as the neutral signification, being the more general, includes the other, the former is to be preferred=wherever. We should also expect עֲלֵיהֶם after the verb, and from its absence conclude that אֲשֶׁר is intended for an adverb of place=whither (Zec_6:10).
Jer_1:8. Be not afraid … saith Jehovah. Their faces refers to the persons indicated implicite in the word wherever, Jer_1:7. Here first the Lord removes Jeremiah’s scruples by the promise of His protection and assistance. So with Moses, Exo_3:12; Exo_4:15; comp. Eze_2:6; Jos_1:5; Jos_7:9; Jdg_6:16; Mat_10:18-20; Mat_28:20; Luk_21:17; Act_18:9-10.
Jer_1:9. Then Jehovah put forth his hand. …into thy mouth. The opposition of the prophet is now broken down. The Lord was too strong for him. Comp. Jer_20:7; 1Co_9:10.—So the Lord now proceeds to the solemn act of inauguration. In this we distinguish two points: (a) the communication of the necessary ability, Jer_1:9; (b) the conferring of the commission and privileges of the office. Both indicate a vigorous offensive attitude of the prophet, which corresponds to an equally strong defensive position, Jer_1:18-19. The first consists in the symbolical act of touching the lips. We call this act symbolical in so far as the touching of the lips and the words spoken were the visible and audible manifestation of a still deeper spiritual transaction. The Lord cannot literally have put His words in the prophet’s mouth: He can only have given him the charism of which the words were the necessary result, “Attactus oris signum est notans efficaciam spiritus sancti, quippe qui digitus Dei sit, aperiens labia ministrorum verbi, Psa_51:13-14; Psa_51:17; Luk_21:15” (Förster). The transaction is, however, to be regarded as an historical objective fact, though occurring outside the sphere of physical or bodily life, and therefore as ἐν πνεύματι, or a vision. Comp. Drechsler on Isa_6:7. We thus avoid a double error. First, that which apprehends the transaction as purely subjective: “as the moment when the presentiment first flashed clearly through the soul of Jeremiah, that his prophetic calling was of Divine appointment” (Ewald, Die Proph. des A. B. II. S. 26). Secondly, that according to which the transaction took place in the sphere of physical or corporeal existence. So Starke, who, actually says that the “Son of God, in pre-intimation of His blessed incarnation, appeared to Jeremiah in a human form.”—This touching of the lips occurs several times, but always with a different meaning. In Isa_6:6 it is for the purpose of expiation, in Dan_10:16 for the purpose of strengthening. Here in Jeremiah it is the outward form of inspiratio (ἒμπνευσις). For the expression “I have put my word in thy mouth” (comp. almost the same expression in Isa_51:16) is, on the one hand, an explanation of the act of touching the lips, on the other the designation of that operation on the human spirit by virtue of which “holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost” (2Pe_1:21). From the following verse moreover we perceive that the prophet was prepared not only for speaking, but for acting, or, that his words were to be at the same time deeds, real exhibitions of power.
Jer_1:10. See, I have this day… to build and to plant. These words represent the second part of the act of inauguration, the conferring of authority and of the commission. Authority is at the same time power. The prophet is not only formally authorized, but rendered physically capable. He is first authorized and empowered to act vigorously in the offensive. הִפְקַדְתִּיךְ I have set thee as a פָקִיד, i.e., overseer, administrator (ἐπίσκοπος, οἰκόνμος), consequently as my officer over the nations and kingdoms, which are my dominion and property. In הִפְקִיד is also included the idea of official plenipotence, which forms the legal basis of the prophet’s ministry. The sphere in which this ministry is to be exercised is “the nations and the kingdoms.” These are not designated more exactly, but the definite article and the plural denote that not only the kingdom of Judah, but all the nations and kingdoms are meant which were then present on the arena of history. They are enumerated Jer_25:17-26. The commission which the prophet received with respect to them has two sides—a positive and a negative. First, he is to extirpate and exterminate (we may thus express the alliteration), to destroy and to throw down, but then also to build and to plant. The first he does by prophesying the Divine judgment, the second by the promise of Divine mercy and grace. נָתַשׁ corresponding to נָטַע. is used of plants (Jer_12:14 sqq.; Jer_24:6; Jer_45:4) נָתַץ corresponding to בָנָה, of buildings (Jer_39:8; Jer_52:14; Eze_26:9; Eze_26:12). It is noteworthy that the negative side is expressed by four verbs, the positive by only two. With this the contents of the book correspond, as owing to the moral condition of the times, it contains more threatenings and rebukes than promises of grace It is full of the former with respect to Israel. The latter are found with respect to the theocracy, besides in many scattered passages, especially in Jeremiah 30-33. With respect to the heathen nations both are found especially in Jeremiah 46-51. It is understood that the prophet was not actually to destroy and to build, but only by word, which as spoken by God involves the certainty of the accomplishment. Analogous modes of expression are found in Gen_49:6; Isa_6:10; Eze_32:18; Eze_43:3; Hos_6:5 Rev_11:5—Comp. Jer_5:14; Jer_23:29.
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
1. There is a vocatio immediate, which is however restricted to the bearers of the prophetic and apostolic office. We know of no prophet who was chosen and called by man to be a prophet. Aaron and Elisha are only apparent exceptions. Comp. Exo_4:14-16; Exo_4:27; 1Ki_19:16. The apostles also were all called immediately by our Lord: Mat_6:18-22; Mat_10:1; Joh_1:37; Acts I:9.; Gal_1:1; Gal_1:11 sqq. Since then this vocatio immediata or extraordinaria is for those servants and instruments, of which the Lord will make use “ad fundandam ecclesiam,” all those who wish to bear office in the church already founded must be called thereto rite, i.e. by the human organ authorized for this purpose. (Conf. August., Art. XIV.) Comp. Budde, Instit. theol. dogm. L. V., cap. IV., § 4.—Turretin. Inst.theol. elencht, Loc. XVIII., Quæst. 23.
2. The free creative act of the personal God, who prepares and forms His instruments according to His idea even in the womb, contradicts both the mechanical idea, of development, and a one-sided traducianism.—It is simply remarked, that Catholic theologians (see Corn a Lapide), in order to obtain analogies for the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary, would conclude from Jer_1:5 that Jeremiah was conceived without originalsin. Neumann understands הקדשׁתיך of a communication of the Holy Ghost to Jeremiah even before his birth. Comp. on the other hand Hofmann, Schriftbeweis, 1, S. 65. [“קָדַשׁ does not primarily signify to be pure or holy, but to be separated from a common to some special purpose. The idea of purity, whether physical, ceremonial or moral, was originated by that of such separation. When, therefore, Jehovah declares that He had sanctified the prophet before his birth, the meaning is not that He had cleansed him from the pollution of original sin, or that He had regenerated him by His Spirit, as some have imagined, but that He had separated him in His eternal counsel to the work in which he was to be engaged.” Henderson. So Calvin.—“In this respect, as in many others, Jeremiah, who was sanctified from his mother’s womb, and was known, i.e. loved, by God before he was conceived and was made a prophet to the Nations, was a figure of Christ, who was loved by the Father from the beginning .... and who was the Prophet of all Nations .... (see S. Jerome here and comp. S. Cyprian c. Judæos, I. 21; S. Ambrose, in Psalms 43, and Origen Homil. 1, in Jer.). S. Jerome says: ‘ Certe nullum puto sanctiorem Jeremia, qui virgo propheta, sanctificatusque in utero, ipso nomine præfigurat Dominum Salvatorem., S. Jerome (who is regarded as a saint and as a great doctor of the church, by the Church of Rome) could not have written these words if he had known anything of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception (i.e. of the original sinlessness) of the Blessed Virgin, which is now enforced by the Church of Rome as an article of faith necessary to everlasting salvation,” Wordsworth.—S. R. A.]
3. The divine call involves, 1. with respect to the called, (a) the duty, to discharge the commission received without shyness or fear of man, and without regard to his own weakness, (b) the privilege of the divine protection and assistance, and of certain success in his work; 2. with respect to those for whose sake the divine commission is given, (a) the duty of believing obedience, (b) the certain prospect of the realization of the threatenings or promises addressed to them.—Zinzendorf (“Jeremiah a preacher of righteousness,” S. 5 of the Berlin Ed. of 1830) remarks on Jer_1:10 : “A general promise which is addressed not to court preachers and general superintendents and such like only, in their extended dioceses, but city and village pastors may a majori ad minus, safely conclude that it will apply also to their rooting out and pulling down, building and planting. Only [be] faithful! only faithful!”—I note that some have sought to derive from Jer_1:9 a proof of verbal inspiration, hence Starke remarks: “ Those sin against the Holy Ghost Himself who attribute to Jeremiah a rude style and solecisms, as Abarbanel, Jerome, Cunæus (De Rep. ebr. III., 7) have done,”—further that, Pope Innocent III., founded on Jer_1:10 his claim to the primacy over civil rulers. Comp. Decret. L. I. Tit. 33, cap. sollicite (Förster).
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
1. This passage may be suitably employed on the tenth Sunday after Trinity. It is also especially adapted to Ordination and Installation sermons.
2. The Lord never allows His Church to lack the strength which time and place demand. He need not seek this or wait for it. He makes it. As the Lord elsewhere chose that which was foolish, weak and base in the sight of the world (1Co_1:19-29; Mat_11:25; Joh_7:48; Jam_2:5), so now he chooses one who to himself and others appears too young. It is not always the greybeard that is wanted (Förster). when God gives office He gives also understanding.—It would be presumptuous to begin a great work in one’s own strength. It is natural that in view of a great and difficult task one should at first be afraid. (Ambrose, De officiis ministrorum, 1,Jer 66: “ Moyses et Hieremias, electi a Domino, ut oracula Dei prædicarent populo, quod poterant per gratiam, excusabant per verecundiam.”) But it would also be wrong if from pusillanimous despondency or love of ease, one should take no heed to an evident call of God.
“ Mark. O my soul, God’s word to thee,
And go at Christ’s command,
Where’er He draws thee hasten on,
When He detains thee, stand,” etc.
“The word and glory, Lord divine,
Not ours, O Christ, but all are Thine,
Grant then Thy gracious aid to those,
Who sweetly on Thy word repose.”
(Nic. Selnekker, in the hymn, “Abide with us, Lord Jesus Christ,” etc., Jer_1:7).—Since the cause is not ours, but the Lord’s, and we have not undertaken it in our own strength, but in obedience to His command, it devolves upon the Lord to protect His cause and His servant.—Where one receives an office from the Lord and conducts it according to the Lord’s purpose and in His Spirit, there the Lord Himself is present with shield and spear, that is, with weapons of defence and offence.—The word of the Lord even in the mouth of the humblest of His servants, is a hammer which breaks the rock in pieces, and no rock is too hard or too high for it.—The work in the vineyard of the Lord. It must 1. be performed by men, whom the Lord prepares and sends. It Isaiah 2. a difficult and dangerous work. But 3. rich in success and reward.—The office to which the Lord appoints Isaiah 1. for the purpose of accomplishing His will,—needs, 2. the means which the Lord Himself provides.
3. Starke:—“He who is called by the Lord to the office of preacher becomes indeed a sacrifice and instrument of God, in that he regards only God’s will and command, and must without exception and without self-conceit do and proclaim that which the Lord commands him to do and preach.—Since the anger of God against sin and the punishment which will certainly follow has to be declared to whole kingdoms, a preacher must set their sins and the anger of God awakened thereby, before governors as well as subjects, the high as well as the low.—A teacher in view of gross corruption must not proceed softly; he must break down, root out, pull up and destroy.—When a teacher has by the Law destroyed the kingdom of Satan in the hearts of men, he must seek to build up the kingdom of Christ therein by the Gospel.”
[“Propheta nascitur non fit—A man is not educated unto a prophet, but originally formed for the office.—Samuel declared a message from God to Eli when he was a little child. Note, God can, when He pleases, make children prophets and ordain strength out of the mouths of babes and sucklings.—If God do not deliver His ministers from trouble, it is to the same effect if He support them under their trouble.—Earthly princes are not wont to go along with their ambassadors, but God goes along with those whom He sends.” Henry.—“You need not fear their faces—the thing that timid young men are most wont to fear. Think only that the Lord God is with you, and let His presence be your joy and strength.” Cowles.—Nothing can sustain the prophet in His outward and inward conflicts but the assurance of his divine calling.—Maurice says: “If Jeremiah had fancied that he was a prophet because there was in him a certain aptitude for uttering divine discourses and foreseeing calamities, who can tell the weariness and loathing which he would have felt for his task when it led to no seeming result, except the dislike of all against or for whom it was exercised,—still more when the powers and graces which were supposed to be the qualifications for it, became consciously feeble.”—S. R. A.]
Footnotes:
[3]Jer_1:4.—Cod. 1092, De Rossi, Cod. D. Mosc., LXX., Vatic., Theodoret in Cod. Monac., Origen, read אֵלָיו, misled by the previous context.
[4]Jer_1:5.—Since the 3d pers. masc. imperf. of a strong verb with the suffix ךָ requires the short o in the last root-syllable (Ewald, Ausf. Lehrb. § 251, b), the Masoretes, deriving אצורך from יַצָר, read אֶצָּרְךָ with the marginal note יַתִּיר ו׳. But the form comes from צוּר (with the meaning “to form,” Exo_32:11; 1Ki_7:15), and the Chethibh is therefore to be pronounced אֲצוּרְךָ.
[5]Jer_1:6.—LXX. ὃ ὤν (δέσποτα κύριε), which Spohn supposes to have arisen from ὦ by the fault of the transcriber; but from the peculiarity of this translation, which would presuppose a derivative from הָיָה (Exo_3:14), we may judge it to have been the original.
[6]Jer_1:7.—The preposition עַל might not unfitly in this connection be rendered “against” (Maurer), yet elsewhere עַל after הָלַךְ differs little in meaning from אֵל, 1Sa_15:20; 1Sa_2:11; comp. Neh_6:17 and rems. on Jer_10:1.
b. The Visions, Rehearsal and Programme
Jer_1:11-16
11Moreover the word of the Lord [Jehovah] came unto me, saying, Jeremiah , 12 what seest thou? And I said, I see a [wakeful] rod of an almond tree. Then said the Lord [Jehovah] unto me, Thou hast well [rightly] seen, for I will hasten 13[be wakeful (Germ., wacker) concerning] my word, to perform it. And the word of the Lord [Jehovah] came unto me the [a] second time, saying, What seest thou? And I said, I see a seething [boiling] pot, and the face thereof Isaiah 14 toward [from] the north. Then the Lord [Jehovah] said unto me, Out of the north an evil [calamity] shall break forth upon all the inhabitants of the land. 15For lo, I will call all the families of the kingdoms of the north, saith the Lord [Jehovah]; and they shall come, and they shall set every one his throne [seat] at the entering of the gates of Jerusalem, and against all the walls thereof round 16about, and against all the cities of Judah. And I will utter my judgments against them7 touching [for] all their wickedness, who8 [because they] have forsaken me, and have burned9 incense [sacrifice] unto other gods, and worshipped the works10 of their own hands.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
In general this section is the continuation of Jeremiah’s induction into the prophetic office, commenced in the previous section. This continuation consists in this, that the Lord at once causes the prophet to make a little trial or exercise in prophetic vision, in which he shows him not only the manner, but the main purport of the prophetic vision and announcement, i.e. the programme in outline of his prophetic ministry. The two sections thus stand in the closest reciprocal relation. Whether we are to assume an interval of time between them, is not clear from the text, which however does not forbid the supposition of a very brief interim.
Jer_1:11. Moreover … rod of an almond tree. The question, “What seest thou?” is found not only here, in Jer_1:13; Jer_24:3, but also in Amo_7:8; Amo_8:2; Zec_4:2; Zec_5:2. It is the object of the inquirer to assure himself that the person addressed has rightly seen, which thus presupposes a certain difficulty, as well as importance, in seeing correctly. Apart from the objective difficulty of always perceiving the object shown, which we meet with, ex. gr., in Amo_8:2; Zec_5:2; the subjective ability of beholding visions, the seeing power of the inner eye, as it were, had to be tested. שָׁקֵד is the almond (Gen_43:11; Num_17:8; Ecc_12:5). The word comes from שָׁקַד, vigilavit. What the cock is among domestic animals the almond is among trees. It awakes first from the sleep of winter: “floret omnium prima mense Januario, Martio vero poma maturat,” says Pliny, Hist. Nat. L. XVI. c. 25.—The LXX have βακτηρίαν καρυΐνην, baculum nuceum. It is questionable whether by this they wished to designate a nut-tree-staff (with a hint at the sweet kernel in a bitter shell, as Theodoret and Ambrose suppose, the latter in Epist. ad Marcellinam sororem, the 41st in the Bened. Ed.). For, according to Heraclius Ephesius (κάρυα ε̇κάλουν καὶ τὰς ἀμυγδάλας, etc.), Hesychius (καρύας̇ ἀμυγδάλας καὶ καστάνους) and others (see Drusiusad h. l. cfr.Passow:κάρυον, every kind of nut), βακτηρία καρυΐνη may also mean an almond-tree-staff, as the LXX also translate Gen_30:37, מַקַּל לוּז by ῥάβδος καρυΐνη (לוּז is however the proper word in Hebrew and the dialects for almond-tree. See Arnold in Herzog, Real-Enc. Art. Mandelbaum), and in Gen_43:11, at least the Cod. Vatic has κάρυα for שְׁקֵדִים, while the Cod. Alex. renders this word by ἀμύγδαλα.—But although the language allows the meaning of “almond” for שָׁקֵד, it has not been universally admitted here. Bugenhagen, ex. gr. translates baculum alacrem or virgam vigilantem, and expressly excludes the idea of an almond tree. For in another reference he makes this remarkable declaration; “Qui in hebraico nunc superstitiosius sua puncta (quæ tamen sciunt olim non fuisse) sequuntur, faciunt hoc loco: baculum amygdalinum. Sed si hoc placet ipsis, cur non postea faciunt etiam sic: bene vidisti, quia ego amygdalabor ad verbum meum” Most commentators admit the idea of “almond-tree” in שָׁקֵד, they differ only in this that some express this idea in the translation as that which is in reality the only one befitting the word, while the others for the sake of the similarity with the following שֹׁקֵד prefer the radical signification (vigilare). The latter again are distinguished into those who take שֹׁקֵד=שָקֵד in the substantive sense, “watchman” (so Calvin:baculus vigilis;Œcolampad.: the watchman club), and those who retain the adjectival signification (vigilans, alacer).—The endeavor to recommend the latter meaning by the explanation, “virga viglians pro minaci, incumbente, instar destricti gladii vibrata” (Zwingli) is wrecked on the difficulty of a rod alone, without an arm to raise it or an object over which it is held, being recognized as vigilans. If on the other hand the staff be recognized by the prophet as an almond-tree staff, not only is (his explicable but the subsequent explanation is connected easily and naturally with the idea of an almond-tree. Ewald has made the thought clear by the translation; A watch-staff of elder, for I will watch, etc.—Theodoret says, long-suffering is a sleep (Psa_44:24; Psa_78:65); watchfulness for vengeance an awaking. That He will not sleepily delay, but will be fresh and watchful to own by speedy fulfilment the word spoken by the mouth of His prophet,—this is what God says to the fearful, hesitating Jeremiah for his comfort and encouragement. But is מַקֵּל שָׁקֵד a branch with twigs and leaves, or a stick stripped of leaves, such as is used for walking with or striking? Many, like Starke and Rosenmueller, favor the former view. They appeal to the circumstance that otherwise the staff would not be recognized as from an almond-tree. Others, as Kimchi, Vatable, Seb. Schmid, Venema, Gaab, decide for the latter, being only not agreed whether the staff is to be understood as being a pilgrim’s staff, a shepherd’s staff, or a stick for beating. I accept the latter view, and take the staff to be a threatening rod of castigation, for the following reasons: 1. Although Gesenius and Fuerst derive מַקֵּל from the root בקל which in Ethiopic, Arabic and Syriac has the meaning of “to sprout, shoot forth,” the word in Hebrew never has the signification of a fresh, green, leafy branch (not even in Jer_48:17, which passage-is adduced by Fuerst), but always that of a stick or staff, and therefore agrees at least in signification with baculus, βακτηρία. The Hebrew expressions for a fresh branch are מַטֶה (Eze_19:11 sqq.), ,עָנָף ,שׂנָךְ סְעִיף ,עֲבוֹת. 2. The connection requires that an instrument of chastisement be meant. The expositors have pointed with justice to the climax: rod—boiling pot. “Qui noluerint percutiente virga emendari, mittentur in ollam æneam atque succensam,” says Jerome. But a leafy branch is not an instrument of punishment.—The objection that the prophet would not then be in a condition to recognize the staff as from an almond-tree is unfounded. He might be able to do this even if we had reason to suppose that a dry almond tree was shown him. To distinguish between different kinds of dry wood is not difficult for a half-informed man. We must imagine a staff stripped indeed of leaves and adapted for striking, but yet fresh, unbarked and sappy. Since it is just in its being fresh and full of sap that the point lies, we may certainly presume that it was an almond rod in this stage that was shown to the prophet. Perhaps the recognition was facilitated by the circumstance that the vision occurred at a time when the sap had just commenced to flow in the almond tree.
Jer_1:12. Then said Jehovah …to perform it.Venema remarks on this verse: “Visum eo tendit, ut propheta experimentum suæ aptitudinis ad munus propheticum caperet.—Bene vidisti: capax ergo es visionum propheticarum.” There seems to be some truth in this. In the other passages where the formula, What seest thou? occurs it is without the Thou hast well seen of confirmation. When it is here said to Jeremiah after his first vision there is certainly something encouraging in the fact, and it may not incorrectly be referred to the apprehension of incapacity expressed by the prophet in Jer_1:6. At the same time it corroborates what has been remarked on שָׁקֵד. If it were a leafy twig, thou hast well seen appears to be superfluous, for there would have been no skill in distinguishing it—I will be wakeful, etc. Comp. Jer_31:28, where the Lord refers expressly to this passage. The paronomasia is the same as between קָרִץ and קֵץ (Amo_8:2).—Observe that we have דְּבָרִי and not דְּבָֽרְךָ. The word which the prophet has to proclaim is that of God, who will not allow His own word to be dishonored. The prophet need not be anxious either about its impression on the hearts of men or about the verification of his threatenings and promises; both will verify themselves. Comp. Heb_2:1; Isa_55:11.
