Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying,
Parallel Translations
-
Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying,
-
And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
-
And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying:
Cross-references
No cross-references for this verse.
Explain this verse (15 sources)
Historical commentary, presented as a primary source — not an endorsement.
Private notes
Saved on this device only — never synced or sent anywhere.
Matthew Henry 1710 · Public Domain Moses is ordered to deliver the summary of the…
Moses is ordered to deliver the summary of the laws to all the congregation of the children of Israel (Lev 19:2); not to Aaron and his sons only, but to all the people, for they were all concerned to know their duty. Even in the darker ages of the law, that religion could not be of God which boasted of ignorance as its mother. Moses must make known God's statutes to all the congregation, and proclaim them through the camp. These laws, it is probable, he delivered himself to as many of the people as could be within hearing at once, and so by degrees at several times to them all. Many of the precepts here given they had received before, but it was requisite that they should be repeated, that they might be remembered. Precept must be upon precept, and line upon line, and all little enough. In these verses,
I. It is required that Israel be a holy people, because the God of Israel is a holy God, Lev 19:2. Their being distinguished from all other people by peculiar laws and customs was intended to teach them a real separation from the world and the flesh, and an entire devotedness to God. And this is now the law of Christ (the Lord bring every thought within us into obedience to it!) You shall be holy, for I am holy, Pe1 1:15, Pe1 1:16. We are the followers of the holy Jesus, and therefore must be, according to our capacity, consecrated to God's honour, and conformed to his nature and will. Israel was sanctified by the types and shadows (Lev 20:8), but we are sanctified by the truth, or substance of all those shadows, Joh 17:17; Tit 2:14.
Read full note →
II. That children be obedient to their parents: "You shall fear every man his mother and his father, Lev 19:3. 1. The fear here required is the same with the honour commanded by the fifth commandment; see Mal 1:6. It includes inward reverence and esteem, outward expressions of respect, obedience to the lawful commands of parents, care and endeavour to please them and make them easy, and to avoid every thing that may offend and grieve them, and incur their displeasure. The Jewish doctors ask, "What is this fear that is owing to a father?" And they answer, "It is not to stand in his way nor to sit in his place, not to contradict what he says nor to carp at it, not to call him by his name, either living or dead, but 'My Father,' or 'Sir;' it is to provide for him if he be poor, and the like." 2. Children, when they grow up to be men, must not think themselves discharged from this duty: every man, though he be a wise man, and a great man, yet must reverence his parents, because they are his parents. 3. The mother is put first, which is not usual, to show that the duty is equally owing to both; if the mother survive the father, still she must be reverenced and obeyed. 4. It is added, and keep my sabbaths. If God provides by his law for the preserving of the honour of parents, parents must use their authority over their children for the preserving of the honour of God, particularly the honour of his sabbaths, the custody of which is very much committed to parents by the fourth commandment, Thou, and thy son, and thy daughter. The ruin of young people has often been observed to begin in the contempt of their parents and the profanation of the sabbath day. Fitly therefore are these two precepts here put together in the beginning of this abridgment of the statutes: "You shall fear, every man, his mother and his father, and keep my sabbaths. Those are hopeful children, and likely to do well, that make conscience of honouring their parents and keeping holy the sabbath day. 5. The reason added to both these precepts is, "I am the Lord your God; the Lord of the sabbath and the God of your parents."
III. That God only be worshipped, and not by images (Lev 19:4): "Turn you not to idols, to Elilim, to vanities, things of no power, no value, gods that are no gods. Turn not from the true God to false ones, from the mighty God to impotent ones, from the God that will make you holy and happy to those that will deceive you, debauch you, ruin you, and make you for ever miserable. Turn not your eye to them, much less your heart. Make not to yourselves gods, the creatures of your own fancy, nor think to worship the Creator by molten gods. You are the work of God's hands, be not so absurd as to worship gods the work of your own hands." Molten gods are specified for the sake of the molten calf.
IV. That the sacrifices of their peace-offerings should always be offered, and eaten, according to the law, Lev 19:5-8. There was some particular reason, it is likely, for the repetition of this law rather than any other relating to the sacrifices. The eating of the peace-offerings was the people's part, and was done from under the eye of the priests, and perhaps some of them had kept the cold meat of their peace-offerings, as they had done the manna (Exo 16:20), longer than was appointed, which occasioned this caution; see the law itself before, Lev 7:16-18. God will have his own work done in his own time. Though the sacrifice was offered according to the law, if it was not eaten according to the law, it was not accepted. Though ministers do their part, what the better if people do not theirs? There is work to be done after our spiritual sacrifices, in a due improvement of them; and, if this be neglected, all is in vain.
V. That they should leave the gleanings of their harvest and vintage for the poor, Lev 19:9, Lev 19:10. Note, Works of piety must be always attended with works of charity, according as our ability is. When they gathered in their corn, they must leave some standing in the corner of the field; the Jewish doctors say, "It should be a sixtieth part of the field;" and they must also leave the gleanings and the small clusters of their grapes, which at first were overlooked. This law, though not binding now in the letter of it, yet teaches us, 1. That we must not be covetous and griping, and greedy of every thing we can lay any claim to; nor insist upon our right in things small and trivial. 2. That we must be well pleased to see the poor supplied and refreshed with the fruit of our labours. We must not think every thing lost that goes beside ourselves, nor any thing wasted that goes to the poor. 3. That times of joy, such as harvest-time is, are proper times for charity; that, when we rejoice, the poor may rejoice with us, and when our hearts are blessing God their loins may bless us.
Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708–1710) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API.
John Gill 1763 · Public Domain And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... About the same,…
And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... About the same, or quickly after he had delivered the above laws to him; and there are many in this chapter, which were before given, and here repeated:
saying; as follows.
John Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible (1746–1763) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API.
John Wesley 1765 · Public Domain Various Precepts to be holy, ver. 1, 2. To…
Various Precepts to be holy, ver. 1, 2. To honour parents and sabbaths, ver. 3. To shun idolatry, ver. 4. Duty to eat their peace-offering, ver. 5- 8. To leave gleanings for the poor, ver. 9, 10. Not to steal, lie, swear falsely, or defraud, ver. 11-13. Not to curse the deaf, or put a stumbling-block before the blind, ver. 14. Not to judge unjustly, carry tales, or bear false witness, ver. 15, 16. To reprove sinners, not to revenge themselves; to love their neighbours, ver. 17, 18. Not to mix different things, ver. 19. Not to lie with their bond- maids, ver. 20-22. Not to eat of the fruit of the land for four years, ver. 23-25. Not to eat blood, use enchantments, or heathen customs, ver. 26-28. Or prostitute their daughters, ver. 29. To reverence God and his sanctuary, ver. 30. Not to regard wizards, ver. 31. To honour the aged, ver. 32. Love and right the stranger, ver. 33, 34. Do no injustice, ver. 34, 35, 36.
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the Whole Bible (1754–1765) — public domain. Text via the GEBible commentary corpus.
Adam Clarke 1810 · Public Domain Exhortations to holiness, and a repetition of various laws,
CHAPTER XIX
Exhortations to holiness, and a repetition of various laws,
Read full note →
1, 2
Duty to parents, and observance of the Sabbath, 3.
Against idolatry, 4.
Concerning peace-offerings, 5-8.
The gleanings of the harvest and vintage to be left for the
poor, 9, 10.
Against stealing and lying, 11;
false swearing, 12;
defrauding the hireling, 13.
Laws in behalf of the deaf and the blind, 14.
Against respect of persons in judgment, 15;
tale-bearing, 16;
hatred and uncharitableness, 17;
revenge, 18;
unlawful mixtures in cattle, seed, and garments, 19.
Laws relative to the bondmaid that is betrothed, 20-22.
The fruit of the trees of the land not to be eaten for the
first three years, 23;
but this is lawful in the fourth and fifth years, 24, 25.
Against eating of blood, and using incantations, 26;
superstitious cutting of the hair, 27;
and cutting of the flesh in the times of mourning, 28;
prostitution, 29.
Sabbaths to be reverenced, 30.
Against consulting those who are wizards, and have familiar
spirits, 31.
Respect must be shown to the aged, 32.
The stranger shall not be oppressed, 33, 34.
They shall keep just measures, weights, and balances, 35, 36.
Conclusion, 37.
NOTES ON CHAP. XIX
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible (1810–1826) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword/MySword module.
Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures 1864 · Public Domain Holiness of Conduct towards God and Man
THIRD SECTION
Holiness of Conduct towards God and Man
Read full note →
Lev_19:1-16
1And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 2Speak unto all the congregation1 or the children of Israel, and say unto them, Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy.
3Ye shall fear every man his mother,2 and his father, and keep my sabbaths: I am the Lord your God.
4Turn ye not unto idols,3 nor make to yourselves molten gods: I am the Lord your God.
5And if ye offer a sacrifice of peace offerings unto the Lord, ye shall offer it at your own will [offerings, unto the Lord ye shall offer it for your acceptance4]. 6It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow: and if ought remain until the third day, it shall be burnt in the fire. 7And if it be eaten at all on the 8third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted. Therefore every one that eateth5 it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the hallowed thing of the Lord: and that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
9And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest. 10And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard [fruit garden6], neither shalt thou gather every grape [the scattered fruit7] of thy vineyard [fruit garden6]; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God.
11Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another. 12And ye shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. 13Thou shalt not defraud [oppress8] thy neighbour, neither9 rob him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning.
14Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling-block before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord.
15Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment:10 thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
16Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people:11 neither12shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord. 17Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him [and not bear sin on his account13]. 18Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.
19Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind:14 thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled [diverse15] seed: neither shall a garment mingled [a diverse garment15] of linen and woollen16 come upon thee.
20And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman that is a bondmaid, betrothed17 to an husband, and not at all redeemed, nor freedom given her; she shall be scourged [there shall be punishment18], they shall not be put to death, because she was not free. 21And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, even a ram for a trespass offering. 22And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.
23And when ye shall come into the land, and shall have planted all manner of trees for food, then ye shall count the fruit thereof as uncircumcised:19 three years shall it be as uncircumcised to you: it shall not be eaten of. 24But in the fourth year all the fruit thereof shall be holy to praise20 the Lord withal. 25And in the fifth year shall ye eat of the fruit thereof, that it may yield21 unto you the increase thereof: I am the Lord your God.
26Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood:22 neither23 shall ye use enchantment, nor observe times. 2327Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou 24mar the corners of thy24 beard. 28Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the Lord.
29Do not prostitute thy daughter, to cause her to be a whore; lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness.
30Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary: I am the Lord.
31Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards to be defiled by them: I am the Lord your God.
32Thou shalt rise up before the hoary head, and honour the face of the old man, and fear thy God: I am the Lord.
33And if a stranger sojourn with thee25 in your land, ye shall not vex [oppress26] him. 34 But [omit but27] the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.
35Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. 36Just balances, just weights,28 a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. 37Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: I am the Lord.
TEXTUAL AND GRAMMATICAL
Lev_19:2. עֲדַת = congregation is omitted by 3 MSS. and the LXX.
Lev_19:3. In the LXX., Vulg., and Syr., the order is reversed to his father and his mother. The Sam and Onk. follow the Hebrew.
Lev_19:4. אֱלִילִים = inania numina, Rosen. It is formed from אֵל with a termination expressive of contempt.
Lev_19:5. לִרְצֹנְכֶם = for your acceptance. See Textual Note6 on Lev_1:3.
Lev_19:8. The Heb. has the plural form אֹכְלָיו, but the Sam. and other versions have the sing as in the following verb and noun.
Lev_19:10. כֶּרֶם is generally a vineyard, but also (Jdg_15:7) an olive yard. It is “a field or yard of the nobler plants and trees, cultivated in the manner of a garden or orchard,” Gesen. It is doubtless here used in its broadest sense, and the vineyard of the A. V. is therefore too restricted.
Lev_19:10. פֶרֶט = that which is scattered, and hence meaning here both the fallen fruit (Chald., Vulg., Syr.), and also the single berries of the olive and the vine not gathered with the harvest.
Lev_19:13. תַעֲשֹׁק. Lev_19:11 forbids sins of craft and falsehood against one’s neighbor; this, sins of violence and open oppression. The translation given is that of the A. V. in Deu_24:14.
Lev_19:13. The Heb. לֹא is without the conjunction which is supplied in 40 MSS. in the Sam. and the LXX.
Lev_19:15. The conjunction ו is prefixed in 7 MSS., the Sam., LXX., and Syr.
Lev_19:16. בְּעַמֶּיךָ. The Sam. and 66 MSS. omit the י.
Lev_19:16. Here again the Heb. omits the conjunction which is supplied in 40 MSS., and in the Syr.
Lev_19:17. וְלֹא־תִשָּׂא עָלָיו חֵטְא is a clause the meaning of which has been much questioned. It seems certain, however, that נָשָׂא cannot mean suffer, (permit) as in the A. V., but must mean bear as in the margin. The marginal for him is ambiguous, and it is better therefore to use the more explicit on his account. For instances of precisely the same Sense of these words, see Lev_22:9; Num_18:32, and comp. also the very similar expression in Psa_69:8.
Lev_19:19. 3 MSS., the Sam., LXX., and Syr., prefix the conjunction.
Lev_19:19. כִּלְאַיִם (dual from כֶּלֶא = separation) occurs only in this verse (three times) and in the parallel Deu_22:9, but is frequent in the Talmud. It signifies of two kinds, heterogeneous. The translation of the A. V. at its first occurrence in the ver. diverse is good, and should by all means be retained in the other clauses, both for consistency’s sake, and for the force of the command. All the Semitic versions preserve the uniformity.
Lev_19:19. שַׁעַטְנֵז occurs only here and in Deu_22:11, where it is explained “of woolen and linen together.” Its etymology is obscure. See the Lexicons and Bochart, Hieroz. I., lib. II., c. 35. p. 545, ed. Rosen. It is probably an Egyptian word, although not yet satisfactorily explained. The Chald. retains the word, and the LXX. translates κίβδηλον = spurious, adulterated, probably by a mere conjecture. Rosenmüller quotes Forster as explaining it of a costly Egyptian dress woven in various figures of plants and animals in colors, having a symbolical idolatrous signification. See Com.
Lev_19:20. נֶחֶרֶפֶת Niph. from חָרַף = to tear off, to set apart. There seems no doubt of the correctness of the text of the A. V., and the margin is therefore unnecessary.
Lev_19:20. בִּקֹּרֶת תִהְיֶה. This word is ἅπ. λεγ., but there seems little doubt of its meaning, investigation, and then punishment. Authorities are much divided on the question whether both parties, or only the woman, was to be scourged. The LXX., Vulg., and Syr., are clear for the former, while the Sam. applies it only to the man. In the uncertainty it is better to retain the indefiniteness of the Heb. as in the marg. of the A. V. The Sam. reading is remarkable בקרת תהיה לו = he shall be punished, and then, in the sing. לא יומת = he shall not die. This gives a sense agreeing excellently with the reason assigned because she was not free, and hence the act did not legally constitute adultery which was punishable with death.
Lev_19:23. “The singular suffix in עָרְלָתוֹ” [and also in פִּרְיוֹ] “refers to בֹּל, and the verb ערל is a denom. from עָרְלָה, to make into a foreskin, to treat as uncircumcised, i.e., to throw away as unclean or uneatable.” Keil. The LXX. rendering περικαθαριεῖτε τὴν ἀκαθαρσίαν αὐτοῦ = ye shall purge away its uncleanness expresses very well the general sense.
Lev_19:24. הִלּוּלִים occurs only here and in Jdg_9:27. In the latter place it seems to mean merry-making feasts to idols, and Josephus (Ant. iv. 8, 19) understands the law to be that the fruit of the fourth year should be carried to the place of the Sanctuary, and there used in a holy feast with friends and the poor. But the following verse seems so clearly to forbid the owner’s partaking of it before the fifth year that it would be unsafe to change the translation. The marg. of the A. V. holiness of praises to the Lord does not convey any distinct idea. The idea of Murphy a praise offering is hardly sustained by the text. The true sense is probably that incorporated into the Targ. Onk. it shall be consecrated to those offering praises before the Lord, i.e., it was to be given to the Lord through His priests, and used by them in feasts.
Lev_19:25. For לְהוֹמִיף that it may yield, the Sam., followed by the Vulg., reads לְהֹאסִיף for collecting (in storehouses) the produce.
Lev_19:26. עַל־הַדָּם. The LXX. must have read ר instead of ד to sustain the version ἐπὶ τῶν ὀρέων, and some critics would adopt this to avoid the peculiarity of the construction of עַל, considering it justified by the frequency of the practice in connection with idolatrous feasts (comp. Hos_4:13). But a mis-reading of the LXX. is not a sufficient ground for a change of the text; for the construction of עַל see Exo_12:8, and comp. Textual Note4 on Lev_2:2.
Lev_19:26-27. In both places the Sam., one or two MSS., and the LXX., supply the conjunction.
Lev_19:27. The Sam. and most of the Ancient Versions put the verb and the pronoun in the plural in accordance with the previous clause.
Lev_19:33. The Sam. and versions have the plural.
Lev_19:33. The marg. of the A. V. expresses the sense of תוֹנוּ better than the text.
Lev_19:34. There is no occasion for the insertion of the but of the A. V.
Lev_19:36. The marg. of the A. V. stones is unnecessary, that being merely the primary sense of אֶבֶן while weight is the fully established derivative sense.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
With this chapter begins a new Parashah of the law extending to Lev_20:27. The parallel Haphtarah from the prophets is Eze_20:2-20, recounting the disobedience of Israel in the wilderness to the commands of this chapter and their consequent punishment; and the close of Amo_9:7-15, denouncing the punishment and foretelling the final restoration of God’s people—a prophecy applied by S. James (Act_15:16-17) to the gathering in of the Gentiles to the Church of Christ.
“This remarkable chapter is perhaps the most comprehensive, the most varied, and in some respects the most important section of Leviticus, if not of the Pentateuch; it was by the ancient Jews regarded as an epitome of the whole Law; it was adopted and paraphrased by the best gnomic writers, such as Pseudo-Phocylides; and it has at all times been looked upon as a counterpart of the Decalogue itself.” Kalisch.
It treats of the holiness in the daily life and conversation which must characterize the covenant people of a holy God. This basis of the commands given is prominently brought forward at the opening and continually kept in mind by the phrase I am the Lord throughout. This expresses at once the basis of the command, and the goal towards which the Israelite must strive. It is as difficult to arrange these laws systematically as to do so with the duties of the daily life, and an arrangement which would be systematic from one point of view would not be so from another. The following analysis of the chapter, from Murphy, presents a somewhat different view from that given by Lange below: “They are in communion with God (1–8), in the communion of saints (9–22), and are about to be in a land of holiness (23–32), and visited by strangers (33–37). And each of these relations brings out a series of duties peculiar to itself.”
Lange says: “We hold that this section, as being the summing up of the laws of the theocratic humanity, is quite in place, as a contrast to the characteristics of the heathen inhumanity which the foregoing chapter has displayed; and in so far forth comprises in no part anything repeated, varying, or in the more restricted sense religious. It gives the characteristics of the consecrated human personality in the theocracy, and of its conduct as it should correspond with the holy personality of Jehovah, and hence it is said again and again: I am Jehovah. From this constant refrain a liturgy of religious humanity could be unfolded. First, in threefold distinctness: Ye shall be holy,i.e. hallowed personalities, for I Jehovah your God am holy, and ever again I am Jehovah your God (Lev_19:3-4; Lev_19:10; Lev_19:25; Lev_19:31; Lev_19:34; Lev_19:36), or I am Jehovah (Lev_19:12; Lev_19:14; Lev_19:16; Lev_19:18; Lev_19:28; Lev_19:30; Lev_19:32; Lev_19:37). Evidently these statements together, as the characteristics of the private human conduct, stand in connection with the legislation for the social humanity in the section, Exodus 21-23.
“Disposition: Lev_19:1-2. The principle of humanity: Jehovah the Holy One. Lev_19:3-8. True and false piety. Lev_19:9-18. Inwardly grounded humanity. Lev_19:19-32. Observance of the moral laws of nature. Lev_19:33-37. Observance of hospitality and the duties of trade.
“The first theocratic law of humanity is the root of all that follow, the law of piety. And here it is not said: ‘Father and mother,’ but mother and father; for the mother precedes the father in the duty of mankind.” Wordsworth says in reference to this order: “In the former chapter God had displayed the evils consequent on the abuse of woman, and here He inculcates reverence towards her, as the foundation of social happiness.” This is the fifth commandment of the Decalogue (Exo_20:12), and is clearly necessary to be called to mind here; for as the family is the basis of all social organization, so is reverence to parents the first necessity of family order. Next follows the reiteration of the fourth commandment (Eze_20:12) as the first duty of man beyond the immediate respect due from him to those from whom he derives his being. The great prominence everywhere given in Scripture to the observance of the Sabbath (comp. e. g.Eze_20:12-13; Eze_20:16; Eze_20:20-21; Eze_20:24, being the portion from the prophets read in the synagogue in connection with this chapter), and the universality of its obligation as grounded upon the Divine rest, show how deeply this must enter into all excellent social organization. These two precepts are here coupled together as they are in the Decalogue, and they are the only commands given there in positive form. They “express two great central points, the first belonging to natural law, and the second to positive law, in the maintenance of the well-being of the social body of which Jehovah was the acknowledged king.” Clark. It is noticeable that the same generality which is given to the command in Ex. by the use of the sing. is here attained also by the use of the plural; for the plural is not to be understood as used (Kalisch) for the purpose of including other festivals than the weekly day of rest.
Lev_19:4. This precept includes the two first commands of the Decalogue. The order of commands in this chapter, in so far as the commands themselves are the same, is different, from that in the Decalogue, because there the starting point is from God Himself; here from man in his family and social relations. In regard to this precept, Lange says: “If the heart of man becomes benumbed to the use of images of false gods of any kind, he sinks down to the idols which are his ideals, and becomes as dumb and unspiritual as they are, Lev_19:4. All gods of the heathen are Elilim, nothingnesses, Psa_96:5; Psa_115:8; Psa_135:18; Isa_40:18; Isa_44:10, etc.” Comp. also Deu_27:15. It was a notion of the Rabbins that this word was compounded of אַל, = not, and אֵל = God. Comp. 1Co_8:4; 1Co_10:19.
