Commandments · Positive commandments

To study Torah and teach it diligently to one's children

#22 Positive commandment Deuteronomy 6:7

The cited verse

The Hebrew (Masoretic Text)

וְשִׁנַּנְתָּם לְבָנֶיךָ וְדִבַּרְתָּ בָּם בְּשִׁבְתְּךָ בְּבֵיתֶךָ וּבְלֶכְתְּךָ בַדֶּרֶךְ וּבְשָׁכְבְּךָ וּבְקוּמֶךָ

In Maimonides’ words

How Maimonides defines this commandment in his Sefer HaMitzvot — his own words, shown as a primary source.

היא שצונו ללמוד תורה וללמדה וזהו הנקרא תלמוד תורה, והוא אמרו ושננתם לבניך וכתוב בספרי לבניך אלו התלמידים שהתלמידים קרויים בנים שנאמר יצאו בני הנביאים, ושם נאמר ושננתם שיהיו מחודדים בתוך פיך כשאדם שואלך דבר לא תהא מגמגם לו אלא אמור לו מיד. וכבר נכפל זה הצווי פעמים רבות ולמדתם ועשיתם למען ילמדון, וכבר נתפזר הצווי והזרוז על מצוה זו במקומות רבים מן התלמוד, והנשים אין חייבות בה מאמרו ולמדתם אותם את בניכם אמרו בניכם ולא בנותיכם כמו שהתבאר בגמרא (קדושין ל"ו). (בפרשת ואתחנן, אהבה הלכות תלמוד תורה פרק א'):

That is that He commanded us to study Torah and to teach it. And that is His saying, "And you shall teach them to your sons" (Deuteronomy 6:4). And it is written in the Sifrei (Sifrei Devarim 34:4), "'To your sons' - these are the students. For students are called, sons, as it is stated, (II Kings 2:3) 'And the sons of the prophets came forth.'" And there (Sifrei Devarim 34:1), it says, "'And you shall teach (shinantam, which is related here to the word, shen, tooth) them' - they shall be sharp in your mouth, so that if one questions you about something, you will not stammer to him, but tell him forthwith." And this command was already repeated several times - "and you shall teach them (and) [to] do them" (Deuteronomy 5:1); "in order that they shall learn" (Deuteronomy 31:12). And the command and the encouragement of this commandment has already been scattered throughout many places in the Talmud. And women are not obligated in it, from His saying, "And you shall teach them to your sons" (Deuteronomy 11:19) - His saying, "your sons," and not, "your daughters," as it is explained in the Gemara (Kiddushin 30a). (See Parashat Vaetchanan; Mishneh Torah, Torah Study 1.)

Hebrew: Sefer HaMitzvot, Warsaw 1883 (public domain). English: Sefaria Edition, trans. Rabbi Francis Nataf, 2021 (CC0). Via Sefaria; translator’s footnotes omitted.

Literary form: a flat, unconditional command

Applicability

How the catalog describes where and when this commandment applies. These are independent descriptions, not a verdict on which laws still count.

  • Recorded as practiced today

Classical halakhic consequences

The consequences the classical halakhah attaches to this commandment, grouped by who imposes them. Where a category has none recorded, that absence is itself meaningful.

Imposed by a court

No court-imposed penalty is recorded.

At the hands of Heaven

No divinely-imposed consequence is recorded.

Ritual remedy

No ritual remedy is recorded.

How the streams of Judaism treat this commandment

The streams of Judaism read the same commandment differently — an ongoing plurality, not a ranking. Each position below is reported as the catalog records it; none is presented as the correct one.

  • Orthodox Binding
  • Conservative Binding
  • Reform Kept as an ethical principle
  • Reconstructionist Kept as an ethical principle
  • Karaite Binding

Two readings, side by side

24 of 613 commandments have been examined in depth so far — this is one of them.

In the traditional Jewish reading How the Jewish legal (halakhic) tradition reads and defends this commandment, in its own developed voice — the classical reasons given for the commandments (ta’amei ha-mitzvot).

The tradition reads “teach them diligently to your children” as the commandment of Torah study — an obligation both to learn oneself and to teach the next generation.