Jer_1:13. And the word …from the north. This second vision is closely related to the first, both as to form and matter, we are therefore not to suppose a long pause between them. In form this vision is like the first, but in matter it forms a climax, since, as already remarked, the boiling pot in relation to the simple rod of castigation appears to be an emblem of an extreme fury of anger. There is also a progress here, in that the second vision, with the explanation attached, plainly expresses why, how and by whom the judgment should be inflicted upon Judah. Thus far Jer_1:13-16 present an outline of the whole prophecy of Jeremiah, for the whole book is no more than a development of the great thought here expressed: Judgment upon Judah by a people coming from the north; and the consolatory portions are but exceptions, like single rays of light in the prevailing darkness of the picture.—A boiling pot, etc. Etymologically it is a pot blown upon, i.e., a pot brought to boiling by blowing the fire. Comp. דּוּד נָפוּחַJob_41:11. The idea of Brenz, that סִיר is here to be taken as =spina(spina, quæ in die iræ Domini ab igne hujus succenditur) is refuted by the singular. We should then expect סִירִים. Comp. Isa_34:13; Hos_2:8; Nah_1:10; Ecc_7:6, in which place the word is used in both meanings. The seething pot is an emblem among the Arabs of warlike fury. Comp. Rosenmueller, ad. h. l. Most expositors understand by the pot here the theocracy. The Chaldeans are then the fire inflamed to a violent heat, which boils the Jews in the pot (comp. Eze_11:3; Eze_11:7; Eze_11:11; Eze_22:20), and that which foams over is the inhabitants driven out of the holy land. So, ex. gr., says Œcolampadius: “Hierusalem ollæ vel lebetï comparatur (ussgesotten Haffen) in qua carnales homines per ignem coquantur, ut quasi spuma ebulliantur per fervorem.” But they have been led by the general similarity of these passages in Ezekiel to overlook the difference. There the pot, with the flesh in it and that which is to come out of it, as well as the fire, are expressly distinguished from each other. In reference to our passage Venema has correctly remarked: “Nihil hic de igne, nihil de folle et sufflatione aliunde orta; simpliciter memoratur olla sufflata, quæ est olla in tumorem erecta et effervescens.” And the prophet certainly sees nothing more than a pot, boiling and foaming from the north. So that this itself is presented as the instrument of the severer punishment, and therefore symbolizes the Chaldeans. So Bugenhagen (“olla malum per Chaldæos et Assyrios Judæis paratum”), Venema (“olla representat regnum Chaldæum sub Nebucadnezare et vasta molimina coquens, et summe sese efferens, simul iratum et ad omnia absorbenda paratum”). With the opposite view of the pot is closely connected the incorrect interpretation of וּפָנָיו מִפְנֵי צָפוֹגָה. If we understand by the pot the Jewish people, and imagine this placed over a burning fire, which, though not expressly mentioned, we assume to be the Chaldeans, then it is natural to view פָנִים as the side of the pot turned towards the fire. But it is not the side turned towards the fire, but towards the prophet. For in the first place in the vision there is no fire, so that פָנִים could denote only the front of the pot, supposing it had one. It would, secondly, be difficult to show that the pot (or kettle, as some translate) had a side which could be expressly marked as the front. Thirdly, if the opposite view were correct we should read אֵל פְנֵי צּ not מִפְנֵי צּ. For the prophet certainly sees the pot from his standpoint as in the north. If now we say that the pot was placed against a fire burning on its northern side, the prophet from his southern standpoint would certainly be unable to see the side towards the fire. I know that frequently in Hebrew the terminus a quo is put where we should use the terminus in quo or in quem (comp. Naegelsb.Heb. Gram., 2d Ed., S. 228), but this mode of expression is applicable only when the object in question presents itself from just that point, at which it is according to our conception of it or towards which it is moving. In the present case, however, the side turned away from the prophet and not visible to him would be designated as that which is presenting itself to him (from the north). We therefore take פָנִים as the side turned towards and displayed to the prophet, whence according to a frequent idiom (comp. Num_8:2; Exo_28:25; Ex. 40:44) it is designated as the face of the pot, and on this account also no further emphasis is to be laid on it. It is merely the visible side as opposed to the invisible; and we therefore translate simply “and it looks from the north.” The He locale in צפנה, as in several cases after prepositions, does not serve to indicate the direction more definitely, Isa. 15:10, 21, בַּנֶּגְבָּה and מִבָבֶלָהJer_27:16, but here as in לַיְלָה appears to have lost its significance as a particle and to be in transition to a mere phonetic substantive termination.
Jer_1:14. Than Jehovah said … the inhabitants of the land.From the north is a general and indefinite expression, and it remains so to the prophet until a great historical event renders it sharply defined. Until the battle of Carchemish a people from the north only is spoken of (Jer_4:6; Jer_6:1; Jer_6:22; Jer_10:22), after the battle this people appears distinctly as the Chaldeans under Nebuchadnezzar (Jer_25:9, etc). This settles the question whether by this northern nation the Chaldeans or Scythians were meant. All the older expositors held the former view. After Eichhorn’s example (Heb. Proph. II. 9), Von Bohlen (Gen. S. 165), Dahler (Jérémie II. 81), Ewald (Proph. d. A. B. 1, S. 361, 373; II., S. 9; Gesch. Isr. III. 392), Bertheau (Gesch. d. Isr. S. 361), Hitzig and others in general, as Rösch says (Zeitschr. d. morg. Ges. XV., S. 536) “pretty nearly all exegetical authorities,” maintain the latter. Without wishing to oppose that which Adolph Strauss (Vatt. Zephanjæ, S. XV.), Tholuck (Die Proph. u. ihre Weiss., S. 94), and Graf (D. proph. Jer. erklärt, S. 16) have urged in favor of the older view, especially from the circumstance that the incursion of the Scythians was made at least five years before the public appearance of our prophet, I am still of opinion, that Jeremiah could have had neither the Scythians, nor the Chaldeans, nor any other people definitely in mind. He saw only this much, that a northern people would visit Judah as the rod of divine discipline. What people this would be, or rather what people all the families of the kingdoms of the earth would unite under their leadership, he knew not. He learned this first, as we have said, from the decisive turn. given by the battle of Carchemish. We shall see when we come to consider the respective passages that where he characterizes this unknown people more particularly (comp. Jer_4:11; Jer_5:15; Jer_6:22; Jer_10:22; Jer_13:20) his description suits the Chaldeans, and that afterwards when he names them (Jeremiah 25.) he is not conscious of correcting an error. Comp. Graf, S. 17, etc.—We thus come to the question, how can Jeremiah call the Chaldeans a northern people, since Babylon lay to the east or southeast of Palestine? We are not to expect an exact localization here, since, as we have said, Jeremiah has no definite people in view. The origin of the Chaldeans in the Koordish mountains (J. D. Michaelis), the extension of the Babylonian kingdom to the north and the connection with it of the Medes and Assyrians (Œcolampadius, Grotius, and others) are not to be urged as reasons for this expression of the prophet. He knows only that they will come against Jerusalem from the north over Dan and the mountains of Ephraim (Jer_4:15; Jer_8:16). At the same time it was determined that these enemies belonged to the dominion not of a southern, but of a (in relation to this) northern empire, for which reason, after he had recognized the Chaldeans, the prophet does not cease to designate them as coming from the north; Jer_25:9, coll. Eze_26:7.—Shall break forth, etc. Jer_1:14-16 contain the interpretation of the second vision, Jer_1:14 giving its general import. פתח is used only of the opening of a closed gate, but metaleptically of the dismission or exclusion of what was enclosed by it, whether in bonam partem, ex. gr. of prisoners (Isa_51:14; Job_12:14), or in malam partem of a calamity, as here. Zwingli remarks on this passage: “hac metalepsi ‘aperiri pro prodire’ non temere utuntur Latini, sed pro ‘prodere’ frequentius.” [Henderson: “Though more to the east than to the north of Judea, the Hebrews always represent the Babylonians as living in, or coming from, the north, partly because they usually appropriated the term east to Arabia Deserta, stretching from Palestine to the Euphrates, and partly because that people, not being able to cross the desert, had to take a northern route when they came against the Hebrews, and always entered their country by the northern frontier.”—S. R. A.]
Jer_1:15. For lo … the cities of Judah. In this verse the general idea רָעָה is more exactly defined. The calamity will consist in this that the Lord will call all the kingdoms of the north against Judah. But all is not to be emphasized. It is only meant that the (in relation to Egypt) northern empire will come with its whole force upon Judah. The expression “and they shall set every one his throne,” etc., is very variously explained. Calvin understands it as the arrangement for a permanent residence (“ut consideant tanquam domi suæ”) which is entirely unsuited to the connection. Others understand by the throne the seat of the general, from which orders are issued as well as judgments. The latter have been referred either to the hostile soldiers (so, ex. gr., Seb. Schmid), or to Judah (Starke, J. D. Michaelis, “describuntur ut assessores ejus judicii, quod v. seq. informatur”). The reference to the hostile soldiery does not agree with the context, the reference to Judah is in so far unsuited that a throne for the purpose of judging a city, is set not before the gates, but within the conquered city. I therefore concur with Venema, Rosenmueller, Maurer and others in the view, that the seat here is only a seat for sitting upon, and that to sit down before a city is simply to besiege it, as in Latin obsidere, and as the French say mettre le siége devant une ville. The phrase אִישׁ כִּסְאו expresses that Jerusalem will be surrounded by many such seats. They will be set especially before the gates of Jerusalem (פֶתַח prepositive, as Gen_18:1; Gen_19:11, etc.) because it is the metropolis and because the siege is directed against the gates, as the approaches to it. From the principal stations before the gates of the capital the attack may be directed not only against the walls of Jerusalem, but against the other cities of the land.
Jer_1:16. And I will utter … their own hands. These words designate the visitation threatened in the preceding verses as a divine judgment, and name also the guilt which has brought such a judgment upon Judah. The expression דַּבֵר מִשְׁבָּטִים אֵת פ signifies to discuss rights with any one, i. e, to dispute (causam agere) between those who have equal rights (Jer_12:1), and partly as a judge with the accused (Jer_4:12; Jer_39:5). The expression here has the suffix of a definite person, which signifies that the case is not one of reciprocal rights, but entirely of the rights of the Lord, for the infraction of which the people are here called to account.
This discussion of the Lord with the people is not to take place in words, but by the judgment announced in the previous verses. [“The idea conveyed by the LXX is somewhat different, and I believe that it is what the original words mean, λαλήσω πρὸς αὐτοῦς μετὰ κρίσεως—I will speak to them with judgment. The original literally is, ‘I will speak my judgments to them;’ that is, I will not speak words but judgments.—The verse may be thus rendered—‘And I will speak by my judgments unto them,’ etc.” Calvin’sComm. I., 58. Tr’s note.—S. R. A.]
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
1. In form both of these visions are objective symbols, in distinction from verbal symbols (parables, tropes, etc.) and from types. The prophetic element is essential to the latter, but not to symbols. The almond-tree staff is only an objective expression of the truth that the Lord is early awake to verify His truth. The seething pot also is only an actual representation of the judgment which is threatening Judah. The circumstance that this is future is not essential. While the type represents a future fact the symbol is only the emblematic expression of a speech, and may refer to the present, the past or the future.—It may be remarked that the older theologians used the expression theologia symbolica in a triple sense, (a) = theologia mystica, kabbalistica (comp. Budde, Inst. Dogm. p. 186), (b) = theology of the confessions or creeds, (c) as correlative to revelatio symbolica, i.e. revelation imparted by bodily signs, in opposition to revelatio simplex, which passes internally from spirit to spirit (comp. Budde S. 25, etc., and Starke, in loc).—Concerning the Biblical symbols, comp. Zöckler, Theologia naturalis, S. 200. [Fair-bairn’s Typology, passim. “Here is a beautiful type of the Resurrection, especially the Resurrection of Christ. ‘Virga Aaron quæ putabatur emortus, in Resurrectione Domini floruit’ (S. Jerome).” Wordsworth.—S. R. A.]
2. It may be asked whether the alacritas, vigilantia, assiduitas, diligentia Dei does not claim to be regarded as a special quality in opposition to the somnolentia, inertia, pigritia of men. The answer must be in the negative. In the conception of the absolute Spirit, who is at the same time the absolute life, the material basis is given for this vigilantia or diligentia as truly as holiness, love, faithfulness, wisdom serve for the formal (ethical and intellectual) basis: He that keepeth Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps. Psa_121:4.
3. The justice of God demands the satisfaction of His wounded honor (Isa_42:8). The divine wisdom in connection with omniscience selects the instruments and fixes the time and manner of the judgment.
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
1. [On Jer_1:12. “Prophets have need of good eyes; and those that see well shall be commended, and not those only that speak well.” M. Henry.—S. R. A.]
God’s justice Isaiah , 1. long-suffering: at first it uses only the rod (Rom_2:4); 2. recompensing zealously and severely: when the gentle chastisement is without result, it becomes a consuming fire (Exo_20:5; Psa_7:12; Heb_10:31). [Ambrose on Psalms 38, quoted by Wordsworth.—S. R. A.]
2. [On Jer_1:16. Maurice:—“We perceive as much from the words of the prophet as from the history, that this idolatry has now become deep and radical.—The state of mind which was latent in them and which they brought forth into full, conscious activity, is represented as an apostate state; not so much an adoption of false gods as a denial of the true. There is a great practical difference between the frivolous, heartless taste for foreign novelties, which was denounced by the earlier prophets, and the utter incapacity for acknowledging a God not appealing to the senses, which Jeremiah discovers in his contemporaries. He boldly sets up the faith of the heathen as a lesson to the Israelites, Jer_2:10-11.”—S. R. A.]
Footnotes:
[7]Jer_1:16.—The form אוֹתָם for אִתָּם is frequent in Jer_2:35; Jer_4:12; Jer_12:1. Comp. Naegelsb. Gr. § 55, 3, Anm.
[8]Jer_1:16.—אשׁר before זזזריּיי refers to the suffix in ריזחח and since it is to be regarded as explicative, introducing a more particular definition of רָעָה, we may translate it by: that, that namely. Moreover רעה here refers to the same expression in Jer_1:14.
[9]Jer_1:16.—ויקטרו. This Piel is frequently synonymous with the Hiphil הִקְטִיר. (Comp. 1Ki_3:3; 1Ki_11:8 with 1Ki_22:44; 2Ki_22:17 with 2Ch_24:25 Chethibh) in the wider sense of offering in general. (Comp. Graf in loc.)—That Jeremiah also uses the Piel in the wider sense seems to follow from the fact that he uses it almost exclusively,—every where indeed with the exception of two places (Jer_33:18; Jer_48:35), where it was proper to use the official terminus technicus. But it is not clear whether the Piel in Jeremiah has the wider meaning, in consequence of a grammatical confusion of the Hiphil with the Piel, or of a rhetorical denominatio a potiore.
[10]Jer_1:16.—מעשׂי, the plural, is found again only Jer_44:8, the singular Jer_25:6-7; Jer_32:30; 2Ki_22:17; coll. 2Ch_34:25.
c. Repetition of the Commission and Promise as the basis of the impregnable defensive position of the Prophet
Jer_1:17-19
17Thou therefore gird up thy loins, and arise and speak unto them all that I [shall] command thee: be not dismayed [confounded] at their faces, lest I confound 18thee before them. For, behold, I have made [make] thee this day a defenced city, and an iron pillar and brazen walls11 against the whole land, against12 the kings of Judah, against2 the princes thereof, against2 the priests thereof and 19against2 the people of the land. And they shall [may] fight against thee, but they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee, saith the Lord [Jehovah], to deliver thee.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
In these concluding verses the general purport of section (a) is first repeated: Jer_1:17 from speak to faces, and the conclusion of ver 19, reproducing the conclusion of Jer_1:7-8. On the basis of this promise (comp. For I am with thee, Jer_1:19), however, the prophet is assured, in antithesis to the offensive position commanded in Jer_1:9-10, of an equally strong defensive position, and this is the new and characteristic element of this concluding section.
Jer_1:17. Thou therefore … before them. A summons to set vigorously to work. The servant of God must be neither cowardly nor slothful. The expression, “gird up the loins,” is frequently used in a proper as well as in a figurative sense; 1Ki_18:46; 2Ki_4:29; 2Ki_9:1; Job_38:3; Eccles. 31:17; Luk_12:35; Eph_6:14; 1Pe_1:13.—Be not dismayed forms a climax in relation to Be not afraid, Jer_1:8, as in Deu_1:21; Jos_10:25.—תֵּחַת and מִפְּגֵיהֶם ,אֲחִתְּךָ and לִפְּיֵיהֶם correspond. [This play upon words may be expressed in English thus: “Be not dumbfounded before them, lest thou be confounded before them.”—S. R. A.] Many commentators have hesitated at rendering the Hiphil of חָתַת in the primary sense of “frangere, to break to pieces.” They have thought the threatening would be too severe, “erigendus erat animus persuasione incolumitatis non minis ac metu frangendus,” says Schnurrer They therefore take either פֶן in a reduced and grammatically inadmissible sense (Bugenhagen: quasi te terream;Starke, “I should terrify thee;” Grotius: nec enim timere te faciam;Schnurrer supplies לֵאמרֹ = putans concessurum me esse, ut tibi sit pereundem), or they understand the verb in the meaning which certainly pertains to the word, “to make afraid.” But what sense is therein this rendering: “Be not afraid before them, lest I make thee afraid before them”? (Œcolamp., Maurer, Ewald). If the prophet was afraid before his enemies he did not need to be rendered still more so. I take הֵחַת, with most commentators, in the sense frangere, conterere, which it has in the radical signification of the Kal.—to be broken in pieces, crushed (see Fuerst), and which it undoubtedly has in such passages as Isa_9:3. The threatening is not too severe. Comp. 1Co_9:16, “For though I preach the Gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel.” From this we see that the inward pressure which a man of God feels in consequence of the divine operation is very strong. He who should resist this divine impulse, like Jonah, would be crushed by it. And it would be the just punishment of that faint-hearted disdain, which would reject such high honor from a miserable fear of man.
Jer_1:18. For behold … the people of the land. I is emphatic in antithesis to thou, Jer_1:17. Thou gird up thy loins and do thy part, I will do mine, to protect thee. In the words “a defenced city and an iron pillar and brazen wall,” the prophet is assured that for the difficult offensive commission which is given him he will receive a sufficient defensive equipment. Offence and defence stand in exact relation to each other. Reference is afterwards made to this promise, in Jer_15:20-21. Comp. Psa_105:15.—On the subject-matter comp. Mat_10:18-19.—people of the land. This expression occurs frequently in the sense of “the common people”: Jer_34:19; Jer_37:2; Jer_44:21; Jer_52:6; Eze_7:27, &c. It is the basis of the later Rabbinical usage according to which it signifies the “unlearned and ignorant” (Act_4:13) comp. Buxtorf. Lex Rabb. s. v. עַם.
Jer_1:19. And they shall fight … to deliver thee. יָכֹל with לְ in the sense of prævalere, Gen_32:26; 1Sa_17:9; Oba_1:7; Jer_38:22.—For I am with thee, comp. Jer_1:8.
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
1. It is fundamentally the same sin, to labor in the Lord’s vineyard without a calling, and not to be willing to labor when one has been called, for in both cases a man seeks his own, not that which is God’s.
2. “He who fears nothing and hopes nothing may preach the truth. He who is unequal to either of these two will act more wisely for his own repose and more honorably for the truth, if he keep silence.”—Dr. Leidemit.
3. Behold I send you forth as lambs among wolves. Luk_10:3; Mat_10:16 sqq. God’s strength is made perfect in weakness. 2Co_12:9.
4. Fear not those who kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul. Rather fear Him who can destroy both soul and body in hell. Mat_10:28. God is no respecter of persons. Rom_2:11; Eph_6:9; 1Pe_1:17.
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
1. Duty and privilege of the sevants of God. 1. Their duty: (a) always to have their loins girded, (b) to proclam without fear of man whatever the Lord commands. 2. Their privilege:—through the power of God to be obliged to yield to no power on earth.
2. The Lord’s requirements and promise to His servants. 1. The requirement, (a) to be always ready for His service, (b) to accomplish that which is bidden without delay. 2. The promise: (a) that the Lord will be with them, (b) that no earthly power will conquer them. [M. Henry: “He must be quick—Arise, and lose no time; he must be busy—Arise, and speak unto them, in season, out of season; he must be bold—Be not dismayed at their faces.—In a word he must be faithful; it is required of ambassadors that they be so. In two things he must be faithful. 1. He must speak all that he is charged with. He must forget nothing—Every word of God is weighty. He must conceal nothing for fear of offending. 2. He must speak to all that he is charged against. Two reasons why he should do this. 1. Because he had reason to fear the wrath of God, if he should be false. 2. Because he had no reason to fear the wrath of man, if he were faithful.”—S. R. A.]
Footnotes:
[11]Jer_1:18.—[Henderson: “Instead of the plural חֹמוֹת, walls, the singular חֹמַה, wall, is found in twelve of De Rossi’s MSS.; it has been originally in seven more, and is now in two by correction. It is likewise in five ancient editions, and occurs in the defective form without the Vau in a great number of MSS. and editions. The LXX., Targ., Syr. and Vulg. all read in the singular. This form further commends itself on the ground of its being the less usual, but at the same time more appropriate in application to a singular subject.”—S. R. A.]