Lev_19:5-8. The Legislator now turns to the especial outward act of communion with God in the peace offering. His object is not to speak of sacrifices in general, nor even of any special kind of peace offering; therefore the distinctions of Lev_7:11-21 are not referred to. The reference is rather to Lev_17:3-7, according to which, during the wilderness life, all food of sacrificial animals was to be sanctified by the peace offering. So here all holy feasting of communion with God must be based upon a sacrifice for their acceptance, and must be treated according to the commands already given. The order of the precepts is therefore perfectly natural: first, filial duty; then the observance of the fundamental divine institution for society; next, negatively, the entire turning away from everything that could come into rivalry with God; and now the keeping holy of the appointed means of communion with Him. After this come (9–18) various precepts to guard the holiness of conduct toward one’s neighbor, especially the poor and distressed, illustrated by one command of detail after another until the all including principle is announced, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
Lev_19:9-10. The gatherer of his harvest, out of the abundance which God had given him, must have a generous care for the poor and the stranger; the poor, as those unable to cultivate their own land, or who had been obliged to sell it until the next year of Jubilee; and the stranger, as those who by the organization of the Hebrew common wealth could have no possession of land in their country. The LXX. and the Syr. interpret stranger of proselytes, and are followed by some Jewish commentators; but such restriction is plainly at variance with the whole spirit of the command. The same precept is repeated, in regard to the grain harvest, in connection with the feast of weeks (Lev_23:22), and more generally in Deu_24:19-22 with a reminder of the privations and bondage they had themselves endured in Egypt. The story of Ruth is a beautiful exemplification of the operation of this statute.
Lev_19:11. This and the following precepts take the usual negative form of statutory law. The eighth commandment is here joined with the offences recounted in Lev_6:2-5 of falsehood and fraud towards others. St. Augustine here (Qu. 68) enters at length into the casuistical question of the justifiableness of lying under certain peculiar circumstances, citing the example of Rahab among others. He concludes that it was not her lying, as such, which received the divine approbation, but her desire to serve God, which indeed prompted her lie. However this may be, it is plain that the law here has in view not extraordinary and exceptional cases, but the ordinary dealings of man with man. Such law is of universal obligation. Comp. Col_3:9.
Lev_19:12 is of course covered by the third commandment, but is not coextens ve with it, since the point of view here is that of conduct towards one’s neighbor. Comp. Lev_6:5.
Lev_19:13-17 relate to social offences of different kinds, common enough in all ages and lands, but all inconsistent with the character of a holy people. Lev_19:13 deals with faults of power, “the conversion of might into right.” The particulars mentioned are oppression (comp. Lev_25:17-43), robbing, and undue retention of wages. The last is spoken of more at length Deu_24:14-15. Comp. Jam_5:4. Lev_19:14 mentions crimes of mean advantage. Comp. Deu_27:18. The sense is, thou shalt not curse the deaf, for though he hears not, God will hear and avenge; and so of the blind, God sees and cares for him. Job remembered with satisfaction that in his prosperity he had been “eyes to the blind” and “feet to the lame” (Job_29:15). The precept in its literal sense belongs to all times, and so also does its obvious spiritual application, Rom_14:13; 1Co_8:9-13. Lange characterizes this verse as the “sanctification of the human dignity of the infirm.’ In Lev_19:15 the Legislator turns to official wrong, guarding against personal influence in judgment from whatever source.—Respect the person of the poor has reference not only to pity for him, but to that instinctive tendency to sympathy with the weaker side which still has such powerful influence with the modern jury in the perversion of justice. On the other hand, honoring the person of the mighty represents the opposite perversion, perhaps almost equally common, but less creditable to humanity. Lev_19:16-17 forbid offences of a meaner kind. On Lev_19:16 Lange says: “Sanctity of a neighbor’s good name, and especially of his life and blood. Casting aside of all inhumane conduct, all ill-will, as manifested in malicious belittling, blackening, and slandering, and especially in attempts against the life of a neighbor, whether in court or in private life.” The Rabbins, equally with the Hindoo laws, are particularly severe upon the crime of tale-bearing. The Targ. Jonathan paraphrases the clause, “Do not go after the tale-bearing tongue, which is harsh as a sword, slaying with both its edges.” The latter clause of Lev_19:16 is sometimes otherwise interpreted; “most of the recent Jewish versions follow the Talmud in giving another sense to the words, which it appears the Hebrew will bear: Thou shalt not stand by idly when thy neighbor’s life is in danger. So Zunz, Luzzato, Herxheimer, Leeser, Wogue.” Clark. Lev_19:17. Lange: “Observance of good-will towards one’s neighbor. Blameworthiness of hate, and also of the bitter keeping back of the reproof which one owes to his neighbor. It is a fine reminder that one may become a sharer in a neighbor’s fault by a lack of openness, and by a holding back of required reproof.” On the last clause, see Textual, and on the whole verse comp. Pro_27:5; Mat_18:15-17.
In the close of Lev_19:18 all is summed up in the royal law—thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. This is twice quoted by our Lord Himself (Mat_19:19; Mat_22:39), and, next to love to God, is made the great commandment of the law. It is repeatedly referred to by the Apostles as the fulfilling of the whole law towards one’s neighbor (Rom_13:9; Gal_5:14; Jam_2:8). It may be that at the time it was given it was too far above the spiritual condition of the people, who must, first be trained by the detailed precepts going before. Nevertheless, it is imbedded in the law as the expression of the divine will, and that it might be reached by such as were able to receive it. Such passages as Pro_24:17-18; Pro_25:21-22, show that it did not fail of exerting an influence upon the nation, and in later times the Rabbins abundantly recognized it as the very summary of all duty toward’s one’s neighbor. That the precept has no narrow limitations to their own people is shown by Lev_19:34, in which it is expressly extended to “the stranger.”
The second series of commands, Lev_19:19-32, is introduced with the formula, Ye shall keep my statutes, in which, says Kalisch, the word “statutes must be taken in its original and most pregnant sense as that which is ‘engraven’ and unalterably ordained: you shall not deviate from the appointed order of things, nor abandon the eternal laws of nature as fixed by Divine wisdom.” Lev_19:19. Lange: “Observance of the natural system, or of the simple laws of nature, symbolically expressed in reference to the tendency to allow the interbreeding of different species of animals, to mix various seeds in the field, and to wear garments made of mixed stuffs. When it is said in regard to these things, Ye shall keep my statutes, the laws of nature are plainly meant as the laws of Jehovah, and we must distinguish between the symbolical exemplification of the law and such mixings as nature herself or the necessities of life compel,—to say nothing of the purpose of investigation.” This law is repeated in Deu_22:9-11. It is clearly to be looked upon as one of those many educational laws given to train the Israelites to the observance of the natural order and separation of things, to a sense of fitness and congruity; and hence, when the underlying principle has come to be comprehended, the particular details by which it was enforced cease to be obligatory. As to the allegation that this command was violated in the high-priest’s dress, which is said to have been woven of linen and wool, it is unnecessary to say more than that the difficulty arises entirely from a misapprehension in taking the word scarlet to mean scarlet wool, instead of as a simple designation of color.
Lev_19:20-22. The punishment for adultery was death for both parties (Lev_20:10), and the same in case, of the seduction of a free virgin who was betrothed (Deu_22:23-24); and it was still death to the man in case the act might be presumed to have been by violence (ib. 25–27). These laws were inapplicable in their full force in the case of a slave, since she could not legally contract marriage. Still, the moral offence existed, and therefore there must be punishment. Versions and authorities vary as to whether the punishment was to be inflicted on both parties (LXX., Vulg., Syr.), on the man alone (Sam.), or on the woman alone (A. V.). The last is supported on the ground that the man’s punishment consisted in his trespass offering; but this is so entirely inadequate that this view may be dismissed. Probably both parties were punished when the acquiescence of the woman might be presumed, and the man alone in the opposite case. This would be in accordance with the analogy of Deu_22:23-27, and would account for the indefiniteness of the Hebrew expression. See Textual note 18. The supposition that both were ordinarily to be punished also agrees best with the following plural—they shall not be put to death. In the form of sacrifice to be presented by the man, the trespass offering (comp. Lev_5:14 to Lev_6:7), the violation of the rights of property of which he had also been guilty is recognized.
Lev_19:23-25. “Treatment of nature, in the case of the culture of plants, after their analogy with the life of man. Symbolic practice: the fruits of trees for the first three years were to be considered as the foreskin of the tree, and were not to be harvested nor eaten. The trees were to be allowed to grow strong by having their fruit hang on them. The fruit of the fourth year was to be hallowed to Jehovah, and thus by a theocratic consecration, the fruit of the following years should be a consecrated food, analogous to the food of the flesh that was slain before the door of the Tabernacle. First, the fruits of the trees were, so to speak, heathen; then they were hallowed in a priestly way; and then finally became fruits to be enjoyed by the theocracy.” Lange. It is noticeable that this command, like so many others, is wholly prospective,—when ye shall come into the land,—one of the constantly recurring evidences that this legislation was actually given during the life in the wilderness.
Lev_19:26-28 forbid several heathen customs, some of them associated with idolatrous or superstitious rites, and all of them unbecoming the holy people of God. “To the consecration of the use of fruit is added for completeness once more the consecration of the use of flesh, and indeed with a more strict prohibition of the use of the blood: ye shall not eat any thing with the blood.” Lange. “These words were not a mere repetition of the law against eating blood (Lev_17:10), but a strengthening of the law. Not only were they to eat no blood, but no flesh to which any blood adhered.” Keil. Patrick, quoting from Maimonides and others, makes it very probable that this has reference to a heathen custom of eating flesh over the blood of the animal from which it had been taken as a means of communion with demons who were supposed to feast upon the blood itself. See Spencer, lib. II., c. 15. Neither shall ye use enchantment.—This is a different sin from that forbidden in Lev_19:31; for in the parallel prohibitions, Deu_18:9-12, the two are distinguished, נָחַשׁ, primarily to whisper, to mutter, covers all kinds of magical formulas, all attempts to secure a desired result otherwise than by natural means or the invocation of divine aid. The LXX. οὐκ οἰωνιεῖσθε and Syr. interpret it of augury by means of birds; but while the form of the Hebrew seems to connect the act primarily with the serpent, its sense in use is certainly more general. Comp. Gen_44:5; Gen_44:15. Nor observe times.—עוֹנֵן, according to some authorities, a denom. verb from עָנָן = a cloud, and this sense has been followed by the A. V.; according to Rabbinical authorities, however, it is from עַיִן = the eye, and means to bewitch with an evil eye. In either case the general sense is in accordance with the preceding clause: to rely upon occult arts for the accomplishment of one’s purposes. Lange: “To the prohibition of the unhallowed sensual use of nature is added the prohibition of the demoniacal misinterpretation of nature, of an impious desire to enter the spirit-world by breaking through the opposing limits of nature; the prohibition of soothsaying and sorcery, whereby, in all their forms, natural things were misused, Lev_19:26. In the same connection belongs the disfiguring of the natural appearance of one’s own personal form, especially of the head and the beard, Lev_19:27. And in this law the Christian world might have cause to see itself reflected, with their unnatural forms of every kind: crinolines, trains, high-heeled shoes, chignons, and hats that are only lids to the forehead. Only the law of customs must be remembered: the taste of the women is the taste of the men.” Theodoret (Qu. 28), followed by many moderns, understands the things here forbidden of heathen customs connected either with idolatrous usages or with mourning for the dead. Lev_19:28. For the dead.—“נֶפֶשׁ מֵת = נֶפֶשׁ, Lev_21:11; Num_6:6; or מֵת, Deu_14:1; so again [the same form as here is used] in Lev_22:4; Num_5:2; Num_9:6-7; Num_9:10.” Keil. Lange: “This opposition to nature was increased by cutting marks in their flesh in remembrance of the dead, as the Jews must have seen done in the cultus of the dead among the Egyptians. With this belongs the cutting in of written characters, every kind of tattooing, of profaning the human dignity in the human form. Lev_19:28. On similar heathen customs see Keil, p. 130 [Trans. p. 424]; Knobel, p. 513.” Comp. Lev_21:5; Deuteronomy 14. But notwithstanding the law, the custom appears to have continued a familiar one, see Jer_16:6; Jer_48:37. “Any voluntary disfigurement of the person was in itself an outrage upon God’s workmanship, and might well form the subject of a law.” Clark.
Lev_19:29. “The common natural disposition becomes especially unnatural when the father of a family gives away his daughter, or allows her to go away, to become a whore. One result of this is that the land or people itself begins to fall to whoredom also in the religious sense. “The religious immorality is here meant, as it was joined with many worships, Num_25:1,” etc. Knobel. The heathen religious service of lust existed among the most different nations, the Babylonians, for example, and the Indians of the present day.” Lange. Keil argues that the reference here can be only “to fleshly whoredom, the word זִמָּה being used only in this connection.” But see Eze_16:27; Eze_16:43; Eze_16:58, etc. Nevertheless, the context here requires that the carnal sin should be understood, and certainly that is the primary sin in Num_25:1.
Lev_19:30. Lange: “The spirit of reverence for the institutions of the church is also a characteristic of true humanity, and the corresponding irreverence, a characteristic of barbarism, even if the barbarism be occasionally in the garments of the higher culture.” History has abundantly shown that the keeping holy of the Lord’s day and reverence for His sanctuary runs hand in hand with the highest national development. Throughout this “social and domestic life is pervaded by the fear of God and characterized by chasteness and propriety.” Keil. In His repeated cleansing of the temple (Joh_2:14-16; Mat_21:12-13) our Lord has shown that the latter duty at least is one of permanent obligation.
Lev_19:31. Lange: “Also the passive superstition which, instead of asking of Jehovah, especially on His days of rest and in His holy place, asks of the conjurors of the dead and of wizards, or of any ungodly oracle of any kind, and thus breaks through the limits of the consecrated humanity, which leaves it to God to rule and trusts in God.” Them that have familiar spirits.—The Heb. אוֹב is used both for the divining spirit, the foreboding demon itself, as here and in Lev_20:27; 1Sa_28:7-8, etc.; and also for the person in whom such a spirit was supposed to dwell, Isa_29:4. The LXX. usually render it by ἐγγαστρίμυθοι = ventriloquists, since among the ancients ventriloquism and magical arts were wont to be associated together. Wizard.—יִדְּענִי—lit. the knowing one; Symm. γνώστης; Aq. γνωριστής, is always associated with אוֹב, and means plainly one who pretends to more than mortal knowledge. The chief means used by both these classes of persons was the consulting with the spirits of the departed. While this furnishes an incidental testimony all along to the belief of the Israelites in the life beyond the grave, it is self-evident that all such attempts to secure knowledge which God has not put it in the power of living man to acquire are a resistance to His will, and a chafing against the barriers He has imposed. It is remarkable that such attempts should have been persisted in through all ages and in all lands. In Lev_19:32 the outward marks of respect to old age are connected with the fear of God. The commendation of this virtue is frequent in Scripture, and its practice appears to have been universal among all ancient nations, as it is still among the Orientals.
Lev_19:33-34. Lange: “Humanity towards the stranger, who is not a Jew, who thus certainly might dwell as a private man in the future inheritance of Israel. He was to be treated exactly as an inhabitant in human intercourse. Thou shalt love him as thyself.—With this the remembrance is still preserved that the Israelites had been strangers in the land of Egypt.” The royal law of Lev_19:18 is here expressly extended to the stranger, and notwithstanding the national narrowness necessary to preserve the true religion in the world, the general brotherhood of mankind is hereby taught as far as was possible under the circumstances.
Lev_19:35-36. Lange: “Integrity, corresponding to the humanity, is now made especially prominent and sharp, as if in prophetic foresight in regard to the occupation of the Israelites in trade, and with reference to all forms of business.
“In this mirror of humanity not only Judaism may see itself reflected, not only mediæval fanaticism, but also modern culture.”
The Ephah is mentioned as the standard of dry, and the Hin of liquid measure. Precisely how much each contained is in dispute. The Hin was the sixth part of the Ephah; and the latter, according to Josephus (Ant. III. 9, § 4; VIII. 2, § 9), contained rather more than eight and a half gallons. But the Rabbins make the capacity only about half this, which is more probable. However this may be, it is clear that equity in the affairs of the daily life is here made to rest upon the foundation of duty towards God.
In Lev_19:37 all duties enumerated in this chapter are placed upon the same ground—the only ground, as experience has abundantly shown, sufficiently strong to withstand the temptations and vicissitudes of the world.
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
I. The foundation of the law here, as everywhere, is the holiness of God. Because He is holy, therefore the people who would live in communion with Him must be holy too. This principle is of universal application to all times, and to all occupations of human life.
II. In the human development of holiness filial reverence must always occupy the first place, and next to that comes reverence for the outward institutions of divine appointment.
III. The fulfilling of our whole duty towards our neighbor, under the old dispensation as under the new, culminates and is comprehended in the law—Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. With a clearness that seems to belong to the teaching of the Gospel, “neighbor” is made to comprehend the stranger as well as one’s own compatriots.
IV. In the general exhortation to holiness are included all details of the daily life. There is nothing so insignificant that one may allow himself in unholy conduct in relation to it; because he would thereby violate the fundamental principle of communion with God. This is particularly applied in the law to matters of business and trade.
V. All attempts to arrive at more than mortal knowledge by consultation with the spirits of the dead are especially and emphatically forbidden.
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
Lange: “The foundation of these laws is announced in the most emphatic declaration of the name of Jehovah and His holiness, again and again, as the sanction of the commands. Ye shall be holy, for I am holy—i.e., ye shall keep your personality pure, for your Jehovah, your covenant God, the absolute Personality, repels all uncleanness, all confusion with the world, either in the heads of Pantheists or in the hearts and morals of the servants of sin, or in the rites of the priests. The personality is dishonored with every act of idolatry and every idolatrous worship (see Isa_44:9 sqq.; Acts 17). There follow the outlines of holy thanksgiving festivals, holy harvest festivals and vintages, holy ways of thought and action, holy oaths, etc. Continually new features of the consecration of life by a humane conduct are made prominent; and truly they are fine and thoughtful features.”
Each precept of this chapter has a homiletical value so clear that no amplification of the text itself is necessary. Holiness is made to consist not merely in the avoiding of sin and in the fulfilment of certain prescribed duties, but in a general course of life prompted by genuine love. The wants of the poor are to be regarded, the weak and defenceless are to be respected, justice is to be unwarped by either personal sympathies or influence, tale-bearing avoided, all magical arts and efforts to attain forbidden knowledge are to be shunned, and, in a word, man is to conduct himself in all things as one who is in communion with God, and therefore seeks to have His will carried out in all the length and breadth of his own daily life.
Footnotes:
[1]Lev_19:2. עֲדַת = congregation is omitted by 3 MSS. and the LXX.
[2]Lev_19:3. In the LXX., Vulg., and Syr., the order is reversed to his father and his mother. The Sam and Onk. follow the Hebrew.
[3]Lev_19:4. אֱלִילִים = inania numina, Rosen. It is formed from אֵל with a termination expressive of contempt.
[4]Lev_19:5. לִרְצֹנְכֶם = for your acceptance. See Textual Note6 on Lev_1:3.
[5]Lev_19:8. The Heb. has the plural form אֹכְלָיו, but the Sam. and other versions have the sing as in the following verb and noun.
[6]Lev_19:10. כֶּרֶם is generally a vineyard, but also (Jdg_15:7) an olive yard. It is “a field or yard of the nobler plants and trees, cultivated in the manner of a garden or orchard,” Gesen. It is doubtless here used in its broadest sense, and the vineyard of the A. V. is therefore too restricted.
[7]Lev_19:10. פֶרֶט = that which is scattered, and hence meaning here both the fallen fruit (Chald., Vulg., Syr.), and also the single berries of the olive and the vine not gathered with the harvest.
[8]Lev_19:13. תַעֲשֹׁק. Lev_19:11 forbids sins of craft and falsehood against one’s neighbor; this, sins of violence and open oppression. The translation given is that of the A. V. in Deu_24:14.
[9]Lev_19:13. The Heb. לֹא is without the conjunction which is supplied in 40 MSS. in the Sam. and the LXX.
[10]Lev_19:15. The conjunction ו is prefixed in 7 MSS., the Sam., LXX., and Syr.
[11]Lev_19:16. בְּעַמֶּיךָ. The Sam. and 66 MSS. omit the י.
[12]Lev_19:16. Here again the Heb. omits the conjunction which is supplied in 40 MSS., and in the Syr.
[13]Lev_19:17. וְלֹא־תִשָּׂא עָלָיו חֵטְא is a clause the meaning of which has been much questioned. It seems certain, however, that נָשָׂא cannot mean suffer, (permit) as in the A. V., but must mean bear as in the margin. The marginal for him is ambiguous, and it is better therefore to use the more explicit on his account. For instances of precisely the same Sense of these words, see Lev_22:9; Num_18:32, and comp. also the very similar expression in Psa_69:8.
[14]Lev_19:19. 3 MSS., the Sam., LXX., and Syr., prefix the conjunction.
[15]Lev_19:19. כִּלְאַיִם (dual from כֶּלֶא = separation) occurs only in this verse (three times) and in the parallel Deu_22:9, but is frequent in the Talmud. It signifies of two kinds, heterogeneous. The translation of the A. V. at its first occurrence in the ver. diverse is good, and should by all means be retained in the other clauses, both for consistency’s sake, and for the force of the command. All the Semitic versions preserve the uniformity.
[16]Lev_19:19. שַׁעַטְנֵז occurs only here and in Deu_22:11, where it is explained “of woolen and linen together.” Its etymology is obscure. See the Lexicons and Bochart, Hieroz. I., lib. II., c. 35. p. 545, ed. Rosen. It is probably an Egyptian word, although not yet satisfactorily explained. The Chald. retains the word, and the LXX. translates κίβδηλον = spurious, adulterated, probably by a mere conjecture. Rosenmüller quotes Forster as explaining it of a costly Egyptian dress woven in various figures of plants and animals in colors, having a symbolical idolatrous signification. See Com.
[17]Lev_19:20. נֶחֶרֶפֶת Niph. from חָרַף = to tear off, to set apart. There seems no doubt of the correctness of the text of the A. V., and the margin is therefore unnecessary.
[18]Lev_19:20. בִּקֹּרֶת תִהְיֶה. This word is ἅπ. λεγ., but there seems little doubt of its meaning, investigation, and then punishment. Authorities are much divided on the question whether both parties, or only the woman, was to be scourged. The LXX., Vulg., and Syr., are clear for the former, while the Sam. applies it only to the man. In the uncertainty it is better to retain the indefiniteness of the Heb. as in the marg. of the A. V. The Sam. reading is remarkable בקרת תהיה לו = he shall be punished, and then, in the sing. לא יומת = he shall not die. This gives a sense agreeing excellently with the reason assigned because she was not free, and hence the act did not legally constitute adultery which was punishable with death.
[19]Lev_19:23. “The singular suffix in עָרְלָתוֹ” [and also in פִּרְיוֹ] “refers to בֹּל, and the verb ערל is a denom. from עָרְלָה, to make into a foreskin, to treat as uncircumcised, i.e., to throw away as unclean or uneatable.” Keil. The LXX. rendering περικαθαριεῖτε τὴν ἀκαθαρσίαν αὐτοῦ = ye shall purge away its uncleanness expresses very well the general sense.
[20]Lev_19:24. הִלּוּלִים occurs only here and in Jdg_9:27. In the latter place it seems to mean merry-making feasts to idols, and Josephus (Ant. iv. 8, 19) understands the law to be that the fruit of the fourth year should be carried to the place of the Sanctuary, and there used in a holy feast with friends and the poor. But the following verse seems so clearly to forbid the owner’s partaking of it before the fifth year that it would be unsafe to change the translation. The marg. of the A. V. holiness of praises to the Lord does not convey any distinct idea. The idea of Murphy a praise offering is hardly sustained by the text. The true sense is probably that incorporated into the Targ. Onk. it shall be consecrated to those offering praises before the Lord, i.e., it was to be given to the Lord through His priests, and used by them in feasts.
[21]Lev_19:25. For לְהוֹמִיף that it may yield, the Sam., followed by the Vulg., reads לְהֹאסִיף for collecting (in storehouses) the produce.
[22]Lev_19:26. עַל־הַדָּם. The LXX. must have read ר instead of ד to sustain the version ἐπὶ τῶν ὀρέων, and some critics would adopt this to avoid the peculiarity of the construction of עַל, considering it justified by the frequency of the practice in connection with idolatrous feasts (comp. Hos_4:13). But a mis-reading of the LXX. is not a sufficient ground for a change of the text; for the construction of עַל see Exo_12:8, and comp. Textual Note4 on Lev_2:2.
[23]Lev_19:26-27. In both places the Sam., one or two MSS., and the LXX., supply the conjunction.
[24]Lev_19:27. The Sam. and most of the Ancient Versions put the verb and the pronoun in the plural in accordance with the previous clause.
[25]Lev_19:33. The Sam. and versions have the plural.
[26]Lev_19:33. The marg. of the A. V. expresses the sense of תוֹנוּ better than the text.
[27]Lev_19:34. There is no occasion for the insertion of the but of the A. V.
[28]Lev_19:36. The marg. of the A. V. stones is unnecessary, that being merely the primary sense of אֶבֶן while weight is the fully established derivative sense.
Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures (Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical), ed. John Peter Lange, English translation edited by Philip Schaff (1864–1880) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers 1878 · Public Domain (1) And the Lord spake unto Moses.—The prohibitions in…
XIX.
(1) And the Lord spake unto Moses.—The prohibitions in the preceding chapter, which are designed to regulate the moral conduct of relations and connections towards each other in their family circles, are now followed by precepts which affect the Israelite’s life in all its bearings, both towards God and man. Hence the authorities during the second Temple regarded it as “embodying the Decalogue,” for which reason, as well as for the fact that “it contains the sum and substance of the precepts of the Law, it is read in public.” The precepts in this chapter are divided into sixteen groups, eight of which end with the emphatic reiteration, “I am the Lord your God” (Lev_19:2-4; Lev_19:10; Lev_19:25; Lev_19:31; Lev_19:34; Lev_19:36), and eight with the shorter formula, “I am the Lord” (Lev_19:12; Lev_19:14; Lev_19:16; Lev_19:18; Lev_19:28; Lev_19:30; Lev_19:32; Lev_19:37).
A Bible Commentary for English Readers, edited by Charles John Ellicott (1878–1897) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
C. H. Mackintosh 1880 · Public Domain Leviticus 18 - 20
Leviticus 18 - 20
This section sets before us, in a very remarkable manner, the personal sanctity and moral propriety which Jehovah looked for, on the part of those whom He had graciously introduced into relationship with Himself and, at the same time, it presents a most humiliating picture of the enormities of which human nature is capable.
Read full note →
"And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, l am the Lord your God." Here we have the foundation of the entire superstructure of moral conduct which these chapters present. Israel’s actings were to take their character from the fact that Jehovah was their God. They were called to comport themselves in a manner worthy of so high and holy a position. It was God’s prerogative to set forth the special character and line of conduct becoming a people with whom He was pleased to associate His name. Hence the frequency of the expressions - "I am the Lord." "I Am the Lord your God." "I the Lord your God am holy." Jehovah was their God, and He was holy; hence, therefore, they were called to be holy likewise. His name was invoked in their character and acting.
This is the true principle of holiness for the people of God in all ages. They are to be governed and characterised by the revelation which He has made of Himself. Their conduct is to be founded upon what He is, not upon what they are in themselves. This entirely sets aside the principle expressed in the words, "Stand by thyself, I am holier than thou;" a principle so justly repudiated by every sensitive mind. It is not a comparison of one man with another; but a simple statement of the line of conduct which God looks for in those who belong to Him. "after the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do; and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do; neither shall ye walk in their ordinances." The Egyptians and the Canaanites were all wrong. How was Israel to know this? Who told them? How came they to be right, and all besides wrong? These are interesting inquiries; and the answer is as simple as the questions are interesting. Jehovah’s word was the standard by which all questions of right and wrong were to be definitely settled in the judgement of every member of the Israel of God. It was not, by any means, the judgement of an Israelite in opposition to the judgement of an Egyptian or of a Canaanite; but it was the judgement of God above all. Egypt might have her practices and her opinions, and so might Canaan; but Israel were to have the opinions and practices laid down in the word of God. "Ye shall do my judgements, and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the Lord your God. Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgements; which, if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord."
It will be well for my reader to get a clear, deep, full, practical sense of this truth. The word of God must settle every question and govern every conscience. There must be no appeal from its solemn and weighty decision. When God speaks, every heart must bow. Men may form and hold their opinions; they may adopt and defend their practices; but one of the finest traits in the character of "the Israel of God" is profound reverence for, and implicit subjection to, "every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord." The exhibition of this valuable feature may, perhaps, lay them open to the charge of dogmatism, superciliousness, and self-sufficiency, on the part of those who have never duly weighed the matter; but, in truth, nothing can be more unlike dogmatism than simple subjection to the plain truth of God; nothing more unlike superciliousness than reverence for the statements of inspiration; nothing more unlike self-sufficiency than subjection to the divine authority of holy scripture.
True, there will ever be the need of carefulness as to the tone and manner in which we set forth the authority for our convictions and our conduct. It must be made manifest, so far as it may be, that we are wholly governed, not by our own opinions, but by the word of God. There is great danger of attaching an importance to an opinion merely because we have adopted it. This must be carefully guarded against. Self may creep in and display its deformity in the defence of our opinions as much as in anything else; but we must disallow it, in every shape and form, and be governed, in all things, by "Thus saith the Lord."
But, then, we are not to expect that everyone will be ready to admit the full force of the divine statutes and judgements. It is as persons walk in the integrity and energy of the divine nature that the word of God will be owned, appreciated, and reverenced. An Egyptian or a Canaanite would have been wholly unable to enter into the meaning or estimate the value of these statutes and judgements, which were to govern the conduct of the circumcised people of God; but that did not, in any wise, affect the question of Israel’s obedience. They were brought into a certain relationship with Jehovah, and that relationship had its distinctive privileges and responsibilities. "I am the Lord your God." This was to be the ground of their conduct. They were to act in a way worthy of the One who had become their God, and made them His people. It was not that they were a whit better than other people. By no means. The Egyptians or Canaanites might have considered that the Israelites were setting themselves up as something superior in refusing to adopt the habits of either nation. But, no; the foundation of their peculiar line of conduct and tone of morality was laid in these words, "I am the Lord your God."
In this great and practically-important fact, Jehovah set before His people a ground of conduct which was immovable, and a standard of morality which was as elevated, and as enduring, as the eternal throne itself. The moment He entered into a relationship with a people, their ethics were to assume a character and tone worthy of Him. It was no longer a question as to what they were, either in themselves or in comparison with others; but of what God was in comparison with all. This makes a material difference. To make self the ground of action or the standard of ethics is not only presumptuous folly, but it is sure to set one upon a descending scale of action. If self be my object, I must, of necessity, sink lower and lower every day; but if, on the other hand, I set the Lord before me, I shall rise higher and higher as, by the power of the Holy Ghost, I grow in conformity to that perfect model which is unfolded to the gaze of faith in the sacred pages of inspiration. I shall, undoubtedly, have to prostrate myself in the dust, under a sense of how infinitely short I come of the mark set before me; but, then, I can never consent to the setting up of a lower standard, nor can I ever be satisfied until I am conformed in all things to Him who was my substitute on the cross, and is my Model in the glory.
Having said thus much on the main principle of the section before us - a principle of unspeakable importance to Christians, in a practical point of view - I feel it needless to enter into anything like a detailed exposition of statutes which speak for themselves in most obvious terms. I would merely remark that those statutes range themselves under two distinct heads, namely, first, those which set forth the shameful enormities which the human heart is capable of devising; and, secondly, those which exhibit the exquisite tenderness and considerate care of the God of Israel.
As to the first, it is manifest that the Spirit of God could never enact laws for the purpose of preventing evils that have no existence. He does not construct a dam where there is no flood to be resisted. He does not deal with abstract ideas, but with positive realities. Man is, in very deed, capable of perpetrating each and every one of the shameful crimes referred to in this most faithful section of the book of Leviticus. If he were not, Why should he be told not to do so. Such a code would be wholly unsuitable for angels, inasmuch as they are incapable of committing the sins referred to; but it suits man, because he has gotten the seeds of those sins in his nature. This is deeply humbling. It is a fresh declaration of the truth that man is a total wreck. From the crown of his head to the sole of his foot, there is not so much as a single speck of moral soundness, as looked at in the light of the divine presence. The being for whom Jehovah thought it needful to write Leviticus 18 - 20 must be a vile sinner; but that being is man - the writer and reader of these lines. How plain it is, therefore, that "they that are in the flesh cannot please God." (Rom. 8) Thank God, the believer is "not in the flesh, but in the Spirit." He has been taken completely out of his old creation standing, and introduced into the new creation, in which the moral evils aimed at in this our section can have no existence. True, he has gotten the old nature; but it is his happy privilege to "reckon" it as a dead thing, and to walk in the abiding power of the new creation, wherein "all things are of God." This is Christian liberty - even liberty to walk up and down in that fair creation where no trace of evil can ever be found; hallowed liberty to walk in holiness and purity before God and man; liberty to tread those lofty walks of personal sanctity whereon the beams of the divine countenance ever pour themselves in living lustre. Reader, this is Christian liberty. It is liberty, not to commit sin, but to taste the celestial sweets of a life of true holiness and moral elevation. May we prize more highly than we have ever done this precious boon of heaven - Christian liberty!
And, now, one word as to the second class of statutes contained in our section - namely, those which so touchingly bring out divine tenderness and care. Take the following: "and when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest. And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God." (Lev. 19: 9, 10) This ordinance will meet us again in Lev. 23, but there we shall see it in its dispensational bearing. Here, we contemplate it morally, as unfolding the precious grace of Israel’s God. He would think of "the poor and stranger;" and He would have His people think of them likewise. When the golden sheaves were being reaped, and the mellow clusters gathered, "the poor and stranger" were to be remembered by the Israel of God, because Jehovah was the God of Israel. The reaper and the grape-gatherer were not to be governed by a spirit of grasping covetousness, which would bare the corners of the field and strip the branches of the vine, but rather by a spirit of large-hearted, genuine benevolence, which would leave a sheaf and a cluster "for the poor and stranger," that they, too, might rejoice in the unbounded goodness of Him whose paths drop fatness, and on whose open hand all the sons of want may confidently wait.
The Book of Ruth furnishes a fine example of one who fully acted out this most benevolent statute. "And Boaz said unto her, (Ruth,) At meal-time come thou hither, and eat of the bread, and dip thy morsel in the vinegar. And she sat beside the reapers: and he reached her parched corn, and she did eat, and was sufficed and left. And when she was risen up to glean, Boaz commanded his young men, saying, Let her glean even among the sheaves, and reproach her not: and let fall also some of the handfuls of purpose for her, and leave them, that she may glean them, and rebuke her not." (Ruth 2: 14-16) Most touching and beautiful grace! Truly, it is good for our poor selfish hearts to be brought in contact with such principles and such practices. Nothing can surpass the exquisite refinement of the words, "let fall also some of the handfuls of purpose for her." It was, evidently, the desire of this noble Israelite that "the stranger" might have abundance, and have it, too, rather as the fruit of her own gleaning than of his benevolence. This was the very essence of refinement. It was putting her in immediate connection with, and dependence upon, the God of Israel, who had fully recognised and provided for "the gleaner." Boaz was merely acting out that gracious ordinance of which Ruth was reaping the benefit. The same grace that had given him the field gave her the gleanings. They were both debtors to grace. She was the happy recipient of Jehovah’s goodness. He was the honoured exponent of Jehovah’s most gracious institution. All was in most lovely moral order. The creature was blessed and God was glorified. Who would not own that it is good for us to ’be allowed to breathe such an atmosphere?
Let us now turn to another statute of our section. "Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob Him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning." (Lev. 19: 13) What tender care is here! The High and Mighty One that inhabiteth eternity can take knowledge of the thoughts and feelings that spring up in the heart of a poor labourer. He knows and takes into account the expectations of such an one in reference to the fruit of his day’s toil. The wages will, naturally, be looked for. The labourer’s heart counts upon them; the family meal depends upon them. Oh! let them not be held back. Send not the labourer home with a heavy heart, to make the heart of his wife and family heavy likewise. By all means, give him that for which He has wrought, to which he has a right, and on which his heart is set. He is a husband, he is a father; and he has borne the burden and heat of the day that his wife and children may not go hungry to bed. Disappoint him not. Give him his due. Thus does our God take notice of the very throbbings of the labourer’s heart, And make provision for his rising expectations. Precious grace! Most tender, thoughtful, touching, condescending love! The bare contemplation of such statutes is sufficient to throw one into a flood of tenderness. Could any one read such passages and not be melted? Could any one read them and thoughtlessly dismiss a poor labourer, not knowing whether he and his family have wherewithal to meet the cravings of hunger?
Nothing can be more painful to a tender heart than the lack of kindly consideration for the poor, so often manifested by the rich. These latter can sit down to their sumptuous repast after dismissing from their door some poor industrious creature who had come seeking the just reward of his honest labour. They think not of the aching heart with which that man returns to his family, to tell them of the disappointment to himself and to them. Oh! it is terrible. It is most offensive to God, and to all who have drunk, in any measure, into His grace. If we would know what God thinks of such acting, we have only to hearken to the following accents of holy indignation: "Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them that have reaped have entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth." (James 5: 4) "The Lord of Sabaoth" hears the cry of the aggrieved and disappointed labourer. His tender love tells itself forth in the institutions of His moral government; and even though the heart should not be melted by the grace of those institutions, the conduct should, at least, be governed by the righteousness thereof. God will not suffer the claims of the poor to be heartlessly tossed aside by those who are so hardened by the influence of wealth as to be insensible to the appeals of tenderness, and who are so far removed beyond the region of personal need as to be incapable of feeling for those whose lot it is to spend their days amid exhausting toil or pinching poverty. The poor are the special objects of God’s care. Again and again He makes provision for them in the statutes of His moral administration; and it is particularly declared of Him who shall, ere long, assume, in manifested glory, the reins of government, that "He shall deliver the needy when he crieth; the poor also, and him that hath no helper. He shall spare the poor and needy, and shall save the souls of the needy. He shall redeem their souls from deceit and violence; and precious shall their blood be in his sight." (Psalm 72: 12-14)
May we profit by the review of those precious and deeply practical truths! May our hearts be affected, and our conduct influenced by them. We live in a heartless world; and there is a vast amount of selfishness in our own hearts. We are not sufficiently affected by the thought of the need of others. We are apt to forget the poor in the midst of our abundance. We often forget that the very persons whose labour ministers to our personal comfort are living, it may be, in the deepest poverty. Let us think of these things. Let us beware of "grinding the faces of the poor." If the Jews of old were taught by the statutes and ordinances of the Mosaic economy, to entertain kindly feelings toward the poor, and to deal tenderly and graciously with the sons of toil, how much more ought the higher and more spiritual ethics of the Gospel dispensation produce in the hearts and lives of Christians a large-hearted benevolence toward every form of human need.
True, there in urgent need of prudence and caution, lest we take a man out of the honourable position in which he was designed and fitted to move - namely, a position of dependence upon the fruits, the precious and fragrant fruits, of honest industry. This would be a grievous injury instead of a benefit. The example of Boaz should instruct in this matter. He allowed Ruth to glean; but he took care to make her gleaning profitable. This is a very safe and a very simple principle. God intends that man should work at something or another, and we run counter to Him when we draw our fellow out of the place of dependence upon the results of patient industry, into that of dependence upon the results of false benevolence. The former is as honourable and elevating as the latter is contemptible and demoralising. There is no bread so sweet to the taste as that which is nobly earned; but then those who earn their bread should get enough. A man will feed and care his horses; how much more his fellow, who yields him the labour of his hands from Monday morning till Saturday night.
But, some will say, "There are two sides to this question." Unquestionably there are; and, no doubt, one meets with a great deal amongst the poor which is calculated to, dry up the springs of benevolence and genuine sympathy. There is much which tends to steel the heart, and close the hand; but, one thing is certain - it is better to be deceived in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred than to shut up the bowels of compassion against a single worthy object. Your heavenly Father causes His sun to shine upon the evil and on the good; and sendeth rain upon the just and upon the unjust. The sure sunbeams that gladden the heart of some devoted servant of Christ are poured upon the path of some ungodly sinner; and the self-same shower that falls upon the tillage of a true believer, enriches also the furrows of some blaspheming infidel. This is to be our model. "Be ye, therefore, perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Matt. 5: 48) It is only as we set the Lord before us, and walk in the power of His grace, that we shall be able to go on, from day to day, meeting with a tender heart and an open hand every possible form of human misery. It is only as we ourselves are drinking at the exhaustless fountain of divine love and tenderness, that we shall be able to go on ministering to human need unchecked by the oft-repeated manifestation of human depravity. Our tiny springs would soon be dried up were they not maintained in unbroken connection with that ever-gushing source.
The statute which next presents itself for our consideration, exemplifies, most touchingly, the tender care of the God of Israel. "Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling-block before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord." (Ver. 14) Here, a barrier is erected to stem the rising tide of irritability with which uncontrolled nature would be almost sure to meet the personal infirmity of deafness. How well we can understand this! Nature does not like to be called upon to repeat its words, again and again, in order to meet the deaf man’s infirmity. Jehovah thought of this, and provided for it. And what is the provision? "Thou shalt fear thy God." When tried by a deaf person, remember the Lord, and look to Him for Grace to enable you to govern your temper.
The second part of this statute reveals a most humiliating amount of wickedness in human nature. The idea of laying a stumbling-block in the way of the blind, is about the most wanton cruelty imaginable; and yet man is capable of it, else he world not be warned against it. No doubt, this, as well as many other statutes, admits of a spiritual application; but that in nowise interferes with the plain literal principle set forth in it. Man is capable of placing a stumbling block in the way of a fellow-creature afflicted with blindness. Such is man! Truly, the Lord knew what was in man when He wrote the statutes and judgements of the Book of Leviticus.
I shall leave my reader to meditate alone upon the remainder of our section. He will find that each statute teaches a double lesson - namely, a lesson with respect to nature’s evil tendencies, and also a lesson as to Jehovah’s tender care.*
{*Verses 16 and 17 demand special attention. "Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people." This is a most seasonable admonition for the people of God, in every age. A talebearer is sure to do incalculable mischief. It has been well remarked that a talebearer injures three persons - he injures himself, he injures his hearer, and he injures the subject of his tale. this he does directly; and as to the indirect consequences, who can recount them? Let us carefully guard against this horrible evil. May we never suffer a tale to, pass our lips; and let us never stand to hearken to a talebearer. May we always know how to drive away a backbiting tongue with an angry countenance, as the north wind driveth away rain.
In verse 17, we learn what ought to take the place of tale bearing. "thou shalt in anywise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him." In place of carrying to another a tale about my neighbour, I am called upon to go directly to himself and rebuke him, if there is anything wrong. This is the divine method. Satan’s method is to act the talebearer.}
C. H. Mackintosh, Notes on the Pentateuch — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Pulpit Commentary 1880 · Public Domain From the prohibition of moral uncleanness exhibiting itself in…
From the prohibition of moral uncleanness exhibiting itself in the form of incest and licentiousness, the legislator proceeds to a series of laws and commandments against other kinds of immorality, inculcating piety, righteousness, and kindness. Chapter 19 may be regarded as an extension of the previous chapter in this direction, after which the subject of chapter 18, is again taken up in chapter 20. The precepts now given are not arranged systematically, though, as Keil has remarked, "while grouped together rather according to a loose association of ideas than according to any logical arrangement, they are all linked together by the common purpose expressed in the words, "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy. They begin by inculcating (in verses 3, 4) duties which fall under the heads of
(1) the fifth commandment of the Decalogue,
Read full note →
(2) the fourth,
(3) the first,
(4) the second.
These four laws are, in their positive aspects,
(1) the religious law of social order, on which a commonwealth rests;
(2) the law of positive obedience to God"s command because it is his command;
(3) the law of piety towards the invisible Lord;
(4) the law of faith, which trusts him without requiring risible emblems or pictures of him. In verses 11, 14, 16, 35, 36, obedience is inculcated to the eighth and the ninth commandments, which are the laws of honesty and of truthfulness; in verse 12 to the third commandment, which is the law of reverence; in verses 17, 18, 33, 34, to the sixth commandment, which is the law of love; in verses 20, 29, to the seventh commandment, which is the law of purity; in verses 9, 10, 13, the spirit of covetousness is prohibited, as forbidden in the tenth commandment, which is the law of charity. Thus this chapter may in a way be regarded as the Old Testament counterpart of the Sermon on the Mount, inasmuch as it lays down the laws of conduct, as the latter lays down the principles of action, in as comprehensive though not in so systematic a manner as the ten commandments.
Morality has a basis of its own.
The moral philosopher, if asked, "Why should I act morally?" replies, "Because it is right for you to do so." If asked further, "Why is it right for me to do so?" he replies, "Because your conscience tells you that it is." If asked why conscience should be obeyed rather than passion, he replies, "Because it possesses greater authority, even if it has less power;" and in proof of this he points to the approval or disapproval which it stamps upon acts according to their character. Morality can be proved to be reasonable, apart from religion.
But it cannot be enforced. If a man denies that his conscience commands him to perform a moral action, the verdict of the general conscience of mankind may be quoted against him as contrary to that of his own, but he can repudiate the authority of that verdict so far as he is himself concerned.
He can reasonably maintain that the general conscience may be misled by prejudice or superstition, and that his own conscience is more enlightened than that of the mass. In this manner the philosopher, or any one who regards himself as a philosopher, finds a way of evasion ready at hand.
With the masses, moral teaching, unaccompanied by religions sanction, is still less effectual. The general good of mankind, or the duty of obeying the highest principle of our nature, has never restrained, and never will restrain, the mass of mankind from yielding to the force of strong passion or desire.
In the present chapter we find the moral duties those of the second table as much as the first rested upon a religious basis. They are God"s commands, whether that command be given by written precept or by an instinct engraven on man"s heart. And because they are God"s commands in both these ways, they are to be obeyed. Thus there is an appeal from man"s mind to something higher than himself, to which man will submit. The effort to preserve morality in a nation without religious sanction and religious motive is like the attempt to keep alive the flame of a fire, when the fuel from which the flame is derived has been withdrawn. One generation may continue moral; the next will certainly be licentious. "I am the Lord" is a basis of morality which never fails.
HOMILIES BY W. CLARKSON Vers. 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 26-28, 30-32, 36, 37. Religion and superstition.
It is not always easy or even possible to distinguish between religion and superstition. We may fall into the latter when we are seeking to practice the former; or we may, from undue fear of the latter, neglect the former. In this chapter the Jews were taught (and we are thereby encouraged) to avoid the one, and to perfect the other in the fear of God.
I THE SUPERSTITION WHICH WAS TO BE SHUNNED.
1. Clearly and decisively everything that was in any way idolatrous was condemned; "turn ye not unto idols" (verse 4).
2. All that was distinctively or closely connected with heathen worship was also forbidden: the use of enchantments, the superstitious observance of lucky or unlucky times, also superstitious cutting of the hair or of the flesh (verses 26-28); resorting to wizards, etc. (see 1Ch_10:13) There is amongst us much adoption of practices which are idle and vain, not warranted in Scripture nor founded on reason. Such things are to be deprecated and shunned, They are
(1) useless;
(2) harmful, as taking the place in our thought which belongs to something really good and wise;
(3) displeasing to the God of truth.
II THE RELIGION WHICH WAS TO BE CULTIVATED AND PRACTISED. The Jews were to cherish and cultivate, even as we are,
(1) sanctity like that of God himself (verse 2), entire separateness of spirit and so of conduct from every evil thing;
(2) reverence for his holy Name (verse 12), and consequent abstention from everything bordering on profanity;
(3) regard for divinely appointed ordinances the sabbath and the sanctuary (verse 30);
(4) gratitude for his redeeming mercy (verse 36), "I am the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt;
(5) spontaneous dedication to his service (verse 5). "At our own will" we must bring ourselves and our offerings to his altar;
(6) daily, hourly consultation of his holy will, "Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them" (verse 37). C.
HOMILIES BY R.M. EDGAR Chapter 19Social morality.
Cf. Mat_22:35-40 Ro 12; James, passim. From the primary principle of unworldliness, we now have to proceed to sundry details about social morality. Although these details are given indiscriminately, it is yet possible to discern certain great principles among them. And
I ALL SOCIAL MORALITY IS MADE TO REST ON OUR RELATION TO GOD HIMSELF. In the Decalogue we have social morality, that is, our duty to man, based upon our duty to God; the "second table" rests upon the first. It is the same here. God brooks no rival (verse 4). He sets himself as our model of holiness (verse 2). He calls man to fellowship through the peace offering (verses 5-8). His Name must be subjected to no profanation (verse 12), and the sabbaths are to be strictly kept (verse 30). In other words, we have the four commandments of the first table strewn up and down these details, and exhibiting the fountainhead of social morality in faithfulness to God.
It is significant that all the efforts to make out an "independent morality" by the elimination or ignoring of God are proving failures. He is, after all, the sine qua non of real morality as well as of salvation. It is when his Name is feared and reverenced as it ought to be that man acts aright in his various relations.
II COMPASSION FOR THE POOR AND AFFLICTED RESULTS, OF NECESSITY, FROM A DUE REGARD FOR GOD. For God is compassionate, and so should his people be. Hence the exhortation of verses 9, 10, about leaving in harvest-time what would be a help to the poor and the stranger. This is grounded upon the great fact, "I am the Lord your God." Hence also the warning not to curse the deaf, nor to put a stumbling-block in the way of the blind, but" thou shalt fear thy God" (verse 14). This consideration for the afflicted and for the poor is a most important element in social morality. Our asylums for the deaf, the dumb, and the blind are embodiments of this great social duty. The poor-law system, if a little more Christian sympathy were engrafted upon it, is a noble tribute to a sense of national obligation towards the poor, better organizations even than these will yet be the fruit of the religious spirit. How to apply the principle that "he that will not work shall not eat," and at the same time show the due measure of compassion, is a problem demanding most careful solution.
III MERCANTILE MORALITY IS STRICTLY ENJOINED. All stealing, lying, and dishonest dealing is denounced (verse 11). No advantage is to be taken of a neighbour or of a servant (verse 13). All arbitration is to be without respect of persons (verse 15). Weights, measures, and balances are all to be just and true (verses 35, 36). This branch of social morality requires the strictest attention from the Lord"s people. It is here that continual contact goes on between them and the world. If religion, therefore, do not produce a higher type of mercantile morality than the world, it will be discredited. Nothing injures religion so much as the mercantile immoralities of its professors. Fraudulent bankrupts, dishonest tradings, overreachings, these are what go to lessen the influence of religion among men. It is just possible that we may, in our eagerness to be always presenting the truth of the gospel to our fellow-men, have failed to enforce sufficiently the morality which must be the great evidence of our religious life. At present, in this peculiarly mercantile age, this department of morality needs most earnest attention.
IV PURITY IS TO BE CULTIVATED IN ALL SOCIAL RELATIONS. Not only was immorality discountenanced (verse 29), and punishment and trespass offerings directed in cases where immorality had occurred (verses 20-22), but the very cultivation of the land, the rearing of cattle, the making of garments, and, in a word, all their associations were to be pervaded by the principle of purity (verses 19, 23-25). For the use made of cattle, and of seed, and of raw material, might be prejudicial to purity in idea. Thus carefully does the Lord fence round his people with precautions.
V SUPERSTITION IS TO BE DISCOURAGED, NO enchantment was to be used, nor were they to round the corners of their heads or beards; they were to make no cuttings in their flesh for the dead, or print marks upon themselves (verses 26-28). Nor were they to have recourse to familiar spirits or wizards, to be defiled by them (verse 31). God treats his people as intelligent, rational beings; and so he discourages all resort to unmeaning and pretended inspirations.
VI IT IS CLEARLY SHOWS THAT LOVE IS THE ESSENCE OF ALL SOCIAL MORALITY. Vengeance is discouraged (verse 18) it is the outcome of hatred, which is unlawful when borne towards a brother (verse 17). The form of blood-feud (verse 16), which existed and exists among the Oriental and wandering tribes, is denounced. In fact, the Law is brought to this simple issue," Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" (verse 18). It is upon this that our blessed Lord seizes as the essence of the Divine Law. (Mat_22:35-40) Paul also brings this out clearly and emphatically. (Rom_13:9, Rom_13:10) And this suggests
1. That there is a legitimate self-love. There is a "better self" which it is our duty to love and cherish, just as there is a "worse self" which it is our duty to detest and mortify. When we consider this "better self," we do not suffer sin upon it, we try to keep it pure and subject unto Christ. We try to be faithful with ourselves. We foster what is good and holy within us. All this is most distinct from selfishness. The selfish man is his own worst enemy; the man who cultivates proper self-love is his own best friend.
2. This self-love is to measure our love to our neighbour. Now, our Lord brought out, by the parable of the "Good Samaritan," who is our neighbour. Every one to whom our heart leads us to be neighbourly. Neighbourhood is a matter of the heart. We must cultivate it. We shall have no difficulty in discerning the objects of our love. Let us then love them as we do ourselves. The golden rule is the essence of the Divine Law, "Do unto others as ye would that they should do unto you.
It is evident from this that Judaism was not intended to be an exclusive and selfish system, so far as outsiders were concerned, Men did not work it out properly, and this was why it became so narrow and selfish. R.M.E.
HOMILIES BY J.A. MACDONALD Vers. 1-8. Purity in worship.
The laws set out in this chapter were before communicated to Aaron and his sons; now they are given to the people (verses 1, 2). It is the privilege and duty of God"s people to acquaint themselves with his will. They should learn the Law from the lips of Moses. They should learn the gospel from the lips of Jesus. It is a maxim of antichrist that" Ignorance is the mother of devotion" The mother of devotion, viz. to superstition, it is. (see 1Jn_2:20, 1Jn_2:21)
I THE PEOPLE OF THE HOLY GOD MUST BE HOLY. (Verse 2)
1. They must be separate from sinners.
(1) The people of God are distinguished by purity of heart. Of this God alone can take full cognizance.
(2) Also by purity of life. (Tit_2:14) This is witnessed both by God and man.
2. They must be separated to God.
(1) This is implied in the reason, viz. "for I am holy". (see 1Pe_1:15, 1Pe_1:16) Our Lord puts it strongly: "Be ye perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect". (Mat_5:48) This cannot be understood absolutely. It must be interpreted relatively, viz. that as in his relations to us God is perfect, so are we to be perfect in our corresponding relations to him. But what are these?
(2) As his servants.
(a) We have our work assigned by his appointment.
(b) He pays us our wages. In this life. In that to come.
(3) As his children.
(a) We have assurance of our adoption. (Rom_8:16 Gal_4:6)
(b) Consequently also concerning our heirship. (Rom_8:17 Gal_4:7)
(c) We have also blissful fellowship. (Joh_17:21 1Co_1:9 1Jn_1:3, 1Jn_1:7)
3. Grace makes us to differ.
(1) This was ceremonially described in the Law. In order to partake of the holy things, the people must be made ceremonially holy by ablutions.
(2) The truth of this is seen in the promise of the gospel. Before we can have spiritual communion with God we must be sanctified at the laver of regeneration, viz. by the renewing of the Holy Ghost.
II THEIR HOLINESS WILL BE EXPRESSED IN PURE WORSHIP.
1. They keep the sabbaths of the Lord.
(1) They cease from the toil of the world. So far the observance is outward. They also rest from the labour of sorrow and sin. This is an inward and spiritual observance.
(2) They appear in the convocations of God"s people. This worship may be public without any corresponding beauties of spiritual holiness. But the true worshipper mingles with the spiritual and heavenly portions of the Church as well as with the visible congregation. (see Eph_3:15 Heb_12:22-24)
(3) Parents are held responsible for instructing their children in the due observance of the sabbath. So in the fourth commandment in the Decalogue, "Thou, and thy son, and thy daughter.
(4) Hence in the text (verse 3), the injunction to keep God"s sabbaths is associated with another touching the respect due from children to parents. (comp. Exo_20:8-12) Parents are God"s representatives to their children.
(a) In their paternity.
(b) In the providence they exercise during the helplessness and dependence of infancy and youth.
(c) In their authority.
This is from God, and it should be religiously maintained. Those who are allowed to break God"s sabbaths will disobey their parents.
2. They keep themselves from idols.
(1) They will not "turn" to them. We are so surrounded by them, that we cannot turn from the true worship without encountering them.
(2) They will not "make" to themselves "molten gods." The allusion here is to Aaron"s calf, which he intended to represent Jehovah Elohim. But in our godly parents, the work of God"s hands, we have truer representations of the living Father than can possibly proceed from our own hands.
(3) Idolatry is folly. Idols are nothings. ( comp. 1Co_8:4)
3. They serve God with reverence.
(1) They fear God, but not as slaves. They offer peace offerings to him which are offerings of friendship. They offer these also "at their own free will" (verse 5). A constrained is an imperfect service. "God loveth a cheerful giver.
(2) They worship him in faith. They will eat the peace offering the same day on which it is offered. They recognize the privileges of an early communion. What remains over on the second day they will eat. The dispensations of the types are two, viz. the patriarchal and Mosaic. But if any remain to the third day, this they burn with fire. Thus they express their faith in the Christian dispensation which should abolish the types by fulfilling them, and which should bring in better hopes.
(3) To return to the legal dispensation is now to provoke the anger of the Lord. Cyril of Alexandria argues that those who fail to see any spiritual meaning in the Law are still bound to keep it in the letter. But even that could do them no good, for according to the text, "If it be eaten at all on the third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted. Therefore every one that eateth it shall bear his iniquity," etc. (verses 7, 8). To rejecters of the gospel now there is nothing but hopeless excision. J.A.M.
HOMILIES BY R.A. REDFORD Vers. 1, 2. "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy." Holiness.
I THE UNIVERSAL REQUIREMENT. "Speak unto all the congregation," etc.
1. No exception. "All have sinned.
2. The nature of man requires him to be holy. The relation between man and God. The laws of God not mere arbitrary decrees, but the expression, in positive relation to the freedom of man, of the Eternal Reality of the universe.
3. The universality of revelation is the universality of responsibility. "Their line is gone out in all the earth." "Having not the Law, they are a law unto themselves." What was said. to the Jews was said. to the world. The blessedness of humanity is the realization of the Divine image. A holy God, a holy universe.
II THE UNIVERSAL MOTIVE. "For I am holy.
1. Dependence upon God the root of religion, not as mere blind dependence, but that of the children on the Father.
2. Gratitude the constant appeal of the heart. The Lord your God, who has done so much for you, requires your holiness.
3. The Divine command is related to and blessed with the Divine provision of grace in a specific system of holiness, in which the people of God are held up. Be holy, for I have prepared for your holiness. We are "created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them". (Eph_2:10) Work out salvation, for God worketh in you.
III THE MEDIATING MINISTRY. "The Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto all the congregation.
1. Here is the gracious method by which our holiness is made possible. The holy God speaks. The holy men of God speak as they are moved by the Holy Ghost. The holy Word speaks, everywhere and always. The holy life is maintained among the holy people.
2. The holiness of humanity will be achieved as a fact through a holy ministry of the people of God to the world at large; of the consecrated few to the many. The hope of a revived Church, in a revived ministry. The spiritual leaders should feel their responsibility, both in teaching and in example.
3. Personal holiness must underlie all other. The purification of temples and services is not the sanctification God requires. He says not, "Be ye punctilious in worship and profuse in ritual;" but "Be ye personally holy, let your holiness be a transcript of mine, which is the holiness of will, of work, of thought, of character. R.
The Pulpit Commentary (1880–1919), ed. H.D.M. Spence-Jones & Joseph S. Exell — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Expositor's Bible 1887 · Public Domain WE have in this chapter a series of precepts…
THE LAW OF HOLINESS (CONCLUDED)
Lev_19:1-37
Read full note →
WE have in this chapter a series of precepts and prohibitions which from internal evidence appear to have been selected by an inspired redactor of the canon from various original documents, with the purpose, not of presenting a complete enumeration of all moral and ceremonial duties, but of illustrating the application in the everyday life of the Israelite of the injunction which stands at the beginning of the chapter (Lev_19:2): "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy."
Truly strange it is, in the full light of Hebrew history, to find anyone, like Kalisch, representing this conception of holiness, so fundamental to this law, as the "ripest fruit of Hebrew culture"! For it is insisted by such competent critics, as Dillmann, that we have not in this chapter a late development of Hebrew thought, but "ancient," "the most ancient" material; -we shall venture to say, dating even from the days of Moses, as is declared in Lev_19:1. And we may say more. For If such be the antiquity of this law, it should be easy even for the most superficial reader of the history to see how immeasurably far was that horde of almost wholly uncultured fugitives from Egyptian bondage from having attained through any culture this Mosaic conception of holiness. For "Hebrew culture," even in its latest maturity, has, at the best, only tended to develop more and more the idea, not of holiness, but of legality-a very different thing! The ideal expressed in this command, "Ye shall be holy," must have come, not from Israel, not even from Moses, as if originated by him, but from the Holy God Himself, even as the chapter in its first verse testifies.
The position of this command at the head of the long list of precepts which follows, is most significant and instructive. It sets before us the object of the whole ceremonial and moral law, and, we may add, the supreme object of the Gospel also, namely, to produce a certain type of moral and spiritual character, a HOLY manhood; it, moreover, precisely interprets this term, so universally misunderstood and misapplied among all nations, as essentially consisting in a spiritual likeness to God: "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy." These words evidently at once define holiness and declare the supreme motive to the attainment and maintenance of a holy character. This then is brought before us as the central thought in which all the diverse precepts and prohibitions which follow find their unity; and, accordingly, we find this keynote of the whole law echoing, as it were, all through this chapter, in the constant refrain, repeated herein no less than fourteen-twice seven-times: "I am the Lord (Heb. Jehovah)!" "I am the Lord your God!"
The first division of the law of holiness which follows (Lev_19:3-8) deals with two duties of fundamental importance in the social and the religious life: the one, honour to parents; the other, reverence to God.
If we are surprised, at first, to see this place of honour in the law of holiness given to the fifth commandment (Lev_19:3), our surprise will lessen when we remember how, taking the individual in the development of his personal life, he learns to fear God, first of all, through fearing and honouring his parents. In the earliest beginnings of life, the parent-to speak with reverence-stands to his child, in a very peculiar sense, for and in the place of God. We gain the conception of the Father in heaven first from our experience of fatherhood on earth; and so it may be said of this commandment, in a sense in which it cannot be said of any other, that it is the foundation of all religion. Alas for the child who contemns the instruction of his father and the command of his mother! for by so doing he puts himself out of the possibility of coming into the knowledge and experience of the Fatherhood of God.
The principle of reverence toward God is inculcated, not here by direct precept, but by three injunctions, obedience to which presupposes the fear of God in the heart. These are, first (Lev_19:3), the keeping of the sabbaths; the possessive, "My sabbaths," reminding us tersely of Gods claim upon the seventh part of all our time as His time. Then is commanded the avoidance of idolatry (Lev_19:4); and, lastly (Lev_19:5-8), a charge as to the observance of the law of the peace offering.
One reason seems to have determined the selection of each of these three injunctions, namely, that Israel would be more liable to fail in obedience to these than perhaps any other duties of the law. As for the sabbath, this, like the law of the peace offering, was a positive, not a moral law; that is, it depended for its authority primarily on the explicit ordinance of God, instead of the intuition of the natural conscience. Hence it was certain that it would only be kept in so far as man retained a vivid consciousness of the Divine personality and moral authority. Moreover, as all history has shown, the law of the sabbath rest from labour constantly comes into conflict with mans love of gain and eager haste to make money. It is a life picture, true for men of every generation, when Amos {Amo_8:5} brings before us the Israelites of his day as saying, in their insatiate worldly greed, "When will the sabbath be gone, that we may set forth wheat?" As regards the selection of the second commandment, one can easily see that Israels loyalty, surrounded as they were on every side with idolaters, was to be tested with peculiar severity on this point, whether they would indeed worship the living God alone and without the intervention of idols.
The circumstances, as regards the peace offering, were different; but the same principle of choice can be discovered in this also. For among all the various ordinances of sacrificial worship there was none in which the requisitions of the law were more likely to be neglected; partly because these were the most frequent of all offerings, and also because the Israelite would often be tempted, through a short-sighted economy and worldly thriftiness, to use the meat of the peace offering for food, if any remained until the third day, instead of burning it, in such case, as the Lord commanded. Hence the reminder of the law on this subject, teaching that he who will be holy must not seek to save at the expense of obedience to the holy God.
The second section of this chapter (Lev_19:9-18) consists of five groups, each of five precepts, all relating to duties which the law of holiness requires from man to man, and each of them closing with the characteristic and impressive refrain, "I am the Lord."
The first of these pentads (Lev_19:9-10) requires habitual care for the poor: we read, "Thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleaning of thy harvest. And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather the fallen fruit of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and for the stranger."
The law covers the three chief products of their agriculture: the grain, the product of the vine, and the fruit of the trees, -largely olive trees, which were often planted in the vineyard. So often as God blessed them with the harvest, they were to remember the poor, and also "the stranger," who according to the law could have a legal claim to no land in Israel. Apart from the benefit to the poor, one can readily see what an admirable discipline against mans natural selfishness, and in loyalty to God, this regulation, faithfully observed, must have been. Behind these commands lies the principle, elsewhere explicitly expressed, {Lev_25:23} that the land which the Israelite tilled was not his own, but the Lords; and it is as the Owner of the land that He thus charges them that as His tenants they shall not regard themselves as entitled to everything that the land produces, but bear in mind that He intends a portion of every acre of each Israelite to be reserved for the poor. And so the labourer in the harvest field was continually reminded that in his husbandry he was merely Gods steward, bound to apply the product of the land, the use of which was given him, in such a way as should please the Lord.
If the law is not in force as to the letter, let us not forget that it is of full validity as to its spirit. God is still the God of the poor and needy; and we are still every one, as truly as the Hebrew in those days, the stewards of God. And the poor we have with us always; perhaps never more than in these days, in which so great masses of helpless humanity are crowded together in our immense cities, did the cry of the poor and needy so ascend to heaven. And that the Apostles, acting under Divine direction, and abolishing the letter of the theocratic law, yet steadily maintained the spirit and intention of that law in care for the poor, is testified with abundant fulness in the New Testament. One of the firstfruits of Pentecost in the lives of believers was just this, that "all that believed had all things common," {Act_2:44-45} so that, going even beyond the letter of the old law, "they sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all, according as any man had need," And the one only charge which the Apostles at Jerusalem gave unto Paul is reported by him in these words: {Gal_2:10} "Only they would that we should remember the poor; which very thing I was also zealous to do." Let the believer then remember this who has plenty: the corners of his fields are to be kept for the poor, and the gleanings of his vineyards; and let the believer also take the peculiar comfort from this law, if he is poor, that God, his heavenly Father, has a kindly care, not merely for his spiritual wants, but also for his temporal necessities.
The second pentad (Lev_19:11-12) in the letter refers to three of the ten commandments, but is really concerned, primarily, with stealing and defrauding; for the lying and false swearing is here regarded only as commonly connected with theft and fraud, because often necessary to secure the result of a mans plunder. The pentad is in this form: "Ye shall not steal; neither shall ye deal falsely, nor lie one to another. And ye shall not swear by My name falsely, so that thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord!"
Close upon stinginess and the careless greed which neglects the poor, with eager grasping after the last grape on the vine, follows the active effort to get, not only the uttermost that might by any stretch of charity be regarded as our own, but also to get something more that belongs to our neighbour. There is thus a very close connection in thought, as well as in position, in these two groups of precepts. And the sequence of thought in this group suggests what is, indeed, markedly true of stealing, but also of other sins. sin rarely goes alone; one sin, by almost a necessity, leads straight on to another sin. He who steals, or deals falsely in regard to anything committed to his trust, will most naturally be led on at once to lie about it; and when his lie is challenged, as it is likely to be, he is impelled by a fatal pressure to go yet further, and fortify his lie, and consummate his sin, by appealing by an oath to the Holy God, as witness to the truth of his lie. Thus, the sin which in the beginning is directed only toward a fellowman, too often causes one to sin immediately against God, in profanation of the name of the God of truth, by calling on Him as witness to a lie! Of this tendency of sin, stealing is a single illustration; but let us ever remember that it is a law of all sin that sin ever begets more sin.
This second group has dealt with injury to the neighbour in the way of guile and fraud; the third pentad (Lev_19:13-14), progressing further, speaks of wrong committed in ways of oppression and violence. "Thou shalt not oppress thy neighbour, nor rob him: the wages of a hired servant shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind, but thou shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord!" In these commands, again it is still the helpless and defenceless in whose behalf the Lord is speaking. The words regard a man as having it in his power to press hard upon his neighbour; as when an employer, seeing that a man must needs have work at any price, takes advantage of his need to employ him at less than fair wages; or as when he who holds a mortgage against his neighbour, seeing an opportunity to possess himself of a field or an estate for a trifle, by pressing his technical legal rights, strips his poor debtor needlessly. No end of illustrations, evidently, could be given out of our modern life. Mans nature is the same now as in the days of Moses. But all dealings of this kind, whether then or now, the law of holiness sternly prohibits.
So also with the injunction concerning the retention of wages after it is due. I have not fulfilled the law of love toward the man or woman whom I employ merely by paying fair wages; I must also pay promptly. The Deuteronomic law repeats the command, and, with a peculiar touch of sympathetic tenderness, adds the reason: {Lev_24:15} "for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it." I must therefore give the labourer his wages "in his day." A sin this is, of the rich especially, and, most of all, of rich corporations, with which the sense of personal responsibility to God is too often reduced to a minimum. Yet it is often, no doubt, committed through sheer thoughtlessness. Men who are themselves blessed with such abundance that they are not seriously incommoded by a delay in receiving some small sum, too often forget how a great part of the poor live, as the saying is, "from hand to mouth," so that the failure to get what is due to them at the exact time appointed is frequently a sore trial; and, moreover, by forcing them to buy on credit instead of for cash, of necessity increases the expense of their living, and so really robs them of that which is their own.
The thought is still of care for the helpless, in the words concerning the deaf and the blind, which, of course, are of perpetual force, and, in the principle involved, reach indefinitely beyond these single illustrations. We are not to take advantage of any mans helplessness, and, especially, of such disabilities as he cannot help, to wrong him. Even the common conscience of men recognises this as both wicked and mean; and this verdict of conscience is here emphasised by the reminder "I am the Lord," - suggesting that the labourer who reaps the fields, yea, the blind also andthe deaf, are His creatures; and that He, the merciful and just One, will not disown the relation, but will plead their cause.
Each of these groups of precepts has kept the poor and the needy in a special way, though not exclusively, before the conscience. And yet no man is to imagine that therefore God will be partial toward the poor, and that hence, although one may not wrong the poor, one may wrong the rich with impunity. Many of our modern social reformers, in their zeal for the betterment of the poor, seem to imagine that because a poor man has rights which are too frequently ignored by the rich, and thus often suffers grievous wrongs, therefore a rich man has no rights which the poor man is bound to respect. The next pentad of precepts therefore guards against any such false inference from Gods special concern for the poor, and reminds us that the absolute righteousness of the Holy One requires that the rights of the rich be observed no less than the rights of the poor, those of the employer no less than those of the employed. It deals especially with this matter as it comes up in questions requiring legal adjudication. We read (Lev_19:15-16), "Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour. Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord!"
A plain warning lies here for an increasing class of reformers in our day, who loudly express their special concern for the poor, but who in their zeal for social reform and the diminishing of poverty are forgetful of righteousness and equity. It applies, for instance, to all who would affirm and teach with Marx that "capital is robbery"; or who, not yet quite ready for so plain and candid words, yet would, in any way, in order to right the wrongs of the poor, advocate legislation involving practical confiscation of the estates of the rich.
In close connection with the foregoing, the next precept forbids, not precisely "tale bearing," but "slander," as the word is elsewhere rendered, even in the Revised Version. In the court of judgment, slander is not to be uttered nor listened to. The clause which follows is obscure; but means either, "Thou shalt not, by such slanderous testimony, seek in the court of judgment thy neighbours life," which best suits the parallelism; or, perhaps, as the Talmud and most modern Jewish versions interpret, "Thou shalt not stand silent by, when thy neighbours life is in danger in the court of judgment, and thy testimony might save him." And then again comes in the customary refrain, reminding the Israelite that in every court, noting every act of judgment, and listening to every witness, is a judge unseen, omniscient, absolutely righteous, under whose final review, for confirmation or reversal, shall come all earthly decisions: "I," who thus speak, "am the Lord!"
The fifth and last pentad (Lev_19:17-18) fitly closes the series, by its five precepts, of which, three, reaching behind all such outward acts as are required or forbidden in the foregoing, deal with the state of the heart toward our neighbour which the law of holiness requires, as the soul and the root of all righteousness. It closes with the familiar words, so simple that all can understand them, so comprehensive that in obedience to them is comprehended all morality and righteousness toward man: "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." The verses read, "Thou shall not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt surely rebuke thy neighbour, and not bear sin because of him. Thou shalt not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children oil thy people, but thou shall love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord!"
Most instructive it is to find it suggested by this order, as the best evidence of the absence of hate, and the truest expression of love to our neighbour, that when we see him doing wrong we shall rebuke him. The Apostle Paul has enjoined upon Christians the same duty, indicating also the spirit in which it is to be performed: {Gal_6:1} "Brethren, even if a man be overtaken in any trespass, ye which are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of meekness; looking to thyself, lest thou also be tempted." Thus, if we will be holy, it is not to be a matter of no concern to us that our neighbour does wrong, even though that wrong do not directly affect our personal well being. Instead of this, we are to remember that if we rebuke him not, we ourselves "bear sin, because of him"; that is, we ourselves, in a degree, become guilty with him, because of that wrong doing of his which we sought not in any way to hinder. But although, on the one hand, I am to rebuke the wrongdoer, even when his wrong does not touch me personally, yet, the law adds, I am not to take into my own hands the avenging of wrongs, even when myself injured; neither am I to be envious and grudge any neighbour the good he may have; no, not though he be an ill-doer and deserve it not; but be he friend or foe, well-doer or ill-doer, I must love him as myself.
What an admirable epitome of the whole law of righteousness! a Mosaic anticipation of the very spirit of the Sermon on the Mount. Evidently, the same mind speaks in both alike; the law the same, the object and aim of the law the same, both in Leviticus and in the Gospel. In this law we hear: "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy"; in the Sermon on the Mount: "Ye shall be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect."
The third division of this chapter (Lev_19:19-32) opens with a general charge to obedience: "Ye shall keep My statutes"; very possibly, because several of the commands which immediately follow might seem in themselves of little consequence, and so be lightly disobeyed. The law of Lev_19:19 prohibits raising hybrid animals, as, for example, mules; the next command apparently refers to the chance, through sowing a field with mingled seed, of giving rise to hybrid forms in the vegetable kingdom. The last command in this verse is obscure both in meaning and intention. It reads (R.V), "Neither shall there come upon thee a garment of two kinds of stuff mingled together." Most probably the reference is to different materials, interwoven in the yarn of which the dress was made; but a difficulty still remains in the fact that such admixture was ordered in the garments of the priests. Perhaps the best explanation is that of Josephus, that the law here was only intended for the laity; which, as no question of intrinsic morality was involved, might easily have been. But when we inquire as to the reason of these prohibitions, and especially of this last one, it must be confessed that it is hard for us now to speak with confidence. Most probable it appears that they were intended for an educational purpose, to cultivate in the mind of the people the sentiment of reverence for the order established in nature by God. For what the world calls the order of nature is really an order appointed by God, as the infinitely wise and perfect One; hence, as nature is thus a manifestation of God, the Hebrew was forbidden to seek to bring about that which is not according to nature, unnatural corn mixtures; and from this point of view, the last of the three precepts appears to be a symbolic reminder of the same duty, namely, reverence for the order of nature, as being an order determined by God.
The law which is laid down in Lev_19:20-22, regarding the sin of connection with a bondwoman betrothed to a husband, apparently refers to such a case as is mentioned in Exo_21:7-8, where the bond maid is betrothed to her master, while yet, because of her condition of bondage, the marriage has not been consummated. For the same sin in the case of a free woman, where both were proved guilty, for each of them the punishment was death. {Deu_22:23-24} In this case, because the womans position, inasmuch as she was not free, was rather that of a concubine than of a full wife, the lighter penalty of scourging is ordered for both of the guilty persons. Also, since this was a case of trespass as well, in which the rights of the master to whom she was espoused were involved, a guilt offering was in addition required, as the condition of pardon.
It will be said, and truly, that by this law slavery and concubinage are to a certain extent recognised by the law; and upon this fact has been raised an objection bearing on the holiness of the law giver, and, by consequence, on the Divine origin and inspiration of the law. Is it conceivable that the holy God should have given a law for the regulation of two so evil institutions? The answer has been furnished us, in principle, by our Lord, {Mat_19:8} in that which He said concerning the analogous case of the law of Moses touching divorce; which law, He tells us, although not according to the perfect ideal of right, was yet given "because of the hardness of mens hearts." That is, although it was not the best law ideally, it was the best practically, in view of the low moral tone of the people to whom it was given. Precisely so it was in this case. Abstractly, one might say that the case was in nothing different from the case of a free woman, mentioned Deu_22:23-24, for which death was the appointed punishment; but practically, in a community where slavery and concubinage were long-settled institutions, and the moral standard was still low, the cases were not parallel. A law which would carry with it the moral support of the people in the one case, and which it would thus be possible to carry into effect, would not be in like manner supported and carried into effect in the other; so that the result of greater strictness in theory would, in actual practice, be the removal thereby of all restriction on license. On the other hand, by thus appointing herein a penalty for both the guilty parties such as the public conscience would approve, God taught the Hebrews the fundamental lesson that a slave girl is not regarded by God as a mere chattel; and that if, because of the hardness of their hearts, concubinage was tolerated for a time, still the slave girl must not be treated as a thing, but as a person, and indiscriminate license could not be permitted. And thus, it is of greatest moment to observe, a principle was introduced into the legislation, which in its ultimate logical application would require and effect-as in due time it has-the total abolition of the institution of slavery wherever the authority of the living God is truly recognised.
The principle of the Divine government which is here illustrated is one of exceeding practical importance as a model for us. We live in an age when, everywhere in Christendom, the cry is "Reform"; and there are many who think that if once it be proved that a thing is wrong, it follows by necessary consequence that the immediate and unqualified legal prohibition of that wrong, under such penalty as the wrong may deserve, is the only thing that any Christian man has a right to think of. And yet, according to the principle illustrated in this legislation, this conclusion in such cases can by no means be taken for granted. That is not always the best law practically which is the best law abstractly. That law is the best which shall be most effective in diminishing a given evil, under the existing moral condition of the community; and it is often a matter of such exceeding difficulty to determine what legislation against admitted sins and evils may be the most productive of good in a community whose moral sense is dull concerning them, that it is not strange that the best of men are often found to differ. Remembering this, we may well commend the duty of a more charitable judgment, in such cases, than one often hears from such radical reformers, who seem to imagine that in order to remove an evil all that is necessary is to pass a law at once and forever prohibiting it; and who therefore hold up to obloquy all who doubt as to the wisdom and duty of so doing, as the enemies of truth and of righteousness. Moses, acting under direct instruction from the God of supreme wisdom and of perfect holiness, was far wiser than such well-meaning but sadly mistaken social reformers, who would fain be wiser than God.
Next follows a law (Lev_19:23-25) directing that when any fruit tree is planted, the Israelite shall not eat of its fruit for the first three years; that the fruit of the fourth year shall be wholly consecrated to the Lord, "for giving praise unto Jehovah"; and that only after that, in the fifth year of its bearing, shall the husbandman himself first eat of its fruit.
The explanation of this peculiar regulation is to be found in a special application of the principle which rules throughout the law; that the first fruit, whether the firstborn of man or beast, or the first fruits of the field, shall always be consecrated unto God. But in this case the application of the principle is modified by the familiar fact that the fruit of a young tree, for the first few years of its bearing, is apt to be imperfect; it is not yet sufficiently grown to yield its best possible product. Because of this, in those years it could not be given to the Lord, for He must never be served with any but the best of everything; and thus until the fruit should reach its best, so as to be worthy of presentation to the Lord, the Israelite was meanwhile debarred from using it. During these three years the trees are said to be "as uncircumcised"; i.e., they were to be regarded as in a condition analogous to that of the child who has not yet been consecrated, by the act of circumcision, to the Lord. In the fourth year, however, the trees were regarded as having now so grown as to yield fruit in perfection; hence, the principle of the consecration of the first fruit now applies, and all the fourth years product is given to the Lord, as an offering of thankful praise to Him whose power in nature is the secret of all growth, fruitfulness, and increase. The last words of this law, "that it may yield unto you its increase." evidently refer to all that precedes. Israel is to obey this law, using nothing till first consecrated to the Lord, in order to a blessing in these very gifts of God.
The moral teaching of this law, when it is thus read in the light of the general principle of the consecration of the first fruits, is very plain. It teaches, as in all analogous cases, that God is always to be served before ourselves; and that not grudgingly, as if an irksome tax were to be paid to the Majesty of heaven, but in the spirit of thanksgiving and praise to Him, as the Giver of "every good and perfect gift." It further instructs us in this particular instance, that the people of God are to recognise this as being true even of all those good things which come to us under the forms of products of nature.
The lesson is not an easy one for faith; for the constant tendency, never stronger than in our own time, is to substitute "Nature" for the God of nature, as if nature were a power in itself and apart from God, immanent in all nature, the present and efficient energy in all her manifold operations. Very fittingly, thus, do we find here again (Lev_19:25) the sanction affixed to this law, "I am the Lord your God!" Jehovah, your God who redeemed you, who therefore am worthy of all thanksgiving and praise! Jehovah, your God in covenant, who gives the fruitful seasons! filling your hearts with joy and gladness! Jehovah, your God, who as the Lord of Nature, and the Power in nature, am abundantly able to fulfil the promise affixed to this command!
The next six commands are evidently grouped together as referring to various distinctively heathenish customs, from which Israel, as a people holy to the Lord, was to abstain. The prohibition of blood (Lev_19:26) is repeated again, not, as has been said, in a stronger form than before, but probably, because the eating of blood was connected with certain heathenish ceremonies, both among the Shemitic tribes and others. The next two precepts (Lev_19:26) prohibit every kind of divination and augury; practices notoriously common with the heathen everywhere, in ancient and in modern times. The two precepts which follow, forbidding certain fashions of trimming the hair and beard, may appear trivial to many, but they will not seem so to anyone who will remember how common among heathen peoples has been the custom, as in those days among the Arabs, and in our time among the Hindoos to trim the hair or beard in a particular way, in order thus visibly to mark a person as of a certain religion, or as a worshipper of a certain god. The command means that the Israelite was not only to worship God alone, but he was not to adopt a fashion in dress which, because commonly associated with idolatry, might thus misrepresent his real position as a worshipper of the only living and true God.
"Cutting the flesh for the dead" (Lev_19:28) has been very widely practised by heathen peoples in all ages. Such immoderate and unseemly expressions of grief were prohibited to the Israelite, as unworthy of a people who were in a blessed covenant relation with the God of life and of death. Rather, recognising that death is of Gods ordination, he was to accept in patience and humility the stroke of Gods hand; not, indeed, without sorrow, but yet in meekness and quietness of spirit, trusting in the God of life. The thought is only a less clear expression of the New Testament word {1Th_4:13} that the believer "sorrow not, even as the rest, which have no hope." Also, probably, in this prohibition, as certainly in the next (Lev_19:28), it is suggested that as the Israelite was to be distinguished from the heathen by full consecration, not only of the soul, but also of the body, to the Lord, he was by that fact inhibited from marring or defacing in any way the integrity of his body.
In general, we may say, then, that the central thought which binds this group of precepts together, is the obligation, not merely to abstain from everything directly idolatrous, but also from all such customs as are, in fact, rooted in or closely associated with idolatry. On the same principle, the Christian is to beware of all fashions and practices, even though they may be in themselves indifferent, which yet, as a matter of fact, are specially characteristic of the worldly and ungodly element in society. The principle assumed in these prohibitions thus imposes upon all who would be holy to the Lord, in all ages, a firm restriction. The thoughtless desire of many, at any risk, to be "in the fashion," must be unwaveringly denied. The reason which is so often given by professing Christians for indulgence in such cases, that "all the world does so," may often be the strongest possible reason for declining to follow the fashion. No servant of God should ever be seen in any part of the livery of Satans servants. That God does not think these "little things" always of trifling consequence, we are reminded by the repetition here, for the tenth time in this chapter, of the words, "I am the Lord!"
Next (Lev_19:29) follows the prohibition of the horrible custom, still practised among heathen peoples, of the prostitution of a daughter by a parent. It is here enforced by the consideration of the public weal: "lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness." Assuredly, that a land in which such harlotry as this, in which all the most sacred relations of life are trampled in the mire, would be nothing less than a land full of wickedness, is so evident as to require no comment.
Herewith now begins the fourth and last division of this chapter (Lev_19:30-37), with a repetition of the injunction to keep the Sabbaths of the Lord, and reverence His sanctuary. The emphasis on this command, shown by its repetition in this chapter, and the very prominent place which it occupies both in the law and the prophets, certainly suggest that in the mind of God, reverence for the Sabbath and for the place where God is worshipped, has much to do with the promotion of holiness of life, and the maintenance of a high degree of domestic and social morality. Nor is it difficult to see why this should be so. For however the day of holy rest may be kept, and the place of Divine worship be regarded with only an outward reverence by many, yet the fact cannot be disputed, that the observance of a weekly sabbatic rest from ordinary secular occupations, and the maintenance of a spirit of reverence for sacred places or for sacred times, has, and must have, a certain and most happy tendency to keep the God of the Sabbath and the God of the sanctuary before the mind of men, and thus imposes an effective check upon unrestrained godlessness and reckless excesses of iniquity. The diverse condition of things in various parts of modern Christendom, as related to the more or less careful observance of the weekly religious rest, is full of both instruction and warning to any candid mind upon this subject. There is no restraint on immorality like the frequent remembrance of God and the spirit of reverence for Him.
Lev_19:31 prohibits all inquiring of them that "have familiar spirits," and of "wizards," who pretend to make revelations through the help of supernatural powers. According to 1Sa_28:7-11, and Isa_8:19, the "familiar spirit" is a supposed spirit of a dead man, from whom one professes to be able to give communications to the living. This pretended commerce with the spirits of the dead has been common enough in heathenism always, and it is not strange to find it mentioned here, when Israel was to be in so intimate relations with heathen peoples. But it is truly most extraordinary that in Christian lands, as especially in the United States of America, and that in the full light, religious and intellectual, of the last half of the nineteenth century, such a prohibition should be fully as pertinent as in Israel! For no words could more precisely describe the pretensions of the so-called modern spiritualism, which within the last half century has led away hundreds of thousands of deluded souls, and those, in many cases, not from the ignorant and degraded, but from circles which boast of more than average culture and intellectual enlightenment. And inasmuch as experience sadly shows that even those who profess to be disciples of Christ are in danger of being led away by our modern wizards and traffickers with familiar spirits, it is by no means unnecessary to observe that there is not the slightest reason to believe that this which was rigidly forbidden by God in the fifteenth century B.C.., can now be well pleasing to Him in the nineteenth century A.D. And those who have most carefully watched the moral developments of this latter-day delusion, will most appreciate the added phrase which speaks of this as "defiling" a man.
Lev_19:32 enjoins reverence for the aged, and closely connects it with the fear of God. "Thou shalt rise up before the hoary head, and honour the face of the old man, and thou shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord."
A virtue this is which-it must be with shame confessed-although often displayed in an illustrious manner among the heathen, in many parts of Christendom has sadly decayed. In many lands one only needs to travel in any crowded conveyance to observe how far it is from the thoughts of many of the young "to rise up before the hoary head. and honour the face of the old man." So manifest are the facts that ore bears from competent and thoughtful observers of the tendencies of our times no lamentation more frequently than just this, for the concurrent decay of reverence for the aged and reverence for God. No more beautiful remarks on these words have we found than the words quoted by Dr. H. Bonar, commenting on this verse: "Lo the shadow of eternity! for one cometh who is almost in eternity already. His head and his beard, white as snow, indicate his speedy appearance before the Ancient of Days, the hair of whose head is as pure wool."
In this last command is also, no doubt, contained the thought of the comparative weakness and physical infirmity of the aged, which is thus commended in a special way to our tender regard. And thus this sentiment of kindly sympathy for all who are subject to any kind of disability naturally prepares the way for the injunction (Lev_19:33-34) to regard "the stranger" in the midst of Israel, who was debarred from holding land, and from many privileges, with special feelings of goodwill. "If a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. The stranger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the homeborn among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God."
The Israelite was not to misinterpret, then, the restrictions which the theocratic law imposed upon such. These might be no doubt necessary for a moral reason; but, nevertheless, no man was to argue that the law justified him in dealing hardly with aliens. So far from this, the Israelite was to regard the stranger with the same kindly feelings as if he were one of his own people. And it is most instructive to observe that this particular case is made the occasion of repeating that most perfect and comprehensive law of universal love, "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself"; and this the more they. were to do that they too had been "strangers in the land of Egypt."
Last of all the injunctions in this chapter (Lev_19:35-36) comes the command to absolute righteousness in the administration of justice, and in all matters of buying and selling; followed (Lev_19:37) by a concluding charge to obedience, thus: "Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. And ye shall observe all My statutes, and all My judgments, and do them: I am the Lord."
