She brought them over the Red sea, and led them through much water; but she drowned their enemies, and she cast them up from the bottom of the deep.
A large body of seawater once split apart to create a dry path across the seafloor, then closed again after people crossed.
Show this passage in
The cited passage
What current science says
The Red Sea at its narrowest point (the Strait of Tiran) is about 13 km wide and up to 1,850 meters deep. Holding back that volume of water would require overcoming the pressure of millions of tons of seawater — roughly 180 atmospheres at the deepest point. No known force could create stable 'walls of water' on both sides; water doesn't hold its shape vertically without a container. Even a strong wind (the text elsewhere mentions an 'east wind') can push shallow water back temporarily in a phenomenon called wind setdown, but this works only in very shallow lagoons, not a deep sea. The energy required to part the Red Sea would be roughly equivalent to thousands of nuclear weapons detonated simultaneously.
What the text says
This comes from the Wisdom of Solomon (likely 10:18-19 or 19:7-8), which references the Red Sea parting to allow passage on dry ground and then closing — the iconic crossing story retold as historical fact.
Three honest ways to read this passage
-
As history
The text records how its authors understood the world with the knowledge they had. Read this way, a difference from modern science is a window into the ancient mind, not a failure.
-
As accommodation
The text speaks to its first audience in their own terms, to make a point that isn't mainly about physics or biology. Read this way, the scientific detail is the vehicle, not the cargo.
-
As contradiction
The text makes a claim about the physical world that modern findings dispute. Read this way, the difference is a genuine factual disagreement worth naming.
GEBible doesn't pick one of these for you. Each entry shows the passage, what it says, and what current science says — nothing more.