[12]Jer_1:18.—לְ is a feebler continuation of ַעל. Comp. Jer_3:17; Ps. 33:28. Naegelsb. Gram. § 112, 8.
Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures (Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical), ed. John Peter Lange, English translation edited by Philip Schaff (1864–1880) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Daniel D. Whedon 1874 · Public Domain THE SUPERSCRIPTION, Jer_1:1-3.
THE SUPERSCRIPTION, Jer_1:1-3.
The first three verses constitute the general heading of the book. The time described does not cover the whole period of Jeremiah’s life, but rather that of his principal influence on the fortunes of the theocracy. Jehoahaz and Jehoiachin are omitted from the list of kings because of their insignificance.
Read full note →
1. Words — Speeches or discourses. — Most of the prophetical books commence with the title “The word of God;” but those of Jeremiah and Amos are called the “words” of these prophets. For this two reasons have been given: 1) These books contain, along with prophecy, much historical matter; 2) The whole books are historical; even the prophecies being a written record of what was at first delivered in the form of oral discourses. Such matter is in Hebrew often called “words.” See marginal note 1Ki_11:41; 1Ch_29:29.
Son of Hilkiah — See Introduction.
Anathoth — A city lying one and one fourth hours northeast from Jerusalem, according to Robinson; or three miles, according to Eusebius. This place is first mentioned in Jos_21:18. “Men of Anathoth” were among those who returned from the captivity. Ezr_2:23; Neh_7:27. It was a priests’ city and had “suburbs.” Jos_21:18; 1Ch_6:60. It would hence appear that the place was not without consequence; and combining, as it did, what is best in the life of the city and the country, it doubtless contained the ripest fruits of Jewish culture. The conditions there were favourable for producing the great representative man of this period.
Daniel D. Whedon (gen. ed.), Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1874–1909) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges 1878 · Public Domain 1. Jeremiah] For the meaning of the name, see…
1. Jeremiah] For the meaning of the name, see Intr. ch. 1 § 2 (a).
the son of Hilkiah] The small number of proper names among the Jews made it necessary to add the father’s name for purposes of distinction. Compare the Welsh custom ap-Thomas, ap-Richard, etc. If we were to render it by Ben-Hilkiah we should no longer be in danger of connecting the words that follow with Hilkiah rather than with the name of the prophet himself.
Read full note →
Anathoth] See Intr. ch. 1 § 2 (c).
Benjamin] The territory of this tribe was 26 miles in length by 12 in breadth, and was thus about the size of the county of Middlesex. It was bounded on the south by Judah, on the north by Ephraim, and was for the most part hilly, being crossed by deep ravines which, mounting from the Philistine country on the west, descend precipitously into the valley of the Jordan on the east. The tribe of Benjamin is noteworthy as having supplied the first of the Jewish kings, as well as his namesake “Saul, who is also called Paul,” the great Apostle of the Gentiles.
Ch. Jer_1:1-3. Title
The Title is a composite one: Jer_1:2 probably was intended simply to date the prophet’s call, while Jer_1:3 was added later to indicate that his activity was continued during subsequent reigns (though some of his utterances were delivered after the breaking up of the kingdom, see Intr. i. § 17). The first verse then is the general title of the Book or of some substantial part of it.
The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (gen. ed. J. J. S. Perowne; Cambridge University Press, 1878–1918) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers 1878 · Public Domain (1-3) The first three verses contain the title prefixed…
I.
(1-3) The first three verses contain the title prefixed to the collection of prophecies by some later editor. This title would seem, from its unusual fulness, to have received one or more additions—Jer_1:1 giving the general title, Jer_1:2 the commencement of Jeremiah’s prophetic work, Jer_1:3 the period of his chief activity and its conclusion. Strictly speaking, indeed, we see from the book itself that his work continued after the beginning of the captivity.
Read full note →
The words of Jeremiah.—The more usual title of prophetic books is “the word of the Lord by the prophet,” but the title of Amos (Amo_1:1) is in the same form as this. The Hebrew for “words” has a somewhat wider connotation than the English, and is translated “acts” in 1Ki_11:41; 2Ch_33:18.
Hilkiah.—Possibly the high priest of that name (2Ki_22:4; 2Ki_23:4). See Introduction.
Anathoth.—In the tribe of Benjamin, one of the cities assigned to the priests, apparently to the house of Ithamar, to which Abiathar belonged (1Ki_2:26; Jos_21:18; 1Ch_6:60).
That were in Anathoth.—There is no verb in the Hebrew, and the description belongs to Jeremiah individually, not to the priests.
A Bible Commentary for English Readers, edited by Charles John Ellicott (1878–1897) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Pulpit Commentary 1880 · Public Domain Vers. 1-3. There are some indications that the original…
AN ACCOUNT OF THE CALL AND CONSECRATION OF JEREMIAH TO THE PROPHETIC OFFICE, FOLLOWED BY TWO EXPRESSIVE SYMBOLS OF THE MATTERS WHICH HE HAS TO ANNOUNCE.
Vers. 1-3. There are some indications that the original form of the heading has been somewhat modified. Notice
Read full note →
(1) that the words with which ver. 2 opens are identical with one of Jeremiah"s characteristic formulae for introducing a prophecy; (comp, Jer_14:1 Jer_46:1 Jer_47:1 Jer_49:34) and notice
(2) the awkward connection of vers. 1 and 2, and 2 and 3 respectively. (The Septuagint has endeavored to efface this awkwardness in part, and is so far unfaithful to the original record, but probably preserves an earlier form of the opening words, to rhma tou Yeou ). It is a reasonable conjecture that the passage originally ran thus: "The word of the LORD which came to Jeremiah in the days of Josiah," etc.; vers. 1 and 3 being added later, which involved a change in the construction.
The words of Jeremiah. This introductory formula only occurs here and in Amo_1:1. The editor of Jeremiah and of Amos deserts the usual phrase ("burden" or, "utterance," "vision," "the word of the LORD which came," etc.) in order to give fuller information concerning the origin of the prophetic writers (but see on ver. 2). On the name Jeremiah, and on the position occupied by Hilkiah, see Introduction. That were in Anathoth. So Vulgate; Septuagint, however (followed by Payne Smith), makes the relative refer to Jeremiah (ov katwkei ). But in this case would not the phrase have been "Jeremiah the priest," etc.? (comp. Eze_1:1) Anathoth was one of the priestly cities; (Jos_21:18) it lay onor near the great northern road, (Isa_10:30) and has been identified by Dr. Robinson (so also by Lieutenant Conder) with "Anata, situated on a ridge, an hour and a quarter north-northeast from Jerusalem.
Vers. 1-3. On the external surroundings of the life of Jeremiah.
These words, which constitute the preface to the Book of Jeremiah, are evidently intended to furnish a historical setting for the writings of the prophet. But they also throw light on his character and work. For, though the true life of every man is his inner spiritual life, we cannot estimate the worth of this until we have taken account of the circumstances in which it is placed, the aids and the hindrances it receives from without. Let us consider, therefore, the spiritual significance of the main historical surroundings of the work of Jeremiah.
I THE OFFICIAL RELATIONSHIP OF JEREMIAH.
1. Jeremiah had the advantage of being the son of a priest. He had probably received a religious education from his childhood. The religion of his fathers must have been familiar to him. Its solemn rites and suggestive symbols were often before his eyes. Possibly, like St. Paul, who was trained in Jewish theology before he became a Christian, (Gal_1:14) he may have found the Law a schoolmaster to bring him to a higher religion. The children of Christian ministers have peculiar privileges in the early knowledge of Scripture, Church life, etc., which they have opportunities of acquiring.
2. Yet this official relationship of Jeremiah"s had its disadvantages. It was quite exceptional. Not more than three of the prophets were of sacerdotal origin. For the most part the priestly class regarded the prophetic with jealousy, if not with envy.
(1) Officialism is conservative, and opposed to the free and revolutionary spirit of prophecy.
(2) It is also formal, and tends to repress the inward and spiritual experiences of which prophecy is the highest outcome. It speaks well for Jeremiah that the spirit of prophecy was not crushed out of him by the dry traditionalism and the rigid ritualism of his priestly connections.
3. It is noteworthy that the official relationship of Jeremiah was entirely overshadowed by his prophetic mission. He is known to history not as the priest, but as the prophet. Official religious services are quite secondary to spiritual work.
II THE CHARACTER OF THE AGE OF JEREMIAH.
1. Jeremiah entered on his mission in the midst of the reformation of Josiah. Yet the prophet"s work was entirely disconnected from that of the king. Political religious activity is very different from personal spiritual work. Ecclesiastical reforms will not effect spiritual regeneration. The king"s overthrow of the idols does not dispense with the need of the prophet"s call to repentance.
2. Jeremiah continued his mission after the failure of Josiahs reformation and during an age of national decay. The character of the age changed, but the prophet remained unchanged. Weak men may be content to echo the popular cries of the day. It is too often the mission of the servant of God to contradict these familiar voices. The true prophet is not the creature of his age, the mouthpiece of the Zeit-geist; he is called to resist this influence.
3. Jeremiah closed his mission amidst scenes of national ruin. It was given him to see the fulfillment of his warnings of doom, but not that of his promises of restoration. Hence he is the prophet of tears. Jesus also wept over Jerusalem, but he brought redemption. We should be thankful that we live in these latter times when we can see the realization of the promises of "the Book of consolation.
III THE DURATION OF THE MISSION OF JEREMIAH. It lasted for at least forty years; how many more after the overthrow of Jerusalem we do not know.
1. This fact speaks much for the prophetic power of Jeremiah. Many men can only rouse themselves to one supreme effort. True greatness is as much seen in the continuance of powers as in supreme exhibitions of them.
2. This fact is a grand proof of the faithfulness of the prophet. Almost the whole of his work was done "in opposition." We admire the young martyr who summons up a momentary heroic courage to seal his testimony with his blood; but greater honor is due to the aged confessor who has persevered through a lifelong martyrdom, and, though spared to old age, is also faithful unto death.
3. This fact sheds light on Gods ways with man. Jeremiah commenced his stern prophetic denunciations forty years before the destruction of Jerusalem. This suggests to us
(1) that God mercifully delays the execution of his threats to give man time for repentance; and
(2) that the forbearance of God, which postpones the evil day, does not frustrate the justice which must ultimately bring it upon the impenitent.
HOMILIES BY S. CONWAY On Jeremiah"s ministry in general.
"It is sufficient," said our Savior, "that the disciple be as his Lord." Now, of all his servants few answered more closely to this description than did the prophet Jeremiah. In a very deep and real sense his life was a type of our Lord"s. It is in the spiritual world as in the natural, a close resemblance exists between the separate parts and the entire organism to which they belong. The root, stem, bud, flower, fruit, and seed are each constructed on the same type as the tree itself. However widely diversified they may seem in form or function, their essential nature is the same. Hence every leaf is a miniature of the tree on which it grows; trunk, branches, foliage, are each patterned in it. And likewise every branch is but a reproduction on a smaller scale of the whole tree. (MacMillan) But this is only what we find constantly exemplified in the spiritual world. What miniature lives of Christ are those of men like Joseph, Moses, David, and many more! And amongst such as are illustrious in this respect stands Jeremiah. Like him, the consciousness of the Divine call was with him from childhood. (cf. Luk_2:49 and Jer_1:6) He too was persecuted with murderous hate by his own townsmen. As Christ was driven from Nazareth, so was Jeremiah from his native Anathoth. (Jer_12:6) His vehement denunciations of the corrupt priests and prophets of his day remind us of the reiterated woes pronounced by our Lord on the scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites," of his day. Like our Lord, Jeremiah also was the prophet who stood nearest to and told most plainly of the dread catastrophe which overwhelmed Jerusalem and her people. Jeremiah was the prophet of Jerusalem"s destruction by the Babylonian Nebuchadnezzar; our Lord of the like destruction by the Roman Titus. Both beheld the glories of the temple, and both told of the swiftly coming days when there should "not be left one stone upon another, which should not be thrown down." The footsteps of him who, beyond all others, was "despised and rejected of men," Jeremiah, in so far as it was possible to him, anticipated. The bitter tears shed by our Savior over impenitent Jerusalem are shadowed forth in the prophet"s prolonged and profound lament over his own idolatrous and disobedient countrymen. His well-known words, "Is it nothing to you all ye that pass by?" uttered concerning the sorrows of Jerusalem and her people, have come to be so universally appropriated to our Lord, that the prophet"s own deep distress which they tell of, and the occasion of that distress, are alike almost if not entirely forgotten. "His sufferings come nearest of those of the whole army of martyrs to those of the Teacher against whom princes, and priests, and elders, and people were gathered together." To him, as to the great apostle, was it given to know "the fellowship of Christ"s sufferings, and to be made conformable unto his death." And we may venture to prolong the parallel, and to apply to Jeremiah the august words which, in their supreme meaning, can belong to but One alone. "Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name." In that high recompense Jeremiah, so far as any servant of God may, shares. For the honor in which his name came to be held was very great. As time rolled on he was regarded as the chief representative of the whole prophetic order. By some he was placed at the head of all the prophets. At the time of the Christian era his return was daily expected. He was emphatically thought to be "the Prophet Prophet like unto Moses," who should close the whole dispensation." No wonder, then, that one devout student after another has been struck by the closeness of the resemblance here briefly pointed out, and has delighted to trace in the prophet"s history foreshadowings of the "Man of Sorrows," who, more than any other, was acquainted with grief. C.
Vers. 1-3. Introductory statements concerning Jeremiah"s parentage and period of his ministry.
I HIS PARENTAGE. He was the son of Hilkiah, not that Hilkiah who was high priest during the reign of Josiah, but of some similarly named priest. Even amid the terrible corruptions of that period, there appear to have been a few faithful souls who held fast to the fear of the Lord. We have their names, Huldah, Shallum, Baruch, etc. From amidst these Jeremiah sprang. The Lord can call and convert and consecrate to his work whom he will; but his more common way is to come to the habitations of his people, when he would find some whom he destines for special and honored service. The homes of the godly are the hope of the Church. Amidst the children of the believing are to be found those whom God will generally employ to carry on his work. This is one way in which the promise is fulfilled, "Them that honor me I will honor.
II HIS PROFESSION. He belonged to the priesthood. Terrible are the charges which are brought against the priests and prophets of that day. They had reached the limit of utmost degradation. They are said to "deal falsely," to be "profane;" and their conduct is described as "a wonderful and horrible thing." Yet Jeremiah belonged to this deeply fallen class. How difficult must have been his position! how constant his resistance to the contagion of their example and influence! When from amongst those who are of the same order, who have common interests, common duties, and who are thrown together in so many and close relationships, one stands aloof and turns upon his companions in severe and solemn rebuke as Jeremiah did, such a one needs to be strong as "a defensed city, and an iron pillar, and brazen walls" (ver. 18) Jeremiah stands before us as a noble proof that the tide of evil, however strongly it may run, may yet be resisted; none are of necessity borne down by it but, by the same grace which was given to Jeremiah, they may stem the fierce current and defy its power. Ten thousand of the saints of God have done this; why should not we?
III THE REASON OF ALL MEN COUNTING HIM AS A PROPHET. "The word of the Lord came unto him." He did not say, "I am a prophet;" but all men felt he was. For his words had power; they were mighty to the pulling down of the strong holds of sin. It was not simply that he announced that there should be a "rooting out and pulling down" (cf. ver. 10), but the words which he spoke so wrought in men"s minds that these results followed. Hence men, conscious of the power of his words, confessed that it was "the word of the Lord" which had come to him. This is the old prophetic word which, whenever spoken, constrains men to confess the presence of God. (cf. 1Co_14:25) And St. Peter (2Pe_1:19) says concerning it, "We have, surer still, the prophetic word." "More sure," he meant, than even the wondrous voice and vision of "the holy mount," for that was but a transient testimony given once and to the three favored apostles of the Lord alone; but the prophetic word, that which woke up the response in men"s hearts, and by which the secrets of each soul were disclosed that was a more constant, more universal, more powerful, and therefore a more sure testimony than aught beside. And the occasions when this "word of the Lord" comes to any of his servants are well known. See how particular and definite the dates are here. "In the thirteenth year of the reign of King Josiah. It came also in the days of Jehoiakim," etc. The coming of the word of the Lord to any soul is a marked and memorable period. He through whom that word is spoken is conscious of an unusual power, he realizes the Divine presence in an altogether unusual manner. He is more passive than active. It is said of the holy men of old, that they "spake as they were moved borne along of the Holy Ghost," and this, St. Peter declares, (2Pe_1:21) is ever a characteristic of the prophetic word. And those who hear the word know that the Lord is speaking through his servant. Listlessness and unconcern give way to serious concern. Some can tell the very day and hour when they first heard the "word of the Lord." They had listened to sermons and read the Scriptures again and again, but one day they felt that the Lord himself was speaking to them, and they could not but give heed. Like as the people of Judah and Jerusalem knew when the voice of God, though they despised it to their ruin, was speaking to them, so do men now. And if we have heard it for our salvation, the time, the place, the speaker, will often be vividly remembered in connection with it, like as those who heard Jeremiah knew the very year when the "word of the Lord came" to him. It is ill for both hearers and speakers alike if they be unable to point to periods when they were conscious that "the word of the Lord" came to them. For a preacher never to realize the sacred glow and the uplifting of soul which accompany the utterance of the prophetic word; or for a hearer to have so dulled his conscience, so destroyed his spiritual ear, that though the word of the Lord be spoken his heart never responds, his soul never realizes the presence of God; from the sin and sorrow of either may God mercifully save us.
IV THE DATE AND DURATION OF JEREMIAH"S MINISTRY. We are told when it began, and how long it lasted. It began when the evil days for Judah and Jerusalem were drawing very near. It was in vain that the devout King Josiah endeavored to turn back the hearts of the people to the Lord God of their fathers. But though the long-suffering of God had been so tried and was now almost ceasing, yet, ere they were given up to the punishment which was their due, God raises up his servant Jeremiah and the band of faithful men who stood by him. (cf. 2Ch_36:15-21) For forty years for that is the period covered by the reigns of the several kings spoken of Jeremiah exhorted, warned, entreated, threatened, prayed, wept; but all in vain. Therefore God"s wrath at length rose against them, and there was no remedy. "Behold the goodness and the severity of God!" How reluctantly will he abandon any to the results of their own ways! how slow is he to let come upon them that which they have long deserved! Yea, he is the long-suffering God. But whilst we fail not to remember and to rejoice in this, let us not fail either to remember and to dread the other equally sure fact, that "God is a consuming fire" to those who set at naught all his counsel, and will have none of his reproof. (Pro_1:24-33) Those to whom Jeremiah prophesied found it so, and so will all who sin in like manner now. C.
HOMILIES BY A.F. MUIR Vers. 1-3. A protracted ministry.
The ministry of Jeremiah attracts attention because of its length, the varied scenes amidst which it was carried on, and the external aspect of failure worn by it from first to last. May there not be in these and other respects a moral attaching to it for those who in distant ages can regard it as a whole, and in connection with the subsequent Divine evolution of events of which it spoke? Contrast it with that of John the Baptist.
I ITS BACKGROUND OF CIRCUMSTANCE. Five reigns: for the most part brief; two of them ridiculously or tragically so. Beginning in a fitful flush of religious enthusiasm, and ending in a long and shameful captivity. Foreign politics were unusually interesting. The Merle-Babylonian overthrow of Syria was about to take place when he began; in the twenty-third year of his ministry Nebuchadnezzar laid the foundation of Baby-Ionian empire in the victory of Carchemish, in which Israel was subdued, and universal rule passed into his hands; the invasion of Judaea followed in four years, and in the eleventh year of Zedekiah Jerusalem was taken. Personally his had been a checkered career. For twenty-two years comparatively obscure; for the most part probably at Anathoth. But towards the end of this period he came to Jerusalem. We find him in the temple; (Jer_7:2) in the gates of the city; (Jer_17:19) in prison; (Jer_32:2) in the king s house; (Jer_22:1 Jer_37:17) and then at times in Egypt. There are two traditions as to his death one that he was stoned by the Jews in their settlement at Tahapanes, in Egypt; the other that Nebuchadnezzar, having in the twenty-seventh year of his reign conquered Egypt, took him and Baruch with him to Babylon. In any case, he probably lived to an extreme age.
II ITS MESSAGE. To warn against idolatry, by exposing its real nature and declaring its consequences. Bat through all and beyond all, to declare the indestructibleness of the kingdom of God, the certain advent of "The Lord our Righteousness," and the ultimate glory and happiness of a redeemed and purified people. Of scarce any other prophet can it be said that his predictions were so absolutely, and to present perception hopelessly future. Yet is his tone on this account none the less believing and confident.
III ITS DIVINE SIGNIFICANCE The "burden" of Jeremiah is identical from reign to reign, although the illustrative and occasioning circumstances vary. May we not say that:
1. The personality of the prophet had a place in the Divine intention? Certain we are that its influence was second only to that of his words, if even to that. His astonishment, sorrow, hope, etc., are all instructive and remarkable.
2. The word of God has to deal with the continuity and development of error, and will outlast it. The best antidote to error is the healthful development of truth. There is no phase of depravity, transgression, or unbelief for which the Word of God has not, in its historic evolution, some doctrine, reproof, correction, or instruction in righteousness. Revealed through human lips and lives by the operation of the Holy Spirit, it is a living, manifold growth, intimately associated with the vicissitudes of that human life it has to correct and redeem. There can never be a time when the gospel will have no word for the inquiring, wondering, suffering, sinning, unbelieving spirit of man.
3. The ministry of the prophet was a visible sign of the Divine long-suffering. "But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people". (Rom_10:21 Isa_65:2) "O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you?". M. (Mat_17:17)
The Pulpit Commentary (1880–1919), ed. H.D.M. Spence-Jones & Joseph S. Exell — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Preacher's Complete Homiletical Commentary 1892 · Public Domain 1. Chronology. Jer_1:1-3, penned cir. B.C. 578; Jer_1:4, sq.…
CRITICAL AND EXEGETICAL NOTES.—
1. Chronology. Jer_1:1-3, penned cir. B.C. 578; Jer_1:4, sq. B.C. 629. But the recently discovered Assyrian chronology would make the date of the “thirteenth of Josiah” to be B.C. 608.
Read full note →
2. Cotemporary Scriptures. 2Ki_22:1-2; 2Ch_34:1-7. Books of Habakkuk and Zephaniah.
3. Historic Facts. Judah tributary to Assur-Banipal, king of Assyria; yet the kingdom at rest: for her northern foe, Assyria, had ceased invasions since Sennacherib’s overthrow (2Ki_19:35-36, B.C. 710); and her southern foe, Egypt, was engrossed and disabled from aggression by intestine wars. Josiah had reigned thirteen years; began religious reformation of Judah B.C. 634; was vigorously prosecuting it when Jeremiah began his prophetic ministry, B.C. 629 (or, according to Assyrian chronology, B.C. 608).
4. Cotemporary History. General outline: International ascendancy had been temporarily with Assyria (cir. 680–640) during the reigns of Esar-Haddon and Assur-Banipal: Saracus saw its overthrow. Judah was tributary to Assyria when Josiah reigned. During the thirty-one years of Saracus, Assyrian power was being undermined by the defection of its chief province, Babylonia, over which Nabopolassar was appointed governor by Saracus, and this at a time when Egypt was consolidating its power under Psammeticus (B.C. 664), and thus menacing Assyria. The Median empire was founded in the sixth year of Josiah’s reign (B.C. 633), by Cyaxares, the Ahasuerus of Dan_9:1. Four years after Jeremiah began his mission (B.C. 625), Babylonia, under Nabopolassar, rose in revolt against Assyria, aided by Cyaxares with his Median forces, took Nineveh, and thereby overthrew the Assyrian domination, and with it the empire, on whose ruins rose the Babylonian empire, Nabopolassar its king. To him Judah’s tributary dependence was now transferred. Egypt, under Psammeticus’ successor, Pharaoh-Necho, then rose against Babylonia, and, by victorious war at Charchemish, claimed a short-lived international ascendancy. [Josiah succeeded by Jehoahaz.] This defeat was soon redressed by Nebuchadnezzar, son and successor to Nabopolassar, in a decisive conquest over Egypt at Charchemish, whereupon he became monarch of the all-powerful Chaldean dynasty. Judah, having been subject to Egypt, was then reduced to vassalage under Chaldean supremacy.
5. Geographical References. Jer_1:1. “Anathoth, in land of Benjamin” (cf. 1Ch_6:60). Situate on or near the great road from the north to Jerusalem (Dr. Smith); = Anâta, 1¼ hour distant N.N.E. of Jerusalem (Robinson). Remains existing of walls and strong foundations. “A poor village of only about twenty houses.”—Dr. Porter. Jer_1:15. “Families of the kingdoms of the North;” denoting the “numerous tribes or smaller nations of which the kingdoms forming the Babylonian empire were composed.” This description is itself a prophecy of the compound elements, the admixture of petty nationalities, which would constitute the (then non-existing, but destined to become) ascendant Chaldean dynasty.
6. Personal Allusions. Jer_1:1. “Jeremiah,” see Introduction, p. 1. “Hilkiah,” idem., also Literary Criticisms below. Jer_1:2. “Amon, king of Judah,” son and successor of Manasseh, reigned two years, B.C. 642–640, killed in a conspiracy (2Ch_33:21-24). “Josiah,” a most religious king (2Ki_23:25). Ascended throne in eighth year, awoke to religious life and divine claims in sixteenth year (2Ch_34:3, B.C. 634), commenced reformation of Judah in twentieth year (B.C. 630), restored Temple services, re-established worship of Jehovah, and cleansed the land of flagrant vice and idolatry. Book of the Law found during Temple restoration. Reigned thirty-one years; during the latter eighteen years Jeremiah prophesied in Jerusalem. Fell in war at Megiddo when resisting Pharaoh–Necho, king of Egypt, in his advance upon Assyria (B.C. 610). Ewald conjectures that Psalms 59. was composed by Josiah during a siege of Jerusalem by Scythians. “Jehoiakim” (see infra), “He was an impious man, and impure in his course of life.”—Josephus. The nation, fearing his despotic character, passed him by, and elected Josiah’s second son, Jehoahaz, as king. But Pharaoh-Necho, returning after three months from Assyria (war at Charchemish), deposed Jehoahaz and enthroned Jehoiakim as dependent king. Reigned eleven years; slain by Nebuchadnezzar, the then all-conquering monarch of Chaldea (B.C. 599). “Zedekiah” (see infra) followed Jehoiachin, son of Jehoiakim, he reigning only three months and ten days. He was the youngest son of Josiah, name Mattaniah; placed on throne by Nebuchadnezzar as his vassal, who named him Zedekiah. “A despiser of justice and duty.”—Josephus. “Not so much bad at heart as weak in will.”—Dr. Smith. In eleventh year of his reign, his Chaldean master ravaged Jerusalem, put out the king’s eyes, and carried him, with the nation, into Babylonian captivity (B.C. 588).
7. Natural History. Jer_1:11. “Rod of an almond-tree.” Luz לוּז, the wild tree (Gen_30:37); shaked שׁקֵד the cultivated, here mentioned: so suggests Rosenmüller. Earliest tree to bloom; in January (Kitto). Resembles peach-tree in leaves and blossoms; bears white flower (allusion made in Ecc_12:5); and almonds, which “in the warm southern latitude mature in March” (Paxton).
8. Manners and Customs. Jer_1:13. “A seething pot,” a large caldron used for cooking purposes (2Ki_4:38; Eze_24:3-5). Jer_1:15. “Set his throne at the entering of the gate.” Inside the gates of Oriental cities wide covered streets or squares were and are found: these were—(a.) places of concourse (Neh_8:1); (b.) of merchandise (2Ki_7:1); (c.) of judicial administration (Deu_16:18; Deu_17:2; Deu_25:7; Amo_5:10; Amo_5:12; Amo_5:15); (d.) of royal judgment (2Sa_19:8; 2Sa_15:2); (e.) of court councils (1Ki_22:10 sq.). Possessing the gate implied dominion (Gen_20:17; Isa_24:12). These words were literally fulfilled; see Jer_39:3. [Refer to “Land and Book,” pp. 26–28.]
9. Literary Criticisms. Jer_1:1-3. “Words of Jeremiah,” &c. The title to the entire book; not merely to Baruch’s roll, which ends with Jehoiakim’s reign (Jer_36:12). Yet Henderson suggests Baruch’s authorship. Michaelis thinks Jeremiah prefixed them to the whole collection of his prophecies ere he gave them to his captive countrymen to carry with them to Babylon. But Lange remarks that the book contains prophecies of later date than Zedekiah (ch. 40–44.), and supposes Jeremiah carried on the writing, under Gedaliah, or in Egypt. Jer_1:1. “Hilkiah of the priests.” Clement Alex., Jerome, Eichhorn, Umbriet, and others, think him the high priest of that name (2Ki_22:4): but Henderson, Wordsworth, Keil, &c., object, for the name was a common one; and the high priest was limited to the line of Eleazar and the house Phinees not Abiathar; and the high priest would live at Jerusalem, not Anathoth; moreover, he would have been “designated by the appellative הַכֹּהֵן הַגָּדוֹל the high priest, or at least הַכֹּהֵן the priest, by way of eminence;” instead “of the priests at Anathoth.” Yet Lange thinks “it is possible, but cannot be proved,” he was Hilkiah who found the “Book of the Law;” while the “Speaker’s Commentary” affirms that beyond a doubt he was the high priest. Jer_1:4. “Then the word;” rather And or Now; a conjunction, not adv. of time. Jer_1:5. “Sanctified thee.” Henderson, “separated from a common to special purpose;” Keil, “consecrated;” but Gesenius points to this passage as illustrating the Piel significance of קָדַשׁ “to declare any one holy.” Jer_1:6. “I cannot speak, for I am a child.” Sharpe translates, “I know not how to speak, for I am a youth.” Keil, “I know not how to speak, for I am too young” (1Ki_3:7). The Rabbins understood by נַצַר a boy in his fourteenth year. Jer_1:11. “A rod of an almond-tree.” Three interpretations of שָקֵד; for here is a noticeable paronomasia; “I see” שָקֵד; “Thou hast well seen, for I will שֹׁקֵד,” &c. Jerome, “a watchful twig;” a twig whose eyes are open, whose buds have burst; denoting God would be “watchful” over His word; it should not fail. Keil, “a wakeful rod,” suggestive of alacrity, haste; for God would quickly perform His word (E. V., “I will hasten my word,” &c.). So also Henderson, rendering שָקַד to be awake, vigilant; so called because the almond-tree wakes earlier than all other trees from the sleep of winter; meaning therefore “God’s determination to execute with all promptitude His threatened judgments.” Kimchi, Lange, Schmidt, and others, render the words “an almond-tree staff;” the reverse of leafy and blossoming; stripped, “a threatening rod of castigation;” urging that an instrument of chastisement is required by the context. “I see a wakeful rod; for I will be swift (alert) to strike.” The event shall follow quick upon the prediction. Jer_1:13. “Face toward north.” Keil, “it looketh hither from the north;” the direction whence would come the “evil;” and being “blown” (נָפוּחַ), will boil over, pouring its contents upon Judah. Among Arabs a steaming pot figures war is preparing. Jer_1:14. “Out of the north,” &c. Not from south—viz., from Egypt, whence disaster was dreaded; but from Chaldea, which as yet showed no menace. All armies marching from the Euphrates towards Palestine entered the land from the north; thus explaining the geographical discrepancy; Chaldea being on the east, not north. Jer_1:17. “Be not dismayed, lest I dismay thee.” Another paronomasia חָתַת, first in Niphil, then in Hiphil. “The Niphil signifies broken in spirit by terror and anxiety; the Hiphil, to throw into terror and anguish.”—Keil. If Jeremiah appeared before his adversaries in terror, then he will have cause to be terrified for them. Sharpe translates, “Be not affrighted at their faces, lest I afright thee before their faces,” for the repetition of the verb חָתַת is followed in each case by פְנֵיהֶם, with prefix מִי at and לְ to or before respectively.
HOMILIES AND OUTLINES UPON SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 1
Section
Jer_1:1-3.
God’s messenger to rebellious Judah.
Section
Jer_1:4-10.
The prophet’s call, consecration, and commission.
Section
Jer_1:11-16.
Premonitory visious.
Section
Jer_1:17-19.
Fearless performance of perilous service.
Jer_1:1-3. Theme: GOD’S MESSENGER TO REBELLIOUS JUDAH
Introduction. Jeremiah’s ministry would prove lengthy and chequered. For forty years in Jerusalem he would sustain the arduous duties of his office, amid the successive reigns of five kings, under each of whom the nation sank to lower stages of decrepitude and vassalage, until at length the ruthless Chaldean forces swept down upon the apostate and impenitent people, and wrought the captivity of Judah, the demolition of Jerusalem, and the desolation of the sacred land.
That so prolonged a period intervened illustrates the Divine forbearance (Psa_103:8; 2Pe_3:9); that God grants lengthened respite, and opportunity to repent and escape, ere He rises to punish. Through “so long a time” He spake unto them by His prophet, if so they would forsake transgression and turn aside the judgments impending.
Yet, however long the interval of respite, the threatened calamities will surely come (2Pe_3:10); and they came “in the eleventh year of Zedekiah, in the carrying away Jerusalem captive” (Jer_1:3).
I. Godly parentage recognised and honoured. “Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah of the priest,” &c.
Besides Jeremiah (and Nathan, 1Ki_4:5, Tholuck), the prophet Ezekiel (Eze_1:3; cf. Josephus, Ant. x. 5, 1), and most probably Zechariah (Jer_1:1, Köhler), were of sacerdotal origin.—Lange.
1. Sacred ancestry Divinely selected. Jeremiah was to be “sanctified” for God’s services even “before birth” (Jer_1:5): it was appropriate that his parents should be holy to the Lord. So John the Baptist (Luk_1:13) and Timothy (2Ti_1:5). This messenger of Jehovah had existence in the Divine mind before he was conceived (Jer_1:4); and his birth into the world was an incident of Divine arrangement. God appreciates, recognises, and honours religious ancestry. Samuel’s dignity, which so greatly honoured Hannah, the reward of her piety and prayers (1Sa_1:27-28; 1Sa_2:1). Solomon also (1Ki_2:1-4 sq.); Esther (Jer_2:5-7; Jer_2:17); and, in a special sense, the Child Jesus (Mat_1:18; Mat_1:23; Luk_1:28; Luk_1:30). Godly parents are not lost sight of by God; and their offspring are objects of His special regard. (See Addenda, “Parentage.”)
2. The child’s birth a home joy (Jer_20:10): “Making him very glad.” Possibly the child was a gift in answer to prayer, and hence the great joy; as with Hannah. Surely his birth was anticipated by prayer, and followed by dedication, as an expression of gladness and gratitude. It was unsuspecting joy, for they knew not to what eminent office, and to what a career of suffering, their son was born. How is a child’s life overshadowed by ignorance and mystery!
3. Honour to the household through the child. Hilkiah had been unknown to history and Christendom but for his son! Who would have heard of the widow Anthusa but for her son Chrysostom? Or of devout Monica but for her son Augustine? Or of the household of the Wesleys but for the boys John and Charles? A child may bring dignity and undying fame to his family and to his birthplace. For Anathoth is thereby raised from obscurity. As is Stratford-on-Avon and Olney, &c. The son may take higher office than his parents (cf. Jer_1:1; Jer_1:5); “prophet” more than a “priest.” Loftier honour to stand and speak for God among men than to appear for men before God. Hereditary social status is not regarded by God (1Sa_2:8).
II. Social seclusion invaded by Divine requirements. The messenger of God was born; in due time God would demand him. Boyhood spent in studious and reverent pursuits. His scriptural knowledge gained during those years; his prophecies show accurate acquaintance with the law. At length, to the quíet home at Anathoth, God came, to seek for Himself a prophet.
(a.) God can seek out whom He chooses; and (b.) speak to whom He selects: “To whom the word of the Lord came,” &c. (Jer_1:2).
1. A communication from God works wondrous changes in him who receives it. It wrought such changes—
a. In Jeremiah himself; a new creature that moment; no longer a mere Anathoth boy; awoke to a new consciousness, new visions, new trusts.
b. In his relation to others; belonged to Hilkiah before, now to God; had something which was not his own, “word of the Lord;” not, therefore, to be kept for himself, not to be silenced; he must speak what he had heard; others must know (1Sa_3:17; 1Jn_1:3).
c. In his life’s worth and work. Until now he was nothing beyond his own home, now of worth to all Judah; his work had began, and it was a ministry for his nation. Communication from God implies commission for God (Act_4:18; Act_4:20).
2. Our natural inclinations may not interfere with God’s claims. To Jeremiah seclusion and irresponsibility would have been far more congenial than publicity, with all its hazards and solicitudes (Jer_9:2); but God cannot be restricted by our preferences, nor determined by our sense of aptitude and qualification (Jer_1:6). If so, the “natural man” would dominate over spiritual laws and God’s demands. Self must be subordinate when God calls. “Lord, I will follow Thee; but let me first,” &c. Christ would hear of no evasions or inclinations.
3. God’s messengers cannot tarry in seclusion. So Anathoth had to be left (Jer_2:2). There is an outside world which must see and hear those who love and serve the Lord. No timidity can justify seclusion; open witness for Christ is needed. The times were evil for Jeremiah, the sufferings entailed severe; but he boldly spoke for God (Act_4:29).
III. Speech for God the outcome of inspiration from God (Jer_1:1). “The words of Jeremiah.” Yet his first outcry was, “I cannot speak” (Jer_1:6). Nevertheless, we have in this book speeches enough to disprove his own plea. The explanation lies in Jer_1:2, “To whom the word of the Lord came.”
1. Natural destitution of gifts, no disqualification for service. He found “words” (Jer_1:1). See Jer_20:9. Moses (Exo_4:10). When duty for God presses upon us, our insufficiency falls out of the question. What ample assurance, what inexhaustible resources, what provision against our own poverty, dwell in 2Co_9:8.
2. Human speech the channel of Divine communications. “The words of Jeremiah;” yet they but expressed and conveyed “the word of the Lord.” Angels brought the Law (Heb_2:2); but all God’s messages have come through human speech; even “The WORD” (Joh_1:1-14) was made incarnate that MAN might speak to man (cf. Heb_1:1-2; Heb_2:3-4).
3. The personal characteristics of inspired messages. Though it was “the word of the Lord;” these communications were “words of Jeremiah;” his personality, temperament, experiences, style of thought, modes of expression, are all stamped upon these Divine messages. Inspiration does not obliterate, scarcely subordinates individuality. Hence the graceful variety and naturalness of the Scriptures; their humanness as well as Divinity; and the manifold unity of the whole. God employs the man, his own true self, “sanctifies” him (Jer_1:5), “moves him by the Holy Ghost” (2Pe_1:21); but does not do violence to his natural gifts and qualities of character. In our work for Him whose we are, all our faculties are needed; Christ asks our every talent, our whole true self.
IV. God’s messenger witnessing amid national convulsions and overthrows (Jer_1:2-3). Jeremiah came to Judah at an eventful crisis and prophesied amid appalling events. But—
1. His mission was originated to meet the crisis. To help Josiah in his work of reformation; to resist Jehoiakim in his reckless impiety; to remonstrate with Zedekiah in his weakness and folly; and to show his captive nation their sin and their Saviour. God’s servants are called to their mission at the right hour. He does not allow any age to be destitute of a messenger from Him. There may always be heard a voice for God, whatever the aspect of the times. Alas! (Isa_1:3-4).
2. However circumstances may vary, God’s prophet must do his work. Friendly or hostile; Josiah king or Jehoiakim; when Judah is reforming, or hastening back to abomination, whether men heed or oppose. Times of calamity afford special opportunities for God’s voice to be heard. When kings fall, and foes are at the gates, and the kingdom is endangered, then God should be heeded. Judah was a Theocracy—God’s nation; and with every epoch and change He sent directions, warnings, denunciations, promises, according to the hour. This is the work of every preacher, every Christian; to address himself to the hour; to make God’s Word heard amid confusion, degeneracy, disobedience: to “warn the people,” lest their blood be upon him.
3. No calamity befalling man places him beyond the Divine message. Josiah’s death was an evil incident to Judah; the kingdom was doomed from that hour. But God remained, and He would have spoken hopefully to the bereft nation had they hearkened. Nevertheless, though they despised His Word, it came still to Jeremiah for Judah; when at peace, or amid war; before the Captivity and after; in their own land and in Egypt. Nothing befalls us but God observes; and He sends some “word” for us suited to the time. Wherever we are, amid privileges or in exile from all joys, still He sends messages of mercy and promise. Man is never beyond the need of God’s message, nor beyond its reach, nor beyond the consequences which follow on reception or rejection; “life unto life” to the observant and obedient, but “death unto death” to those who will not heed the call to repentance and salvation. “Hear, and your soul shall live.”
Jer_1:4-10. Theme: THE PROPHET’S CALL, CONSECRATION, AND COMMISSION
The Divine call involves—
I. With respect to him who is called:
a. The duty, to discharge the commission without fear of man, and without regard to his own weakness.
b. The privilege, being assured of Divine protection and aid, and certain success in the work.
II. With respect to those to whom he is commissioned:
a. The urgency of their believing obedience.
b. The certainty of the Divine message being fulfilled; no doubt of their realising the threatenings or promises addressed to them.
ZINDENDORF from Lange
Call and consecration. The investiture of Jeremiah with the prophetic office is effected in four distinct acts:
I. The call of Jehovah, 4–8. This was not the product of a reflective musing, nor the result of an inward impulse, but a supernatural Divine revelation, an inspiration, a voice from without.
II. His Divine consecration, 9, 10. He felt the hand of the Lord touch him: “a palpable pledge of His support.” Touching his mouth meant endowment. Equipment and qualification for God’s work must be from God. “For the man God has chosen before his birth to a special office in His kingdom He equips with the gifts and graces needed for the exercise of his functions.”
III. Signs which unveil his mission. These he “saw in spirit.” God interpreted them to him as confirmatory tokens of his Divine commission; they are a surety of the Divine promise: (a.) Of the speedy and certain fulfilment of the word of God proclaimed by him; and (b.) the contents of his preaching; disaster and ruin which the North will pour out on Judah.
IV. Supernatural assurances of help. Jeremiah is charged to address himself stoutly to his duties, to discharge them fearlessly, and is assured of powerful Divine assistance. “Only by unshaken confidence in the power of the Word he preaches in the name of the Lord will he be able to accomplish anything.” God will furnish strength, will make him valiant and impregnable.
Condensed and arranged from Keil.
Commission of the Prophet. In all cases it applies equally as with Jeremiah—
I. As to the work in the vineyard of the Lord:
1. It must be performed by men whom He prepares and sends.
2. It is a work both difficult and dangerous.
3. Yet it is rich in successes and rewards.
II. As to the office to which the Lord appoints:
1. It is for the purpose of accomplishing His will.
2. It needs the means which the Lord Himself provides.
NAEGELSBACH in Lange.
Provision for the Church.
I. The Lord never allows His Church to lack the strength which time and place demand. He does not seek this, or wait for it: He makes it (Jer_1:18).
II. He chooses to Himself despised and inefficient agents for His service. Now He selects one who to himself and to others appears too young; as elsewhere He chose what was foolish, weak, and base in the sight of the world (1Co_1:19-29; Mat_11:25; Joh_7:48; Jas_2:5). “It is not always the greybeard who is wanted.”—Förster.
III. When God gives office He give, also understanding. (a.) It would be presumptuous to begin a great work in one’s own strength. (b.) It is natural in view of a great and difficult task that one should be afraid. (c.) But it would be wrong if, from any pusillanimous despondency or love of ease, one should take no heed to an evident call of God.