The ephah is named here, of course, as a standard of dry measure, and the hin as a standard of liquid measure. These commandments are illustrated in a graphic way by the parallel passage in Deu_25:13-14, which reads: "Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small"; i.e., one set for use in buying, and another set for use in selling. This charge is there enforced by the same promise to honesty in trade which is annexed to the fifth commandment, namely, length of days; and, furthermore, by the declaration that all who thus cheat in trade "are an abomination unto the Lord."
How much Israel needed this law all their history has shown. In the days of Amos it was a part of his charge against the ten tribes, {Amo_8:5} for which the Lord declares that He will "make the land to tremble, and everyone in it to mourn," that they "make the ephah small, and the shekel great," and "deal falsely with balances of deceit." So also Micah, a little later, represents the Lord as calling Judah to account for supposing that God, the Holy One, can be satisfied with burnt offerings and guilt offerings; indignantly asking, {Mic_6:10-11} "Are there yet the treasures of wickedness in the house of the wicked, and the scant measure that is abominable?"
But it is not Israel alone which has needed, and still needs, to hear iterated this command, for the sin is found in every people, even in every city, one might say in every town, in Christendom; and-we have to say it-often with men who make a certain profession of regard for religion. All such, however religious in certain ways, have special need to remember that "without holiness no man shall see the Lord"; and that holiness is now exactly what it was-when the Levitical law was given out. As, on the one side, it is inspired by reverence and fear toward God, so, on the other hand, it requires love to the neighbour as to ones self, and such conduct as that will secure. It is of no account, therefore, to keep the Sabbath-in a way - and reverence-outwardly-the sanctuary, and then on the weekdaywater milk, adulterate medicines, sugars, and other foods, slip the yardstick in measuring, tip the balance in weighing, and buy with one weight or measure and sell with another, "water" stocks and gamble in "margins," as the manner of many is. God hates, and even honest atheists despise, religion of this kind. Strange notions, truly, of religion have men who have not yet discovered that it has to do with just such commonplace, everyday matters as these, and have never yet understood how certain it is that a religion which is only used on Sundays has no holiness in it; and therefore, when the day comes, as it is coming, that shall try every mans work as by fire, it will, in the fierce heat of Jehovahs judgment, be shrivelled into ashes as a spiders web in a flame, and the man and his work shall perish together.
And herewith this chapter closes. Such is the law of holiness! Obligatory, let us not forget, in the spirit of all its requirements, today, unchanged and unchangeable, because the Holy God, whose law it is, is Himself unchangeable. Man may be sinful, and because of sin be weak; but there is not a hint of compromise with sin, on this account, by any abatement of its claims. At every step of life this law confronts us. Whether we be in the House of God, in acts of worship, it challenges us there; or in the field, at our work, it commands us there; in social intercourse with our fellow men, in our business in bank or shop, with our friends or with strangers and aliens, at home or abroad, we are never out of the reach of its requirements. We can no more escape from under its authority than from under the overarching heaven! What sobering thoughts are these for sinners! What self-humiliation should this law cause us, when we think what we are! what intensity of aspiration, when we think of what the Holy One would have us be, holy like Himself!
The closing words above given (Lev_19:37) assert the authority of the Law giver, and, by their reminder of the great deliverance from Egypt, appeal, as a motive to faithful and holy obedience, to the purest sentiment of grateful love for undeserved and distinguishing mercy. And this is only the Old Testament form of a New Testament argument. For we read, concerning our deliverance from a worse than Egyptian bondage: {1Pe_1:15-19} "Like as He which called you is holy, be ye yourselves also holy in all manner of living; because it is written, Ye shall be holy; for I am holy. And if ye call on Him as Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to each mans work, pass the time of your sojourning in fear: knowing that ye were redeemed, not with corruptible things, as silver or gold but with precious blood, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot, even the blood of Christ."
William Robertson Nicoll, ed., The Expositor's Bible (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1887–1910) — public domain. 65 of 66 books (1 Corinthians is not separately keyed, as that volume carries no machine-parseable verse references); section-level commentary keyed to the opening verse. Introductory and overview sections not keyed to a specific passage are excluded.
The Preacher's Complete Homiletical Commentary 1892 · Public Domain Practical Piety: Religion in all Relationships
Practical Piety: Religion in all Relationships
SUGGESTIVE READINGS
Read full note →
Lev_19:2.—Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, and say: Nowhere else in the whole of Leviticus does this direction to address “all the congregation” occur; a fact which indicates the importance of this section of the decalogue. And in the precepts of this chapter, traversing the entire range of personal, social, and religious life, we have the law summarized—“the whole duty of man” in epitome.
Reverence for parents (Lev_19:3); sabbath observance (Lev_19:3); repudiation of idolatry (Lev_19:4); the conditions of acceptable sacrifice (Lev_19:5; Lev_19:8); regard for the poor in harvest gleanings (Lev_19:9-10); honesty in act and speech (Lev_19:11); fidelity to oaths (Lev_19:12); commercial integrity (Lev_19:13); consideration for sufferers, the deaf and blind (Lev_19:14); impartiality in justice (Lev_19:15); avoidance of slander (Lev_19:16); care for one’s neighbour (Lev_19:16); gentleness yet faithfulness to other’s faults (Lev_19:17); malice to be shunned (Lev_19:18); hybrid products forbidden (Lev_19:19); the crime of seduction (Lev_19:20-22); regulations concerning fruit growths (Lev_19:22-25); blood to be put aside as food (Lev_19:26); and sorceries and superstitious practices avoided (Lev_19:26); prohibition of heathenish manners and rites of mourning (Lev_19:27-28); traffic in vice condemned (Lev_19:29); regard for the sabbath and sanctuary (Lev_19:30); necromancy denounced (Lev_19:31); respect for the aged commanded (Lev_19:32); courtesy to strangers (Lev_19:33-34); honesty, in trade (Lev_19:35-36): and all based on the grand requirement that the “statutes and judgments” of “the Lord” were to be the rule of their conduct in all relationships and all transactions.
The righteousness which God delights in pervades our whole life, purifies all habits, ennobles all actions, stamps character with rectitude and conduct with integrity. Religion is for daily life; not for sacred scenes and solemn hours, but for every place, every moment; sanctifying the full manhood, elevating all action, dignifying all aims There is not a plan or project, not a fault or foible, not a vice or misdemeanour, not a social or sacred duty, but the thought of God is upon it, and He has a word in condemnation or sanction respecting it. He “with whom we have to do” overlooks nothing in our behaviour, “neither is there any creature that is not manifest in His sight, but all things are open and naked to the eyes of Him” (Heb_4:13).
How scrupulously should we, therefore, speak and act; not in reluctant submission but in cheerful obedience; His “laws within our heart”; His “statutes our song”; delighting to do His will, For He who requires such minute dutifulness shows concern that none should suffer at our hands, and therefore that we should suffer nought from others. Divine benevolence regulates these requirements, and all are detailed indications of His fatherly eagerness for His children’s comfort. Only in right doing is there happiness, whether in the family, in society, or in the church, hence God requires the right to be maintained in all relationships; and when His “will is done on earth” earth will be a reflection of heaven.
HOMILIES ON CHAPTER 19
Topic: THE RELIGION OF MORALITY
i. Piety is not to be all ecstatic. Tabor heights, Beulah rhapsodies, third-heaven visions—these are not the whole of religion, nor indeed the standard of a sacred life. There is the piety of daily work, of common things. Easier to be religious when we are on the wing soaring, than when we are on our feet struggling.
ii. Piety may not become eclectic. There are divine precepts and laws congenial to us, others the reverse. Yet we may not select. Directions concerning the “Sabbath and sanctuary” are easier and more pleasant to heed than those against tale-bearing, fraud in business, gleaning on the fields, etc. But “these ought ye to have done, and not to have left the others undone.”
iii. Piety should not be narrowly egotistic. God’s laws and directions call us out of ourselves, give no room for selfishness, self-assertion, individualism. Think of others first, care for the “poor” (Lev_19:9), your “neighbours” (Lev_19:13; Lev_19:17), bearing no malice (Lev_19:18), etc. Let self give place; “look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others” (Php_2:4).
iv. Piety must never become elastic. There is a peril of the godly man relaxing and relapsing from strict and severe rectitude; stretching his convictions, and accommodating himself to prevailing tastes or personal fancies. Here is rigid law; to that he must bring all conduct; by this standard all his behaviour must be ruled. Avoid an easily adjusting religion, straining and shaping itself to the conveniences of the hour, and the inducements of temptation, and the impulses of the carnal heart.
I. RELIGION REQUIRES THE MORALITIES OF FAMILY LIFE.
God asks that there be “first piety at home.” [See Addenda to chapter, Morality.]
1. Family dutifulness among children. “Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father” (Lev_19:3). This is the “first commandment with promise” (Eph_6:2). The word “fear” enjoins respect, felt and shown; generous succour and attention to their comfort; obedience to their rule and desires.
2. Purity in conjugal relationships. Between husband and wife there should be strictest fidelity. Any departure from morality is severely denounced as the violation of the sanctities of family bonds (Lev_19:20; Lev_19:22). “No man should go beyond or defraud his brother” in this matter (1Th_4:4-6). And equally, with sternest reprobation, God marks the traffic in vice (Lev_19:29). There have been parents sufficiently “earthly, sensual, devilish,” to be capable of this foul crime against a child. Jehovah would have the home clean and loving and hallowed.
3. Homage for the aged (Lev_19:32). Venerating the “hoary head,” and caring for the “old man” gently in his drooping years, and paying him the courtesies and attentions due to one who has lived a lengthened life and is nearing eternity.
II. RELIGION REQUIRES THE MORALITIES OF NEIGHBOURLY RELATIONSHIP.
In the narrowest circle of our neighbours, near residents, there should be the cultivation of rectitude and goodwill. The yet larger range of neighbourliness is taught us in our Lord’s parable of the Good Samaritan—care for anyone in need.
1. Every device of deceitfulness is to be abhorred (Lev_19:11-12). No advantage to be taken, no trickery practised, no falsity condoned.
2. All oppression and injustice is to be shunned (Lev_19:13). Straightforwardness in dealings, considerateness in payment of his dues.
3. Slander and whispering are denounced (Lev_19:16). How disastrous this pernicious habit has proved! (see 1Sa_22:9; 1Sa_22:18; Eze_22:9, etc.). Yes: and as harm may come to a neighbour from doing nothing equally as from our slandering him, God denounces our “standing,” i.e., standing still, when inactivity might let a neighbour’s blood be shed, either in accident from which we could rescue him, or from the stroke of justice when we could prove him innocent.
4. Generous concern for a neighbour is inculcated. “Hate” to be closed from thine “heart”; then venturing to “rebuke” him if he be going into “sin” (Lev_19:17); yet never allowing malice to urge thee to “avenge or bear grudge”; but to “love thy neighbour as thyself” (Lev_19:18). In this last precept is summed up all the moral aspects, the human side of religion.
III. RELIGION REQUIRES THE MORALITIES OF CIVIC BENEVOLENCE.
A man of God is not less a member of society, of the state, or of the nation because he is religious. He has duties towards his fellow-citizens as such.
1. The prosperous are to care for the “poor.” When the harvest is being reaped (Lev_19:9) there is to be a generous dropping of ears for the poor: and so with the vine gathering (Lev_19:10).
2. The healthy are to be pitiful to the afflicted. Instead of despising and maltreating “the deaf” and “the blind” (Lev_19:14), all the instincts of philanthropy—which is piety humanized—prompt “the strong to bear the infirmities of the weak.”
3. Hospitality for the stranger (Lev_19:33-34). A willing asylum should be offered to any fugitive or sojourner: there might be no national exclusiveness or selfishness: the generous band should be outstretched to any one who would find a home amid the people of God.
IV. RELIGION REQUIRES THE MORALITIES OF HONEST TRANSACTIONS.
1. Impartiality in the administration of justice (Lev_19:15) If the high courts of judgment should be demoralized by no cupidity, certainly our personal conduct should be swayed by no servility. The “poor” and the “mighty” should have equal justice at our hands: not one law for the rich and another for the poor.
2. Fairness in the transactions of trade (Lev_19:35-36). Honesty in commerce; in forming estimate of articles of purchase (“in judgment”), not saying “It is nought, it is nought,” etc. (Pro_20:14); as well as in serving and selling these articles.
V. RELIGION REQUIRES ALL MORALITIES TO BE JOINED WITH THE ELEVATED SANCTITIES OF WORSHIP.
Just as that religion is wrong which consists in serving God to the neglect of man; so is that as surely wrong which fulfils duties to man but neglects God’s claims. Week-day righteousness needs to be crowned by sacred solemnities on the sabbath and in the sanctuary.
1. Family life should be hallowed with Sabbath sanctities. “Keep my Sabbaths” (Lev_19:3); for that is the day of days in which to instruct the household in sacred duties. When God is revered in the home family reverence will not wane.
2. Delusive idolatries will be escaped by homage for Jehovah on His day. Keeping His Sabbaths will correct the perils of “turning unto idols” (connect Lev_19:3 thus with Lev_19:4).
3. Worship of the Lord should be with sacrificial offerings (Lev_19:5-8); for man is a sinner, and must come with propitiation to God’s altar.
4. God’s sanctuary should be held in reverence (Lev_19:30); “not forsaking the assembling of yourselves together” (Heb_10:25); but coming with solemn thought and prayer.
5. All superstition to be sedulously shunned. Heathenish delusions (Lev_19:26-28), and “familiar spirits” (Lev_19:31). God should fill the spiritual life of man; and Him only should we serve.
Topic: THE GENIUS OF THE MOSAIC LAWS
“And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,” etc. How repeatedly these words occur previous to enunciation of statutes to Israel, to indicate that Moses was only the amanuensis, or mouthpiece of Jehovah, and that the statutes demanded devout attention and implicit obedience The repetition of sundry laws recorded in this chapter furnishes a fair specimen of the whole economy, embraces principles and doctrines exhibited in the realms of Nature, Providence, and Grace. Looked at as a whole, they suggest the following trains of thought:—
I. THEIR STRIKING ANALOGY WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF NATURE. This accords with what might have been expected à priori, viz., that God would govern men by similar laws to those by which He governs the world, that between physical and spiritual laws there would be close correspondence. The laws here promulgated were:
(a) Unsystematic in their arrangement. Like the glorious diffuseness in nature, where the geologist and botanist can make their scientific arrangements from world-wide materials, scattered here and there in great profusion; so, in the Mosaic economy, running through Leviticus—and through the whole Bible—are sundry precepts unformulated, unscientifically arranged, leaving scope for the sanctified soul of man to arrange in a course of systematic theology.
(b) Disciplinary in their character. Nature’s laws teach man that he is a probationer; that if he obeys, safety and happiness will ensue; if he disobeys, danger and death will await him. The Mosaic laws taught that whatsoever a man sows that shall he reap, that retribution follows closely on the heels of the wrong-doer. Thus, the law was a schoolmaster, teaching self-restraint, and enforcing lessons upon human conduct that have been the basis of all good government in the world, the germs of all pure morality among men.
(c) Merciful in their tendency. The law put no embargo upon anything that would minister to the real welfare of the human race, only pernicious habits were condemned. The weak, the poor, the aged, parents and strangers, all were to be treated with kindness; sympathy and aid were to be extended to them. Even towards the brute creation care and kindness were to be exercised, nothing was to be wantonly or unmercifully treated. Nature’s laws exhibit kindness and mercy in their operations; even in their sternest moods they work for good, and in the end produce happiness.
(d) Mysterious in their operations. Many of nature’s laws perplex and puzzle the greatest minds, seem inconsistent with the perfect wisdom and goodness of the Infinite Author of the universe. And in the Levitical code many of the sacrificial rites and ceremonial observances seem strange and ambiguous. These facts teach us (i.) how comprehensive God’s laws are; (ii.) how limited our knowledge is; (iii.) how incumbent faith, humility, and resignation are upon all who would know the will of the Lord and do it.
II. THEIR BENEFICENT INFLUENCE UPON THE NATIONAL LIFE OF ISRAEL. The people were in great danger of becoming corrupt, from their recollections of their surroundings in Egypt, from their inherent tendency to depart from the living God; the system of sacrifices instituted among them, the ceremonial laws to which they were expected rigidly to submit, would keep them distinct from the surrounding nations, lift them to a high standard of national greatness. The prohibition of all false swearing, fraud, deception, tale-bearing, selfishness, revenge, and every kind of private and public immorality, would conduce to the safety and stability of the Hebrew Commonwealth. The Levitical laws, while they taught the people that they were one as a nation, also enjoined upon each individual responsibility. The whole nation was one great family, mutually related to each other, all amenable to Jehovah, their Father and King. The religion of the Bible exalts the life of any nation that follows its precepts. Those—where the Holy Scriptures are regarded as the foundation of national greatness—will be found in the van of the civilisation of the world.
III. THEIR SPECIAL ADAPTATION TO ELEVATE THE WHOLE NATURE OF MAN. The laws respecting uncleanness, restraining the animal passions and appetites, securing rest one day in seven, would conduce to man’s physical well being. Powers of the mind would be awakened and expanded by efforts required to apprehend and obey the elaborate ritual of the tabernacle. The moral powers would be cultivated by everything having reference to purity of heart, and the spotless supremacy of Jehovah. Thus Israel were shown that God took special interest in them, that they were not like the brutes which perish, but servants of the Lord, children of the great King, being educated for higher future employment. They had access to the house of the Lord; listened to the Word of the Lord; were led by chosen servants of the Lord. These facts would lead them to look onward and upward, present to them the way to pardon and peace, to fellowship with God and meetness for Heaven.
IV. THEIR ELEMENTARY FORESHADOWINGS OF THE TEACHINGS OF THE GOSPEL. (a) In the supremacy of their claims. Everything was to be subordinated to the demands of Jehovah; so, Christ said, “seek ye first the kingdom of God,” etc. (b) In the object of their observances. Holiness was the end of everything in the law; so, the gospel—in the precepts of Christ and His apostles—demands purity of heart, sets holiness as the mark of our high calling, to which is attached the prize of heaven. (c) In the substitutionary character of their sacrifices. The Hebrews were taught to consider their guilt transferred to the victim offered for them; through it, in some way, they were forgiven, accepted of the Lord; so, in the gospel, through the one great sin offering guilt is removed, the favour of God secured, heaven opened. The services of the tabernacle, the statutes of the Levitical law, were calculated to suggest the priceless value of the human soul, the existence for it of a life beyond, of which the present is introductory and preparatory. In the gospel all these foreshadowings are presented as substantial realities, just as indefinite twilight merges into revealing distinguishing day.—F.W.B.
OUTLINES ON VERSES OF CHAPTER 19
Lev_19:2.—Theme: PERSONAL HOLINESS.
“Ye shall be holy, for I, the Lord your God, am holy.”
The glorious end for which the law was given, every ceremonial precept enforced, was that the people should become holy. The holy nature, name, will and purpose of Jehovah demanded that those who would be constantly drawing near to Him in the tabernacle services should come out from the heathen world, forsake their sinful customs, and become conformed to His commandments, which were—
I. WORTHY OF JEHOVAH. Not one can be characterised as mean or unmerciful; some of them may seem beyond, but not one against, reason. The unreaped corners of the field, the gleanings of the harvest, the grapes left upon the vine for the poor and the stranger in the land, would speak of the considerateness of Jehovah for the physical wants of the people; and the injunctions against fraud, against hating in the heart, against impurity in social life; the command, “thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself”; all these injunctions pointed to the heart as the seat of all holiness, and demanded that the motives by which the Hebrews would be actuated should be pure Such a code of laws, with such humane and holy ends, reflected glory upon the supreme Lawgiver, proving that He is holy, that His nature is on the side of righteousness.
II. BENEFICIAL TO ISRAEL. Everything was to be avoided that would work detoriation in the physical constitution, for vice and impurity produce feobleness and decay. Want of reverence for parents and the aged; lack of sympathy for the suffering and infirm, bring ruin into the domestic and social circle. Greed, dishonesty, unrighteousness, work disintegration and disaster in the commercial world. The holy laws of God were a barrier against all these terrible evils by demanding personal holiness in everyone who heard these injunctions.
The disposition of the heart and mind was to be brought into conformity with the will of Jehovah, “ye shall offer at your own will.” The people were not slaves, to do reluctantly the will of God, or perform services and offer sacrifices in a mechanical manner; they were the Lord’s free men, and from wills in harmony with Him were to obey His statutes. Thus inward, personal holiness would be secured, Jehovah’s glory displayed. The great end of the gospel is holiness of heart and life The Christian Church is a community of “saints.” The redeemed in heaven are those who are faultless, without spot in the presence of God’s unsullied glory.—F. W. B.
Lev_19:3.—Theme: FAMILY PIETY.
“Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father, and keep my Sabbaths; I am the Lord your God.”
I. In home life the SPIRIT OF FEAR DEMANDS CULTURE.
1. No dutiful submission to parents where “fear “has no place in children’s hearts. This “fear” not slavish but respectful, leading to an unresisting spirit, and obedient behaviour.
2. No proper basis of obedience where duty is not made forceful by the requirements of religion. “Keep my sabbaths,” making piety an integral part of home-life; thus fortifying the claims of parentage by the teachings of God’s Word and His house.
II. In children, both their HUMAN AND DIVINE RELATIONSHIPS SHOULD BE FOSTERED
1. This requires piety in the parents. How else can they show their children the ways of the Lord? Parents are to their children God’s representatives and viceregents on earth.
2. This will cultivate piety in the children “Keep God’s Sabbath” in the home: bring upon young hearts and minds the graces of religion, the delight of “holy psalm and song,” the teachings of Jesus, the bliss of adoption through Christ; and “bringing them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.”
III. IN SABBATH HABITS the family needs be devoutly educated,
1. Sabbath leisure gives opportunity for parental attention to the religious interests of the family.
2. The Sabbath solemnity is helpful to the effort of leading children’s thoughts to godly instruction.
3. Sanctuary services and ordinances should form themes of teaching and interest in the home on sabbath days
Children, thus trained in early recognition of God by parents who link themselves with God in holy life and word, and who “make the Sabbath a delight” in their homes, assuredly will not depart from the ways of religion, but tread early the path after Jesus. [See Addenda to chapter, Family Piety and Sabbath and Sanctuary]
Lev_19:3—Theme: FILIAL OBLIGATIONS.
“Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father.”
Under the patriarchal dispensation the father was to be revered not only as the head of the family, but as the priest in the home circle The tent and the altar were reared together, children were expected to honour their parents by becoming attention to social and sacred duties. In the decalogue the claims of parental authority were enforced; and, being here reiterated, the Hebrews would be taught those duties which, disregarded, bring discord and misery into the home. Natural instincts prompt filial fear, but undutifulness to parents will often spring up with other moral delinquencies to which our fallen nature is prone. Want of reverence for parenthood—
I. EXHIBITS BASENESS OF HEART. The affections must have become corrupt, the feelings hardened, when parents are dishonoured.
