However that which is spiritual isn’t first, but that which is natural, then that which is spiritual.
Physical forms developed first in nature, and spiritual awareness came later.
Show this passage in
The cited passage
What current science says
This is an interesting case where someone tried to harmonize scripture with science. The evolutionary timeline does show physical forms developing first: single-celled life for billions of years, then complex bodies, then nervous systems, then brains capable of abstract thought. Whether 'spiritual awareness' is a useful scientific category is debatable, but the sequence of 'bodies first, complex cognition later' does match the fossil record. However, this reading requires ignoring that the same author (Paul) elsewhere insists on a literal first man, a literal fall, and literal death entering through sin — claims that directly contradict evolution. Cherry-picking compatible verses while ignoring incompatible ones from the same author isn't a scientific methodology.
What the text says
This comes from 1 Corinthians 15:46, which says 'that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.' Asa Gray, the leading American botanist of the 19th century and Darwin's close friend, used this verse to argue that the bible is not inconsistent with evolution.
Three honest ways to read this passage
-
As history
The text records how its authors understood the world with the knowledge they had. Read this way, a difference from modern science is a window into the ancient mind, not a failure.
-
As accommodation
The text speaks to its first audience in their own terms, to make a point that isn't mainly about physics or biology. Read this way, the scientific detail is the vehicle, not the cargo.
-
As contradiction
The text makes a claim about the physical world that modern findings dispute. Read this way, the difference is a genuine factual disagreement worth naming.
GEBible doesn't pick one of these for you. Each entry shows the passage, what it says, and what current science says — nothing more.