IV. It devolves upon God to protect the cause of His servant. Since (a.) It is not our cause, but His; and (b.) we do not undertake it in our own strength, but in obedience to His command.
V. To bear a Divine office ensures Divine succour. When the office is received from the Lord, and is conducted according to His purpose and in His spirit, there the Lord Himself is present with weapons of defence and offence.
VI. God’s Word is mighty, however weak His messenger.
a. It may be in the mouth of the humblest of His servants.
b. It is nevertheless a hammer which breaks the rock in pieces.
c. And no rock is too hard or high for it.
Arranged from NAEGELSBACH in Lange.
JEREMIAH’S MISSION
Some saints have been consecrated from the womb. The Baptist was; Jeremiah was (Jer_1:5). The time came for calling Jeremiah out to his work (Jer_1:4, &c.). His age uncertain, but he was evidently in the morning of life. God’s call was clear, precise, peremptory. Look—
I. At his objection, as here given. Not unreasonable; for his age—
1. Would indicate inexperience. 2. Insufficient knowledge. 3. Modest diffidence. Yet, 4. His age and defects time would remedy.
II. How God overrules his objection.
1. He refers to his pre-ordination. “Knew, sanctified, ordained” (Jer_1:5).
2. He refers to his commission. “Go to all that I shall,” &c. (Jer_1:7).
3. He was to speak God’s words. Did not require his own knowledge.
4. He pledged His Divine presence (Jer_1:8). Shield, help, deliverer.
5. Then there was supernatural communication (Jer_1:9).
III. Important lessons suggested.
1. God, and not man, arranges the affairs of His moral kingdom. He plans as to the work and the agency, &c.
2. God qualifies the instruments He employs.
3. God often selects His agents not as men would do. Men the mature, He the young; learned, illiterate; the respectable, the poor.
4. God gives His own message to His messengers. “My words.”
5. The ministry of God’s servants is mighty for good or evil (Jer_1:10). How great the results; portentous; solemn 1 Jonah, the Baptist, Jesus, the Apostles.
a. Let us listen when God speaks.
b. Obey when He commands.
c. Trust when He promises.
REV. J. BURNS, D.D., LL.D.
Jer_1:11-16. Theme: PREMONITORY VISIONS
Introduction. Jeremiah glides, almost imperceptibly to himself, from being a hearer into the office of a seer. He had listened only as yet (Jer_1:4-10), now he is asked to penetrate and gaze. It is a preparatory and initiative incident; his first exertion of the prophetic faculty of seeing visions. God is thereby gently leading him on towards the prophetic office. Without realising that he is undergoing his first lesson, he passes through it. God allures him, surprises him, indeed, into the exercise of the perceptive powers needful for his mission; and He thus renders self-evident Jeremiah’s aptitude for the work. So that when he answered the Divine inquiry, “What seest thou? ” God could respond, “Thou hast well seen;” thus virtually saying to him, You already prove your power of spiritual discernment, your possession of the prophetic insight (Addenda to chap. Jer_1:11).
In this cautious manner, dealing so tenderly with Jeremiah’s misgivings and sense of inability, God leads him on. It is the second stage in the process of his induction. First he hears that be is selected to this mission. Now a proof is unwittingly supplied by Jeremiah to himself that God has not erred in entrusting him with the prophet’s office; for he shows immediate ability to discern the symbolic force and teaching of things.
I. Truths pictured in symbols. “What seest thou? ” And his eye rested on the blossoming bough of an almond-tree. “What seest thou? ” And he perceived a boiling pot, whose contents ran over from the north. Each thing seen held a truth; and a truth which ran through all Jeremiah’s after history and work.
1. Helpfulness of objective signs. Better for God to show Jeremiah these truths than to merely say them. Signs are impressive; they are remembered; they fix their teaching on the understanding.
The childlike temperament of man is always assumed by God; He teaches him by pictures; not tells him abstract truths. All Bible revelation is a series of pictures, an array of symbols which hold truths. We have very little direct teaching compared with picture-teaching in the Scriptures. All the Temple, its services and incidents, were symbols. All Christ’s miracles were truths acted out in incident; parables in action.
2. The eye an avenue of instruction. When Pharaoh and the magicians saw Aaron’s rod effect mightier results than their rods could work, they needed not a word to convince them of the supreme power of Aaron’s God. It was convincing argument; the lesson was trenchant and decisive. Jeremiah never lost the lessons of these visions; he knew that events would follow quickly upon his prediction (Jer_1:12, “hasten”); and that calamity would come upon Judah from the north (Jer_1:14-15). Our Lord knew the value of lessons seen; hence He continually appealed to His hearers to look at things around and heed their teaching: “Behold the fowls of the air,” &c. (Mat_6:25). “Behold a sower,” &c. (Jer_13:3). “Behold my hands, and feel that it is I” (Luk_24:39). This Divine plan with the prophets, and Christ’s plan with His apostles and the multitudes, supplies the model for effectively teaching sacred truths.
3. Hidden meaning in things. The almond bough, the seething pot, were for signs; and Jeremiah saw their significance. Some persons see nothing; “have eyes but see not;” blind with a blank literalism. Everything is merely what it is. They have no imagination, no perceptive power, no spiritual vision.
“The primrose on the river’s brim
A yellow primrose was to him,
And it was nothing more.”—Peter Bell.
Yet, to discerning eyes, all things hold hidden truths, a Divine suggestiveness. The world is full of parables, in which sacred teachings are portrayed, and in which the enlightened soul perceives some counsel or promise from God.
To a few even the Bible is nothing more than a printed book, sealed and silent, with no revelation for them. “The veil is upon their heart.” Yea, the gracious Jesus, “fairest among ten thousand, and altogether lovely,” has to them “no beauty that they should desire Him.”
This barren materialism closes the universe around a man like the grim walls of a prison.
“Two worlds are ours: ‘tis only Sin
Forbids us to descry
The mystic heaven and earth within,
Plain as the sea and sky.”
How different this from the thoughts breathed in Keble’s hymn, “There is a book who runs may read!” so full of enlightened discernment of the sacred side of natural objects. If we see “the deep things of God,” it is because of grace; and we have reason to say—
“Thou, who hast given me eyes to see
And love this sight so fair,
Give me a heart to find out Thee,
And read Thee everywhere.—See Addenda to chap. 1., “Visions.”
II The Prophet’s initiation
He was not ushered suddenly into the dazzling splendours of prophetic visions, making heaviest demands on spiritual insight; the first step was simple, the gradations gradual.
1. The learner tested. “What seest thou?” Exert your own perceptive powers; try how far they will carry you towards truth. It is wise to educe a learner’s powers. So Jeremiah looked out first upon nature. Would he see anything? Among all the arboreous growths, would anything suggestive strike him? Trees were all black in winter’s death; no fertility, no vitality; barrenness, somnolence everywhere! But lo! one solitary twig among the trees bears blossom; it is an early fulfilment of God’s word, which pledged the spring: he calls it “the wakeful tree,” quick to bloom, hastening into activity with earliest dawn of spring. And God commended his vision, for he had “seen well,” or aright.
He then turns towards the habitations of men: activity is everywhere; on the open hearth steams the caldron; many things are happening which would engross the idle gazer; does anything stand out specially on Jeremiah’s vision? One object arrests him, and he sees that only, all else is excluded; it has a significance to his mind—a pot boiling over in a certain direction. He observes every minute particular. It makes evident his faculty of suggestive discernment.
There stands a Cross on Calvary. Men pass by. “It is nothing to them;” but “What seest thou?” All depends on your discernment. Is it merely a symbol of suffering, or of salvation?
2. Progressive stages of instruction. The first vision was easier far than the second. The almond bough was the only living thing within his gaze. Noticeable, therefore, by contrast with surrounding death; readily discernible. Having passed that test, the second demand comes. This “seething pot” was only one of many noticeable things; not conspicuous; it required more effort on his part to detect the suggestive object.
But more. The truth taught by the sign was harder to bear. The first simply taught that God would early perform His word; the second indicated mixed elements in the pot, boiling over, with its face from the north, meaning that mingled nations which would constitute the Northern scourge, which would overflow its boundaries and pour calamities on Judah. Thus our Lord gave to His disciples teachings “as they were able to bear” them, holding back the weightier truths till they had learned the simpler.
God has more to show us of Divine purposes, more great and marvellous truths; but He leads on as we are fitted to discern them. The Israelites under Sinai heard once God’s voice, then entreated that it might never speak again; but Moses, who, reverently regarded, went up to the heights, saw visions of resplendent glory, and talked face to face with God. Our power to receive visions is the only limit to larger revelations.
3. Personal preparation. The visions Jeremiah would eventually behold would be full of awfulness and dark with threatenings. God showed him an outline first, that he might be prepared to meet the wider portrayal of things to come.
His mind received the germ of truth, and he had been exercised in prophetic perception. His eyes had now been Divinely opened. He most conclusively showed his aptitude for sacred communications. He could “see well.” This aptitude was not at first manifest; but the visions had taught him his qualifications and mission. He was to be a seer, a “prophet.” It is, then, right to remark that, If God calls us to use powers in His service which we do not think we possess, (a.) Be assured that we have them: (b.) He will teach us to use them: (c.) They will be sufficient for our work: (d.) They will grow into vigour by further use. Reflections:
1. God never errs in calling us to service for Him; He will qualify us.
2. Cultivate a discerning eye of signs God puts before us.
3. Simplest things may hold sublime teachings. Christ’s parables were simple, but they contained truths of eternal value to the world.
III. The messages taught by the visions. 1. That his prophetic word would be followed quickly by the event (Jer_1:12). Some prophecies pointed to distant years; but these were nigh. Therefore his mission was urgent; the judgments gathered thick and fast. Comp. Jonah, his preaching to Nineveh. Analogy: Our testimony of the nearing hour of death; the “accepted time” hastening away; the Spirit grieved, ready to depart. “To-day, if ye will hear His voice,” &c.
2. That an unexpected foe was gathering his forces for their destruction. They dreaded Egypt; but the Chaldean dynasty would soon gather together the “families of the kingdoms,” and become a scourge to Judah.
a. Where we look not for calamity it may come (Jer_1:14).
b. God prepares retribution for transgressors (Jer_1:15).
c. Apostasy from Him cannot go unpunished (Jer_1:16). (See Addends to chap. 1, “Out of the North.”)
Such was the prophet’s announcement! The Gospel admonitions and denunciations are equally appalling. May they who hear them “flee from the wrath to come.” For in Christ “we have redemption through His blood, even the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace” (Eph_1:7).
Jer_1:17-19. Theme: FEARLESS PERFORMANCE OF PERILOUS SERVICE
Jehovah’s “charge” to His servant.
Paul’s charge to Timothy is emphatic and vigorous (2Ti_4:1-5), pointing out the hazards and difficulties of his ministry, the forms of hostility which would assail his word, and encouraging him to assurance, diligence, and fidelity.
But this is a charge from the Almighty God Himself to His prophet, who had shown much reluctance and trembling. (See Addenda to ch. 1., “I cannot speak.”)
I. Attitude must be valiant, Jer_1:17.
1. Not craven: “Stand,” or “arise.”
2. Not apologetic: “Speak.”
3. Not awed by men: “Be not dismayed.”
4. Not forgetful Whom you serve: “Lest I confound thee.”
II. Strength shall be invincible, Jer_1:18.
1. God had made him impregnable: “I make thee,” &c.
2. His work would be “against” all ranks of the people.
3. He would be assailed, as a “defenced city” is besieged, Jer_1:19. “Fight against thee.”
III. Hostility would be impotent.
An “iron pillar” which could not be overthrown; “brazen walls” which fire could not consume.
Judah would be overthrown, and Jerusalem burned; but not God’s prophet: for
1. A Divine promise of safety is given: “They shall not prevail.”
2. The Divine Presence would be around him: “For I am with thee.”
3. The Divine Power would be exerted for him: “To deliver thee.”
A prophet’s work.
I. The Divinely-called prophet becomes a sacrifice and instrument for God.
1. He regards only God’s will and command.
2. Must do and proclaim what the Lord bids him do and preach.
3. Must expose himself to consequent hostility.
4. Must meet antagonism with fearlessness of man and faith in God.
II. The wrong and results of sin must be proclaimed to all, heedless of their station, Jer_1:18.
1. The anger of God against sin will certainly overtake them.
2. The preacher must set forth these facts: sin, and God’s consequent displeasure.
3. This must be declared to the whole people: “All the land.”
4. Equally before governors as subjects; the high as well as the low.
III. A teacher, in view of gross corruption, must not proceed softly.
1. Vigorously overthrowing wrong, Jer_1:10.
2. Having by the Law destroyed the kingdom of Satan in the hearts of men;
3. He must seek to “build up” the kingdom of Christ therein by the Gospel.
IV. Resentment may be the only return men make for faithful work for God.
1. Kings and subjects equally hate a reprover.
2. Sense of its justice makes reproof more exasperating.
3. Yet God’s witness must fearlessly tell the whole truth.
4. In courageous service God will protect His messenger.
Enlarged and evolved from STARKE in Lange.
Servants of God.
I. Their duty.
a. Always to have their loins girded, Jer_1:17.
b. To proclaim without fear of man whatever the Lord commands.
II. Their privilege.
a. Mighty through the power of God.
b. Unyielding to any power on earth.
III. The Lord’s requirements of His servants.
a. To be always ready for His service: “Gird loins.”
b. To accomplish what is bidden without delay: “Arise and speak.”
IV. The Lord’s promise to His servants.
a. That He will be with them.
b. That no earthly power shall conquer them.
NAEGELSBACH, in Lange.
God’s witness.
I. He must be quick: “Arise,” and lose no time.
II. He must be busy: “Speak unto them,” in season, out of season.
III. He must be bold: “Be not dismayed.”
IV. He must be faithful; for
1. He must speak all that he is charged with. Forget nothing, conceal nothing.
2. He must speak to all that he is charged against.
a. Because he has reason to fear the wrath of God if he should be false.
b. Because he has no reason to fear the wrath of man if he is faithful.
MATTHEW HENRY.
HOMILETIC TREATMENT OF SUCCESSIVE OR SELECTED VERSES IN CHAPTER 1
Jer_1:1. “The word of Jeremiah.” A revival of prophecy marked this epoch. Long silent under Manasseh and Amon, it now was heard again (see Intro. Jer_1:6).
The name “Jeremiah” means either “Jehovah throws down” (Hengstenberg and Lange, deriving the name from “Ramah”), indicating that God would overthrow by him His foes: or “Jehovah exalts” (Speaker’s Commentary, from word “Ram,” high), denoting that none should cast down him whom God upholds.
But the name was borne by others of no significant character, exalted office, or special mission. (1Ch_5:24; 1Ch_12:4; 1Ch_12:10; 1Ch_12:13; 2Ki_23:31; Neh_10:3; Neh_12:1; Jer_35:3.) It is not our name makes us great; the mission we fulfil and the grace God bestows, these make our lives of worth.
I. The voice of prophecy heard among men. He was entrusted with “words” to speak to Judah and the nations.
1. The necessity for Divinely-sent words. Nation was ignorant (Book of Law lost); indifferent (to conscience, memory, Divine claims); insensible (not believing in or preparing against looming peril). Certainly desirable some voice should appeal for God and truth.
2. The mission of Divinely-sent words. To arouse the people to repentance, to true piety (not merely the “form of godliness”), and to escape by national humiliation “the wrath to come” (chap. Jer_36:3).
3. The results of Divinely-sent words. Effect of Jeremiah’s preaching on Judah would be either (a.) To lead back the heart to God, and so prove a “savour of life unto life;” or (b.) to increase their hardness of heart, their responsibility, guilt, and doom; “a savour of death unto death.”
Divine words, by a Divinely-inspired speaker, cannot be heard without results, saving or hardening, on hearers.
So when Christ spoke: Joh_15:22; Joh_9:41, “Take heed how ye hear.”
II. The messages of prophecy brought to men.
Before a prophet it is natural to ask, What words he comes to utter? (Act_17:18-20; Act_10:33.)
1. The tidings which the “words” convey.
a. Of mingled import. Not all denunciatory. Dark though Judah’s criminality, God did not send only words of wrath and menace, but pitiful, pleading, promising also.
b. Suggested by man’s spiritual case. Our state, mood, actions, call forth specific “words.” God’s messages meet man in every circumstance and condition. We turn from the vile in silent loathing, refuse words with those who wrong us; but God speaks to all.
c. Foretelling doom and redemption Doom from “the North;” redemption by the “Lord our Righteousness.” Temporal ruin to Judah; but a darker destiny for those who reject the salvation of Christ. Temporal restoration, and a Messiah incarnate in Palestine, to Judah; but a spiritual return to God, and possession of Heavenly Land, for those who rest in Jesus. “With Him in paradise.”
2. The calling which the Prophet fulfils.
a. He utters what he receives from God. Is not a philosopher, to evolve truths; but a prophet, to accept a message and utter it. His are not, therefore, earth-born speeches, not of human wisdom or human wishes. Preachers are to “tell what seen and heard” (Luk_7:22).
b. Announces truths with a grieving heart. Sorrowing over the sin he has to denounce, and the doom he has to pronounce. Not angry with the people (Num_20:10); “not desiring the woeful day” (Jer_17:16); but with tearful pity (chap. Jer_9:1), as with Paul (Php_3:18).
c. Suffering at the hands of those he warns. (Joh_3:20; Joh_10:31; Joh_10:39; Gal_4:16.) The preacher of righteousness is a living denunciation of those who love sin and disobey God. So, too, is every Christian whose character and actions speak out for the Lord against human indifference and iniquity; therefore he is maligned and maltreated.
3. The hearers to whom the words apply. To Judah first, as being his own nation. “Beginning at Jerusalem.” For there is a patriotism of Divine service (comp. Rom_9:1-3; Rom_10:1).
But also “to the nations,” Jer_1:4. The world needs the “words.” “Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature.”
Jer_1:2. “To whom the word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah.”
Theme: THE PROPHET’S TIMELY ARRIVAL.
Jerusalem and Judah had already heard the Divine sentence of overthrow from former prophets; now the time was near; and as the interval diminished, God raised up this earnest, pleading witness under the third king before the Captivity.
I. God discerns the spiritual necessities of the age.
He had given Josiah as king; but more was required.
1. The royal reformation. The king, alone in his pious zeal, was doing all a king could; rectifying the evil customs, instituting religious observances, stemming crime, establishing Jehovah’s worship. But notwithstanding all, there remained still:
2. The nation’s degeneracy. The king’s work could not reach the nation’s heart, could not renew Judah, and recall the people to spiritual allegiance to Jehovah. All was external thus far. There was needed, and therefore sent:
3. The sacred call. It was Jeremiah’s work to plead for God, speak to the heart of Judah, allure the nation’s trust and love. This inner work remained to be done. And the prophet came upon the scene to supply the lack which the king’s work made more evident.
II. God sends companionship in holy and arduous work.
Jeremiah came to the aid of Josiah. “At first no man stood by him.” But lonely service will weary the most heroic heart. Christ sent His disciples “two and two.” All sacred ministry asks helpful companionship.
1. It supplemented the royal deficiency. Not only
a. The impotence of the king, who could not attempt the persuasive ministry, the spiritual pleading with the people, needful to awaken their sympathetic response to his reforming plans; but
b. The ignorance of the king. The Scriptures were lost; Josiah did not know the Law and Covenants until after he had reigned eighteen years, when the Book was found. A child of guilty Amon, brought up in a corrupt court, he could have received no religious instruction. Jeremiah supplied this lack, as Aaron supplemented Moses’ deficiency.
2. It sanctioned the royal work. Jeremiah’s timely arrival would:
a. Show the king God’s approval of his designs; and
b. Impress the nation with the urgency and need of a complete return to God.
III. God supplies effective helps to conversion.
Could He have done more to aid Judah to return to Him than by giving so devotedly religious a king, and so pathetically patriotic a prophet?
1. Guilt and irreligion were condemned and discouraged. Both king and prophet expressed Divine disapproval of wrong. None were left in doubt whether to “call good evil or evil good.” Sinners cannot plead ignorance or unconsciousness, of sin.
2. Calls and opportunities were offered to newness of life. Oh, how they surround us! The Gospel, the Cross, the Spirit, our instructors, all plead with us. Jeremiah’s ministry was an interval of hope to Judah. We have “an accepted time, a day of salvation.”
3. Neglect of God was left without justification or excuse. They would not hearken (Heb_10:26-29). “How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation?”
Jer_1:2-3. Theme: THE CHANGEFUL INCIDENTS OF A LIFE’S WORK.
Life is full of changes, reverses, and uncertainties. (See Addenda to chap. 1, “Changes.”)
I. His mission began in auspicious times.
All encouraging and helpful to the prophet’s mission. King friendly to his work; nation aroused by royal activities; Temple services re-established; Book of Law soon found.
II. His office continued amid regal changes.
1. The various character of kings. Each unlike the other. Royal goodness not hereditary. (See Critical Notes, 5, above.)
2. The royal attitude towards the prophet. What an influence, in furthering or retarding the servants of God, the throne exerts!
3. The overthrow of royal opponents. Each crowned head that lifted itself against God’s purpose and the prophet’s mission was bowed to ignominious shame (Psa_2:2-4).
III. His prophecies closed amid national calamity. Destruction and exile.
1. His warnings fulfilled upon the disobedient.
2. His messages followed the captives. He still was with them, and spoke for God among them in Egypt.
3. His promises lighted up their exile, pointing them on to Restoration and to Christ.
Thus:
i. We cannot perceive the end of a thing from its beginning. A career began amid national reformation, closed amid utter overthrow and ruin. What reverses enter life! How may promises perish amid disaster!
ii. God hides the sterner duty from us at the outset. Strength and courage and faith must grow, or Jonahs would always flee from life’s severer ordeals and tasks. “He tempers the wind to the shorn lamb,” does not lay upon us more than we can bear.
iii. Sacred work must be done regardless of surroundings. It is not for the Lord’s servants to “faint in the day of adversity.” Kings may menace, perils may arise: but
“Where duty calls or danger,
Be never wanting there.”