II. INCURS THE DIVINE DISPLEASURE. It is God’s will that children should reverence their parents; to disobey His will is to dishonour and displease Him.
III. ENTAILS DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES. A special promise was made to those who would obey in these particulars, and in several parts of Scripture threatenings of punishment are annexed to disobedience. Obedience should be reverent affectionate, cheerful and constant. “Children obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.”—F. W. B.
Lev_19:5.—Theme: WILLING: OFFERINGS OF PEACE.
See homilies on Chapters 3 and 7 Compare specially Outline, Chapter
1., Lev_19:3, p. 14, VOLITION IN WORSHIP.
Lev_19:9.—Theme: HARVEST GLEANINGS.
How notable are the provisions made in the Mosaic law for the poor
The Sabbatical year (Exo_23:10-11; compare Deu_15:12; Deu_15:15)
The equalization of the atonement money for poor and rich, thus establishing the value of the poor as equal to the rich (Exo_30:12).
The same minute directions for the poor man’s offerings, showing God’s equal interest in his sacrifice (Leviticus 2, etc.).
And here the command that the harvest and vintage gleanings should be left (Lev_19:9-10).
Notice—
I. THAT THE HUMANE LAWS OF MODERN TIMES, respecting gleaning privileges, are all based upon this Mosaic command
Everywhere there is a popular feeling that the farmer should allow, and was not entitled to prevent the poor from gathering what the reaper left behind.
In England the custom of gleaning had very nearly passed into a legal right, for there is an extra judicial dictum of Lord Hall, in which he says that those who enter a field for this purpose are not guilty of trespass; and Blackstone (Lev_3:12) seems to adopt his opinion. But that has since been twice tried, and decided in the negative in the Court of Common Pleas; the Court finding it to be a practice incompatible with the exclusive enjoyment of property, and productive of vagrancy and many mischievous consequences.
“It is still, however, the custom all over England to allow the poor to glean, at least after the harvest is carried” (Chambers).
The law of Moses directed a liberal consideration for the poor at the seasons of harvest and ingathering. The corners of the field were not to be reaped; the owner was not to glean his own fields; and a sheaf accidentally left in a field was not to be fetched away, but to be the possession of the poor gleaners.
Although the permission to glean was a favour, it required no special influence to secure it; for Ruth secured this liberty without any recommendation (Rth_2:2-3)
II. That a benevolent helpfulness in respect of the poor IS A SPECIAL OBLIGATION OF THOSE WHO ENJOY PLENTY.
1. With God in thought, the rich will spare of their abundance that the poor may be fed. And this is the meaning of this sealing sentence, “I am the Lord your God” (Lev_19:10). You owe all to Him, especially in harvest; and, therefore, share with the needy His gifts to you.
2. Amid harvest rejoicings, gratitude should incite to generosity. What render to God? “As ye have received, give!” Seek occasion to gladden others—those in need. Gladness which has no kindly outlet and expression makes men selfish and hard. God is lavish; let your “hands be open “also (Psa_145:16).
3. Kindness to the poor has especial assurances of divine approval. “He that giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord.” “The liberal soul shall be made full.” But He will requite those who neglect the poor (Psa_9:18; Psa_12:5).
III. That this generous consideration for the poor is A TOKEN OF GOD’S REGARD FOR THE LOWLY.
1. Their maintenance engaged the divine attention. For them “the corner” of the field was claimed from the reapers, and to them was assigned the right to clear the ground. It was their part in the national soil, the poor had this heritage in the land. And God enjoins on His Church now to “care for the poor.” They are Christ’s bequeathment to His disciples. “The poor always ye have with you.”
2. Their salvation is prominently sought in the gospel. “To the poor the gospel is preached.” And “God hath chosen the poor rich in faith.” He who showed concern for their physical supply and maintenance, as emphatically manifests His desire that they be “blessed with all spiritual blessings” in Christ. Therefore—
(a) The poor should cherish a grateful and trustful hope in their God.
(b) They should value the high mercies of redemption in Christ beyond all the kindnesses of His providence. For the favours of providence only affect them temporally. but “the riches of His grace” are of eternal consequence. Therefore, “seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.”
(c) Let none, because of lowliness or poverty, despond of God’s favour. All His regulations prove that “he careth for you.” Look unto Him with assurance. “This poor man cried and the Lord heard him, and saved him out of all his troubles” (Psa_34:6)
“His love ordained the seasons,
By Him are all things fed,
He for the sparrow careth,
He gives the poor their bread:
Every bounteous blessing
His faithful love bestows:
Then magnify His glorious Name
From Whom all goodness flows.”
Lev_19:10.—Theme: JEHOVAH’S RIGHTEOUS DEMANDS.
“I am the Lord your God.”
Though the record of divine revelation contains no argument to prove the existence of God, it repeatedly asserts the fact; all the forces of nature, all positive and moral statutes, are traced to the sovereign will and absolute authority of Jehovah. The Hebrews were taught that their obedience was not to be governed by the customs of society, their own preferences or prejudices, but by the declared will of Him Who had sovereign claim to them and theirs. Thus they were emphatically taught—
I. The absolute supremacy of Jehovah. No imaginary deity was to be brought into competition. or comparison with Him. He, the Eternal, Infinite, Almighty, Creator, and Governor of all things. He had right to assert His claim to universal homage; to settle the question of the human mind about the divine existence. God has spoken, declared His existence, and character; to doubt that word, deny that existence, impeach that character, indicate derangement of the mental powers, and debasement of the heart.
II. The absolute character of their obligations. They belonged to the Lord, He claimed them as His own peculiar people. All idols were to be forsaken (Lev_19:4), the worship of Israel was not to have its basis in ignorance, or origin in fear, but in the recognition of the obligations under which Jehovah’s relationship and dealings had placed them. He was a jealous God, and would not share worship with another. Having received such a revelation of the divine character and claims, Israel was under obligation to render intelligent, cheerful, devout, constant, implicit, willing obedience. The divine claims to obedience are unrelaxing, declarations of our obligations unrepealed. “Ye are not your own,” etc. “I beseech you, brethren, by the mercies of God,” etc. The divine supremacy of Christ places us under binding obligation to serve Him loyally; His self-sacrificing love constrains us to serve Him lovingly.—F. W. B.
Lev_19:12—Theme: FALSE SWEARING.
All nations have severely punished perjury. The Egyptians with death or mutilation; the Greeks with heavy fines and ultimate loss of all civil rights; the Romans visited it with the penalty of death.
These ancient nations all held that the gods were especially incensed by this crime, and that a divine Nemesis pursued the perjurer. [See Addenda to chapter, Perjury].
I. WHAT SWEARING BY GOD’S NAME ENTAILS.
1. Acknowledgment of His Omniscience. It calls Him to witness, and imprecates Him as the avenger of falsehood.
2. Acknowledgment of His Righteousness. He is to be the umpire and arbitrator. We call in as a witness to our fidelity only such a one as is himself faithful and true, and will act a right part. Such is God. Man’s use of His name is an appeal to the certainty that He will judge aright.
II. WHAT PERJURY IN GOD’S NAME ENTAILS.
1. An insolent affront upon God’s character. It is infamy, daring insolence, the degradation of His most holy name for unholy ends. It invokes Him to act as a witness that a lie is true Yet He loathes falsity. It is defiant trifling, an affront to the God of truth. It “profanes his name.”
2. A certain visitation of judgment. He “will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain” (Exo_20:7) Certainly, therefore, He will punish lying and profanity. Having been called in as a witness to a lie He will prove that He witnessed it. Thus to insult His love of truth and defy His power to vindicate it, and trail the purity of His character in the mire—before whom the very angels veil their faces as they adore Him—will ensure a just requital (Heb_10:30). And “there shall in no wise enter the heavenly city any who loveth and maketh a lie” (Rev_21:27).
Lev_19:13—Theme: FAIRNESS TO HIRED LABOURERS
I. WORK IS A JUST BASIS FOR AN EQUITABLE CLAIM.
Therefore it should be paid for, not patronisingly, nor grudgingly, but as a due. The labourer has given you his time, strength, ability, and ingenuity; he has a right to an equivalent from you, and should not be treated ignominiously, but respectfully in asking a just return
II. WAGES CANNOT RIGHTEOUSLY BE DEFERRED AFTER WORK IS DONE.
During a day of toil the labourer has put his capital into your service, spent his life for that period for your advantage and gain. You are to that extent his debtor; to detain his wages is to make yourself more his debtor, and delay in payment should be compensated with increment. “Short reckonings make long friends.”
III. MASTERS SHOULD STUDY THE POSITION AND COMFORT OF THOSE THEY EMPLOY.
A poor man has no capital, wants prompt settlement; he lives day by day upon his hard earnings. His strength—expended by the day’s toil—must be replenished for the morrow’s work. To hold back the means for his nourishment is to rob him of the morrow’s capital, his replenished energy. And he may have dependents in his lowly home waiting to share in the earnings of the day. Hold not back his dues “all night until the morning,” lest your inconsiderateness inflict privation and embitter poverty. Comp. Deu_24:14; Deu_24:16; Jer_32:13; Mal_3:5; Jas_5:4. [See Addenda to chapter, Business and work.
Lev_19:14.—Theme: DEAF AND BLIND.
i. As witnesses to AFFLICTIONS POSSIBLE TO ALL. they call for our commiseration
ii. As sufferers of DIREFUL INFIRMITIES, they should enlist our gentle care and generous helpfulness. “Eyes to the blind.”
iii. As pensive illustrations of MAN’S FRAILTY they should incite our gratitude that God made us to differ.
Consider—
1. How mean the act of ridiculing those who carry the grief of such bodily infirmities. “But fear thy God,” for He will requite.
2. How swift was the compassion of Jesus towards those sad children of infirmity.
3. How glad the outlook of the heavenly life for such as suffer here—if they have hope in Christ. For “there shall be no more sorrow, nor crying, neither any more pain.”
Lev_19:15.—Theme: IMPARTIAL JUSTICE.
I. JUSTICE PERVERTED.
In every nation and age wealth and influence have effectively distorted the administration of justice.
Poverty and weakness have borne cruel and basest wrongs by reason of their very helplessness.
II. JUSTICE INFLEXIBLE.
Poverty may not be pleaded in arrest of justice. He, who being poor, acts wrongly, may not make poverty his screen; he must bear his guilt. A sentimental pity for the poor would thwart the ends of righteousness. Sin is sin whether committed in rags or in ermine. [Comp. Exo_23:3.]
A servile courtesy to the “mighty” is equally subversive of righteousness. A pertidious king is as guilty a traitor to his country as a pertidious subject. Neither station nor purse should sway the balances of justice.
As in the sanctuary, so at the bar, there should be “no respect of persons.” [Comp. Jas_2:6; Jas_2:19, with Lev_19:2-4.]
III. JUSTICE CERTAIN
God will judge those who now administer or pervert judgment. “Every man shall give account of himself to God.”
The “supreme Judge of all the earth” will do right. He “discerns judgment” now, and will dispense justice at the last day. [See Addenda to chapter, Justice.]
Lev_19:16.—Theme: TALE-BEARING AND SLANDER.
I. CHARACTER IS IN THE KEEPING, and therefore at the mercy of acquaintances.
1. Therefore supremely value each other’s good name.
2. Jealously defend a worthy reputation.
3. Scornfully silence the unproved rumours of evils [See Addenda to chapter, Slander.]
II. CHARACTER MAY BE RUTHLESSLY SHATTERED by sinister whisperings.
1. For listeners are ready to entertain and repeat slander.
“Man’s inhumanity to man!”
2. Aspersions feed on the inventiveness of malice.
Proof not asked; nothing therefore to check or refute the slander. And “lying lips” find delight in adding to the lie as they pass it on.
3. Reputation is easily damaged. That which only a lifetime can build an hour may defame.
III. CHARACTER IS SO PRECIOUS that its traducers should be loathed.
1. Dread a tale bearer as a destroying pestilence
2. He who wrongs another’s reputation may next wrong yours. By heeding his slanders you encourage his vile trade, and slander must find new victims!
3. Put to shame all tale-bearers with ruthless severity.
Note—
i. There is enough of woe abroad without increasing it.
ii. As we need our many evils to be pitied by man and pardoned by God, let us with “charity hide sins,” not expose them.
iii. There is grace in Christ, and energy in the Holy Spirit, by which to perfect a good life and win a good name, which even enemies of religion shall be unable to defame or destroy.
iv. The light of the final judgment will refute all slander, and bring every secret thing to the open gaze of the world.
Lev_19:18—Theme: NEIGHBOURLY LOVE.
“Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.”
Disinterested love is difficult to cherish, and is all too rare.
The contraries of love are everywhere rife: jealousy, rivalry, cruelty, selfishness, greed, hate.
An unloving spirit is an ungodly one; for a malicious man is as unlike God as an immoral man is; the slanderer is as cruel as the murderer.
I. ALL TRUE HUMAN LOVE HAS ITS ROOT AND ORIGIN IN GOD.
It is a ray of His glory, a breath of His Spirit. A mother’s love is a divinely-implanted instinct. So the love of friendship is heaven-born. And neighbourly love is an inspiration from God The fine feelings of benevolence, of Philanthrophy, of charity—all aspects of the divine spirit of love are of Him. And Christian love, the love of God, love for Christ, the brotherly love of saints, all come from our drinking in the spirit of Jesus.
II. EVERY EXPRESSION OF TRUE HUMAN LOVE HAS HEAVEN’S HIGHEST APPROVAL.
Our love Godward is the rising of the flame towards its Source, and is as a “sweet savour of Christ” to Him.
Our love for man is the outbreathing of the mind of Christ in us, the diffusion of the very spirit of Jesus.
Love for God and for man, let it prevail, and it brings heaven’s blessedness within the human breast, and will make our bleared and distracted earth again like heaven
III. NEIGHBOURLY LOVE HAS AMPLE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ILLUSTRATION.
1. In seeking to turn him aside from sin (Lev_19:17). [See Addenda to chapter, Neighbourliness.]
2. In bearing patiently any wrong received from him (Lev_19:18)
3. In praying and working for his conversion to God.
4. In leading him to the Saviour you have yourself found; as did the woman of Samaria her neighbours.
A. Cultivate kindness and generosity by communion with Jesus; and that will so fill your soul with pity for the erring, and yearning for their deliverance as will make it easy to love your neighbour.
B. Consider how many evils you have wrought, which men have had to condone and God to forgive, and then you will take meekly the wrongs others have done you.
C. Live with eternity in view, and act towards others more as you will wish you had done in the Day of Account, and through the everlasting ages
D. And as opportunity goes by swiftly, do at once what love prompts, and “do it with thy might.” There are wounds waiting to be healed, hearts to be comforted, estrangements to be conciliated, errors to be forgiven.
“Love thy neighbour,” with like depth and thoroughness as thou lovest “thyself.”
Lev_19:19.—Theme: THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STEWARDSHIP.
“Ye shall keep my statutes.”
The Israelites knew that the land towards which they were moving was given them for their inheritance, they were to possess it, and enjoy its abundant resources. But they had to remember that it was Jehovah who had delivered them from Egypt, who would conduct them through the wilderness, and to whom they would be responsible when they would get to the end of their wanderings, and enter upon the land flowing with milk and honey. In Canaan they would be the Lord’s husbandmen, and stewards, to farm the land according to His will. “Ye shall keep my statutes.” They would be reminded of their stewardship in—
I. THE SACRIFICES THEY OFFERED TO THE LORD (see preceding Homilies on offerings). As the Hebrews brought the best of their substance and offered it to the Lord, they would recognise the claims of the Highest and Holiest to themselves and all they possessed.
II. IN THE PORTIONS THEY RESERVED FOR THE POOR. They were the almoners of the Lord, and at His command must see that the needy did not perish from want. Coveteousness and selfishness were alike condemned; they could not do as they pleased with the grapes and corn.
III. IN THE NON-PARTICIPATION OF UNCIRCUMCISED FRUIT. The young trees were to be left for four years, the fifth year they might partake thereof. Thus a curb was put upon their appetites, and the first-fruits were to be wholly devoted to the Lord. Thus the earth would be to Israel God’s banqueting house, and the people were to partake only of those things which the divine host considered good for them and the land.
IV. IN THE PRESERVATION OF PRODUCE AND STOCK FROM ADULTERATION. There was to be no breeding between diverse kinds of cattle, no mingling of seed in sowing a field, no mixing of materials in fabrics for garments. These injunctions would not only be in harmony with Jehovah’s requirement of purity in heart and life, but would keep before the minds of the people the fact that corn and cattle, food and clothing were all under His surveillance. He was the proprietor of all; to Him account must be rendered for all.
V. IN THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THEIR COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS. Here we see (Lev_19:35-36) how thorough and searching the morality of the Mosaic law was. The Hebrews were to avoid every kind of wrong-doing. Religion was to affect their business transactions, cover the whole of their secular life. In everything they did they were to remember that the eye of the Lord was on them, they were His servants, under obligation to do all to His glory, according to the principles of righteousness.
Under the new dispensation we are stewards in the kingdom of Christ. We are responsible for the use we make of the talents entrusted to us. The gospel does not exempt us from responsibility to live righteously all our days; all the precepts of the moral law are summed up in the golden law, as enunciated by Christ, “Thou shalt love,” etc. Christianity demands a holy, righteous life as well as a sound scriptural belief.—F. W. B.
Theme: THE DUTY OF REPROVING OUR NEIGHBOUR. “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart: thou shalt in anywise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.”
The ritual or ceremonial law was such “a yoke as neither our fathers nor we (says Peter) were able to bear.” Yet many excellent moral precepts are interspersed among those laws. Several in this chapter (Lev_19:10-11; Lev_19:13-16). In this injunction consider—
I. WHAT DUTY IS ENJOINED, AND WHAT SHOULD BE REBUKED.
1. To tell anyone of his fault, “Thou shalt not suffer sin upon him.” sin, therefore, is the thing we are called to reprove, or rather him that commits sin. Do all we can to convince him of his fault, and lead him in the right way.
2. Love requires that we also warn him of error which would naturally lead to sin. If we do “not hate him in our heart,” but love our neighbour, we shall generously warn him of mistakes likely to end in evil.
3. Avoid reproving for anything that is disputable. A thing appears evil to me, therefore if I do it I am a sinner before God. But another is not to be judged by my conscience. So I must only reprove for what is clearly and undeniably evil, e.g., profanity, insobriety. Few who are guilty of these will defend them, when appeal is made to their conscience in the sight of God.
II. WHO THEY ARE WE ARE CALLED TO REPROVE.
1. There are some sinners we are forbidden to rebuke. “Cast not pearl before swine,” i.e., brutish men, Known to be immersed in sins, having no fear of God before their eyes. Do not expose the precious pearls, i.e, the sublime doctrines of the gospel, to their contempt, and yourself to injurious treatment. Yet if we saw such persons speak or do what they themselves know to be evil we ought to reprove them.
2. Our “neighbour” is every child of man, all that have souls to be saved. If we refrain because some are sinners above other men they may perish in their iniquity, but God will require their blood at our hands.
3. Else, in the lower world there might be upraiding of us for our neglect of duty, through which souls, left unwarned, failed to “flee from the wrath to come.”
4. Yet, the reproving is not to be done in the same degree to everyone. First it is particularly due to our parents, if needing it; then to brothers and sisters; then to relatives; then to our servants; to our fellow citizens; members of the same religious society; watch over each other that we may not suffer sin upon our brother. To neglect this is to “hate our brother in our heart”; and “he that hateth his brother is a murderer.” It imperils our own salvation to neglect this duty.
III. WHAT SPIRIT AND MANNER SHOULD MARK OUR PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY.
1. There is considerable difficulty in doing it aright. Although some are specially qualified to do it by grace, and skilful by practice. But. though difficult, we must do it; and God will aid us.
2. How most effectual? When done in “the spirit of love,” of tender goodwill for our neighbour, as for one who is the son of our common Father, as for one for whom Christ died, that he might be a partaker of salvation.
3. Yet speak in the spirit of humility “Not think of yourself more highly than you ought to think.” Not feeling or showing the least contempt of those whom you reprove; disclaiming all self superiority; owning the good there is in him
4. In the spirit of meekness. “For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.” Anger begets anger, not holiness.
5. Put no trust in yourself; in you wisdom or abilities; speak in the spirit of prayer.
6. And as for the outward manner, as well as the spirit, in which it should be done; let there be a frank outspokenness, a plain and artless declaration of disinterested love. It will pierce like lightning.
7. With great seriousness, showing that you are really in earnest. A ludicrous reproof makes little impression, or is taken ill.
8. Yet there are exceptions when a little well placed raillery will pierce deeper than solid argument. “Ridiculum acri fortius.” “Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.”
9. Adapt the manner to the occasion. By few or many words as the situation determines; or by no words at all, but a look, a gesture, a sigh. Such silent reproof may be attended by the power of God.
10. Watch for a fair occasion. “A word spoken in season, how good it is.” Catch the “Mollia tempora fandi,” the time when his mind is soft and mild.
11. But should a man be left alone when intoxicated? I dare not say so; for instances are forthcoming of its having had good effects. Despise not the poor drunkard. Many of them are self-condemned, but they despair. He that tells a man there is no help for him is a liar from the beginning. “Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world.”
12. You that are diligent in this labour of love be not discouraged. You have need of patience. That “you reap, if you faint not.”
When a religious movement is abroad it will be accompanied with a spirit of reproving. All who are awakened by God’s Spirit will be reprovers of outward sin.—John Wesley, M.A., Sermons lxv.
Lev_19:26; Lev_19:31.—Theme: WICKED SUPERSTITIONS.
I. A PROOF OF MAN’S ARRANT ALIENATION FROM GOD.
He will create oracles, consult devils, anything rather than seek unto God.
II. A RECOGNITION OF DARK SPIRITUAL AGENCIES OPPOSED TO GOD.
Scripture does not declare these “familiar spirits “to be unreal; it acknowledges them, and records man’s dealings with them: Samuel and Witch of Endor. [Compare Act_16:16.]
III. A REPROBATION OF SUCH PERSONS AS CLAIM TO BE “MEDIUMS “OF INTERCOURSE WITH SPIRITS.
“Regard not them.” God disowns them. A fearful case they are in who make this their trade. Heaven denounces them, and will exclude them. Spiritualists are in no favour or league with Deity.