Maimonides counts the study of Torah as a positive commandment binding on every Jew, and holds that a father must teach his son and see that he is taught. Reading “and you shall teach them diligently (ve-shinantam),” he requires that the words of Torah be fluent and sharp in one’s mouth, ready to be answered without hesitation.

Maimonides (Rambam), Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Talmud Torah 1:1–7; Sefer HaMitzvot, positive commandment 11 (12th c.)

The Talmud lists teaching one’s child Torah among a father’s duties toward his son, and reads “you shall teach them diligently to your children” as requiring that the teaching be clear and well-ordered enough that the learner can repeat it in kind.

Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 29b–30a (rabbinic period)

Linked rather than reproduced — Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 29b–30a: A public-domain or CC0 English translation exists at this reference but does not carry the passage cited.

The Mishnah places the study of Torah among the duties whose fruits a person enjoys in this world while the principal remains for the world to come, and adds that the study of Torah is weighed against them all.

Mishnah, Peah 1:1 (rabbinic period)

Linked rather than reproduced — Mishnah, Peah 1:1: No public-domain or CC0 English translation of this passage is available.

Rabbinic citations here link to the source text at Sefaria, a free online library of Jewish texts. Where a public-domain or CC0 English translation — one anyone may reuse — of the exact passage cited has been verified and is short enough to set out in full, the passage is also reproduced here in the source’s own words; where it is not, the citation says which of those conditions it missed. Which passages are reproduced is a matter of licensing, length and verification — never of how much a source matters.

Modern critical scholarship How modern academic biblical scholarship reads this text — the source-critical and form-critical school. Its hedges are shown as it states them; nothing here is presented as settled fact.

Modern source-critical scholarship assigns this text to the Deuteronomic source (D).

Scholarly confidence in this reading: scholarly consensus.

The catalog reads this law as plausibly aimed against Restriction of covenantal/sacral knowledge to scribal and priestly elites; per Weinfeld, a repurposing of Neo-Assyrian vassal-treaty loyalty pedagogy (adê) to redirect transmitted loyalty from the imperial king to YHWH and his torah..

Deuteronomy 6:7 reads: "You shall recite them (wĕšinnantām) to your children, and you shall talk about them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road, when you lie down and when you rise up." The verb šānan is striking — its root sense is "to sharpen" or "to whet" (as in sharpening a sword), suggesting that the words of Torah are to be honed into the next generation with intensity and precision, not passively passed along. The Septuagint renders it as prosbibaseis, "you shall impress upon," capturing the same connotation of active, deliberate instruction. This verse sits within the Shema paragraph (Deuteronomy 6:4–9), arguably the most theologically concentrated passage in the entire Pentateuch, which functions as a kind of Israelite creed — a declaration of YHWH's singularity followed by instructions for its perpetual transmission.

Deuteronomy is deeply invested in what scholars call "pedagogical theology" — the idea that Israel's survival as a covenant community depends on the intergenerational transfer of knowledge. Moshe Weinfeld famously argued that Deuteronomy reflects the influence of Assyrian vassal treaty traditions, where the vassal is required to teach the terms of the treaty to future generations to ensure ongoing loyalty (Weinfeld, *Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School*, pp. 298–306). The Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon (672 BCE) contains similar clauses requiring subjects to instill loyalty to the Assyrian king in their children. Deuteronomy essentially repurposes this imperial rhetoric: YHWH replaces the Assyrian king, and Torah replaces the loyalty oath. The domestic setting — "when you sit in your house, when you walk on the road" — is distinctly Deuteronomic; it relocates religious instruction from the temple to everyday life, a move that would prove essential for Jewish survival after the destruction of both Temples.

No other ancient Near Eastern law code mandates universal popular education in this way. Literacy in Mesopotamia and Egypt was largely confined to scribal elites. The Deuteronomic vision — every parent teaching every child the content of the divine covenant — is, at minimum, aspirational and arguably revolutionary. Whether it reflects actual social practice in Iron Age Judah is debated; the epigraphic evidence (ostraca from Lachish, Arad, etc.) suggests functional literacy was more widespread than once thought, but "studying Torah" in the Deuteronomic sense likely meant oral recitation and memorization rather than reading scrolls.