Painful as are the mutations around us—and they were to Jeremiah—still we must be loyal in our duty to God, and responsive to sacred claims.
iv. Our mission is to act the part the hour demands. Help the good Josiah; withstand the rebellious Jehoiakim; chide and correct the compromising Zedekiah; go with the captives into their affliction. Suit our work for Christ to the characters around us, and to the circumstances in which we find them. Human life is not stereotyped; Christian work must be versatile.
v. Every crisis finds the dutiful servant sufficient and sustained. For God is able to make him stand; yea, and he shall be holden up. So this prophet found. So all who are the Lord’s (2Co_2:14).
Jer_1:5. Foreknowledge and predestination.
God’s address here is unequivocal and emphatic. Two antagonistic opinions held: 1. Divine purposes are absolute with man, and include the determination by God of man’s will and life. 2. Divine purposes are conditional on man; they foresee and accord with man’s own determination.
Certainly Jeremiah’s will had to be subordinated; but. it was a free subordination. There was no violation of his liberty of action; God gently conquered his reluctance and rectified his fears. This Divine work upon him gave him liberty, set him free from enthralling misgivings and dreadful apprehensions; raised him into assurance and reliance on Jehovah; his subjugation was his “translation from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.”
I. Facts affirmed.
1. The unborn child foreknown of God. “Before I formed, I knew thee.” The Divine idea antedates the Divine act (Psa_139:16). Yet this assertion of mere foreknowledge is not all which the Hebrew word “knew” implies. “Verbum cognitionis verbum favoris est.” It as to be taken in the sense of having a regard for; I approved of thee. “I know him (Abraham), that he will command his children,” &c. (Gen_18:19; comp. Psalms 1, 6; Nah_1:7. See cognate N. T. word, Mat_7:23). “Those who know, (revere and cherish) Thy name,” &c. (Psa_9:10; comp. Hos_8:2).
2. A life predestinated to God’s service. “Before birth I sanctified thee.” Not from (after) birth, but from before birth. We may understand the word “sanctified” as meaning (with Henderson and Lange) set apart to sacred service; they contending that primarily the word “does not mean to be pure or holy; that God had cleansed Jeremiah from the pollution of original sin, or had regenerated him by His Spirit; but that He had separated him in His eternal counsel to his appointed work.” So Samson (Jdg_13:5); Isaiah (Isa_49:1); John the Baptist (Luk_1:15); Paul (Gal_1:15). Others claim that the primary significance is to be pure, clean (Speaker’s Commentary); and here, therefore, “I made thee holy,” and “so to dedicate to holy purposes” (comp. 2Sa_8:11). Keil observes and infers that “God has predetermined before our birth what is to be our calling on earth, and He has accordingly so influenced our origin and growth in the womb as to prepare us for what we are to become and to accomplish,” &c Three interpretations: (a.) Eternal separation to God’s service. (b.) Absolute sanctification prior to birth; personal purity. (c.) Control over the life prior to birth so as to effect individual adaptation for the sacred services he would have to fulfil.
The last is preferable. He whom God foreknows is born with a Divinely secured aptitude for Divine work. (See Addenda to chap. 1, “Fore-ordination.”)
3. God’s prophet a Divine production. “I ordained, ”—i.e., “appointed” or “gave.” A prophet is a Divine benefaction; he is born as a boon; his ministry is a gracious bestowment. Thus:
a. Gifted witnesses of God are gifts to the age from God (comp. Eph_4:11-12). How melancholy if the Divine Father sent forth no messenger to an erring world! “All gone out of the way, none seeketh after God;”—yet God leaves men to their own wilfulness, unchecked, uninformed, uninvited! Dreadful if always true—“I looked, but there was none to help, and I wondered that there was no intercessor.” But comp. Jer_11:7; Jer_7:25.
b. Their presence among men a testimony of God, and their voice a testimony from God. A prophet is a proof that God is: his endowments and mission are supernatural: and his attestations are miraculous: and his word speaks from God; inspired, authoritative. “He that heareth you, heareth Me.” Such are the assertions of this verse.
II. Truths evolved.
1. Events of time do but unfold projects of eternity. Occurrences on earth, as if the veil is thrown aside, show Divine arrangements till then hidden. God is planning; time is unrolling His plans, “bringing hidden devices to pass.” God is interested therefore in all incidents; they lie within His anticipation. “My Father worketh hitherto.”
2. Opportune incidents are Divinely regulated events. It was opportune that Jeremiah came just at that juncture of Judah’s history, while Josiah was endeavouring to reform the nation, and ere the foe was at the gates. Was it merely fortuitous, a coincidence? Or rather, “He worketh all things after the counsel of His own will.”
3. A child’s birth and occupation work out God’s purposes. There is a providence therefore over our entrance into life. Yes, and the fitfulness of childhood, wilfulness of youth, the risk and uncertainty of opening manhood (as we see them), only screen the movements of a Hand which controls all, directing the life into appointed paths. We work into and work out Divine intents.
4. Messages from God await the advent of a herald. God had much to say to Judah, even while Josiah worked on alone; but Jeremiah’s hour was not yet. Startling to think of solemn messages laid up in heaven, kept sealed, until a babe is born at Anathoth, and nourished into youth. But the word of the Lord comes by the appointed herald at the needed hour. “O Lord, send by whom Thou wilt send.”
Thus, therefore, a man pleading for God is God’s pleading with man.
Query. Is the Divine foreknowledge and predestination true only of earth’s greatest sons, and God’s special witnesses? In a sense true of all men. “Known unto God are all His works, from the beginning of the world.” “A man’s goings are of the Lord.” Each should realise his place in God’s plans, and ask, “Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? ”
“Stand up! thou art as true a man
As moves the human mass among;
As much a part of the great plan
That with creation’s dawn began,
As any of the throng.
“The great! what better they than thee?
As theirs, is not thy will as free?
Has God with equal favours thee
Neglected to endow?
“With these, and passions under ban,
True faith, and holy trust in God,
Thou art the peer of any man!
Look up, then, that thy little span
Of life may be well trod.”
Jer_1:6. The pleadings of fear.
Literally, “Alas! my Lord Jehovah!” There is no resistance on Jeremiah’s part, but he shrinks back alarmed. So at the vision of the cherubim, Isaiah cried, “Woe is me!” and Ezekiel “sat astonished seven days.” Jeremiah’s gentle and tender spirit submits, but with a cry of pain” (Speaker’s Commentary). “I cannot speak,” &c. The Targum paraphrases this correctly, “I cannot prophesy”—i.e., I have not the powers of oratory necessary for success. The prophets of Israel were the national preachers in religious matters, and their orators in political. The reluctance exhibited by God’s servants (Exo_4:10; Exo_6:12; Exo_6:30; Jon_1:3) to accept the call shows that they did not assume the office under the impulse of self-deceiving fanaticism.
I. Weakness is the channel of Divine efficiency. God works by weak things (1Co_1:26-29); for they most magnify God (Psa_8:2).
II. Conscious disqualification the preparation for noblest achievements. Equipped with nothing of self, there was room for God’s grace to clothe him. He became mighty because he felt himself nothing.
A prophet’s qualification is not aptitude for uttering Divine discourses or foreseeing calamities, but speaking words given him with all assurance, and as an ambassador. (Addenda to chap. 1., “I am a child,” and “I cannot speak.”)
III. Terror in the presence of responsibility.
a. Overwhelmed with vastness. “Ah, Lord God!”
b. Timidity shrinks appalled. “Ah!”
c. Inexperience dreads duty. A child to speak!
d. Incapacity urged. “I cannot speak.”
e. Youth’s natural misgivings. “I am a child.”
Jer_1:5-7. Theme: FEARS AND COMFORTS IN PROSPECT OF LABOUR FOR GOD
Here is a young man trembling on the threshold of a life of arduous service. Here is the Master equipping him for the service, dissipating his fears and assuring his heart.
The scene is a common one. Trembling fingers ever gird on the armour. Nor is it wonderful. Think of magnitude of the undertaking, feebleness of instrument, deadly hostility of foe. God’s Davids always had to meet the world’s Goliaths with nothing but sling and stone.
I. The fear of God’s servants in prospect of labour.
1. He feels his weakness. “A child.”
a. Having no influence. Men will listen to those of riper years. Speakers who can appeal to public services rendered, and to old and tried friends, thus secure attention. Jeremiah had no such advantages.
b. Having no experience. How can a “child” find the clue to intricacies of human heart? How successfully combat sophistries of man?
c. Being unstable. “A child” is easily influenced, soon afraid. While seeking to deliver others, himself may be ensnared.
2. He feels his ignorance. How speak of themes which exhaust vocabulary of angels? How little know of Thy word and ways, or of deplorable and dreadful condition of men!
Every preacher should feel this. Think of the surpassing excellencies of Jesus; and we but beggars outside the city gate, who yet have to tell of the Majesty dwelling amidst splendours of palace! We only know in part; have seen but glimpses of the King. True, we know enough to bless ourselves, but not enough to do Him the honour He deserves.
How little we know of man. Each different from his fellow; exposed to specific temptations and sorrows.
3. He feels his unworthiness. “A child,” undistinguished, unknown.
4. He dreads the enmity of man. Though “a child” he knows the hostility of man to truth. Not unnatural to dread world’s malice. “Crucified together with Christ,” is no mere poetic fancy. We have fellowship with His shame, scourging, darkness, distress. Men drove rough iron into the Master’s hands, will not bind ours with silken cords; placed on His head crown of thorns, will not place on ours crown of roses; gave Him vinegar, not us wine; pierced His side, will not merely menace ours!
II. The comforts of God’s servants in prospect of labour.
If our fears be many, our consolations abound.
1. The assurance they are called to the work. “I ordained thee a prophet.” Despite his ignorance, unworthiness, and fear.
2. The knowledge of the purpose of God. “Thou shalt go to whom I send thee.” Some find here reason for inactivity; they say, “He will save His elect,” and then fold their arms. But God’s purpose is not only that Israel shall be saved, but that Jeremiah should “go.” It contemplates the means as well as end.
Rejoice at the knowledge that it is part of Divine plan to use us.
3. The promise of the presence of God. “I am with thee,” &c. (Jer_1:8). We have not to carry out His purpose without His help. This promise a sovereign antidote for every fear. Was he weak? The Almighty was near. Ignorant? The “wisdom” was at hand. Unworthy? The Lord of glory stood by him.
4. The fact that the message was from God. “Whatsoever I command thee, thou shalt speak.” We have not to guess our theme; we have the mind of Christ. The teacher sent from God may and must be dogmatic.—“Items and Twigs.”
Jer_1:8. He had never occupied any public station or performed any public duty. “You need not fear their faces—the thing that timid young men are most wont to fear. Think only that the Lord is with you, and let his presence be your joy and strength.”
1. His ministry would lead him before high and mighty personages.
2. His messages would arouse the malignity of haughty potentates.
Not easy to confront such men, to condemn them, to incur their hatred, to denounce their designs. Fear of man must retire before fealty to God.
Jer_1:9-10. Theme: INCAPACITY DIVINELY RECTIFIED.
There is a special feature in Jeremiah’s preparation and equipment—no human presence came upon the scene to render aid, as with Saul of Tarsus (Act_9:17); nor even angelic interposition, as with Joshua (Zec_3:4-5); nay, nor yet exalted seraphim, as with Isaiah (Isa_6:6-7)—it was a direct act of JEHOVAH. Already there had been (Jer_1:8)—
I. Courage inspired. For God requires valour, and a dauntless faith. These he called into exercise.
II. Ability conferred (Jer_1:9).
1. The act: stretching forth of the Divine hand = exertion of Divine power. Something was accomplished. There was more than an exertion; an emanation of power.
2. The touch: it indicated Divine energy communicated. It had passed into him whom the Hand touched, like electric fluid into a receiver.
3. The localisation of power: the “mouth.” Jeremiah’s power was to be in speech; not in physical vigour, nor even mental force, but in uttering God-given “words.” The local incapacity rectified.
III. Communication intrusted. “I have put my words in thy mouth.” This was a tangible pledge of inspiration. God committed His messages into Jeremiah’s charge. Henceforth he would not speak of himself, but “as the Spirit gave him utterance.”
It was a real, not imaginary occurrence; a positive contact of Deity with the now divinely-endowed prophet, and it imparted to him his sacred commission.
IV. Installation completed (Jer_1:10).
1. The dividing line of his life. “This day.” A mere Anathoth youth until that day; henceforth God’s prophet. “All things become new.”
2. His exalted mission. “Set over,” &c. God’s deputy: placed as overseer, above kings and nations, to supervise and control events. For his word would work more potently than royal designs or strife of armies (Jer_23:29). The issue showed this (comp. Act_5:38-39).
V. Work defined. “To root out,” &c. He had the highest authority (comp. Mar_1:22). He moved amid magnates doing Heaven’s behests, foreshadowing the Lord’s mission (Joh_5:2). God’s Word has much to overthrow and demolish—in nations, in human habits, in secret affections and thoughts. All forms of sin must fall before its condemnations (Heb_4:12-13). On the scene of ruin it then begins “to build and plant” (comp: Eph_3:20-21; Eph_2:10).
Such is the work every man of God has to do. Taking the sword of the Spirit, he is to exterminate and slay all hostility to God; and then to rear on the ruins of sin a “holy temple unto the Lord.” “Our sufficiency is of God.”
Jer_1:9. Theme: THE TOUCH OF GOD. “The Lord touched my mouth.”
Query. Was the act objective, or only subjective; an actual occurrence, or an impression on the inner consciousness?
“The Lord cannot literally have put His words into the prophet’s mouth; He can only have given him the charism of which the words were the necessary result”—Lange.
“Attactus oris signum est notans efficaciam spiritus sancti, quippe qui digitus Dei sit, aperiens labia ministrorum verbi” (Psa_51:13-14; Psa_51:17; Luk_21:15).—Förster.
A purely subjective transaction, “as the moment when the presentiment first flashed clearly through the soul of Jeremiah that his prophetic calling was of Divine appointment.”—Ewald.
“A physical and literal incident;” and that “the Son of God, in pre-intimation of His blessed incarnation, appeared to Jeremiah in a human form.”—Starke.
“The hand is the instrument of making and doing; the touching of Jeremiah’s mouth by the hand of God is consequently an emblematic token that God frames in his mouth what he is to speak. It is a tangible pledge of ἔμπνευσις inspiratio, embodiment of that influence exercised on the human spirit by means of which holy men of God speak, being moved by the Holy Ghost. The act is a real occurrence, taking place not indeed in the earthly, corporeal sphere, but experienced in spirit, and of the nature of ecstasy.”—Keil.
“An appropriate symbolic act.… The touching of the lips of Isaiah with a live coal (chap. Jer_6:7), and the giving of a book to Ezekiel to eat (chap. Jer_2:8-10), were similarly symbolical of prophetic qualification, and implied a gift of inspiration (comp. Dan_10:16). In all these instances the actions occurred in supernatural vision.”—Henderson.
“The symbol of the bestowal of divine grace and help, by which that want of eloquence, which the prophet had pleaded as a disqualification, was removed; and distinctly was an external act, impressing itself objectively upon his consciousness, though in what manner it is impossible for us to tell.”—Speaker’s Com.
I. The varied consequences of the Divine touch.
Old Testament.
1. Expiation (Isa_6:6).
2. Inspiration (Jer_1:9; comp. Eze_2:8-10; Isa_51:16; comp. Act_2:3).
3. Impartation of strength (Dan_10:16).
New Testament.
Blessing infants (Luk_18:15).
Removing organic defects (Mar_7:32; Mar_8:22).
Curing diseases (Mat_8:2; Mat_8:15).
Upraising the prostrate (Mar_9:27).
Awaking the dead (Luk_7:14).
Reviving the overwhelmed soul (Rev_1:17).
Infer:
1. That the hand of power and renewal is the same in the Old and New Testaments. “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.”
2. That all remedial changes in man are Divine. “He that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new” (Rev_21:5). “We are His workmanship” (Eph_2:10).
II. Human need of the transforming touch of God.
1. These varied incidents denote man’s varied ailments and afflictions.
a. Incompetent for Divine work (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel).
b. Suffering from physical malformations and maladies.
c. Bowed down before visions of glory (John on Patmos).
2. The gracious issues of the Divine touch reveal the suitability and sufficiency of grace in God.
Power unlimited is in His hand. The everlasting hills tremble and smoke if He touch them. “Right hand of the Lord doeth valiantly.” He never stretched forth His hand to work on frail humanity without (a.) immediate results, no delay in the remedy; nor without (b.) appropriate results, the very effect desired ensued; nor without (c.) beneficent results; in all cases “He put His hands upon them and blessed them.” Contact with Christ is life-giving, healthful, saving.
Jer_1:10. Theme: THE PROPHET A SUBVERTER OF KINGDOMS. “I have set thee over the nations,” &c.
The strict and literal import of words here used assign to the Divine teacher a sway above sceptres, a power mightier than potentates, a spiritual domination over dynasties and temporal kings.
As he stands before God he is a mere servant, a trembling child; but as he stands in God’s stead among men, he is above rulers and princes, installed as vicegerent, swaying the destinies of kingdoms.
This title (Pâkeed) is given only to those invested with high authority—Egyptian officers (Gen_41:34), Abimelech’s viceroy (Jdg_9:28), the high-priest’s deputy (2Ch_24:11), the Levitical representative (Neh_11:22), chief governor in Temple (Jer_20:1). Jeremiah was God’s highest officer, supreme above monarchs and nations.
I. His official supremacy and supervision. “I have set thee over,” &c.
1. Empowered with a sway superior to kings; for their sway was soon broken, their word frustrated; but his endured and was accomplished. For there was a Power behind his word, and therefore power in his word.
They thought to defeat Jeremiah’s influence by imprisoning him; but his sway went on. “The word of God was not bound;” it still worked towards fulfilment. Every living servant of God is thus endowed with a sway and a dignity above potentates. A chained prisoner could say to “King Agrippa” and “noble Festus,” “I would to God ye were both almost and altogether such as I am!”
2. Intrusted with the destiny of kingdoms. “He was to have his eye upon the conduct of nations, and to utter predictions of prosperity or adversity accordingly.”—Henderson. What was effected in accordance with, is spoken of as a consequence of, his word. This mode of speech also indicates the certainty of the events he announced: they would follow as effects of the cause. The prophet’s word would thus determine the fate of nations (comp. Eze_43:3; Jer_25:15-17 sq.; Hos_6:5).
II. The irresistible activity of his word.
In this case the spiritual was ascendant over temporal authority. Divine speech is more stable than sceptres; words are mightier than swords. “His words were at the same time deeds, real exhibitions of power.”—Lange. “The word of God in His prophets has power to do what it says will be done.”—Wordsworth. “With the words of the Lord he is to destroy and to build up peoples and kingdoms. The Word of God is a power that carries out His will, and accomplishes that whereto He sends it (Isa_55:10 sq.). Against this power nothing earthly can stand.”—Keil.
“At first we should say, ‘Such words can never be applied in their literal import to any seer or teacher: they belong to the warrior and the conqueror. We must explain them by a figure of speech—he who discourses of the fall of kingdoms is represented as himself the over-thrower of them.’ I do not think that either the analogy of language or the facts of the case justify that method of interpretation. If the prophet only talked of what was happening or what was to happen, no poetical licence could permit us to confound him with the subverters of thrones and societies. But have we yet to learn that a great teacher or reformer, though he may never take a sword into his hand, does that which swords cannot do; that swordsmen, in fact, only carry out upon the surface that which he is doing underground? The uprooting of the thoughts and principles in which acts originate, the planting the seeds of life which are hereafter to bring forth fruits that all will recognise, are his functions. If he has received any inspiration, any vital power at all, it must be one which enables him to produce a movement at the very heart of human life and society, in a region of which the ordinary statesman knows nothing.”—Maurice.
This power would be used for the most part destructively; the overthrowing being expressed by four different similes; yet also constructively, though to a lesser extent—only two words describing this part of his mission. The first is accomplished by prophesying Divine judgment; the second, by promising Divine mercy.
See the power of prophecy (Eze_37:7-10), and of the LIVING WORD (Rev_2:16; Rev_19:15; Isa_11:4).
Jer_1:15. Theme: WAR THE STROKE OF GOD.
“I will call,” = I am calling. The present tense of Hebrew indicates judgment has begun; the Almighty has risen up to decisive action; a Voice which will be obeyed is calling for the long-delayed retribution; Jehovah is summoning His hosts to the war. (See Addenda to chap. 1, “War.”)
I. Divine punishment by human agency. “I will call,” &c.
This fact is the basis of text. What man does, he does in obedience to a Force higher than himself. God uses him.
1. Miraculous forms of justice are needless.
God has them, and used them (2Ki_6:15-17; 2Ki_19:35).
But the armies of nations are His, to do with as He wills. So also affliction, accident, reverses of fortune, mental and physical disasters. Even crafty and covetous men, who can wreck strong fortresses of wealth and position, God can use.
2. Common incidents of calamity are not the less supernatural. If God employs them, though His hand be not seen, they are supernatural. He now avoids the extraordinary methods of old times, and works by the ordinary.
II. Jehovah’s forces of retribution. “All the families of the kingdoms,” &c. = Nebuchadnezzar’s motley combination which made up the Chaldean army comp. Isa_13:4-5).
1. Armies assemble at His bidding. Nebuchadnezzar or Cyrus may lead their war-hosts to the siege, but God reigns over rulers; the “King of kings” doeth “according to His will among the armies of heaven and inhabitants of earth.” All wars have behind them a Divine use.
2. National overthrow testifies to national sin. So in Judah’s case. Guilt is the occasion of all catastrophes. History shows this so with nations (see Nineveh, Babylon, Jerusalem; and recently Paris). Experience reveals the same law at work among men.
III. Military counsels fulfil God’s commands.
“They shall set every one his throne,” &c.; indicating a tribunal of judgment, a council of war concerning the fate of Jerusalem. The decision would be as God had determined (comp. Critical Notes, above, 8).
1. Over decisions of court the “Judge of all the earth” presides. This still true concerning senates, chambers, parliaments. See the fact as relating to our Lord (Act_4:27-28; Act_2:23; Isa_14:24-27).
2. Over the plots of armies the “Lord of hosts” sways rule. Their stratagems He oft defeated; their designs He sometimes prospered. (See “Scripture battles.”) This equally true of plots of wicked against righteous, and of hellish foes (Psa_37:12-13; Eze_35:10; Rev_20:9).
IV. Foes sweep down on those whom God abandons. “Every one his throne against Jerusalem.”
1. The protection of Providence withdrawn, they invite the spoilers. “Where the carcase is, there the eagles will gather together.”
2. The restraint of Providence withdrawn, the spoilers hasten to the prey. Just as serpents in the wilderness rushed into camp as soon as God’s restraining care was forfeited.
a. Unkept by God, our life is hourly imperilled. How different this from Psa_91:1-7.
b. Around those Divinely forsaken the hosts of evil quickly assemble.
c. Left to our enemies ensures utter ruin. As with Judah (2Th_2:10-12).
Jer_1:16. “I will utter my judgments,” &c. This phrase, “to speak or pronounce judgment,” is properly to have a lawsuit with one, an expression peculiar to Jeremiah (cf. Jer_4:12, Jer_12:1, Jer_39:5), is equivalent to pleading with a person (cf. Jer_12:1 with Jer_2:35; Eze_20:35), and signifies not only remonstrating against wrong-doing, but also the passing of condemnation, and so includes trial and sentencing.—Keil.
“To pronounce a judgment or judicial sentence upon any one. Jehovah threatened the Jews with punishment on account of their rebellious conduct; He now declares He will carry His threatenings into effect by means of their enemies, who would sit in judgment and inflict the calamities upon them they merited. The sentences delivered by the foreign princes would be in effect the judgments of God. He would employ them as His instruments in carrying them into execution.”—Henderson.
“By the capture of Jerusalem God as judge pronounces solemn condemnation upon her.”—Speaker’s Com.
“Viewed in one light, war is the boiling caldron of human passion, upset by hazard, and bringing only ruin in its course; in the other, it is God sitting in judgment, with the kings of the earth as His assessors, solemnly pronouncing judgment upon the guilty.”—Idem.
Through these idolatrous enemies of God’s people Jehovah would execute His judgments.
Theme: UNCONSCIOUS DIVINE AGENTS.
I. Divine control over the workings of the human will.
II. The ungodly may unknowingly further God’s designs. So Joseph’s brethren who sold him. So Israel’s enemies in the wilderness.
III. Reckless hostility may but obey His behests. “The wrath of man shall praise Him.” Indulging their idolatrous hatred, they wrecked the Temple and the city of God, and thus chastised Judah as God designed; and fulfilled prophecy, thus confirming revelation for after-time.
IV. Man in his most impious moods is still a subject of Divine government. The godless cannot repel the Almighty from their lives. He may work by their very impiety, and compel them blindly to obey Him.
V. To be in the hands of God for His use in our rebellion, forewarns our being in His hands for our just requital. As Egypt (Jer_46:13); as Chaldea (Jer_50:1-3; Jer_50:9-10).
Jer_1:17. I. God’s method of holding judgment. Brings nations before Jerusalem, and lets them determine the fate of the city. Their resolves respecting Jerusalem would express God’s thought and plan.
II. God’s chastisements are based upon deserts. “Judgments touching their wickedness,” &c. They would suffer nothing they had not merited. Judicial sentence, righteous, deserved.
Jer_1:17. Theme: HEROISM IN GOD’S SERVICE. “Gird up thy loins, stand and speak,” &c.
Girding the loins = resolute preparation for the performance of duty. A metaphor: the Orientals, who wore long robes, bound them up with a girdle ere attempted work or started on journey (comp. 2Ki_4:29; Job_38:3; Luk_12:35; Eph_6:14). God here summons Jeremiah to
a.) Earnest exertion; (b.) firm purpose; (c.) ready alacrity; (d.) cheerful hope, not despairing that good might ensue from his ministry.
He is further reminded that
(a.) Fear is a snare and dishonour. (b.) God is greater than the greatest, therefore should His servants bear themselves with assurance. (c.) Cowardice will entail confusion and contempt. “With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.” (Addenda to chap. 1., “Courage before kings.”)
I. God will be served by courageous, not by craven souls.
A ministry of “whispering humbleness” is puerile and revolting. The age wants men. Men appreciate manly fortitude. God is dishonoured by a fawning ambassador. Lion-hearted preachers wanted.
II. God’s work requires resolute preparation and purpose.
“Gird and stand,” = Equip thyself, and with a stalwart heart preach My words to the land.
1. It is a determined work. “Whether they will hear or forbear.”
2. It is a denouncing work. “Speak to them all that I command,” “against kings,” &c., Jer_1:18.
3. It is a destructive work. “To root out, pull down,” &c., Jer_1:10.
4. It is a Divine work. In God’s stead and name, speak. “Who sufficient?”
III. God’s servants must confront all menaces with a dauntless faith in Him.
1. As one bearing awful tidings, which must not be trifled with. “Stand and speak all I command thee.”
2. As a messenger who will himself be condemned if he fail in his charge. Warn the people; with earnestness, and all-conquering importunity, “lest their blood be required at thy hand” (Ezekiel 33). “Necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe,” &c. (1Co_9:26; 1Co_9:17).
3. With unabashed fortitude, remembering for Whom he speaks. “I command thee:” “be not dismayed at their faces.” For who is man, even the mightiest, when God is in our thought? What can man do to silence us, when we bethink of the eternal issues at stake, and the urgency of redemption?
Jer_1:18-19 suggest further
IV. God’s witness assured of invincible strength.
1. The hostile array, Jer_1:18.
2. Their malevolent treatment, Jer_1:19.
3. His impregnable strength, Jer_1:18.
4. His Almighty fortress, Jer_1:19, “I am with thee.”
OUTLINES ON NOTICEABLE TOPICS AND TEXTS
Jer_1:5. Topic: THE DIVINE FORMATION OF A HUMAN LIFE. Text: “I formed thee.”
This rectifies the scientific idea of natural development; asserts an Active Cause working for definite ends in the instance of an individual; that God has something to do with our formation and our career.
It also explains the startling individuality of character and work which is often apparent, and which cannot be accounted for by parentage and circumstances; children do not reproduce their ancestry always; grand departures from the rule have given the ages their greatest and most useful men. Hence it is right to affirm that
I. Individuality of character and life is a specific creation of God.
1. Our natural qualities are not accidents of human progeniture. (See Addenda to chap. 1, “Divine formation of a life.”)
2. Our religious disposition is not determined by domestic culture e.g., Manasseh was the wicked son of good Hezekiah, Josiah the good son of wicked Amon.
3. Our personality is a factor in society which God authorises and employs.
Ergo,
a.
The sacredness of our individuality.
b.
God’s interest in each life, and our use of life.
c.
Our place in Divine regard. His readiness to befriend and bless. His desire for our piety and salvation. He who made us, made us for Himself, for His glory and our weal.
II. The Divine purposes forecast the issues of human birth.
1. Our existence argues that there is a place for us in the world; awaiting us, suited to us, needing us.
2. Our being in the world is itself an incentive to the faithful use of life.
3. Our special aptitudes denote and designate our calling. God gives us our distinctive powers. His purpose for us is that we use ourselves, and in the most useful way, and that we make earthly existence a pathway to eternal blessedness and reward.
III. A mission on earth is predetermined to the man of God. “I ordained thee a prophet.”
God does not ordain the careers of evil men. Men are free to resist and reverse God’s plans for them. They are not helpless slaves of Divine decrees.
1. For the Divine servant there awaits a Divine service. “Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do?”
2. A life of religious usefulness works out God’s plans. Ergo, His plans are beneficent. He who uses life to bless others, and brings wanderers back to God, does what God desires and designs.
3. No career of godly activity can be fruitless or unrewarded. For it effects what God arranged. And “God is not unrighteous to forget your work,” &c.
IV. Equipment for sacred duties is the effect of Divine grace. “I sanctified thee.”
Catholic theologians argue that Jeremiah was born without original sin. Neuman interprets the statement as that the Holy Spirit was communicated to him before birth. Hoffman, Henderson, Lange, &c., regard the word as denoting the sacred designation of his life.
1. The importance of a good life, both to God and man. The life we live does affect Him who formed us, and its influence on others may be vast and imperishable. What majestic work one life may do for God!
2. A life wrecked and wasted by sin is a calamity. It arrests the aim of God’s grace; it adds some force to the rule of evil; it deprives a man of his birthright; it is a melancholy perversion and an irremediable catastrophe. Even if the soul is saved at the last, the life is lost.
3. Divine grace avails for the salvation and sanctification of each one. Jeremiah, like Paul, only illustrates the fulness of redemption, the abounding grace of God for others (1Ti_1:16).
Jer_1:7. Topic: THE HUMAN OUTCRY SILENCED. Text: “The Lord said unto me, Say not!”
This outcry was born of shrinking, lowliness, apprehension. It indicated a lack of fortitude and faith. If allowed to rule, it would have arrested God’s plans, and deprived Judah of one of her noblest prophets, and of a warning ministry urgently needed.
I. The human heart is prone to speak out against God.
1. In self-assertion. (a.) Sometimes pride objects to God’s commands and plans: “I dislike this kind of service, this mode of salvation. It levels me!” (b.) Or self-will utters itself: “I cannot bow, cannot acquiesce, cannot think it right. My will, not Thine, be done!”
2. In self-excusing. (a.) Cowardice tremblingly pleads: “I cannot take up that cross. I should make shipwreck of faith. I am not fit to serve.” (b.) Indifference answers with subtle voice: “Sacrifice is not required of all. God cannot have given pleasures merely to deny them. It is not urgent that I seek the Lord, or do His bidding.” (c.) Graceless humility urges its plea: “I am unworthy. I am not qualified. Surely God doesn’t mean or want me!”
II. Heaven’s claims override all human reluctance.
1. God has rightful authority over His creatures. “Thou, Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, but hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven; and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified” (Dan_5:22-23). “Ye call me Master and Lord, and ye say well, for so I am!” (Joh_13:13).
2. Man’s true attitude is unhesitating acquiescence. “Who art thou that repliest against thy Maker?”
3. Divine prescience never errs in demands. It is folly, therefore, and presumption for us to question. He does not mistake the man or the appointment. He never calls to service or salvation the wrong person (Joh_6:45; Joh_6:37; Rev_22:17).
III. God silences altercation, and summons to obedience. “Say not!” “Thou shalt go; thou shalt speak.”
With unquestioning promptitude we should reply to His call, “Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth.” His work is solemn, urgent, all-constraining.
1. Our will and faculties subordinated to God. Even as Abraham “obeyed, not knowing whither he went.” Do not raise a difficulty in the way of God’s plans. If He wants to use you, let Him; if to save you, let Him; if to honour you, let Him. “It is the Lord; let Him do what seemeth Him good!”
2. Our lives expended in service for God. Times of sore hardship may make us falter; ready again to speak out against God. “Then I said, I will not make mention of Him, nor speak any more in His name,” &c. (Jer_20:8-9). But our sole course is to “endure to the end.”
3. Our entire self completely abandoned to God. No word of excuse (Luk_9:57–end, Jer_14:18). No looking back. No reservation (Luk_18:28). For “ye are not your own.” Calvin’s motto on his crest was, “I give Thee all; I keep back nothing for myself.” (See Addenda to chap. 1, “Obedience.”)
Jer_1:10. Topic: CHARGE TO PASTORS: THEIR WORK DEFINED. Text: “See I have this day set thee over nations and over kingdoms to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.”
Differences between the prophet’s and pastor’s office: his an extraordinary, yours ordinary: his was to be exercised over nations and kingdoms, yours over a church and congregation.
Yet, even in his case, there was no civil power: he was no pope: nor was he invested with the authority of a modern bishop: no secular away; he pulled down and built up prophetically. Though you have no such power as this, given by extraordinary inspiration, yet in the way of declaring God’s word, “whosesoever sins you remit, they are remitted, and whosesoever sins you retain, they are retained.”
Your labour is less, yet the nature of your work is the same; and the same spirit of faithfulness is required over a few things as over many.
Your work is divided into two parts:
1. To discourage evil, “root out, pull down, destroy, and throw down.”
2. To encourage good, “build and plant.”
The imagery is of two kinds: that of a house, and that of a garden.
1. The Church is God’s house, God’s building, and you are appointed to “labour together with God,” to pull down, destroy, and throw down the rubbish, and then to build upon a new and good foundation.
2. The Church is also God’s garden, and you are appointed to work in it, keep it in order, root out weeds, plant and cultivate the godly fruit.
I. Inquire what are the evils against which you must contend, and the methods you are to adopt in this opposition.
1. By your public ministry root out errors in doctrine. Respecting God: His character, His ways with men, His law, both in precepts and penalty. Respecting Christ: defend His dignity, maintain His atonement. Respecting your people: such as self-righteousness and presumptuous hope. Pull down also the vain expectations of sinners.
2. By leading the Church, in the exercise of faithful discipline, root out evil-doers. Churches, formerly respectable and prosperous, are decaying for want of discipline. Some pervert the parable of wheat and tares as excuse for negligence; but the field is the world, not the Church.
3. By rendering your pastoral visits subservient to the purposes of conviction and correction. There are cases which you could not touch in the pulpit without irritating; others which do not fall under church censure, which should come within the cognisance of the pastor. This is difficult; consequently some have declined it, pleading it would offend and damage the cause. Leave results with Christ. Yet all may be done without offence: mingle counsel and encouragement with censure, as did Paul with the Corinthians.
II. What is that good which you are to encourage: what the work denoted by building and planting?
In general, encourage and impart just sentiments. Encourage and cultivate holy tempers and dispositions. A company of modest, humble, upright, diligent, holy people evidences “a good minister.” But more particularly—
1. As a Builder.
1. Be sure you lay a right foundation. Christ is the foundation: of God’s laying, of apostles’ and prophets’; and you must lay Him as the foundation of faith and holiness.
2. See that your materials be fitly framed together (Eph_2:21): implying that
a. They be hewed and squared. What could a company of proud, prejudiced professors do together with the godly? These sins must be cut off.
b. They be formed by the same rule. Whatever variety, in some respects there must be uniformity: similarity of views; hearts renewed after image of Christ; for “what fellowship,” &c. (2Co_6:14-18).
c. Every one be put in the situation for which he is formed. Some have splendid gifts, stones in front of building, for ornament and strength. Others have more private excellences, affectionate in counsel, grave in deportment. Every gift should be disposed of as that it shall be of greatest use to the whole. Offices filled by men because of their property, perverts this law.
3. So frame the whole as that it may be a fit habitation for God. It must be God’s house, not yours. Because of Nebuchadnezzar’s vanity, “This is the house I have built!” All buildings are with a view to habitation. Build so that God may take up His abode with you.
2. As a Planter.
1. Sow “wholly a right seed.”
2. Give attention to the plants as you see them grow.
3. Cultivate them by every means.
4. Pray that they may be watered by the Holy Spirit.
a. While pulling down or building, rooting out or planting, in God’s house and vineyard, do not overlook your own. Personal religion is of utmost importance to a minister.
b. Consider that you are “a labourer together with God.” He that employs you will reward you.—Rev. Andrew Fuller.
Jer_1:19. Topic: OPPOSITION. Text: “And they shall fight against thee,” &c.
Every servant of God sure to meet opposition. In proportion as we are faithful to God expect to be assailed by man. Doctrines, habits, and acts of true servants of God antagonistic to maxims and tastes of world: they are protests against what sinners love. Success in God’s service fills them with alarm: “these men turn world upside down;” and would expel us from every paradise of pleasure, cut off every supply of gratification, and abandon us to a life of melancholy.
I. The vehemence of our foes. “Fight against thee.”
Not fight against principle so much as persons. Aim to wound the saint more than refute his doctrine.
1. Formerly this virulence was manifested in revolting cruelties; lit fires of martyrdom; crowded prisons with sufferers for conscience’ sake; drove thousands into exile; even disturbed ashes of pious dead to emphasise their execrations of the living.
2. Now opposition resorts to more secret, though not less deadly means. Seeks to prison confidence and joys; impede progress, disturb peace, destroy spirituality.
The angel of tolerance and specious doctrine is seen, not the foul enemy: but the same implacable heart of hate prompts hostility. “They shall fight” to end of time, though methods vary.
II. The certainty of our security. “They shall not prevail.”
Saints may be weary, maimed, fearful, but cannot be ultimately defeated. False professors will fall a prey: indeed they tempt the tempter; but true men are sure of victory. Issue has ever been, “We are more than conquerors.”
III. The source of our confidence. “I am with thee, to deliver thee.”
This assures
1. The abiding presence of the Lord. Near to observe our behaviour, hear our entreaties, stimulate our hearts.
2. The constant manifestation of the power of the Lord. “To deliver;” i.e., such help shall be vouchsafed that every one of His soldiers shall “work out his own salvation.”
Word of caution: Let us be careful that our enemies are the enemies of truth; that our strict adherence to Divine commandments is the sole occasion of their hostility.
If we suffer, let it be for the kingdom of heaven’s sake, or we shall not inherit the benediction.
It is possible to fight for God, and yet not be fighting with God, nor with Divinely-appointed means: in which case defeat is neither wonderful nor undeserved.—“Sermon Framework.”
ADDENDA TO CHAPTER 1: ILLUSTRATIONS AND SUGGESTIVE EXTRACTS
Jer_1:1. “Anathoth.” A poor village of some twenty houses, built among white rocks and white ruins, on a bare, grey mountain side. No trees, no verdure, no richness, no grandeur, no beauty: amid mountain solitudes and rocky dells, he (Jeremiah) mourned and wept over the foreseen calamities of his beloved country.… One can trace in nearly all the images and illustrations with which his writings abound, the influence of those wild scenes amid which he passed his boyhood. Mountains, rocks, wild beasts, shepherds, are again and again introduced.—Dr. Porter’s “Syria’s Holy Places.”
Hither to his “fields” Abiathar was banished by Solomon after the failure of his attempt to put Adonijah on the throne (1Ki_2:26). This was the native place of Abiezer, one of David’s thirty captains (2Sa_23:27), and of Jehu (1Ch_12:3). The “men of Anathoth” returned from the captivity with Zerubbabel (Ezr_2:23; Neh_7:27).… The cultivation of the priests survives in tilled fields of grain, with figs and olives.… The quarries still supply Jerusalem with building-stone.—Dr. Smith’s Dictionary.
Mean as the place is now, it was then a walled town, and its ruins still afford some traces of its ancient importance.—Kitto.
“Son of Hilkiah.” Parentage. A young minister, when about to be ordained, stated that at one period of his life he was nearly an infidel. “But,” said he, “there was one argument in favour of Christianity which I could never refute—the consistent conduct of my father.”
Richard Cecil, from contemplating his mother’s holy character and inward peace, was persuaded of the Faith, and led to consecrate his life to most successful devotion to the Redeemer.
Plato, seeing a child do mischief, went and corrected the father for it.
Jer_1:2-3. Mutations of life. When one sea floweth, another ebbeth. When one star riseth, another setteth. When light is in Goshen, darkness is in Egypt. When Mordecai groweth into favour, Haman groweth out of favour. When Benjamin beginneth, Rachel endeth. Thus we are rising or setting, getting or spending, winning or losing, growing or fading, until we arrive at heaven or hell.—Henry Smith.
Predestination. “If Jeremiah had fancied he was a prophet because there was in him a certain aptitude for uttering Divine discourses and foreseeing calamities, who can tell the weariness and loathing he would have felt for his task when it led to no seeming results, except the dislike of all against or for whom it was exercised,—still more when the powers and graces which were supposed to be the qualification for it became consciously feeble. Nothing but a witness, the more sure for being secret, ‘thou wast marked and sealed for this function before thou hadst done good or evil; all thy powers are endowments to fit thee for fulfilling thy vocation, but do not constitute it; … it may produce nothing but pain to thyself and to those who are brought within thy influence; … still the words must be spoken, the acts must be done; for they are not thy words or thy acts;’—nothing but such a persuasion, written and rewritten in a man’s heart, could sustain him against the conflicts, outward and inward, which pursue the true prophet.”—Maurice’s “Prophets and Kings.”
Jer_1:5. Divine formation of a life.
Fore-ordination. “Propheta nascitur non fit. A man is not educated unto a prophet, but originally formed for the office. Samuel declared a message from God to Eli when he was a little child. Note, God can, when He pleases, make children prophets, and ordain strength out of the mouths of babes and sucklings.”—M. Henry.
Children do not always reproduce their parents.
Origen had Christian parents, but Clement of Alex., and Justin Martyr were born and trained amid heathenism; rising like stars out of night. St. Francis of Assisi, again, had parents who were gross, brutal, and sordid; whereas he himself became one of the loveliest, holiest, and most self-abnegating of men which Christendom has known. Erasmus, also, the eminent Christian scholar, had a parentage whose history was one of sorrow, shame, and monastic bigotry; yet he rose to great usefulness and honour in the Church. Parentage does not always determine the character and career of the child.
Jer_1:6. “I am a child.” Lowliness of mind. “Self-distrust is the first proof we give of having obtained a knowledge of ourselves.”—Zimmerman. St. Augustine being asked, What is the first thing in religion? replied, Humility; and what is the second? Humility: and what the third? Humility. “Humility is the truest abstinence in the world. It is abstinence from self-love and self-conceit, the hardest and severest abstinence.” “Humility leads to the highest distinction, because it leads to self-improvement.”—Sir B. Brodie. “We must be little children in our own sight, in order to be prophets.”—Bishop Wordsworth. God dwells with the humble.