IV. A PROHIBITION OF ALL USE OF THESE WICKED MYSTERIES.
Man is to deal alone with Deity, with God in Christ, with the Holy Spirit. They who “seek after wizards,” and “use enchantments,” are offending God, and are “defiled by them.”
Prayer brings us direct to Him who is the “Father of lights”; and He giveth liberally to “any who lack wisdom and will ask of God” (Jas_1:17; Jas_1:5).
Jesus Christ is the one Mediator, and “ever liveth to make intercession for us.” There should be no intercourse with the spirit world but through Jesus, and through Him with the Father alone. [See Addenda to chapter, Superstitions.]
Lev_19:3; Lev_19:30.—Theme: SACREDNESS OF THE SABBATHS.
“Ye shall keep my Sabbaths.”
All days belong to God, and should therefore be kept sacred, but He has seen fit to anoint one day in seven with the oil of gladness above its fellows. The Sabbath is a divine institution dating from Eden, is associated with the completion of the great work of creation. It was heaven’s antidote to the curse of labour. Let us consider:
I. FOR WHAT PURPOSE WAS THE SABBATH ORIGINALLY INSTITUTED?
Certainly not because God needed it: though on it He rested from His labours and sanctified it. It was made for man, that in it he might enjoy; (a) physical repose; (b) mental recreation; (c) spiritual profit; (d) uninterrupted opportunities for divine worship. Godlesness has ignored its claims, selfishness has begrudged its weekly advent and call from secular engagements. The observance of one day in seven for the repose and refreshment of body, mind and heart brings blessings to man and glory to God.
II. FOR WHAT PURPOSES THE SABBATH HAS BEEN PERPETUATED UNDER THE NEW DISPENSATION.
The change of day, the less rigid demand for its ceremonial observance, have not lessened its importance and necessity, It is still to be observed as a day of rest from secular toil, and specially devoted to the work and worship of Jehovah. The Christian Sabbath is associated with the completion of the great work of redemption. Christ set His appropriation and approval upon it by making special posthumous appearances to His disciples on the first day of the week. The conduct of the apostles gives authoritative sanction to the observance of the first day instead of the seventh; and the Holy Spirit has set His seal of approval upon the change, not only by the descent at Pentecost, but by exerting His saving power, as Christians have met for worship and extending the Redeemer’s Kingdom on the Lord’s Day.—F. W. B.
Lev_19:32,—Theme: HOMAGE FOR AGE.
That is, when and—
i. Because the aged REPRESENT MATURE WISDOM.
ii. Because the aged record LONG YEARS SPENT IN OUR SERVICE.
iii. Because the aged demonstrate GOD’S PROVIDENTIAL CARE.
iv. Because the aged are SOLEMN ADMONITIONS OF LIFE’S DECAY
v. Because the aged suggest NEARNESS TO ETERNITY.
vi. Because the aged exhibit the RICHEST FRUITS OF GRACE.
vii. Because the aged mark the LINE OF GOD’S COVENANT BLESSINGS for descendants.
viii. Because the aged REPRESENT ON EARTH HIM WHO IS THE “ANCIENT OF DAYS.”
(a) Youth should venerate the aged (Job_30:1; Job_30:12; Isa_3:4-5).
(b) Age should influence and hallow the young (2Ti_1:5).
[See Addenda to chapter, Old Age.]
Lev_19:33.—Theme: COURTESY TO STRANGERS.
I. WE OURSELVES ARE STRANGERS ON THE EARTH.
“For ye were strangers in the land” (Lev_19:34).
1. Dependent on other care than our own; human and divine
2. Transient, soon to leave, resting but a little while on earth.
Observe: it is good to see in the case of others an analogy with our own; it will foster sympathy, and helpfulness.
II. COURTESY SHOULD ROOT ITSELF IN GENEROUS LOVE.
“Thou shalt love him as thyself.”
1. Acting to the stranger as if the service were being rendered to us. This will teach us what to do, and how to show kindness.
2. Recognising that we may perchance be in the stranger’s position. As thus needing kindness, let us now exhibit it.
3. Opening our hearts in ungrudging benevolence. “Love” gives lavishly. Courtesy should not be meagre and superficial.
III. GRATITUDE TO HEAVEN PROMPTS US TO GENEROUS KINDNESS.
“Ye were strangers in the land of Egypt; I am the Lord your God.”
1. Memory of God’s rescue should constrain us to care for others.
2. God’s relationship to us requires that we illustrate His lovingkindness.
3. His commands to courtesy cannot be evaded with impunity.
“I was a stranger and ye took me not in: Depart! “
Lev_19:35-36—Theme: BUSINESS HONESTY.
i. SOCIAL LIFE IS BASED UPON COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS.
Each bringing to the other some product of skill or toil. We cannot supply a fraction of our own wants, we must buy; and we have also, in turn, something to sell. Business is the outcome of this reciprocal dependence. Each can, each must help the other; or social and civic life would be impossible
ii. DISHONESTY IS SUBVERSIVE OF THE VERY BASIS OF SOCIAL LIFE
It breaks confidence, alienates intercourse; closes friendly relationships, substitutes roguery for righteousness, and wrecks all goodwill.
Pleasant to reflect—
1. How much trade honour there is among men.
2. How surely trickery brings discovery, and therefore penalty, on rogues.
3. How honesty is ever winning respect and reward.
iii. JUSTICE SITS OBSERVANT OF ALL DECEITFUL DEEDS.
“I am the Lord “
He sees all secresies; weighs all balances; hales all dishonesties; will requite all deceits.
ILLUSTRATIVE ADDENDA TO CHAPTER 19
MORALITY
Morality is the object of government. We want a state of things in which crime will not pay, a state of things which allows every man the largest liberty compatible with the liberty of every other man.”—EMERSON, Fortune of the Republic.
“O let us still the secret joy partake
To follow virtue even for virtue’s sake.”
—POPE.
FAMILY PIETY
Where Abraham pitched his tent, there he built an altar.
“We are really what we are relatively.”
—P. HENRY.
“Children are what their mothers are.”
—LANDOR,
SABBATH AND SANCTUARY
“O day of rest! How beautiful, how fair.
How welcome to the weary and the old!
Dav of the Lord! and truce to earthy care!”
—LONGFELLOW, Christus.
Sin keeps no Sabbaths.
Of a well spent Sabbath Philip Henry used to say: “If this be not the way to heaven, I know not what is.”
POOR
“This mournful truth is everywhere confessed,
Slow rises worth by poverty depressed.”
—SAMUEL JOHNSON.
“Poverty is the only load which is the heavier the more loved ones there are to assist in supporting it.”—RICHTER.
CHARITY
“They serve God well,
Who serve His creatures.”
—MRS. NORTON.
“He is truly great, that is great in charity.”
—THOMAS A. KEMPIS.
“To pity distress is but human; to relieve it is Godlike.”—HORACE MANN.
PERJURY
“Sworn on every slight pretence,
Till perjuries are common as bad pence,
While thousands, careless of the damning sin,
Kiss the Book outside, who ne’er looked within.”—COWPER.
BUSINESS AND WORK
“Business dispatched is business well done, but business hurried is business ill done.”—BULWER LYTTON.
“All true work is sacred; in all the work, were it but true hand labour, there is something of divineness.”—CARLYLE.
“In every rank, or great or small,
’Tis industry supports us all.”—GAY.
“For men must work, and women must weep,
And the sooner it’s over, the sooner to sleep.”
—KlNGSLEY.
JUSTICE
“Heaven is above all yet; there sits a Judge
That no king can corrupt”
—Henry VIII. iii., 1.
“He who the sword of Heaven would bear,
Should be as holy as severe;
Pattern in himself, to know
Grace to stand, and virtue go;
More nor loss to others paying
Than by self-offences weighing.”
—Measure for Measure.
“Four things belong to a judge: to hear courteously, to answer wisely, to consider soberly, and to decide impartially.”
—SOCRATES.
“The virtue of justice consists in moderation, as regulated by wisdom.”—ARISTOTLE.
SLANDER
“One evil tongue, “say the Jews, “hurts three persons, the speaker, the hearer, and the person spoken of.”
“A lost good name is ne’er retrieved.”
—GAY.
“I hate the man who builds his name
On ruins of another’s fame.”—GAY.
“ ’Twas slander filled her mouth with lying words:
Slander, the foulest whelp of sin.”
—POLLOCK.
“Low breathed talkers, minion lispers
Cutting honest throats by whispers.”
—SCOTT.
“Be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as
Snow, thon shalt not escape slander.”
—Hamlet.
“Convey a libel in a frown,
And wink a reputation down.”
—SWIFT.
NEIGHBOURLINESS
“We cannot show ourselves more friendly to any man than by an early reproof of his error, or, as it is here expressed, by not suffering sin upon him. “Tis a mercy to meet with reproof (though late) from others; but to be soon reproved is much mercy. Every good, the sooner it comes to us, the better it is.”—CARYL.
SUPERSTITIONS
“Superstition is related to this life, religion to the next; superstition is allied to fatality, religion to virtue: it is by the vivacity of earthly devices that we become superstitious: it is, on the contrary, by the sacrifice of these devices that we become religious.”—MADAME DE STAEL.
OLD AGE
“Life’s shadows are meeting Eternity’s day.”—JAS. G CLARKE.
“Age is not all decay: it is the ripening, the swelling, of the fresh life within, that withers and bursts the husk.”—GEO. MACDONALD.
“Thus fares it still in our decay,
And yet the wiser mind
Mourns less for what age takes away,
Than what it leaves behind.”
—WORDSWORTH.
The Preacher's Complete Homiletical Commentary (gen. ed. Joseph S. Exell; Funk & Wagnalls, c. 1892) — public domain (pre-1929). A full-Bible homiletical/sermon-outline anthology covering 65 of 66 books (2 John is absent from the source module). Text from a community e-Sword module.
The Sermon Bible 1900 · Public Domain The duty of brotherly admonition or reproof.
Lev 19:17
The duty of brotherly admonition or reproof.
Read full note →
I. Consider what the duty is. St. Paul uttered a great truth when he said, "We are members one of another." If we be members one of another, there must be relative duties which could not exist were these mutual relationships wholly destroyed. We may not act with a view to ourselves alone. If there be an obligation upon us, from the very fact of our creation, to have reference in all we do to the benefit of our brethren, we cannot shift off from ourselves the duty of brotherly admonition or reproof. If we see a brother or neighbour pursuing a course which is likely to provoke God’s wrath and must issue in ruin, then we are altogether and grievously at fault if we "suffer sin upon him" and do not strive to bring him to repentance and amendment.
II. There are certain rules and motives to be noticed as regulating the careful performance of the duty which the text lays down. (1) He who takes upon himself the duty of reproving another is required to proceed with much delicacy and caution. It by no means holds good that wherever a man sees vice, he is bound to rebuke it. We do not want a headlong and quixotic chivalry, fancying itself commissioned to break a lance with all whom it may meet on the highways of the land. (2) Since the end of reproof is mainly the well-being of the party reproved, there is to be a careful avoidance of that indiscriminate and unqualified censure which is calculated to disgust, and we should show by the tenderness of our dealing that, though we dare excuse nothing, we know how to distinguish between an involuntary betrayal and an unblushing rebellion. (3) The reproof should be given privately rather than publicly. (4) If we hope that our admonition will carry any weight, we must take heed that we are not ourselves chargeable with the fault that we reprove in others.
H. Melvill, Penny Pulpit, No. 1970.
References: Lev 19:18.—T. Oswald Dykes, The Law of the Ten Words, p. 207. Lev 19:30.—New Manual of Sunday-school Addresses, p. 238; Sermons for Boys and Girls, 1880, p. 213. Lev 19:36.—Spurgeon, Evening by Evening, p. 250; R. W. Dale, Sunday Magazine, 1866, p. 89; Parker, vol. iii., p. 135.
The Sermon Bible, ed. William Robertson Nicoll (1888–1900) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
J. R. Dummelow 1909 · Public Domain Various Laws, mainly of a Moral and Humane Character
Various Laws, mainly of a Moral and Humane Character
This chapter was very naturally regarded by Jewish authorities as an embodiment of the Decalogue. It will be observed that in general the precepts in Lev_19:3-8 correspond to those of the first table of the Decalogue ('Thou shalt love the Lord thy God'), and those in Lev_19:9-18 to the second table ('Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'). In this chapter alone the characteristic phrase 'I am the Lord' (i.e. Jehovah) occurs no fewer than sixteen times. It is the divine seal set to the enactments of the law.
Read full note →
5-8. See Lev_7:15-18.
9. Kindly consideration of the poor is part of that holiness which God requires and which is the reflection of His own. He is the champion of the weak and oppressed: see on Exo_22:21, and Lev_19:33, Lev_19:34. This injunction is not applicable to the time of the sojourn in the desert; it presupposes a settled agricultural life in the land of Canaan: see on Deu_24:20.
13. Cp. Deu_24:14-15; Mal_3:5; Jam_5:4.
14. The sin is that of intention, and is seen by Him who 'trieth the hearts.'
15. Justice must be administered impartially, no favour, being shown to a poor man because he is poor (cp. Exo_23:3), or to a rich man because he is rich.
16. Stand against the blood of thy neighbour] This may mean generally any conduct imperilling a neighbour's life. But its connexion here with the sin of slander suggests that what is specially meant is the procuring of a sentence of condemnation by means of false witness: cp. Exo_23:1, Exo_23:7.
17. Upon him] RV 'because of him,' on his account, i.e. by cherishing ill-will against him in secret.
18. Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself] This is the 'royal law' (Jam_2:8) and the principle underlying the second table of the Decalogue: see Mat_22:35-40. The word neighbour was interpreted in a narrow sense as equivalent to a fellow Israelite or at most to a stranger living in the midst of Israel. Our Lord removed all such limitations and applied the law universally: see Luk_10:29-37.
19. Such mixtures are forbidden, as not only in themselves contrary to the divinely appointed order of nature, but as opening the door to the unnatural sins mentioned in Lev_18:22-23; Rom_1:26-27 : see on Deu_22:5. There may be an allusion here to the practice of magic, in which unnatural mixtures played an important part.
20. In the case of a betrothed free woman, both persons were put to death as adulterers, betrothal being regarded as sacredly as marriage itself: see on Exo_22:16.
23. Uncircumcised] i.e. unconsecrated, unclean, and therefore not to be used for the first three years. In the fourth year the fruit is to be dedicated to God, after which the owner is free to enjoy the use of it. Besides impressing the duty of gratitude to God for the fruits of the earth this law is one of practical value. For the metaphorical use of the term 'circumcise' see Lev_26:41; Exo_6:12; Deu_30:6; Jer_4:4; Jer_6:10; Jer_9:26; Act_7:51; Rom_2:28-29; Php_3:3.
26. Use enchantment] charms or incantations. Observe times] RV 'practise augury,' perhaps by watching the clouds or the flight of birds: see on Deu_18:10.
27. The practices in this and the following verses were commonly employed among idolatrous nations. The rounding of the corners of the head and beard may refer to the Arabian custom of presenting the first locks as an offering to the deity: see Jer_9:26; Jer_25:28; Jer_49:32, with the marginal readings in each case: cp. the practice of the Nazirite (Num_6:5, Num_6:18). Oaths by the hair of the head were common (cp. Mat_5:36), and a usual Mohammedan oath is still 'by the beard of the prophet.'
28. Cutting the flesh and tattooing the skin are closely connected with cutting the hair as an idolatrous rite: cp. Jer_16:6; Jer_48:37; 1Ki_18:28; Zec_13:6.
29. This, too, was a degrading accompaniment of idol worship among the Canaanites, and even among the Greeks. Idolatry and immorality always went hand in hand: see on Exo_34:13, Exo_34:15, and cp. Isa_57:5-9; Hos_4:13; Rom_1:23-29.
31. That have familiar spirits] necromancers who profess to hold communication with the dead: cp. Exo_22:18; Deu_18:11; 1Sa_28:7.
33, 34 See on Lev_19:9.
35. Meteyard] i.e. measuring rod.
36. The ephah (about a bushel) and the hin (about a gallon and a half) are used here as representative measures: cp. Eze_45:10.
J. R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (Macmillan, 1909) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Arno C. Gaebelein 1922 · Public Domain 2. Different Duties
2. Different Duties
CHAPTER 19
Read full note →
1. Honoring parents and fearing God (Lev 19:1-8)
2. The care of the poor (Lev 19:9-10)
3. Against stealing and lying (Lev 19:11-12)
4. Against oppression (Lev 19:13-14)
5. Against unrighteousness in judgment (Lev 19:15-16)
6. Thou shalt love thy neighbor (Lev 19:17-18)
7. Different commands and prohibitions (Lev 19:19-37)
Many of these duties enjoined upon a people called to holiness, the different commands and prohibitions, are of much interest. It is true, believers are not under the law. This, however, does not mean that we should refrain from reading and studying these commands. Jehovah changes not. May we remember that our call, like Israel’s, is unto practical holiness in life. Our responsibilities are even greater. Many lessons are here for us which will greatly help us in our walk as His people. The provision made for the poor (verses 9-10 compare with Rth 2:14-16) manifests the loving care of Jehovah. God has special regard for the poor and strangers. His blessed Son became poor and was indeed a stranger in the world He created. His people had no heart for Him and He was hungry, while His disciples had to take ears of corn from the field to satisfy their hunger. The Lord Himself was the owner of Israel’s land (Lev 25:23), and as owner He charged His servants to be unselfish in the use of the bountiful provision He was making for their temporal need.
Note the precept concerning the laborer. “The wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning” (verse 13). This again reveals the gracious care of the Lord. How little such care and consideration for the poor and the servant is found in our day! If these simple instructions were followed the discontent of the poor and the unrest of the laborers would not be as prominent as they are now. Israel failed in this. They cheated the poor and hired servants (Amo 8:5-6). What is to be in the last days of the present age we find in Jas 5:4: “Behold the hire of the laborers, who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth; and the cries of them that have reaped have entered into the ears of the lord of Sabaoth.” The divine plea for the poor and the laborer is utterly disregarded in the last days, and Jehovah has to take up their case.
The deaf and the blind are also mentioned. The defenceless and helpless with the poor and the hired servant are the objects of His special care.
In verse 19 the raising of hybrid animals is forbidden. Anything “mingled” God despises. His people are to avoid this, even in the smallest things.
Heathen superstitions, such as using enchantments and observing times are forbidden by Jehovah. These are unworthy of a redeemed people linked with Jehovah. All superstitions, such as dreading certain days and numbers (“Friday” or “13”), and other foolish observances, alas! found so much amidst professing Christians are heathenish and dishonor God, who alone knows and controls the welfare and future of His people. All “cuttings in your flesh for the dead” were also prohibited. Thus the pagans did who have no hope. Such sorrow, expressed in fearful lamentations and frenzied outbreaks, were unworthy of Israel, as they are more so for Christian believers (1Th 4:13). Those who have familiar spirits (mediums) and wizards were not to be consulted.
But it is truly most extraordinary that in Christian lands, as especially in the United States of America, and that in the full light, religious and intellectual, of the twentieth century, such a prohibition should be fully as pertinent as in Israel! For no words could more precisely describe the pretensions of the so-called modern spiritualism, which within the last half century has led away hundreds of thousands of deluded souls, and those, in many cases, not from the ignorant and degraded, but from circles which boast of more than average culture and intellectual enlightenment. And inasmuch as experience sadly shows that even those who profess to be disciples of Christ are in danger of being led away by our modern wizards and traffickers with familiar spirits, it is by no means unnecessary to observe that there is not the slightest reason to believe that this which was rigidly, forbidden by God in the fifteenth century B.C., can now be well-pleasing to Him in the nineteenth century A.D. And those who have most carefully watched the moral developments of this latter-day delusion, will most appreciate the added phrase which speaks of this as “defiling” a man. (S.H. Kellogg)
It will be wise to meditate carefully on all these commands and prohibitions. They reveal the tenderness, the wisdom and the holiness of God.
Arno C. Gaebelein, The Annotated Bible (1913–1922) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
Paul E. Kretzmann 1924 · Public Domain Chiefly of the First Table
Chiefly of the First Table
v. 1. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
Read full note →
v. 2. Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel and say unto them, ye shall be holy; for I, the Lord, your God, am holy. They were not only to be pure and sinless, but their entire life was to present a definite and unvarying contrast to sin and transgression in any form. That is the fundamental thought of the Chapter.
v. 3. Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father. The mother is here mentioned first, as the children are chiefly dependent upon her and associated with her, especially in the first years of their lives. Reverence to the mother of the home is essential for the proper social relationship, and the importance of this relation is seen from the fact that the family is the unit of civilization. And keep My Sabbaths, all the festival days sacred to the Lord. I am the Lord, your God. This observance governed the entire social organization of the Jews.
v. 4. Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods. I am the Lord, your God. "If the heart of man becomes benumbed to the use of images of false gods of any kind, he sinks down to the level of the idols which are his ideals, and becomes as dumb and unspiritual as they are. " (Lange. ) It is significant that the word here used for idols really means "nothingnesses," thus describing the idols in their true character. Cf Psa 96:5; Psa 115:8; Psa 135:18; Isa 40:18; Isa 44:10.
v. 5. And if ye offer a sacrifice of peace-offerings unto the Lord, ye shall offer it at your own will. Unless the offerings were made in this spirit, with a right good will, from the heart, they would have no value in the sight of God.
v. 6. It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow, for that was the rule with regard to voluntary sacrifices, Lev 7:16; and if aught remain until the third day, it shall be burned in the fire.
v. 7. And if it be eaten at all on the third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted, the object of the sacrifice was not attained, its purpose was made void by the deliberate disregard of God’s rule.
v. 8. Therefore every one that eateth it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the hallowed thing of the Lord, in eating of flesh which had been devoted to the Lord as a gift after it had become unclean; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. This threat involved excommunication on the part of the congregation and the punishment of death on the part of God, who is a holy, jealous God.
Paul E. Kretzmann, Popular Commentary of the Bible (1921–1924) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.
unfoldingWord translationNotes 2017 · CC BY-SA 4.0 keep my Sabbaths
keep my Sabbaths
"observe my Sabbaths" or "respect my day of rest"
Read full note →
Do not turn to worthless idols
Worshiping idols is spoken of as if it were physically turning towards them. AT: "Do not begin to worship worthless idols" (See: Metaphor)
translationWords
Yahweh
Moses
assembly
people group
Israel
holy
God
Sabbath
turn
worthy
false god
false god
unfoldingWord translationNotes — © Distant Shores Media and the Door43 World Missions Community, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Source: git.door43.org/Door43/en_tn.