those who were counted of them, of the tribe of Benjamin, were thirty-five thousand four hundred.
Parallel Translations
-
those who were counted of them, of the tribe of Benjamin, were thirty-five thousand four hundred.
-
Those that were numbered of them, even of the tribe of Benjamin, were thirty and five thousand and four hundred.
-
those that were numbered of them, of the tribe of Benjamin, were thirty and five thousand and four hundred.
Cross-references (4)
Passages linked to Numbers 1:37 in the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, ordered by reader-vote popularity; verse text shown in World English Bible.
- Numbers 26:41 These are the sons of Benjamin after their families; and those who were counted of them were forty-five thousand six hundred.
- Numbers 2:23 His army, and those who were counted of them, were thirty-five thousand four hundred.
- Judges 20:44-46 Eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor. They turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon. They gleaned five thousand men of them in the highways, and followed hard after them to Gidom, and struck two thousand men of them. So that all who fell that day of Benjamin were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword. All these were men of valor.
- 2 Chronicles 17:17 From Benjamin: Eliada, a mighty man of valor, and with him two hundred thousand armed with bow and shield;
Cross-references from openbible.info (CC BY 4.0)
Explain this verse (3 sources)
Historical commentary, presented as a primary source — not an endorsement.
Private notes
Saved on this device only — never synced or sent anywhere.
Matthew Poole 1685 · Public Domain The smallest number, except one, though Benjamin had more…
The smallest number, except one, though Benjamin had more immediate children than any of his brethren, Gen 46:21; whereas Dan had but one immediate son, Gen 46:23, yet now his number is the biggest but one of all the tribes, and is almost double to that of Benjamin. Such great and strange changes God easily can, and frequently doth, make in families, 1Sa 2:5. And therefore let none boast or please themselves too much in their numerous offspring.
Matthew Poole's English Annotations on the Holy Bible (1683–1685) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword/MySword module.
John Wesley 1765 · Public Domain Thirty five thousand - The smallest number, except one,…
Thirty five thousand - The smallest number, except one, though Benjamin had more immediate children than any of his brethren, Gen. xlvi, 21, whereas Daniel had but one immediate son, Gen. xlvi, 23, yet now his number is the biggest but one of all the tribes, and is almost double to that of Benjamin. Such great and strange changes God easily can, and frequently doth make in families, 1 Sam. ii, 5. And therefore let none boast or please themselves too much in their numerous offspring.
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the Whole Bible (1754–1765) — public domain. Text via the GEBible commentary corpus.
Joseph Benson 1811 · Public Domain Num 1:37. Thirty-five thousand — The smallest number, except…
Num 1:37. Thirty-five thousand — The smallest number, except one, though Benjamin had more immediate children than any of his brethren, Gen 46:21; whereas Dan had but one immediate son, (Gen 46:23,) yet now his number is the largest but one of all the tribes, and is almost double to that of Benjamin. Such great and strange changes God easily can, and frequently doth make in families, 1Sa 2:5. And therefore let none boast or please themselves too much in their numerous offspring.
Joseph Benson's Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1811–1818) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.