“The saint that wears heaven’s brightest crown
In deepest adoration bends;
The weight of glory bows him down
The most when most his soul ascends;
Nearest the throne itself must be
The footstool of humility.”
—MONTGOMERY.
“I cannot speak.”
“Eloquence—a plague upon the word when we are talking of Jesus and of souls!—has no gift or benediction.”—F. W. Faber.
“The sign-posts that point the way by the side of the road, never have a quotation of poetry upon them, or sentences from Isocrates or Sophocles. There is just the word, and that is enough.”—C. H. Spurgeon.
Having heard Massillon preach at Versailles, Louis XIV. said to him, “Father, when I hear others preach, I am very well pleased with them; when I hear you, I am dissatisfied with myself?”
“Even the world honours consistency and courage, and the plainest speaker will have, in general, the most hearers. The only part by which a bull can be safely taken is the borns.”—Power.
Jer_1:7. Obedience.
“Submit yourself to God, and you shall find
God fights the battles of a will resigned.”
—BISHOP KEN.
“We can have no idea what we should be able to do if we were completely lost in accord with God; if we sought no will but His; if not a word of our mouths, not a beat of our hearts, not a thought of our minds, not a movement of our souls or bodies but were turned to Him obediently, in the spirit of Samuel, ‘Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth.’ There have been men who have shown what a man can do—a Luther, a Calvin, a St. Paul, a Moses—these men have shown what a man can do when he only seeks to obey the will of God.”—A. Monod.
“Blessed is that simplicity which leaveth the difficult paths of dispute, and goeth on in the plain and sure path of God’s commandments.”—Thomas à Kempis.
Jer_1:11. “What seest thou?” “Prophets have need of good eyes; and those that see well shall be commended, and not only those that speak well.”—M. Henry.
“Almond-tree.” The rods which the princes of Israel bore were almond rods, at once the ensign of their office, and the emblem of the vigilance which became them as leaders of God’s chosen people (Num_17:6-8). Aaron’s rod, that blossomed and yielded nuts, was an almond bough. The almond-tree has always been regarded by the Jews with reverence. Its fruit was among the presents which Jacob charged his sons to take with them on their second visit to Egypt (Gen_43:11); and the ornaments of the golden candlesticks were made after the pattern of almonds (Exo_25:33); and even to this day the modern English Jews on their great feast-days carry a bough of flowering almond to the synagogue. An allusion is made in Ecc_12:5, to the white or silver hair which, ere one is well aware, covers the head of old age.
“The hope, in dreams, of a happier hour,
That alights on misery’s brow,
Springs out of the silvery almond flower,
That blooms on a leafless bough.”
Jer_1:11. Visions. Refer to Kebel’s hymn for Septuagesima Sunday.
—— “Earth is crammed with heaven,
And every common bush on fire with God,
But only he who sees takes off his shoes.”
—UNKNOWN.
“And this our life, exempt from public haunt,
Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in everything.”
—“As You Like It,” SHAKESPEARE.
Jer_1:14. “Out of the North.” “The swelling waters of a flood are a usual type of an overwhelming calamity (Psa_69:1-2), and especially of a hostile invasion (Isa_8:7-8); but this is a flood of scalding waters, whose very touch is death. The caldron represents the great military empires upon the Euphrates … The tide of passion and carnage is sure finally to pour itself upon Judea. The caldron looks ominously towards Jerusalem, but it has not yet overturned; and if Judah repent, God may make it exhaust its fury upon itself [Nineveh and Babylon being in conflict], or a defeat instead of victory at Charchemish may alter the whole tide of events. But if Judah remain impenitent, it must become the prey of whosoever conquers in the plains of Mesopotamia.”—Speaker’s Com.
Jer_1:15. War.
“’Twas man himself
Brought Death into the world; and man himself
Gave keenness to his darts, quickened his pace,
And multiplied destructions on mankind.
“One murder made a villain [Cain],
Millions a hero [warrior]. Princes were privileged
To kill, and numbers sanctified the crime.
Ah! why will kings forget that they are men,
And men that they are brethren!”
“Still monarchs dream
Of universal empire growing up
From universal ruin.”—PORTEUS.
Jer_1:17-18. “Be not dismayed.” Courage before kings.
Said the Roman Emperor to Chrysostom, “I will banish thee.” “Thou canst not,” was his answer, “for the world is my Father’s house.” “Then will I Kill thee.” “That is not in thy power, for my life is hid with Christ in God.” “I will deprive thee of all thou possessest.” “Nay, for my treasure is in heaven, and my riches are within me.” “But I will exile thee, that thou shalt not have a friend or companion left.” “Neither canst thou do that; for my Friend is He who will never leave me, and from whom none can sever me. I defy thee, proud emperor; thou canst do me no harm at all!”—From “Crowds of the Bible.”
When Polycarp was brought before the pro-consul, this officer addressed him: “Renounce Christ and I will release you!” Polycarp answered, “Eighty and six years have I served Him, and He hath done me no wrong; and how can I speak evil of my King, my Saviour?” The pro-consul replied, “I have wild beasts; to these I will cast you, if you change not your mind.” But he boldly rejoined, “Thou seemest not to know what I am; hear me freely professing it to thee—I am a Christian.”
“And how can man die better than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers, and the temple of his gods.”—MACAULAY.
“He holds no parley with unmanly fears;
Where duty bids he confidently steers,
Faces a thousand dangers at her call,
And trusting in his God, surmounts them all.”—COWPER.
The Preacher's Complete Homiletical Commentary (gen. ed. Joseph S. Exell; Funk & Wagnalls, c. 1892) — public domain (pre-1929). A full-Bible homiletical/sermon-outline anthology covering 65 of 66 books (2 John is absent from the source module). Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Sermon Bible 1900 · Public Domain Jer 1:1-13
Jer 1:1-13
I.—(Jer 1:4). The two great blessings of election and mediation are here distinctly taught. God did not speak to the nations directly, but mediationally. He created a minister who should be His mouthpiece. Observation itself teaches us that men are called and chosen of God to do special work in all departments of life. The difficult lesson for some of us to learn is, that we are called to obscurity, and yet this is as clearly a Divine appointment as is the choice of an Isaiah or a Jeremiah.
Read full note →
II.—(Jer 1:6-8). It is thus that fear and confidence make up our best life. We are sure that God has called us, yet we dread to set down our feet on the way which He has marked out with all the clearness of light. Fear well becomes our mortality, for what is our strength? and as for our days, their number is small. Beautiful is modesty in its own place, but never forget that there is something which closely imitates its loveliest features, and that its foul name is hypocrisy.
III.—(Jer 1:9-10). You made much of your own weakness; now what are you going to make of God’s strength. You may obstinately persist in looking at your own small arm, or you may piously turn to the almightiness of God, and draw your power from eternity; and upon your choice will depend your whole after-life. (1) Observe the expression, "I will put My words in thy mouth." The minister of God is to speak the words of God. (2) The tenth verse sets forth, under a personal figure, the majesty and omnipotence of truth. It is not the mere man Jeremiah who is thus mighty, even to terribleness; he is but representative and ministerial, and if he tamper with his mission he will be dispossessed and humbled.
IV.—(Jer 1:11-13). The power of spiritual vision is preeminently the gift of God. The power of parables, making them or reading them, is a deep mystery of the unseen Kingdom. It is the gift of sight which distinguishes one man from another.
Parker, The Ark of God, p. 170.
References: Jer 1:5.—C. J. Vaughan, Old Testament Outlines, p. 243. Jer 1:6.—Preacher’s Monthly, vol. iv., p. 80.
Jer 1:6-9
It is not improbable that Jeremiah was almost a child when he spoke these words. Considering the time to which he lived, he must have been young in the thirteenth year of Josiah,—young enough to make the most literal sense of the expression in the text a reasonable one. Jeremiah has a kind of feminine tenderness and susceptibility; strength was to be educed out of a spirit which was inclined to be timid and shrinking. Think of such a vision as being presented to a mind cast in that mould: "See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant."
I. The discoveries and revelations to the minds of the prophets became deeper in proportion as they approached nearer to some great crisis in their country’s history. It was possible for the Israelite of an earlier time to think of the covenant which God had made with His people as an act of grace expressing, no doubt, the mind of a gracious Being, but still almost arbitrary. Isaiah was gradually educated to know that the covenant denoted a real and eternal relation between God and man in the person of a Mediator. If that truth is not brought out with the same force and distinctness in Jeremiah, if he is not in the same sense as the other the evangelical prophet, yet he had even a deeper conviction that a Divine Spirit was with him continually, a Spirit which was seeking to subdue his will—all wills—to Itself. That men should break loose from this gracious government, should choose to be independent of it, seemed to him the saddest and strangest thing in the world.
II. The greatest cause of dismay to Jeremiah was the falsehood of the priests and prophets. No doubt the official or personal self-conceit of the priests, which arose from their forgetfulness of their relation to the people at large, was one of their greatest offence’s in his eyes. But these sins arose from their not confessing that they were called by the Lord to be witnesses of His sympathy: whenever they were not witnesses for Him, they were necessarily proud and self-seeking. Jeremiah could only be qualified for his work by feeling in himself every one of the evil tendencies which he imputed to the priests generally. He had to feel all the peculiar temptations of his tribe and class to vanity, self-glorification, self-indulgence,—to feel how quickly they might fall into all the commonest, grossest habits of other men; while there is also a subtle, radical, internal wickedness that is nearer to them than to those whose offerings they present.
F. D. Maurice, Prophets and Kings of the Old Testament, p. 378.
Reference: Jer 1:7-10.—Homiletic Magazine, vol. viii., p. 195.
Jer 1:8
The prophets were ever ungratefully treated by the Israelites; they were resisted, their warnings neglected, their good services forgotten. But there was this difference between the earlier and the later prophets: the earlier lived and died in honour among their people,—in outward honour; though hated and thwarted by the wicked, they were exalted to high places, and ruled in the congregation. But in the later times, the prophets were not only feared and hated by the enemies of God, but cast out of the vineyard. As the time approached for the coming of the true Prophet of the Church, the Son of God, they resembled Him in their earthly fortunes more and more, and as He was to suffer, so did they. Moses was a ruler, Jeremiah was an outcast; Samuel was buried in peace, John the Baptist was beheaded.
I. Of all the persecuted prophets, Jeremiah is the most eminent, i.e. we know more of his history, of his imprisonments, his wanderings, and his afflictions. He comes next to David—I do not say in dignity and privilege, for it was Elijah who was taken up to heaven and appeared at the Transfiguration; nor to inspiration, for to Isaiah one should assign the higher evangelical gifts; but in typifying Him who came and wept over Jerusalem, and there was tortured and put to death by those He wept over.
II. Jeremiah’s ministry may be summed up in three words: good hope, labour, disappointment. No prophet commenced his labours with greater encouragement than Jeremiah. A king had ascended to the throne who was bringing back the times of the man after God’s own heart. Josiah, too, was young—at most twenty years of age—in the beginning of his reformation. What might not be effected in a course of years, however corrupt and degraded was the existing state of his people? So Jeremiah might think. Everyone begins with being sanguine; doubtless then, as now, many labourers in God’s husbandry entered on their office with more lively hopes than their after fortune warranted. Whether or not, however, such hope of success encouraged Jeremiah’s first exertions, very soon, in his case, this cheerful prospect was overcast, and he was left to labour in the dark. Huldah foretold a woe—an early removal of the good Josiah to his rest, as a mercy to him and to the nation, who were unworthy of him; a fierce destruction. This prophecy was delivered five years after Jeremiah entered into his office; he ministered in all forty years before the captivity; so early in his course were his hopes cut away.
III. All of us live in a world which promises well, but does not fulfil; all of us begin with hope and end with disappointment. Let us prepare for suffering and disappointment, which befit us as sinners, and are necessary for us as saints. Let us not turn away from trial when God brings it on us, or play the coward in the fight of faith. Take the prophets for an example of suffering affliction and of patience. "Behold, we count them happy who endure." The prophets went through sufferings to which ours are mere trifles; violence and craft combined to turn them aside, but they kept right on, and are at rest.
Plain Sermons by Contributors to "Tracts for the Times," vol. v., p. 248; see also J. H. Newman, Parochial and Plain Sermons, vol. viii., p. 124.
Reference: Jer 2:2.—Spurgeon, Morning by Morning, p. 352.
The Sermon Bible, ed. William Robertson Nicoll (1888–1900) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
J. R. Dummelow 1909 · Public Domain The Call of Jeremiah (13th year of Josiah). First…
The Call of Jeremiah (13th year of Josiah). First Prophecy
1-3. See Introduction.
Read full note →
3. The fifth month] i.e. when Jerusalem was destroyed (2Ki_25:3, 2Ki_25:8).
4-10. Jeremiah's call and first prophecy.
4. The word of the Lord came unto me] see art. 'Introduction to Hebrew Prophecy.' We cannot doubt that Jeremiah had long mourned over his people's sins, and yet perhaps hesitated to undertake the burden of witnessing against them. At length he became conscious of a divine call to the prophetic office, which was not to be restricted: cp. Jer_20:7.
5. I knew thee] approved, selected thee: cp. Gen_18:19; Psa_1:6; Nah_1:7. Sanctified] consecrated: cp. John Baptist (Luk_1:15-17) and St. Paul (Gal_1:15-16). Unto the nations] This points out a distinction between the work of Jeremiah as a prophet and that of many of his predecessors, e.g. Elijah and Elisha. Their predictions were concerned with the Jews only. Those of Jeremiah, on the other hand, had to do with the heathen world as well, and also with the nations of subsequent ages, as he foretold the blessings that were to come on the earth through the Messiah. See Intro.
6. A child] not probably in years, but in fitness. 'Who is sufficient for these things?'
9. Touched my mouth] symbolic of divine grace and inspiration: cp. Isa_6:6; Eze_2:9 to Eze_3:3.
10. Jeremiah's work was to be radical and destructive in denouncing the sins of his people and predicting their chastening, but also one of restoration and rebuilding through leading them to repentance.
11-19. Words of encouragement. Jeremiah is vouchsafed two visions. The first (11, 12) was the branch of an almond tree, which is extremely early in blossoming. This indicated that God would very soon execute His purposes and judgments.
12. Since the days of Manasseh the Lord had not visited upon the people their sins. That period of rest was like the winter. The Lord is now rousing Himself; yet not only to punish, but to save as well. Through Josiah's reforms and Jeremiah's ministry religion is to be kept alive in a remnant, viz. those carried to Babylon, and so the return shall at last be brought about.
13. The second vision was that of a seething pot with its mouth 'towards the south' (lit. 'from the face of the north'), and about to boil over. The meaning was as hinted in Jer_1:14, that the great Babylonian power to the N. of Palestine, which had long been at strife with Elam and Media, would soon be directed against Judæa, the danger to which always depended upon the fact that it lay on the direct route of an army proceeding from the E. against Egypt.
15. Shall set every one his throne, etc.] This prediction was literally fulfilled (see Jer_39:3). The function of administering justice was exercised by the king in person, and the neighbourhood of the city gate was the ordinary place at which trials were held. Here then the rulers of the invader's army will sit in judgment on the conquered people.
17. Gird up thy loins] The shortening of the robe by drawing it up through the girdle was preparatory to active exertion: cp. Elijah 1Ki_18:46.
18. I have made thee.. a defenced city, etc.] God would endue Jeremiah with firmness and resolution to carry out his mission in spite of all opposition.
J. R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (Macmillan, 1909) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Arno C. Gaebelein 1922 · Public Domain Analysis and Annotations
Analysis and Annotations
I. THE CALL TO REPENTANCE, THE IMPENITENCE OF THE PEOPLE, AND THE JUDGMENT ANNOUNCED
Read full note →
CHAPTER 1
The Call of the Prophet
1. The introduction (Jer 1:1-3)
2. The divine call (Jer 1:4-10)
3. The renewed call and the first visions (Jer 1:11-19)
Jer 1:1-3. The first three verses introduce us to the person of the prophet, to the time the Word of the Lord came unto him, and to the sphere of his ministry. Jeremiah’s father, Hilkiah, was a priest of the line of Ithamar; his home was Anathoth of Benjamin. (See general introduction.)
Jer 1:4-10. “Then the Word of the LORD came unto me” (Jer 1:4). The prophet is the writer who tells us how he was called into the office of a prophet. A sovereign, omniscient and omnipotent Lord speaks to and informs the young Jeremiah that He knew him, that his call was prenatal. He had been chosen and set apart for the specific work which he now was to undertake. (See Isa 49:1; Gal 1:15-24). What comfort this assuring knowledge must have been to the prophet in his trying ministry, in the persecutions which were his portion and the suffering he passed through! The Lord had called him, the Lord knew all that would take place, and He had the power to sustain him. And he is the same Lord today, and Jeremiah’s comfort is still the comfort of His trusting people.
Jeremiah expresses at once his fear. Like Moses Exo 4:10, he manifests self-distrust. He was but a child, not in the sense of a mere child, but a youth. The Septuagint translates it, “I am too young.” After that the Lord encouraged him by the promise of His presence, “I am with thee to deliver thee.” Then He touched his mouth and said, “Behold, I have put my words in thy mouth.” He was the mouthpiece of Jehovah, Who commissioned him to fulfill a ministry over nations and kingdoms, to announce the overthrow of them by the judgments of the Lord.
Jer 1:11-19. Some think that this renewed call came in the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim. There is nothing in the text to indicate this. The first vision is that of the rod of the almond tree. The Hebrew word for almond is “Shakad,” which means to watch, to wake early. It is the first tree which shows the return of spring. It denotes the early fulfillment of the judgment purposes of the Lord. The vision of the seething pot toward the north denotes the coming invasion by the kingdom of the north, that is, the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar. Then follows the renewed commission with a threat in case of disobedience; if his fearfulness would lead him to abandon the commission. More than that, the Lord, knowing the fears of the servant He had called and separated, encouraged him and once more promised him, “I am with thee saith the LORD, to deliver thee.”
Arno C. Gaebelein, The Annotated Bible (1913–1922) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Paul E. Kretzmann 1924 · Public Domain The Superscription
The Superscription
v. 1. The words of the word of the Lord came in the days of Jeremiah, the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth, in the land of Benjamin, this being one of the four cities within the territory of Benjamin allotted to the Kohathites, Jos 21:18;
Read full note →
v. 2. to whom Josiah, the son of Amon, king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign.
v. 3. It came also in the days of Jehoiakim, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the carrying away of Jerusalem, that is, of its inhabitants, captive in the fifth month. Note that Jeremiah expressly claims divine authority and inspiration for his prophecies, insisting that it is the Word of the Lord which he recorded. He omits the names of Jehoahaz and Jehoiachin from his list, since they reigned only three months each, and his title intends to specify in a general way only. "Since Jeremiah labored from the thirteenth year of Josiah, consequently eighteen years under Josiah, and eleven years each under Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, he ministered altogether, including the six months under the kings omitted, forty years in the midst of the theocracy. " Jeremiah was a member of a lowly family, and yet the Lord called him to a very important position as chief adviser of kings. God often chooses the weak, base, and despised things to confound the mighty. 1Co 1:27-29.
Paul E. Kretzmann, Popular Commentary of the Bible (1921–1924) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
unfoldingWord translationNotes 2017 · CC BY-SA 4.0 Jeremiah son of Hilkiah, one of the priests
Jeremiah son of Hilkiah, one of the priests
"Jeremiah son of Hilkiah. Jeremiah was one of the priests"
Read full note →
Hilkiah
This is the name of a man. (See: How to Translate Names)
Anathoth
This is the name of a town. (See: How to Translate Names)
the land of Benjamin
"the land that belongs to the tribe of Benjamin"
The word of Yahweh came to him
This idiom is used to announce that God gave messages to him. AT: "Yahweh gave messages to him" or "Yahweh spoke to Jeremiah" (See: Idiom)
Yahweh
This is the name of God that he revealed to his people in the Old Testament. See the translationWord page about Yahweh concerning how to translate this.
in the days of Josiah son of Amon, king of Judah
Here "in the days of" is an idiom that refers to the time when a king reigned. AT: "when Josiah son of Amon was king of Judah" (See: Idiom)
the thirteenth ... the eleventh
(See: Ordinal Numbers)
Amon
This is the name of a man. (See: How to Translate Names)
his reign
"Josiah's reign"
It also came
"The word of Yahweh also came"
in the days of Jehoiakim son of Josiah, king of Judah
Here "in the days of" is an idiom that refers to the time when a king reigned. AT: "when Johoiakim son of Josiah was king of Judah" (See: Idiom)
the fifth month
This is the fifth month of the Hebrew calendar. It is during the last part of July and the first part of August on Western calendars. (See: Hebrew Months and Ordinal Numbers)
of Zedekiah
This refers to the rule of Zedekiah. This can be stated explicitly. AT: "of the reign of Zedekiah" (See: Assumed Knowledge and Implicit Information)
when the people of Jerusalem were taken away as prisoners
This can be stated in active form. It can be stated clearly that they were taken to Babylon. AT: "when the army of Babylon took the people of Jerusalem away as prisoners" or "when the army of Babylon took the people of Jerusalem as prisoners to Babylon" (See: Active or Passive and Assumed Knowledge and Implicit Information)
translationWords
word
Jeremiah
priest
Benjamin
word of God
Yahweh
day
Josiah
king
kingdom of Judah
year
reign
Jehoiakim
Zedekiah
people group
Jerusalem
prison
unfoldingWord translationNotes — © Distant Shores Media and the Door43 World Missions Community, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Source: git.door43.org/Door43/en_tn.
Tyndale Open Study Notes 2022 · CC BY-SA 4.0 1:1-19 Jeremiah’s call is presented as a conversation; God…
1:1-19 Jeremiah’s call is presented as a conversation; God spoke as a king to Jeremiah. Jeremiah’s objections show that he understood himself clearly. God responded to his objections with promises and compelling visions.
Tyndale Open Study Notes — © Tyndale Open Resources, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Text via the HelloAO Bible API.