Rabbinic Judaism made this commandment foundational. The Mishnah (Avot 1:1) opens with the chain of Torah transmission — Moses to Joshua to the Elders to the Prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly — establishing an unbroken pedagogical lineage. The Talmud (Kiddushin 29b–30a) extensively discusses the father's obligation to teach his son Torah, making it one of the defining duties of Jewish parenthood. Maimonides (Hilkhot Talmud Torah 1:1–3) codifies this as a universal obligation applying to every Jewish male, regardless of social standing. The practical consequence was the development of one of the ancient world's earliest systems of communal education — tradition credits Joshua ben Gamla (1st century CE) with establishing schools in every town (Bava Batra 21a). The emphasis on education as religious obligation, rather than elite privilege, became one of Judaism's most distinctive and historically consequential features.

How later traditions received this commandment

How later traditions read or reworked this commandment, each attributed to its own voice. The catalog’s own classification of each reception is shown as it records it, never adopted as GEBible’s.

Qumran (the Dead Sea Scrolls)

  • 1QS 6:6-8 (continuous communal Torah study) read it more strictly

Rabbinic aggadah

  • Genesis Rabbah 1:1 (Torah as primordial instrument of creation) expanded it homiletically
  • Avot de-Rabbi Natan A 6 expanded it homiletically

Philo of Alexandria

  • De Specialibus Legibus 4.149-150 affirmed it
  • Hypothetica 7.14 (weekly public instruction in the laws on the Sabbath) affirmed it

Josephus

  • Against Apion 2.178 affirmed it
  • Against Apion 2.204 affirmed it
  • Antiquities 4.211 affirmed it

The New Testament

  • Mark 12:29-30 // Matt 22:37 // Luke 10:27 affirmed it Jesus cites the Shema's love-of-God clause (Deut 6:4-5), adjacent to the teaching-children command of 6:7; transmission context presupposed but the cited verses are 6:4-5, not 6:7 directly
  • Ephesians 6:4 reinterpreted it fathers to raise children 'in the discipline and instruction of the Lord'
  • 2 Timothy 3:15 affirmed it Timothy taught the sacred writings 'from childhood'

The Church Fathers

  • Origen, Homilies on Numbers (general thematic reference to spiritualized meditation on the Law; not a single located citation) read it spiritually

The Qur'an and hadith

  • Q 3:79 (rabbaniyyin — those devoted to teaching and studying the Book) carried a parallel

Beside the older legal codes of its world

The commandment set beside the ancient Near-Eastern legal collections scholars compare it to — a descriptive comparison, not a claim of dependence.

  • neo assyrian vassal treaties obligation to instill treaty loyalty in one's children/descendants Relationship to the parallel: polemical contrast loyalty-transmission clauses requiring subjects to instill adê-loyalty in sons and future generations (e.g. §§ 4, 24, 57 and colophon) Parpola & Watanabe, SAA II (1988), no. 6
  • neo assyrian vassal treaties vassal subjects required to teach covenant loyalty to their children and future generations, providing the political-diplomatic model that Deuteronomy 6:7 repurposes for YHWH-directed Torah pedagogy Relationship to the parallel: polemical contrast lines 283-291 (loyalty-transmission clauses) Parpola and Watanabe, Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (SAA 2, 1988)

Where this commandment meets modern human-rights frameworks

One modern normative lens, attributed to it — not GEBible’s assessment. Each row names the framework it measures against and the catalog’s own classification of the relation.

This framework catalogues tensions; it records agreement in only one of its entries. The near-total tension rate is the shape of the instrument, not a finding.

No tension with the catalogued modern frameworks is recorded here.

Source & licence

The commentary, cross-references, reception, and modern-conflict analysis in this section are drawn from a public compilation of the 613 commandments, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The cited biblical text is rendered from GEBible’s own public-domain reading corpus. CC BY-SA 4.0 (opens in a new tab). GEBible’s presentation of this material is offered under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms.